Skip to main content
Log in

Relative contribution of initial root and shoot morphology in predicting field performance of hardwood seedlings

  • Published:
New Forests Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract.

Single and multiple linear regression techniques were used to explain the capacity of initial seedling root volume (Rv) and first-order lateral roots (FOLR) relative to shoot height, diameter, and fresh mass to serve as important indicators of stock quality and predictors of first- and second-year height and diameter on an afforestation site in southern Indiana, USA. This was accomplished for northern red oak (Quercus rubra L.), white oak (Quercus alba L.), and black cherry (Prunus serotina Ehrh) seedlings graded into four Rv categories at establishment. Field survival was high (85–97%) for all species. Initial diameter, height, fresh mass, and Rv provided similar predictive ability of second-year field response for absolute height (R2 = 0.59–0.77) and diameter (R2 = 0.50–0.73) for both oak species. Initial seedling Rv was a better predictor of field response than FOLR for both oak species, though not for cherry. Multiple-variable models accounted for a greater proportion of the total variation in seedling field height and diameter than did single-variable equations. The high R2 (up to 0.95) of regression models suggests field performance of these species can be reliably predicted and confirms the importance of initial seedling morphology in dictating early plantation performance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bardon R.E. and Countryman D.W. 1993. Survival and growth for the first-growing season of northern red oak (Quercus rubra L.) seedlings underplanted in mixed upland hardwood stands in south central Iowa. In: Gillespie A.R., Parker G.R., Pope P.E. and Rink G.Proc. 9th Central Harwood Forest Conference. USDA For. Serv., North Central Forest Exp. Sta., St. Paul, MN. Gen. Tech. Rep. NC-161, pp. 195–209.

  2. T.J. Blake R.F. Sutton (1987) ArticleTitleVariation in water relations of black spruce stock types planted in Ontario Tree Physiol. 3 331–344 Occurrence Handle14975917

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. A.N. Burdett L.J. Herring C.F. Thompson (1984) ArticleTitleEarly growth of planted spruce Can. J. For. Res. 14 644–651

    Google Scholar 

  4. A.N. Burdett (1979) ArticleTitleA nondestructive method for measuring the volume of intact parts Can. J. For. Res. 9 120–122

    Google Scholar 

  5. A.N. Burdett (1990) ArticleTitlePhysiological processes in plantation establishment and development of specification for forest planting stock Can. J. For. Res. 20 415–427

    Google Scholar 

  6. W.C. Carlson (1986) ArticleTitleRoot system considerations in the quality of loblolly pine seedlings South. J.␣Appl. For. 10 87–92

    Google Scholar 

  7. C.G.R. Chavasse (1977) ArticleTitleThe significance of planting height as an indicator of subsequent seedling growth New Zeal. J. For. 22 283–296

    Google Scholar 

  8. S.L. Clark S.E. Schlarbaum P.P. Kormanik (2000) ArticleTitleVisual grading and quality of 1-0 northern red oak seedlings South. J. Appl. For. 24 93–97

    Google Scholar 

  9. B.D. Cleary R.D. Greaves P.W. Owston (1978) Seedlings B.D. Cleary R.D. Greaves R.K. Hermann (Eds) Regenerating Oregon’s Forests Oregon State Univ. Extension Service Corvallis, OR 63–98

    Google Scholar 

  10. T.R. Crow (1988) ArticleTitleReproductive mode and mechanisms for self replacement of northern red oak (Quercus rubra) – a review For. Sci. 34 19–40

    Google Scholar 

  11. M.C. Demchik W.E. Sharpe (2000) ArticleTitleThe effect of soil nutrition, soil acidity and drought on northern red oak (Quercus rubra L.) growth and nutrition on Pennsylvania sites with high and low red oak mortality For. Ecol. Manage. 136 199–207 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0378-1127(99)00307-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. D.C. Dey W.C. Parker (1997) ArticleTitleMorphological indicators of stock quality and field performance of red oak (Quercus rubra L.) seedlings underplanted in a central Ontario shelterwood New Forests 14 145–156 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1006577201244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. R.K. Dixon H.E. Garrett G.S. Cox S.G. Pallardy (1984) Mycorrhizae and reforestation success in the oak-hickory region M.L. Duryea W. Brown (Eds) Seedling Physiology and Reforestation Success Nijhoff/Dr. W. Junk Pub. Boston, MA 301–309

