Skip to main content
Log in

Polymorphism distribution of RYR1, PRKAG3, HFABP, MYF-5 and MC4R genes in crossbred pigs

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Molecular Biology Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study was designed to screen the crossbred pigs for SNPs in five candidate genes, associated with pork quality traits and to differentiate their genotypes by PCR–RFLP. The results indicated that genotypes of crossbred pigs were NN (90%) and Nn (10%) for RYR1; RR (83%) and QR (17%) for PRKAG3; HH (98%), Hh (1%) and hh (1%) for HFABP; DD (99%) and CD (1%) for MYF-5; and AG (57%), GG (26%) and AA (17%) for MC4R SNPs, respectively. Allelic frequencies for five SNPs {RYR1 (1843C>T), PRKAG3 (c.599G>A), HFABP (c.1322C>T), MYF-5 (c.1205A>C) and MC4R (c.1426A>G)} were 0.95 and 0.05 (N/n), 0.08 and 0.92 (Q/R), 0.99 and 0.01 (H/h), 0.00 and 1.00 (C/D) and 0.45 and 0.55 (A/G), respectively. The effect of RYR1 (1843C>T) SNP was significant on pH45 (P < 0.05), pH24 (P < 0.05) and protein % (P < 0.05). The PRKAG3 (c.599G>A) and MC4R (c.1426A>G) SNP had significant association with dressing percentages. The results revealed that RYR1, PRKAG3 and MC4R SNPs may be used in marker associated selection for pork quality traits in crossbred pigs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Wang W, Xue W, Zhou X, Zhang L, Wu J, Qu L, Jin B, Zhang X, Ma F, Xu X (2012) Effects of candidate gene’s polymorphisms on meat quality traits in pigs. Acta Agric Scand A 62(3):120–126

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Reardon W, Mullen AM, Sweeney T, Hamill RM (2010) Association of polymorphisms in candidate genes with colour, water-holding capacity, and composition traits in bovine M. longissimus and M. semimembranosus. Meat Sci 86:270–275

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Gispert M, Faucitano L, Oliver MA, Guardia MD, Coll C, Siggens K, Harvey K, Diestre A (2000) A survey of preslaughter conditions, halothane gene frequency, and carcass and meat quality in five Spanish pig commercial abattoirs. Meat Sci 55:97–106

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Andersson L (2001) Genetic dissection of phenotypic diversity in farm animals. Nat Rev Genet 2:130–138

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Offer G (1988) The structural basis of water-holding capacity in meat. Part 2: drip losses. In: Lawrie R (ed) Developments in meat science, vol. 4. Elsevier Science Publications, London, pp 61–171

    Google Scholar 

  6. Fujii J, Otsu K, Zorzato F, de Leon S, Khanna S, Weiler VK, O’Brien PJ, MacLennan DH (1991) Identification of a mutation in porcine ryanodin receptor associated with malignant hyperthermia. Science 253:448–451

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Hao LY, Kameyama A, Kuroki S, Takano J, Takano E, Maki M, Kameyama M (2000) Calpastatin domain L is involved in the regulation of L-type Ca2+ channels in guinea pig cardiac myocytes. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 279(3):756–761

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Bozzi R, Crovetti A, Nardi L, Pugliese C, Sirtori F, Franci O (2007) Study of genes related to meat quality in cinta senese pig breed. Proceedings of 6th International Symposium on the Mediterranean Pig ISSN 2035-4088

  9. Jankowiak H, Sielska N, Kapelański W, Bocian M, Zmudzińska A (2010) The effect of H-FABP gene polymorphism on carcass and meat quality. J Cent Eur Agric 11(4):459–464

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Mahlapuu M, Johansson C, Lindgren K, Hjalm G, Barnes BR, Krook A, Zierath JR, Andersson L, Marklund S (2004) Expression profiling of the γ3-subunit isoform of AMP-activated protein kinase suggests a major role for γ3 in white skeletal muscle. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 86(2):E194–E200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Ryan MT, Hamill RM, O’Halloran AM, Davey GC, McBryan J, Mullen AM, McGee C, Gispert M, Southwood OI, Sweeney T (2012) SNP variation in the promoter of the PRKAG3 gene and association with meat quality traits in pig. BMC Genet 13:66. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2156-13-66

