Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

p53 codon 72 polymorphism is associated with susceptibility to hepatocellular carcinoma in the Turkish population: a case–control study

  • Published:
Molecular Biology Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The tumor suppressor p53 gene plays a crucial role in preventing carcinogenesis through its ability to induce cell cycle arrest and apoptosis following DNA damage and oncogene activation. A guanine (G)/cytosine (C) common single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) at second position of codon 72 in exon 4 of p53 gene determines a arginine (Arg) to proline (Pro) (Arg72Pro) aminoacidic substitution within the proline-rich domain of p53 protein. Arg72 and Pro72 allele are different from a biochemical and biological point of view and many reports suggest that they can modulate individual cancer susceptibility. To determine the association of the p53 Arg72Pro polymorphism with the risk of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) development in a Turkish population, a hospital-based case–control study was designed consisting of 119 subjects with HCC and 119 cancer-free control subjects matched for age, gender, smoking and alcohol status. The genotype frequency of the p53 Arg72Pro polymorphism was determined by using a polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism (PCR-RFLP) assay. Our data shows that the Pro/Pro genotype of the p53 Arg72Pro polymorphism is associated with increased risk of HCC development in this Turkish population (OR = 3.20, 95% CI: 1.24–8.22, P = 0.02). Furthermore, according to stratified analysis, a significant association was observed between the homozygote Pro/Pro genotype and HCC risk in the subgroups of male gender (OR = 3.01, 95% CI: 1.14–7.97, P = 0.03) and patients with hepatitis B virus (HBV)-related HCC (OR = 4.04, 95% CI: 1.46–11.15, P = 0.007). Because our results suggest for the first time that the Pro/Pro homozygote of p53 Arg72Pro polymorphism may be a genetic susceptibility factor for HCC (especially in the male gender and HBV-infected patients) in the Turkish population, further independent studies are required to validate our findings in a larger series, as well as in patients of different ethnic origins.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Parkin DM, Bray F, Ferlay J, Pisani P (2005) Global cancer statistics, 2002. CA Cancer J Clin 55:74–108. doi:10.3322/canjclin.55.2.74

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Farazi PA, DePinho RA (2006) Hepatocellular carcinoma pathogenesis: from genes to environment. Nat Rev Cancer 6:674–687. doi:10.1038/nrc1934

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. El-Serag HB, Rudolph KL (2007) Hepatocellular carcinoma: epidemiology and molecular carcinogenesis. Gastroenterology 132:2557–2576. doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2007.04.061

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Jin S, Levine AJ (2001) The p53 functional circuit. J Cell Sci 114:4139–4140

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Levine AJ (1997) P53, the cellular gatekeeper for growth and division. Cell 88:323–331. doi:10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81871-1

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Hollstein M, Sidransky D, Vogelstein B, Harris CC (1991) p53 mutations in human cancers. Science 253:49–53. doi:10.1126/science.1905840

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Greenblatt MS, Bennett WP, Hollstein M, Harris CC (1994) Mutations in the p53 gene: clues to cancer etiology and molecular pathogenesis. Cancer Res 54:4855–4878

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Staib F, Hussain SP, Hofseth LJ, Wang XW, Harris CC (2003) TP53 and liver carcinogenesis. Hum Mutat 21:201–216. doi:10.1002/humu.10176

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Matlashewski GJ, Tuck S, Pim D, Lamb P, Schneider J, Crawford LV (1987) Primary structure polymorphism at amino acid residue 72 of human p53. Mol Cell Biol 7:961–963

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Buchman VL, Chumakov PM, Ninkina NN, Samarina OP, Georgiev GP (1988) A variation in the structure of the protein-coding region of the human p53 gene. Gene 70:245–252. doi:10.1016/0378-1119(88)90196-5

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Walker KK, Levine AJ (1996) Identification of a novel p53 functional domain that is necessary for efficient growth suppression. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 93:15335–15340

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Shepherd T, Tolbert D, Benedetti J, Macdonald J, Stemmermann G, Wiest J, DeVoe G, Miller MA, Wang J, Noffsinger A, Fenoglio-Preiser C (2000) Alterations in exon 4 of the p53 gene in gastric carcinoma. Gastroenterology 118:1039–1044

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Sakamuro D, Sabbatini P, White E, Prendergast GC (1997) The polyproline region of p53 is required to activate apoptosis but not growth arrest. Oncogene 15:887–898

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Thomas M, Kalita A, Labrecque S, Pim D, Banks L, Matlashewski G (1999) Two polymorphic variants of wild-type p53 differ biochemically and biologically. Mol Cell Biol 19:1092–1100

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Harris N, Brill E, Shohat O, Prokocimer M, Wolf D, Arai N, Rotter V (1986) Molecular basis for heterogeneity of the human p53 protein. Mol Cell Biol 6:4650–4656