    Google Scholar 

  14. M.L. Duryea (1985) Evaluating seedling quality: importance to reforestation M.L. Duryea (Eds) Evaluating Seedling Quality: Principles, Procedures, and Predictive Abilities of Major Tests Forest Research Laboratory, Oregon State University Corvallis, OR 1–6

    Google Scholar 

  15. A.D.M. Glass (2002) Nutrient absorption by plant roots: regulation of uptake to match plant demand Y. Waisel A. Eshel U. Kafkafi (Eds) Plant Roots: The Hidden Half, 3rd ed. Marcel Dekker Inc. New York 571–586

    Google Scholar 

  16. D.L. Haase R. Rose (1993) ArticleTitleSoil moisture stress induces transplant shock in stored and unstored 2 + 0 Douglas–fir seedlings of varying root volumes For. Sci. 39 275–294

    Google Scholar 

  17. R.R. Hicks SuffixJr. (1998) Ecology and Management of Central Hardwood Forests John Wiley and Sons Inc. New York 412

    Google Scholar 

  18. Jacobs D.F. and Seifert J.R. 2004. Re-evaluating the significance of the first-order lateral root grading criterion for hardwood seedlings. In: Proc,14th Central Hardwood Forest Conference. USDA For. Serv., North Central Forest Exp. Sta., St. Paul, MN. Gen. Tech. Rep. NE-316, pp.␣382–388.

  19. D.F. Jacobs R. Rose D.L. Haase P.O. Alzugaray (2004a) ArticleTitleFertilization at planting impairs root system development and drought avoidance of Douglas–fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii) seedlings Ann. For. Sci. 61 643–651 Occurrence Handle10.1051/forest:2004065

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. D.F. Jacobs A.L. Ross-Davis A.S. Davis (2004b) ArticleTitleEstablishment success of conservation tree plantations in relation to silvicultural practices in IndianaUSA New Forests 28 23–36 Occurrence Handle10.1023/B:NEFO.0000031329.70631.d0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. P.S. Johnson (1984) ArticleTitleResponse of planted northern red oak to three overstory treatments Can. J. For. Res. 14 536–542

    Google Scholar 

  22. Johnson P.S. 1992. Underplanting northern red oak in Missouri without herbicides. USDA For. Serv., North Central Forest Exp. Sta., St. Paul, MN. Gen Tech. Rep. NC-152.

  23. P.S. Johnson S.L. Novinger W.G. Mares (1984) ArticleTitleRootshootand leaf area growth potentials of northern red oak planting stock For. Sci 30 1017–1026

    Google Scholar 

  24. P.S. Johnson S.R. Shifley R. Rogers (2002) The Ecology and Silviculture of Oaks CAB International New York 503

    Google Scholar 

  25. Kaczmarek D.J. and Pope P.E. 1993a. Covariate analysis of northern red oak seedling growth. In: Brissette J.C.eds., Proc. 7th Biennial Southern Silvicultural Research Conference. USDA For. Serv., Southern Forest Expt. Sta., AshevilleNC. Gen. Tech. Rep. SO-93, pp. 351–356.

  26. Kaczmarek D.J. and Pope P.E. 1993b. Seedling morphology related to growth and survival of northern red oak. In: Thompson J.R.R., Schultz R.C. and Van Sambeek J.W. eds., 5th Workshop on Seedling Physiology and Growth Problems in Oak Plantings. USDA For. Serv., North Central Forest Expt. Sta., St. Paul, MN. Gen. Tec. Rep. NC-159, pp. 11.

  27. Kormanik P.P., Ruehle J.R. and Muse H.D. 1988. Frequency distribution of seedlings by first-order lateral roots: a phenotypic or genotypic expression. In: Proc. 31st Northeastern Forest Tree Improvement Conference University Park, PAPenn. St. Univ., University Park, PApp. 181–187.