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Milan D, Jeon J, Looft C, Amarger V, Robic A, Thelander M, Rogel-Gaillard C, Paul S, Iannuccelli N, Rask L, Roone H, Lundstrom K, Reinsch N, Gellin J, Kalm E, Le Roy P, Chardon P, Andersson L (2000) A mutation in PRKAG3 associated with excess glycogen content in pig skeletal muscle. Science 288:1248–1251

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Ciobanu D, Bastiaansen J, Malek M, Helm J, Woollard J, Plastow G, Rothschild M (2001) Evidence for new alleles in the protein kinase adenosine monophosphate activated γ3-subunit gene associated with low glycogen content in pig skeletal muscle and improved meat quality. Genetics 159:1151–1162

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Granlund A, Jensen-Waern M, Essén-Gustavsson B (2011) The influence of the PRKAG3 mutation on glycogen, enzyme activities and fibre types in different skeletal muscles of exercise trained pigs. Acta Vet Scand 53(1):20

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Gerbens F, Rettenberger G, Lenstra JA, Veerkamp JH, Te Pas MF (1997) Characterization, chromosomal localization, and genetic variation of the porcine heart fatty acid binding protein gene. Mamm Genome 8:328–332

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Janss LL, de Koning DJ, Rattubk P, Van Arendonk JA, Brascamp EW (1999) Detection of quantitative traits loci for back fat thickness and intramuscular fat content in pig. Genetics 152:1679–1690

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Soumillion A, Rettenberger A, Vergouwe MN, Erkens JHF, Lenstra JA, Te Pas MFW (1997) Assignment of the porcine loci for MYOD1 to chromosome 2 and MYF5 to chromosome 5. Anim Genet 28:37–38

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Liu M, Peng J, Xu DQ, Zheng R, Li FE, Li JL, Zuo B, Lei MG, Xiong YZ, Deng CY, Jiang SW (2007) Association of MYF5 gene polymorphisms with meat quality traits in different domestic pig (Sus scrofa) populations. Genet Mol Biol 30:370–374

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Hughes SM. Schiaffino S (1999) Control of muscle fibre size: a crucial factor in ageing. Acta Physiol Scand 167:307–312

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Pierzchała M, Wyszyńska-Koko JOANNA, Urbański P, Różycki M (2008) The analysis of MYF5, MYF6, GHR and IGFR1 expression profile in muscle and liver in growing pigs of different breeds, regarding to their muscle and carcass quality. Arch Anim Breed. Special: 76–77

  21. Kim KS, Larsen N, Short T, Plastow G, Rothschild MF (2000) A missense variant of the porcine melanocortin-4 receptor (MC4R) gene is associated with fatness, growth, and feed intake traits. Mamm Genome 11:131–135

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Kim KS, Shin HY, Lee JJ, Hong SK, Choi BW, Kim TH, Lee HK, Jo BW (2005) Investigation of porcine melanocortin-4 receptor (MC4R) polymorphism on economic traits. Life Sci J 15:968–971

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Piórkowska K, Tyra M, Rogoz M, Ropka-Molik K, Oczkowicz M, Rozycki M (2010) Association of the melanocortin-4 receptor (MC4R) with feed intake, growth, fatness and carcass composition in pigs raised in Poland. Meat Sci 85:297–301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Sambrook J, Russell D (2001) Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual, 3rd edn. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor

    Google Scholar 

  25. Bundy C, Diggins R, Christensen V (1976) Swine production, 4th edn. Prentice Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffes

    Google Scholar 

  26. Christien LL, Strock KL, Carleon JP (1980) Effect of protein, breed crass, sex and slaughter weight on swine performance and carcass traits. J Anim Sci 51(1):51–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Krider JI, Carrol WE (1971) Swine production, fourth edition. McGraw-hill Book Company, New York

    Google Scholar 

  28. Trout ES, Hunt NC, Johnson DE, Claus JR, Kashner CL, Krolpf OH (1992) Chemical, physical and sensory characteristics of ground beef containing 5–30 percent fat. J Food Sci 57(1):25–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. AOAC (1995) Official methods of analysis, 13th edn. Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Pang WJ, Bai L, Yang GS (2006) Relationship among HFABP gene polymorphism, intramuscular fat content, and adipocyte lipid droplet content in main pig breeds with different genotypes in Western China. Acta Genetica Sin 33:515–524

