Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Low-oxygen and knock-out serum maintain stemness in human retinal progenitor cells

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Molecular Biology Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Using stem and progenitor cells to treat retinal disorders holds great promise. Using defined culture conditions to maintain the desires phenotype is of utmost clinical importance. We cultured human retinal progenitor cells (hRPCs) in different conditions: such as normoxia (20% oxygen), and hypoxia (5% oxygen) with and without knock-out serum replacement (KOSR) to evaluate its effect on these cells. KOSR is known nutrient supplement often used to replace bovine serum for culturing embryonic or pluripotent stem cells, especially those destined for clinical applications. The purpose of this study was to identify the impact of different environmental and chemical cues to determine if this alters the fate of these cells. Our results indicate that cells cultured with or without KOSR do not show significant differences in viability, but that the oxygen tension can significantly change their viability (higher in hypoxia than normoxia). However, cells with KOSR in hypoxia condition expressed significantly higher stemness markers such as C-myc and Oct4 (31.20% and 13.44% respectively) in comparison to hRPCs cultured in KOSR at normoxia (12.07% and 4.05%). Furthermore, levels of markers for retinal commitment such as rhodopsin were significantly lower in the KOSR supplemented cells in hypoxia culture compared to normoxia. KOSR is known to improve proliferation and maintain stemness of embryonic cells and our experiments suggest that hRPCs maintain their proliferation and stemness characteristics in hypoxia with KOSR supplement. Normoxia, however, results in mature cell marker expression, suggesting a profound effect of oxygen tension on these cells.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Oswald J, Baranov P (2018) Regenerative medicine in the retina: from stem cells to cell replacement therapy. Ther Adv Ophthalmol 10:2515841418774433. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515841418774433

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Maguire AM et al (2008) "Safety and efficacy of gene transfer for Leber's congenital amaurosis. N Engl J Med 358(21):2240–2248. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa0802315

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Carr AJ, Smart MJ, Ramsden CM, Powner MB, da Cruz L, Coffey PJ (2013) Development of human embryonic stem cell therapies for age-related macular degeneration. Trends Neurosci 36(7):385–395. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tins.2013.03.006

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bainbridge JW et al (2008) Effect of gene therapy on visual function in leber's congenital amaurosis. N Engl J Med 358(21):2231–2239. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa0802268

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Schmitt S et al (2009) Molecular characterization of human retinal progenitor cells. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 50(12):5901–5908. https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.08-3067

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Aftab U et al (2009) Growth kinetics and transplantation of human retinal progenitor cells. Exp Eye Res 89(3):301–310. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exer.2009.03.025

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Klassen H, Ziaeian B, Kirov II, Young MJ, Schwartz PH (2004) Isolation of retinal progenitor cells from post-mortem human tissue and comparison with autologous brain progenitors. J Neurosci Res 77(3):334–343. https://doi.org/10.1002/jnr.20183

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Redenti S et al (2009) Engineering retinal progenitor cell and scrollable poly(glycerol-sebacate) composites for expansion and subretinal transplantation. Biomaterials 30(20):3405–3414. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.02.046

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Lavik EB, Klassen H, Warfvinge K, Langer R, Young MJ (2005) Fabrication of degradable polymer scaffolds to direct the integration and differentiation of retinal progenitors. Biomaterials 26(16):3187–3196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.08.022

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. "Safety and Tolerability of hRPC in Retinitis Pigmentosa," ed: https://ClinicalTrials.gov/show/NCT02464436.

  11. Vugler A et al (2008) Elucidating the phenomenon of HESC-derived RPE: anatomy of cell genesis, expansion and retinal transplantation. Exp Neurol 214(2):347–361. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.expneurol.2008.09.007

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Bharti K et al (2014) Developing cellular therapies for retinal degenerative diseases. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 55(2):1191–1202. https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.13-13481

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Nakagawa S, Takada S, Takada R, Takeichi M (2003) Identification of the laminar-inducing factor: Wnt-signal from the anterior rim induces correct laminar formation of the neural retina in vitro. Dev Biol 260(2):414–425

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Idelson M et al (2009) Directed differentiation of human embryonic stem cells into functional retinal pigment epithelium cells. Cell Stem Cell 5(4):396–408. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stem.2009.07.002

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Abdollahi H et al (2011) The role of hypoxia in stem cell differentiation and therapeutics. J Surg Res 165(1):112–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2009.09.057

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Mas-Bargues C et al (2019) Relevance of oxygen concentration in stem cell culture for regenerative medicine. Int J Mol Sci 20(5):1195. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20051195

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Shi X, Zhang Y, Zheng J, Pan J (2012) Reactive oxygen species in cancer stem cells. Antioxid Redox Signal 16(11):1215–1228. https://doi.org/10.1089/ars.2012.4529

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Hansen JM, Klass M, Harris C, Csete M (2007) A reducing redox environment promotes C2C12 myogenesis: implications for regeneration in aged muscle. Cell Biol Int 31(6):546–553. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cellbi.2006.11.027

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Bell EL, Chandel NS (2007) Genetics of mitochondrial electron transport chain in regulating oxygen sensing. Methods in enzymology. Academic Press, Massachusetts, pp 447–461

    Google Scholar 

  20. Grayson WL, Zhao F, Bunnell B, Ma T (2007) Hypoxia enhances proliferation and tissue formation of human mesenchymal stem cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 358(3):948–953. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbrc.2007.05.054

