Skip to main content
Log in

Bakhtin our contemporary

  • Speculum
  • Published:
Neohelicon Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

My contribution draws on the tenuous retrospective assessment of Bakhtin’s theoretical legacy, consistent with a wide array of epistemological agendas, that “interpreted” him in all the possible meanings of this word. It emphasizes Bakhtin’s early concerns for the axiomatic cooperation between aesthetics, theology, ethics and science, from his first important study Art and Answerability (1919) through the early seventies, unveiling the top-down dynamic of his thought which took off from anthropology and ethics towards cultural theory and linguistics rather than the other way around.

The very core of his system, the most diversely interpreted and the most frequently misunderstood concept, remains the “dialogue” now almost embodied by him. As defined by Bakhtin, dialogism is a theatrical performance implying three main instances: a speaker, his targeted audience and a transcendental addressee. Bakhtin’s theoretical legacy legitimates a phenomenology of dialogism, apparently rooted in the text, but pointing to much wider horizons.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Works Cited

  • Bakhtin, Mikhail (1981): “Discourse in the Novel”, The Dialogical Imagination: Four Essays, edited by Michael Holquist, translated by Caryl Emerson and Michael Holquist, Austin: University of Texas Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bakhtin, Mikhail (1984a): Rabelais and His World, translated by Helene Isowolsky, Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bakhtin, Mikhail (1984b): “Les genres du discours”, Esthetique de la creation verbale, Paris: Gallimard.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bakhtin, Mikhail (1984c): Problems of Dostoevsky’s Poetics, translated by Caryl Emerson with an Introduction by Wayne C. Booth, Manchester: Manchester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bakhtin, Mikhail (1986): Speech Genres and other Late Essays, translated by Verna McGee, Austin: University of Texas Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bakhtin, Mikhail (1990): Art and Answerability: Early Philosophical Essays by M. M. Bakhtin, edited by Michael Holquist and Vadim Liapunov, Austin: University of Texas Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bakhtin, Mikhail, Medvedev, P. N. (1985): The Formal Method in Literary Scholarship: A Critical Introduction to Sociological Poetics, translated by Albert Wehrle, Harvard: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, Catharina, Holquist, Michael (1984a): The Influence of Kant in the Early Work of Bakhtin, In: J. Strelka, ed., Literary Theory and Criticism, New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, Catharina, Holquist, Michael (1984b): Mikhail Bakhtin, Harvard: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardiner, Michael (1992): The Dialogics of Critique: M. M. Bakhtin and the Theory of Ideology, London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Genette, Gerard (1979): Introduction à l’architexte, Paris: Seuil.

    Google Scholar 

  • Genette, Gerard (1982): Palimpsestes. La littérature au second degré, Paris: Seuil.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutcheon, Linda (1985): A Theory of Parody. The Teachings of Twentieth Century Art Forms, New York, London: Methuen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kristeva, Julia (1974): La révolution du langage poétique, Paris: Seuil.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kristeva Julia (1980): “Word, Dialogue and the Novel”, In: Desire in Language. A Semiotic Approach to Literature and Art, edited by Leon S. Roudiez, translated by Thomas Gora, Alice Jardine and Leon Roudiez, Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Man, Paul de (1983): “Dialogue and Dialogism”, Poetics Today, IV,1: 99–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morson, Gary Saul, Emerson Caryl (1989): Rethinking Bakhtin: Extensions and Chalenges, Urbana: Northwestern University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, Margaret (1979): Parody & Metafiction. An Analysis of Parody as a Critical Mirror to the Writing and Reception of Fiction, London: Crom Helm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Titunik, I. R. (1984): “Bakhtin &/or Voloshinov &/or Medvedev: Dialogue &/or Doubletalk?”, In: Stolz, Benjamin A., Lubomir Dolezel, I. R. Titunik, eds, Language and Literary Theory, Ann Arbor.

  • Todorov, Tzvetan (1966): Théorie de la litérature. Textes des formalistes russes réunis par Tzvetan Todorov, Paris: Seuil.

    Google Scholar 

  • Todorov, Tzvetan (1981): Mikhail Bakhtine: Le principe dialogique suivi de Ecrits du cercle de Bakhtine, Paris: Seuil.

    Google Scholar 

  • Todorov, Tzvetan (1984a): “L’humain et l’interhumain (Mikhail Bakhtine)”, Critique de la critique. Un roman d’apprentissage, Paris: Seuil, 83–192.

    Google Scholar 

  • Todorov, Tzvetan (1984b): Mikhail Bakhtin: The Dialogical Principle, translated by Wlad Godzich, Manchester: Manchester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Voloshinov V. N. (1986): Marxism and the Philosophy of Language, translated by Ladislav Matejka and I. R. Titunik, New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Monica Spiridon.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Spiridon, M. Bakhtin our contemporary. Neohelicon 35, 297–305 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11059-008-4020-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11059-008-4020-8

Keywords

Navigation