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Band GO, Guimaraes SEF, Lopes PS, Schierholt AS, Silva KM, Pires AV, Junior AAB, Gomide LAM (2005) Relationship between the porcine stress syndrome gene and pork quality traits of F2 pigs resulting from divergent crosses. Genet Mol Biol 28(1):88–91

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Feng MZ, Zhou X, Shao H, Kong XF, Yin YL, Huang R (2012) Genotyping of five Chinese local pig breeds focused on meat quality by using PCR-RFLP based on halothane and Mx1. J Food Agric Environ 10(3–4):840–845

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Škrlep M, Kavar T, Candek-Potokar M (2010) Comparison of PRKAG3 and RYR1 gene effect on carcass traits and meat quality in Slovenian commercial pigs. Czech J Anim Sci 55(4):149–159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Russo V, Dall’Olio S, Davoli R, Coscelli MB, Bigi D (1996) Studio del locus alotano nelle razze suine allevate in Italia mediante test PCR. Zoot Nutr Anim 22:33–38

    Google Scholar 

  35. Monin G, Larzul C, Le Roy P, Culioli J, Mourot J, Roussetakrim S, Talmant A, Touraille C, Sellier P (1999) Effects of the halothane genotype and slaughter weight on texture of pork. J Anim Sci 77:408–415

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Monin G (2004) Conversion of muscle to meat/colour and texture deviations. In: Jensen WK, Devine C, Dikeman M (eds) Encyclopedia of meat sciences. Elsevier Ltd., Oxford, pp 323–330

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  37. Fontanesi L, Davoli R, Nanni Costa L, Scotti E, Russo V (2003) Study of candidate genes for glycolytic potential of porcine skeletal muscle: identification and analysis of mutations, linkage and physical mapping and association with meat quality traits in pigs. Cytogenet Genome Res 102:145–151

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Dall’olio S, Emilio ST, Costa LN, D’alessandro E, Russo V, Fontanesi L (2013) Analysis of PRKAG3 gene polymorphisms in Italian Autochthonous pig breeds. Acta Agric Slov 4:29–32

    Google Scholar 

  39. Kováčik A (2013) The association of heart fatty acid binding protein gene polymorphism on selected production traits in pigs. Sci Pap Anim Sci Biotechnol 46(2):74–78

    Google Scholar 

  40. Ngu NTKK (2013) Effects of myogenic factor 5 (MYF5) gene on carcass and meat quality of Mong Cai pigs. Thai J Vet Med 43(2):213–218

    Google Scholar 

  41. Octura JER, Yambao RRCS, Santiago RC, Cho BW, Vega RSA (2014) Polymorphism in the melanocortin-4 receptor (MC4R) gene and its effect on fatness and weight performance of Philippine native pigs: a preliminary study. Int J Sci: Basic Appl Res 15(1):464–474

    Google Scholar 

  42. Kim JW, Lee JY, Singh NK, Choi SY, Kim H, Park SR, Lee YS, Jeong DK, Lee JK, Lee SK, Lee SJ (2015) Effects of 7 SNPs on growth and meat quality traits in F1crossbred of Korean native pig × Duroc. Indian J Anim Sci 85(4):407–410

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Salajpal K, Dikic M, Karolyi D, Janjecic Z, Juric I (2009) The effect of MC4R polymorphism on carcass composition and meat quality traits in pigs slaughter at different live weights. Ital J Anim Sci 8:98–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Dvořáková V, Stupka R, Šprysl M, Čítek J, Okrouhlá M, Kluzáková E, Kratochvílová H (2011) Effect of the missense mutation Asp298Asn in MC4R on growth and fatness traits in commercial pig crosses in the Czech Republic. Czech J Anim Sci 56:176–180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Klimenko A, Usatov A, Getmantseva L, Kolosov Y, Tretyakova O, Bakoev S, Kostjunina O, Zinovieva N (2014) Effects of melanocortin-4 receptor gene on growth and meat traits in pigs raised in Russia. Am J Agric Biol Sci 9(2):232–237