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Dumont P, Leu JI, Della Pietra AC III, George DL, Murphy M (2003) The codon 72 polymorphic variants of p53 have markedly different apoptotic potential. Nat Genet 33:357–365. doi:10.1038/ng1093

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Pim D, Banks L (2004) p53 polymorphism variants at codon 72 exert different effects on cell cycle progression. Int J Cancer 108:196–199. doi:10.1002/ijc.11548

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Siddique M, Sabapathy K (2006) Trp53-dependent DNA-repair is aff ected by the codon 72 polymorphism. Oncogene 25:3489–3500. doi:10.1038/sj.onc.1209405

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Murphy ME (2006) Polymorphic variants in the p53 pathway. Cell Death Differ 13:916–920. doi:10.1038/sj.cdd.4401907

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Chipuk JE, Kuwana T, Bouchier-Hayes L, Droin NM, Newmeyer DD, Schuler M, Green DR (2004) Direct activation of Bax by p53 mediates mitochondrial membrane permeabilization and apoptosis. Science 303:1010–1014. doi:10.1126/science.1092734

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Leu JI, Dumont P, Hafey M, Murphy ME, George DL (2004) Mitochondrial p53 activates Bak and causes disruption of a Bak-Mcl1 complex. Nat Cell Biol 6:443–450. doi:10.1038/ncb1123

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Whibley C, Pharoah PD, Hollstein M (2009) p53 polymorphisms: cancer implications. Nat Rev Cancer 9:95–107. doi:10.1038/nrc2584

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Anzola M, Cuevas N, López-Martínez M, Saiz A, Burgos JJ, de Pancorbo MM (2003) Frequent loss of p53 codon 72 Pro variant in hepatitis C virus-positive carriers with hepatocellular carcinoma. Cancer Lett 193:199–205. doi:10.1016/S0304-3835(03)00046-6

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Leveri M, Gritti C, Rossi L, Zavaglia C, Civardi E, Mondelli MU, De Silvestri A, Silini EM (2004) Codon 72 polymorphism of P53 gene does not affect the risk of cirrhosis and hepatocarcinoma in HCV-infected patients. Cancer Lett 208:75–79. doi:10.1016/j.canlet.2004.02.016

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Xu Y, Liu L, Liu J, Zhang Y, Zhu J, Chen J, Liu S, Liu Z, Shi H, Shen H, Hu Z (2011) A potentially functional polymorphism in the promoter region of miR-34b/c is associated with an increased risk for primary hepatocellular carcinoma. Int J Cancer 128:412–417. doi:10.1002/ijc.25342

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Zhu ZZ, Cong WM, Liu SF, Dong H, Zhu GS, Wu MC (2005) Homozygosity for Pro of p53 Arg72Pro as a potential risk factor for hepatocellular carcinoma in Chinese population. World J Gastroenterol 11:289–292

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Zhu ZZ, Cong WM, Liu SF, Xian ZH, Wu WQ, Wu MC, Gao B, Hou LF, Zhu GS (2005) A p53 polymorphism modifies the risk of hepatocellular carcinoma among non-carriers but not carriers of chronic hepatitis B virus infection. Cancer Lett 229:77–83. doi:10.1016/j.canlet.2005.04.014

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Ezzikouri S, El Feydi AE, Chafik A, Benazzouz M, El Kihal L, Afifi R, Hassar M, Pineau P, Benjelloun S (2007) The Pro variant of the p53 codon 72 polymorphism is associated with hepatocellular carcinoma in Moroccan population. Hepatol Res 37:748–754. doi:10.1111/j.1872-034X.2007.00126.x

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Yoon YJ, Chang HY, Ahn SH, Kim JK, Park YK, Kang DR, Park JY, Myoung SM, Kim do Y, Chon CY, Han KH (2008) MDM2 and p53 polymorphisms are associated with the development of hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with chronic hepatitis B virus infection. Carcinogenesis 29:1192–1196. doi:10.1093/carcin/bgn090

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Yu MW, Yang SY, Chiu YH, Chiang YC, Liaw YF, Chen CJ (1999) A p53 genetic polymorphism as a modulator of hepatocellular carcinoma risk in relation to chronic liver disease, familial tendency, and cigarette smoking in hepatitis B carriers. Hepatology 29:697–702. doi:10.1002/hep.510290330

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Akkız H, Bayram S, Bekar A, Akgöllü E, Ülger Y (2011) Functional polymorphisms of cyclooxygenase-2 gene and risk for hepatocellular carcinoma. Mol Cell Biochem 347:201–208. doi:10.1007/s11010-010-0629-9

