Skip to main content
Log in

Release of ultrafine particles from three simulated building processes

  • Research Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Nanoparticle Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Building activities are recognised to produce coarse particulate matter but less is known about the release of airborne ultrafine particles (UFPs; those below 100 nm in diameter). For the first time, this study has investigated the release of particles in the 5–560 nm range from three simulated building activities: the crushing of concrete cubes, the demolition of old concrete slabs, and the recycling of concrete debris. A fast response differential mobility spectrometer (Cambustion DMS50) was used to measure particle number concentrations (PNC) and size distributions (PNDs) at a sampling frequency of 10 Hz in a confined laboratory room providing controlled environment and near–steady background PNCs. The sampling point was intentionally kept close to the test samples so that the release of new UFPs during these simulated processes can be quantified. Tri–modal particle size distributions were recorded for all cases, demonstrating different peak diameters in fresh nuclei (<10 nm), nucleation (10–30 nm) and accumulation (30–300 nm) modes for individual activities. The measured background size distributions showed modal peaks at about 13 and 49 nm with average background PNCs ~1.47 × 104 cm−3. These background modal peaks shifted towards the larger sizes during the work periods (i.e. actual experiments) and the total PNCs increased between 2 and 17 times over the background PNCs for different activities. After adjusting for background concentrations, the net release of PNCs during cube crushing, slab demolition, and ‘dry’ and ‘wet’ recycling events were measured as ~0.77, 19.1, 22.7 and 1.76 (×104) cm−3, respectively. The PNDs were converted into particle mass concentrations (PMCs). While majority of new PNC release was below 100 nm (i.e. UFPs), the bulk of new PMC emissions were constituted by the particles over 100 nm; ~95, 79, 73 and 90% of total PNCs, and ~71, 92, 93 and 91% of total PMCs, for cube crushing, slab demolition, dry recycling and wet recycling, respectively. The results of this study firmly elucidate the release of UFPs and raise a need for further detailed studies and designing health and safety related exposure guidelines for laboratory workplaces and operational building sites.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andronache C, Gronholm T, Laakso L, Phillips V, Venalainen A (2006) Scavenging of ultrafine particles by rainfall at a boreal site: observations and model estimations. Atmos Chem Phys 6:4739–4754

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Blake LS (1989) Civil Engineer’s Reference Handbook. 4th Edn. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann, London

  • Brouwer D (2010) Exposure to manufactured nanoparticles in different workplaces. Toxicol 269:120–127

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Brouwer DH, Gijsbers JHJ, Lurnvink MWM (2004) Personal exposure to ultrafine particles in the workplace: exploring sampling techniques and strategies. Ann Occup Hyg 48:439–453

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Brouwer D, van Duuren-Stuurman B, Berges M, Jankowska E, Bard D, Mark D (2009) From workplace air measurement results toward estimates of exposure? Development of a strategy to assess exposure to manufactured nano-objects. J Nanopart Res 11:1867–1881

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • BS EN 12390-4:2000 (2000) Testing hardened concrete. Compressive strength. Specification for testing machines ISBN 0580354008

  • BS EN 12390-2:2009 (2009) Testing hardened concrete. Making and curing specimens for strength tests. ISBN 9780580670688

  • BS EN 12390-3:2009 (2009) Testing hardened concrete. Compressive strength of test specimens ISBN 9780580587979

  • Buonanno G, Morawska L, Stabile L (2009) Particle emission factors during cooking activities. Atmos Environ 43:3235–3242

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bystrzejewska–Piotrowska G, Golimowski J, Urban PL (2009) Nanoparticles: their potential toxicity, waste and environmental management. Waste Manag 29:2587–2595

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carpentieri M, Kumar P (2011) Ground-fixed and on-board measurements of nanoparticles in the wake of a moving vehicle. Atmos Environ 45:5837–5852

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • COSHH (2005) Control of substances hazardous to health (Fifth edn.). The control of substances hazardous to health regulation 2002 (as amended) approved code of practice and guidance L5, HSE Books, ISBN 978 970 7176 2981 7177

  • de Hartog JJ, Hoek G, Mirme A, Tuch T, Kos GPA, ten Brink HM, Brunekreef B, Cyrys J, Heinrich J, Pitz M, Lanki T, Vallius M, Pekkanen J, Kreyling WG (2005) Relationship between different size classes of particulate matter and meteorology in three European cities. J Environ Monit 7:302–310

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dorevitch S, Demirtas H, Perksy VW, Erdal S, Conroy L, Schoonover T, Scheff PA (2006) Demolition of high-rise public housing increases particulate matter air pollution in communities of high-risk asthmatics. J Air Waste Manag Assoc 56:1022–1032

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fuller GW, Green D (2004) The impact of local fugitive PM10 from building works and road works on the assessment of the European union limit value. Atmos Environ 38:4993–5002

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fuller G, Carslaw DC, Lodge HW (2002) An empirical approach for the prediction of daily mean PM10 concentrations. Atmos Environ 36:1431–1441

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen D, Blahout B, Benner D, Popp W (2008) Environmental sampling of particulate matter and fungal spores during demolition of a building on a hospital area. J Hosp Infect 70:259–264

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Harrison RM, Beddows DCS, Dall’Osto M (2011) PMF analysis of wide-range particle size spectra collected on a major highway. Environ Sci Technol 45:5522–5528

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • HSE (2006) The assessment of different metrics of the concentration of nano (ultrafine) particles in existing and new industries. Health and Safety Executive Research Report RR513, pp 72

  • HSE (2010) Dust control on cut-off saws used for stone or concrete cutting. Health and Safety Executive Construction Information Sheet No 54 (Revision 1), pp 1–4