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Kim TW, Kim CW, Kwon SG, Hwang JH, Park DH, Kang DJ, Ha J, Yang MR, Kim SW, Kim IS (2016) pH as analytical indicator for managing pork meat quality. Sains Malays 45(7):1097–1103

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Thomas R, Banik S, Barman K, Mohan NH, Sarma DK (2016) Carcass composition and meat quality parameters of Ghungroo pigs. Indian J Anim Sci 86(8):925–929

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Thomas R, Banik S, Mohan NH, Sarma DK (2017) Carcass and meat quality of triple cross (Ghungroo × Hampshire × Duroc) fattener pigs. Int Food Res J 24(1):153–158

    Google Scholar 

  49. Jiang YZ, Zhu L, Tang GQ, Li MZ, Jiang AA, Cen WM, Xing SH, Chen JN, Wen AX, He T, Wang Q, Zhu GX, Xie M. Li XW (2012) Carcass and meat quality traits of four commercial pig crossbreeds in China. Genet Mol Res 11(4):4447–4455

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Sahu S (2014) Performance of crossbred pigs on feeding sugarcane press mud. Indian Veterinary Research Institute, Izatnagar, pp 80–82

    Google Scholar 

  51. Sutha M, Gawdaman G, Robinson JJ, Abraha- Thirumurugan K (2015) Influence of age on the carcass characteristics of three way synthetic pigs raised under swill feed regime. Indian J Anim Res 49(1):114–117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Fisher P, Mellett FD, Hoffman LC (2000) Halothane genotype and pork quality. 1. Carcass and meat quality characteristics of three halothane genotypes. Meat Sci 54:97–105

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Fernandez X, Neyraud E, Astruc T, Sante V (2002) Effects of halothane genotype and pre-slaughter treatment on pig meat quality. Part 1. Post mortem metabolism, meat quality indicators and sensory traits of m. Longissimus lumborum. Meat Sci 62(4):429–437

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Bastos RG, Federezzi J, Deschamps JC, Cardellino RA, Dellagostin OA (2001) Efeito do gene do estresse suíno sobre características de quantidade e qualidade de carcaça. Rev Bras Zootecn 30:37–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Rosner F, Lengerken G, Maak S (2003) The value of pig breeding herds in Germany and progress in improvement of meatiness and pork quality. Anim Sci Pap Rep 21(Suppl. 1):153–161

    Google Scholar 

  56. Enfalt AC, Lundstrom K, Hanssona I, Johansenb S, Nystrom PE (1997) Comparison of non-carriers and heterozygous carriers of the RN- allele for carcass composition, muscle distribution and technological meat quality in Hampshire-sired pigs. Livest Prod Sci 47:221–229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Škrlep M, Candek-Potokar M, Zlender B, Robert N, Sante- Lhoutellier V, Gou P (2012) PRKAG3 and CAST genetic polymorphisms and quality traits of dry cured hams—III. Associations in Slovenian dry-cured ham Kraski prsut and their dependence on processing. Meat Sci 92:360–365

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Lindahl G, Enfalt AC, von Seth G, Josell A, Hedebro- Velander I, Andersen HJ, Braunschweig M, Andersson L, Lundstrom K (2004) A second mutant allele (V199I) at the PRKAG3 (RN) locus—I. Effect on technological meat quality of pork loin. Meat Sci 66:609–619

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. Otto G, Roehe R, Looft H, Thoelking L, Knap PW, Rothschild MF, Plastow GS, Kalm E (2007) Associations of DNA markers with meat quality traits in pigs with emphasis on drip loss. Meat Sci 75:185–195

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The help rendered by Director, Joint Director (Research) and Joint Director (Academic); Indian Veterinary Research Institute, Izatnagar, Uttar Pradesh and financial support by Indian Council of Agricultural Research, New Delhi is highly acknowledged.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to B. L. Saini.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests for this publication.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Saini, B.L., Gaur, G.K., Sahoo, N.R. et al. Polymorphism distribution of RYR1, PRKAG3, HFABP, MYF-5 and MC4R genes in crossbred pigs. Mol Biol Rep 45, 1575–1585 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11033-018-4263-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11033-018-4263-z

Keywords

Navigation