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Akkiz H, Bayram S, Bekar A, Akgöllü E, Ozdil B (2010) Relationship between functional polymorphism in the Aurora A gene and susceptibility of hepatocellular carcinoma. J Viral Hepat 17:668–674. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2893.2009.01225.x

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Bruix J, Sherman M, Llovet JM, Beaugrand M, Lencioni R, Burroughs AK, Christensen E, Pagliaro L, Colombo M, Rodés J (2001) Clinical management of hepatocellular carcinoma. Conclusions of the Barcelona-2000 EASL conference. European Association for the Study of the Liver. J Hepatol 35:421–430

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Tsai JF, Chang WY, Jeng JE, Ho MS, Lin ZY, Tsai JH (1994) Hepatitis B and C virus infection as risk factors for liver cirrhosis and cirrhotic hepatocellular carcinoma: a case–control study. Liver 14:98–102

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Pugh RN, Murray-Lyon IM, Dawson JL, Pietroni MC, Williams R (1973) Transection of the esophagus for bleeding esophageal varices. Br J Surg 60:646–649

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Liu G, Miller DP, Zhou W, Thurston SW, Fan R, Xu LL, Lynch TJ, Wain JC, Su L, Christiani DC (2001) Differential association of the codon 72 p53 and GSTM1 polymorphisms on histological subtype of non-small cell lung carcinoma. Cancer Res 61:8718–8722

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Ludwig JA, Weinstein JN (2005) Biomarkers in cancer staging, prognosis and treatment selection. Nat Rev Cancer 5:845–856. doi:10.1038/nrc1739

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Wang YC, Lee HS, Chen SK, Chang YY, Chen CY (1999) Prognostic significance of p53 codon 72 polymorphism in lung carcinomas. Eur J Cancer 35:226–230. doi:10.1016/S0959-8049(98)00369-4

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Shen H, Solari A, Wang X, Zhang Z, Xu Y, Wang L, Hu X, Guo J, Wei Q (2004) P53 codon 72 polymorphism and risk of gastric cancer in a Chinese population. Oncol Rep 11:1115–1120

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Storey A, Thomas M, Kalita A, Harwood C, Gardiol D, Mantovani F, Breuer J, Leigh IM, Matlashewski G, Banks (1998) Role of a p53 polymorphism in the development of human papillomavirus-associated cancer. Nature 393:229–234. doi:10.1038/30400

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Bonafe′ M, Ceccarelli C, Farabegoli F, Santini D, Taffurelli M, Barbi C, Marzi E, Trapassi C, Storci G, Olivieri F, Franceschi C (2003) Retention of the p53 codon 72 arginine allele is associated with a reduction of disease-free and overall survival in arginine/proline heterozygous breast cancer patients. Clin Cancer Res 9:4860–4864

    Google Scholar 

  42. Mabrouk I, Baccouche S, El-Abed R, Mokdad-Gargouri R, Mosbah A, Saïd S, Daoud J, Frikha M, Jlidi R, Gargouri A (2003) No evidence of correlation between p53 codon 72 polymorphism and risk of bladder or breast carcinoma in Tunisian patients. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1010:764–770. doi:10.1196/annals.1299.137

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Beckman G, Birgander R, Själander A, Saha N, Holmberg PA, Kivelä A, Beckman L (1994) Is p53 polymorphism maintained by natural selection? Hum Hered 44:266–270

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Weston A, Ling-Cawley HM, Caporaso NE, Bowman ED, Hoover RN, Trump BF, Harris CC (1994) Determination of the allelic frequencies of an L-myc and a p53 polymorphism in human lung cancer. Carcinogenesis 15:583–587. doi:10.1093/carcin/15.4.583

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Bond GL, Levine AJ (2007) A single nucleotide polymorphism in the p53 pathway interacts with gender, environmental stresses and tumor genetics to influence cancer in humans. Oncogene 26:1317–1323. doi:10.1038/sj.onc.1210199

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Naugler WE, Sakurai T, Kim S, Maeda S, Kim K, Elsharkawy AM, Karin M (2007) Gender disparity in liver cancer due to sex differences in MyD88-dependent IL-6 production. Science 317:121–124. doi:10.1126/science.1140485

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was funded by Çukurova University Research Fund TF2007LTP16. The authors thank all the subjects who participated in this study.

Conflict of interest

All of the authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Süleyman Bayram.

Additional information

Ahmet Taner Sümbül, Hikmet Akkız and Süleyman Bayram contributed equally to this work.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sümbül, A.T., Akkız, H., Bayram, S. et al. p53 codon 72 polymorphism is associated with susceptibility to hepatocellular carcinoma in the Turkish population: a case–control study. Mol Biol Rep 39, 1639–1647 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11033-011-0903-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11033-011-0903-2

Keywords

Navigation