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Lu J, Hou R, Booth CJ, Yang SH, Snyder M (2006) Defined culture conditions of human embryonic stem cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103(15):5688–5693. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0601383103

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Wagner K, Welch D (2010) Feeder-free adaptation, culture and passaging of human IPS cells using complete knockout serum replacement feeder-free medium. J Vis Exp 41:e2236. https://doi.org/10.3791/2236

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Hadjimichael C, Chanoumidou K, Papadopoulou N, Arampatzi P, Papamatheakis J, Kretsovali A (2015) Common stemness regulators of embryonic and cancer stem cells. World J Stem Cells 7(9):1150–1184. https://doi.org/10.4252/wjsc.v7.i9.1150

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Cai Y, Dai X, Zhang Q, Dai Z (2015) Gene expression of OCT4, SOX2, KLF4 and MYC (OSKM) induced pluripotent stem cells: identification for potential mechanisms. Diagn Pathol 10:35–35. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13000-015-0263-7

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Wu G, Schöler HR (2014) Role of Oct4 in the early embryo development. Cell Regener 3(1):7–7. https://doi.org/10.1186/2045-9769-3-7

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Ejtehadifar M et al (2015) The effect of hypoxia on mesenchymal stem Cell biology. Adv Pharm Bull 5(2):141–149. https://doi.org/10.15171/apb.2015.021

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Baranov P, Tucker B, Young M (2014) Low-oxygen culture conditions extend the multipotent properties of human retinal progenitor cells. Tissue Eng Part A 20(9–10):1465–1475. https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.tea.2013.0361

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Bolnick A et al (2017) Using stem cell oxygen physiology to optimize blastocyst culture while minimizing hypoxic stress. J Assist Reprod Genet 34(10):1251–1259. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-017-0971-x

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Campisi J (2013) Aging, cellular senescence, and cancer. Annu Rev Physiol 75:685–705. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-physiol-030212-183653

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Ai G et al (2017) Epidermal growth factor promotes proliferation and maintains multipotency of continuous cultured adipose stem cells via activating STAT signal pathway in vitro. Medicine 96(30):e7607–e7607. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000007607

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Lim T, Toh W, Wang L, Kurisawa M, Spector M (2012) The effect of injectable gelatin-hydroxyphenylpropionic acid hydrogel matrices on the proliferation, migration, differentiation and oxidative stress resistance of adult neural stem cells. Biomaterials 33(12):3446–3455. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.01.037

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Rubin H (2011) Intracellular free Mg(2+) and MgATP(2-) in coordinate control of protein synthesis and cell proliferation. In Magnesium in the Central Nervous System. Vink R, Nechifor M (Eds). Adelaide.

  33. Wang F, Zachar V, Pennisi CP, Fink T, Maeda Y, Emmersen J (2018) Hypoxia enhances differentiation of adipose tissue-derived stem cells toward the smooth muscle phenotype. Int J Mol Sci 19(2):517. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms19020517

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Gustafsson MV et al (2005) Hypoxia requires notch signaling to maintain the undifferentiated cell state. Dev Cell 9(5):617–628

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Hill RP, Marie-Egyptienne DT, Hedley DW (2009) Cancer stem cells, hypoxia and metastasis. Seminars in radiation oncology. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 106–111

    Google Scholar 

  36. Wanek J, Teng PY, Blair NP, Shahidi M (2013) Inner retinal oxygen delivery and metabolism under normoxia and hypoxia in rat. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 54(7):5012–5019. https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.13-11887

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Kern TS, Berkowitz BA (2015) Photoreceptors in diabetic retinopathy. J Diabetes Investig 6(4):371–380. https://doi.org/10.1111/jdi.12312

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Arden GB, Sidman RL, Arap W, Schlingemann RO (2005) Spare the rod and spoil the eye. Br J Ophthalmol 89(6):764–769. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjo.2004.062547

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Braun RD, Linsenmeier RA, Goldstick TK (1995) Oxygen consumption in the inner and outer retina of the cat. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 36(3):542–554

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Lin MK, Kim SH, Zhang L, Tsai YT, Tsang SH (2015) Rod metabolic demand drives progression in retinopathies. Taiwan J Ophthalmol 5(3):105–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tjo.2015.06.002

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

P.D would like to acknowledge the funding for his Ph.D. and his Ph.D. advisor Dr. Myron Spector for his inputs throughout the project and D.S would like to acknowledge “The DeGunzberg OcularRegeneration fund” for the support provided to complete this study.

Funding

This study was funded by The DeGunzberg OcularRegeneration fund (Grant Number 533133).

Author information

Author notes

  1. Deepti Singh and Pierre C. Dromel are first co-authors

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Schepens Eye Research Institute of Massachusetts Ear and Eye, Harvard Medical School, 20 Staniford Street, Boston, MA, 02114, USA

    Deepti Singh, Pierre C. Dromel & Michael Young

  2. Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, 02139, USA

    Pierre C. Dromel

Authors
  1. Deepti Singh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Pierre C. Dromel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Michael Young
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael Young.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Singh, D., Dromel, P.C. & Young, M. Low-oxygen and knock-out serum maintain stemness in human retinal progenitor cells. Mol Biol Rep 47, 1613–1623 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11033-020-05248-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11033-020-05248-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation