Skip to main content
Log in

Efficient copy detection for compressed digital videos by spatial and temporal feature extraction

  • Published:
Multimedia Tools and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This research aims at developing a practical video copy detection mechanism to determine whether an investigated video is a duplicated copy that may infringe the intellectual property rights. The significant features of original videos are extracted and stored in the server. Given an uploaded video, the same feature is extracted and compared with the stored ones to seek a possible match. Both the spatial and temporal features of compressed videos are employed in the proposed scheme. The scene-change detection is applied to select the key frames, from which the robust spatial features are extracted to help search visually similar frames. The shot lengths are used as the temporal features to further ensure the matching accuracy. To ensure that the proposed method is practical in considered applications, the size of stored features in the server, efficiency and accuracy of matching features are the major design principles. The experimental results by testing a large number of compressed videos demonstrate the feasibility of the proposed scheme.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Awad G, Over P, Kraaij W (2014) Content-based video copy detection benchmarking at TRECVID. ACM Trans Inf Syst:32

  2. Benchmark videos from Youtube [Online]. Available: http://www.video-comparer.com/product-benchmark-youtube-list.php

  3. Coskun B, Sankur B, Memon N (2006) Spatio-temporal transform based video hashing. IEEE Trans Multimedia 8:1190–1208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Cotsaces C, Nikolaidis N, Pitas I (2006) Shot detection and condensed representation—a review. IEEE Signal Process Mag 23:28–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. De Roover C, De Vleeschouwer C, Lefebvre F, Macq B (2005) Robust video hashing based on radial projections of key frames. IEEE Trans Signal Process 53(10):4020–4037

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Esmaeili MM, Fatourechi M, Ward RK (2011) A robust and fast video copy detection system using content-based fingerprinting. IEEE Trans Inf Forensics Secur 6:213–226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Ferman A, Tekalp M, Mehrotra R (2002) Robust color histogram descriptors for video segment retrieval and identification. IEEE Trans Multimedia 11:497–508

    Google Scholar 

  8. Gersho A, Gray RM (1992) Vector quantization and signal compression. Kluwer Academic Publishers

  9. Hsu W, Chua TS, Pung HK (1995) An integrated color-spatial approach to content-based image retrieval. In: Proceeding of ACM Multimedia

  10. Kang L-W, Hsu C-Y, Chen H-W, Lu C-S (2010) Secure SIFT-based sparse representation for image copy detection and recognition. In: IEEE International Conference on Multimedia Exposition, pp 1248–1253

  11. Kashino K, Kurozumi T, Murase H (2003) A quick search method for audio and video signals based on histogram pruning. IEEE Trans Multimedia 5(3):348–357

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Katsavounidis I, Kuo C-C, Zhang Z (1994) A new initialization technique for generalized Lloyd iteration. IEEE Signal Processing Letters 1(10):144–146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Law-To J, Joly A, Boujemaa N (2007) Muscle-VCD-2007: a live benchmark for video copy detection. http://www-rocq.inria.fr/imedia/civr-bench/

  14. Ling H, Cheng H, Ma Q, Zou F, Yan W (2012) Efficient image copy detection using multiscale fingerprints. IEEE MultiMedia 19:60–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Liu H, Lu H, Xue X (2013) A segmentation and graph-based video sequence matching method for video copy detection. IEEE Trans Knowl Data Eng 25:1706–1718

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Liu J, Huang Z, Cai H, Ngo HTSCW, Wang W (2013) Near-duplicate video retrieval: current research and future trends. ACM Comput Surv:45

  17. Liu T, Zhang H-J, Qi F (2003) A novel video key-frame-extraction algorithm based on perceived motion energy mode. IEEE Trans Circuits Syst Video Technol 13:1006–1013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Lowe DG (2004) Distinctive image features from scale-invariant keypoints. Int J Comput Vis 60:91–110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Lu S, Wang Z, Mei T, Guan G, Feng D (2014) A bag-of-importance model with locality-constrained coding based feature learning for video summarization. IEEE Trans Multimedia 16:1497–1509

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. ReefVid A Resource of Free Coral Reef Video Clips for Educational Use [Online]. Available: http://www.reefvid.org

  21. Song J, Yang Y, Huang Z, Shen HT, Luo J (2013) Effective multiple feature hashing for large-scale near-duplicate video retrieval. IEEE Trans Multimedia 15:1997–2008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Su PC, Chen C-C, Chang H-M (2009) Towards effective content authentication for digital videos by employing feature extraction and quantization. In: IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, vol 19, pp 668–677

  23. Swain M, Ballard D (1991) Color indexing. Int J Comput Vis:7

  24. Tan YP, Saur DD, Kulkarni SR, Ramadge PJ (2000) Rapid estimation of camera motion from compressed video with application to video annotation. IEEE Trans Circuits Syst Video Technol:133–145

  25. van Rijsbergen CJ (1979) Information retrieval. Butterworth-Heinemann, London

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  26. Wang T, Yu W, Chen L (2007) An approach to video key-frame extraction based on rough set. In: International Conference on Multimedia and Ubiquitous Engineering, 2007. MUE ’07, pp 590–596

  27. Wolf (1996) Key frame selection by motion analysis. In: IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing, pp 1228–1231

  28. Wu P-H, Thaipanich T, Jay Kuo C-C (2009) A suffix array approach to video copy detection in video sharing social networks. In: IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, Taipei, Taiwan

  29. Zargari F, Mehrabi M, Ghanbari M (2010) Compressed domain texture based visual information retrieval method for I-frame coded pictures. IEEE Trans Consum Electron 56:728–736

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Zhou X, Zhou X, Chen L, Bouguettaya A, Xiao N, Taylor JA (2009) An efficient near-duplicate video shot detection method using shot-based interest points. IEEE Trans Multimedia 11:879–891

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Zhuang Y, Rui Y, Huang TS, Mehrotra S (1998) Adaptive key frame extracting using unsupervised clustering. In: Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Image Processing, pp 866–870

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research is supported by the Ministry of Science and Technology in Taiwan, ROC, under Grants MOST 103-2221-E-008-080 and MOST 104-2221-E-008-075.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Po-Chyi Su.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Su, PC., Wu, CS. Efficient copy detection for compressed digital videos by spatial and temporal feature extraction. Multimed Tools Appl 76, 1331–1353 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-015-3132-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-015-3132-1

Keywords

Navigation