  28. Kormanik P.P., Sung S.S., Kormanik T.L. and Zarnoch S.J. 1995. Oak regeneration why big is better. In: Landis T.D. and Cregg B. (Tech. Coords.), National Proceedings, Forest and Conservation Nursery Associations. USDA For. Serv., Pacific NW Res. Sta., Fort Collins, CO., Gen. Tech. Rep. PNW-GTR-365, pp. 117–123.

  29. J.P. Kramer (1986) ArticleTitleThe role of physiology in forestry Tree Physiol. 2 1–16 Occurrence Handle14975837

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. P.C. Kramer H.C. Bullock (1966) ArticleTitleSeasonal variations in the proportions of suberized and unsuberized roots of trees in relation to the absorption of water Am. J. Bot. 53 200–204

    Google Scholar 

  31. H.A. Margolis D.G. Brand (1990) ArticleTitleAn ecophysiological basis for understanding plantation establishment Can. J. For. Res. 20 375–390

    Google Scholar 

  32. A. Mattsson (1997) ArticleTitlePredicting field performance using seedling quality assessment New Forests 13 227–252 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1006590409595

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. J.D. McMillin M.R. Wagner (1995) ArticleTitleEffects of water stress on biomass partitioning of ponderosa pine seedlings during primary root growth and shoot growth periods For. Sci. 41 594–610

    Google Scholar 

  34. E.K.S. Nambiar R. Sands (1993) ArticleTitleCompetition for water and nutrients in forests Can. J. For. Res. 23 1955–1968

    Google Scholar 

  35. J. Neter M.N. Kutner C.J. Nachtshein W. Wasserman (1996) Applied Linear Regression Models Irwin Chicago 714

    Google Scholar 

  36. Oak S.W., Huber C.M. and Sheffield R.M. 1991. Incidence and impact of oak decline in West Virginia1986. USDA For. Serv., Southeastern Forest Exp. Sta., AshevilleNC. Res. Bull. SE-123.

  37. F. Ponder SuffixJr. (2000) ArticleTitleSurvival and growth of planted hardwoods in harvested openings with first-order lateral root differences, root dipping, and tree shelters North. J. Appl. For. 17 45–50

    Google Scholar 

  38. Pope P.E. 1993. A historical perspective of planting and seeding oak. Progress, problems and status. In: Loftis D.L. and McGee C.E. eds.,Proc. Oak Regeneration: Serious problems, practical recommendations. USDA For. Serv., Southeastern Forest Exp. Sta., AshevilleNC. Gen. Tech. Rep. SE-84, pp. 224–240.

  39. P. Puttonen (1996) ArticleTitleLooking for the “silver bullet”-can one test do it all? New Forests 13 9–27 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1006557502326

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. G.D. Racey (1985) ArticleTitleA comparison of plating stock characterization with root area index, volumeand dry weight For. Chron. 61 64–70

    Google Scholar 

  41. G.A. Ritchie J.R. Dunlap (1980) ArticleTitleRoot growth potential – its development and expression in forest tree seedlings New Zeal. J. For. Sci. 10 218–248

    Google Scholar 

  42. R. Rose M. Atkinson J. Gleason T. Sabin (1991a) ArticleTitleRoot volume as a grading criterion to improve field performance of Douglas–fir seedlings New Forests 5 195–209 Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF00028111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Rose R., Carlson W.C., Morgan P. 1990. The target seedling concept. In Rose R., Cambell S.J., Landis T.D. eds.,Proc. Combined meeting of the Western Forest Nursery Associations. USDA For. Serv., Rocky Mtn. Forest and Range Expt. Sta., Fort Collins, CO. Gen. Tech. Rep. RM-200. pp. 1–8

  44. R. Rose J. Gleason M. Atkinson T. Sabin (1991b) ArticleTitleGrading ponderosa pine seedlings for outplanting according to their root volume West. J. Appl. For. 6 11–15