  • ILO (1995) Safety, health and welfare on construction sites: a training manual. International Labour Organization ISBN 92-2-109182-1, pp 134

  • Kittelson DB (1998) Engines and nano-particles: a review. J Aerosol Sci 29:575–588

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Knibbs LD, Cole-Hunter T, Morawska L (2011) A review of commuter exposure to ultrafine particles and its health effects. Atmos Environ 45:2611–2622

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kuhlbusch T, Asbach C, Fissan H, Gohler D, Stintz M (2011) Nanoparticle exposure at nanotechnology workplaces: a review. Part Fibre Toxicol 8:22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kukadia V, Upton S, Grimwood C (2003) Contorlling particles, vapour and noise pollution from construction sites; Part 2: Site Preparation, demolition, earthworks and landscaping. BRE Pollution Guide, pp 1–8

  • Kumar P (2011) Footprints of airborne ultrafine particles on urban air quality and public health. J Civil Environ Eng 1:e101: doi:10.4172/jcee.1000e4101

  • Kumar P, Fennell P, Britter R (2008a) Measurements of particles in the 5–1000 nm range close to road level in an urban street canyon. Sci Total Environ 390:437–447

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar P, Fennell P, Langley D, Britter R (2008b) Pseudo-simultaneous measurements for the vertical variation of coarse, fine and ultra fine particles in an urban street canyon. Atmos Environ 42:4304–4319

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar P, Fennell P, Symonds J, Britter R (2008c) Treatment of losses of ultrafine aerosol particles in long sampling tubes during ambient measurements. Atmos Environ 42:8819–8826

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar P, Fennell P, Hayhurst A, Britter RE (2009) Street versus rooftop level concentrations of fine particles in a Cambridge street canyon. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 131:3–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar P, Fennell P, Robins A (2010a) Comparison of the behaviour of manufactured and other airborne nanoparticles and the consequences for prioritising research and regulation activities. J Nanopart Res 12:1523–1530

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar P, Robins A, Vardoulakis S, Britter R (2010b) A review of the characteristics of nanoparticles in the urban atmosphere and the prospects for developing regulatory controls. Atmos Environ 44:5035–5052

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar P, Gurjar BR, Nagpure A, Harrison RM (2011a) Preliminary estimates of nanoparticle number emissions from road vehicles in megacity Delhi and associated health impacts. Environ Sci Technol 45:5514–5521

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar P, Ketzel M, Vardoulakis S, Pirjola L, Britter R (2011b) Dynamics and dispersion modelling of nanoparticles from road traffic in the urban atmospheric environment- a review. J Aerosol Sci 42:580–603

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar P, Robins A, Vardoulakis S, Quincey P (2011c) Technical challenges in tackling regulatory concerns for urban atmospheric nanoparticles. Particuology 9:566–571

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mann S (2006) Nanotechnology and construction. Nanoforum Report. Institute of nanotechnology, Stirling

    Google Scholar 

  • McDonald PJ, Aptaker PS, Mitchell J, Mulheron M (2007) A unilateral NMR magnet for sub-structure analysis in the built environment: The Surface GARField. J Magn Reson 185:1–11

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • McGarry P, Morawska L, He C, Jayaratne R, Falk M, Tran Q, Wang H (2011) Exposure to particles from laser printers operating within office workplaces. Environ Sci Technol 45:6444–6452

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Morawska L, Ristovski Z, Jayaratne ER, Keogh DU, Ling X (2008) Ambient nano and ultrafine particles from motor vehicle emissions: characteristics, ambient processing and implications on human exposure. Atmos Environ 42:8113–8138

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nazari A, Riahi S (2011) Splitting tensile strength of concrete using ground granulated blast furnace slag and SiO2 nanoparticles as binder. Energ Build 43:864–872

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nowack B, Bucheli TD (2007) Occurrence, behaviour and effects of nanoparticles in the environment. Environ Pollut 150:5–22

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Park K, Cao F, Kittelson DB, McMurray PH (2003) Relationship between particle mass and mobility for diesel exhaust particles. Environ Sci Technol 37:577–583

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sanchez F, Sobolev K (2010) Nanotechnology in concrete-a review. Constr Build Mater 24:2060–2071

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider T, Brouwer DH, Koponen IK, Jensen KA, Fransman W, Van Duuren-Stuurman B, Van Tongeren M, Tielemans E (2011) Conceptual model for assessment of inhalation exposure to manufactured nanoparticles. J Expos Sci Environ Epidemiol 21:450–463

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • The Stationary Office (1974) Health and safety at work etc. Act. Ch37, ISBN 010543774

  • Tjoe Nij E, Hilhorst S, Spee T, Spierings J, Steffens F, Lumens M, Heederik D (2003) Dust control measures in the construction industry. Ann Occup Hyg 47:211–218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wallace L, Ott W (2011) Personal exposure to ultrafine particles. J Expos Sci Environ Epidemiol 21:20–30

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Mr. Prasana Kunapalan, Mr. Fred Auckland, Mr. Thomas Pagkalis and Mr. Rex Packiyarajah for their help during the laboratory experiments. PK also thanks Drs. Hong Cheng and Vina Kukadia from the Building and Research Establishment (BRE), UK, for providing BRE pollution guide.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Prashant Kumar.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Associated content: please see figures s.1–s.5 in supporting information (DOC 1692 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kumar, P., Mulheron, M. & Som, C. Release of ultrafine particles from three simulated building processes. J Nanopart Res 14, 771 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11051-012-0771-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11051-012-0771-2

Keywords

Navigation