    Google Scholar 

  45. R. Rose D.L. Haase F. Kroiher T. Sabin (1997) ArticleTitleRoot volume and growth of ponderosa pine and Douglas fir seedlings: a summary of eight growing seasons West. J. Appl. For. 12 69–73

    Google Scholar 

  46. K.F. Salifu (2002) ArticleTitleBulk densities of Ghanaian forest soils in relation to other physico-chemical soil parameters J. Trop. For. Sci. 14 49–60

    Google Scholar 

  47. K.F. Salifu V.R. Timmer (2001) ArticleTitleNutrient retranslocation response of Picea mariana seedlings to nitrogen supply Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 65 905–913

    Google Scholar 

  48. K.F. Salifu V.R. Timmer (2003) ArticleTitleNitrogen retranslocation response of young Picea mariana to nitrogen-15 supply Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 67 309–317

    Google Scholar 

  49. R. Sands (1984) ArticleTitleTransplanting stress in radiata pine Aust. For. Res. 14 67–72

    Google Scholar 

  50. InstitutionalAuthorNameSAS Institute Inc. (2001) SAS Version 8.2 SAS Inc. Cary, NC

    Google Scholar 

  51. R.C. Schultz J.R. Thompson (1990) ArticleTitleNursery cultural practices that improve hardwood seedling root morphology Tree Plantersȁ9 Notes 41 21–32

    Google Scholar 

  52. R.C. Schultz J.R. Thompson (1997) ArticleTitleEffect of density control and undercutting on root morphology of 1 + 0 bareroot hardwood seedlings: five-year field performance of root-graded stock in central USA New Forests 13 297–310 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1006594510503

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. InstitutionalAuthorNameSPSS Inc. (2001) SPSS Version 11.0 SPSS Inc. ChicagoIL

    Google Scholar 

  54. E.E. Stange K.L. Shea (1998) ArticleTitleEffects of dear browsing, fabric mats, and tree shelters on Quercus rubra seedlings Restoration Ecol. 6 29–34 Occurrence Handle10.1046/j.1526-100X.1998.06114.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. D.K. Struve (1990) ArticleTitleRoot regeneration in transplanted deciduous nursery stock HortScience 25 266–270

    Google Scholar 

  56. D.K. Struve R.J. Joly (1992) ArticleTitleTransplanted red oak seedlings mediate transplant shock by reducing leaf surface area and altering carbon allocation Can. J. For. Res. 22 1441–1448

    Google Scholar 

  57. R.M. Teclaw J.G. Isebrands (1993) ArticleTitleAn artificial regeneration systems for establishing northern red oak on dry-mesic sites in the Lake States, USA Ann. For. Sci. 50 543–552

    Google Scholar 

  58. B.E. Thompson (1985) Seedling morphological evaluation: what you can tell by looking M.L. Duryea (Eds) Evaluating Seedling Quality: Principles, Procedures, and Predictive Ability of Major Tests Oregon State Univ. Corvallis, OR 59–71

    Google Scholar 

  59. J.R. Thompson (1991) Influence of root system morphology and site characteristics on development of transplanted northern red oak (Quercus rubra L.) seedlings Iowa State Univ. Ames

    Google Scholar 

  60. J.R. Thompson R.C. Schultz (1995) ArticleTitleRoot system morphology of Quercus rubra L. planting stock and 3-year field performance in Iowa New Forests 9 225–236 Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF00035489

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. C.E. Tripler C.D. Canham R.S. Inouye (2002) ArticleTitleSoil nitrogen availability, plant luxury consumption, and herbivory by white-tailed deer Oecologia 133 517–524 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s00442-002-1046-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. J.S. Ward M.P.N. Gent G.R. Stephens (2000) ArticleTitleEffects of planting stock quality and browse protection-type on height growth of northern red oak and eastern white pine For. Ecol. Manage. 127 205–216 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0378-1127(99)00132-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to D.F. Jacobs.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jacobs, D., Salifu, K. & Seifert, J. Relative contribution of initial root and shoot morphology in predicting field performance of hardwood seedlings. New Forest 30, 235–251 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11056-005-5419-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11056-005-5419-y

Keywords

Navigation