Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

RCCS enhances EOE cell proliferation and their differentiation into ameloblasts

  • Published:
Molecular Biology Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this article we report on the culturing of dental enamel organ epithelia (EOE) using a rotary cell culture system (RCCS) bioreactor associated with a cytodex-3 microcarrier. This culture system enhanced the proliferation and differentiation of the EOE into ameloblasts. Primary dental EOE trypsinized from 4-day old post-natal rat pups were cultured in the RCCS associated with Cytodex-3. The results were analyzed in comparison to a conventional plate system (control). Cells grown in RCCS have shown higher viabilities (above 90%) and final cell densities in terms of cells/ml than in the control system. In the case of RCCS, 46 ± 2 manifold increases were obtained, while significantly lower yields of 10.8 ± 2.5 manifod were obtained for control plates. Throughout the experiments, glucose levels were maintained within the accepted physiological range. In this case, LDH levels are kept low (below 150 mmol/ml), which is in accordance with the low cell death observed in the RCCS. Scanning electron microscopy revealed cells that were spread and forming three dimensional aggregates on the surface of cytodex-3. Cells cultured in the RCCS exhibited a stronger positive immunofluorescence staining for ameloblastin than those in control plates. RT-PCR results revealed that cells cultured in RCCS have higher amelogenin mRNA levels compared to controls. We have done an exploratory study on biological characteristics and self-assembling of epithelium cellula intersitialis, which demonstrated that the special 3D environment enhanced the rat dental EOE cell proliferation and differentiation into ameloblasts. The study has revealed that RCCS could be used to study the reaction of the EOE cells, tooth enamel organ cells and mesenchymal cells under the spacial 3D culture system, which will also provide a novel hypothesis for dental regeneration.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Den Besten PK, Mathews CH, Gao C, Li W (1998) Primary culture and characterization of enamel organ epithelial cells. Connect Tissue Res 38:3–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. DenBesten PK, Machule D, Zhang Y, Yan Q, Li W (2005) Characterization of human primary enamel organ epithelial cells in vitro. Arch Oral Biol 50:689–694

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Kukita A, Harada H, Kukita T, Inai T, Matsuhashi S, Kurisu K (1992) Primary and secondary culture of rat ameloblasts in serum-free medium. Calcif Tissue Int 51:393–398

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Yan Q, Zhang Y, Li W, DenBesten PK (2006) Differentiation of human ameloblast-lineage cells in vitro. Eur J Oral Sci 114(Suppl 1):154–158

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. MacDougall M, Nydegger J, Gu TT, Simmons D, Luan X, Cavender A, D’Souza RN (1998) Developmental regulation of dentin sialophosphoprotein during ameloblast differentiation: a potential enamel matrix nucleator. Connect Tissue Res 39:25–37

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Leung HW, Chen A, Choo AB, Reuveny S, Oh SK (2011) Agitation can induce differentiation of human pluripotent stem cells in microcarrier cultures. Tissue Eng C Methods 17:165–172

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Talbot NC, Caperna TJ (1998) Selective and organotypic culture of intrahepatic bile duct cells from adult pig liver. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim 34:785–798

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. DenBesten PK, Gao C, Li W, Mathews CH, Gruenert DC (1999) Development and characterization of an SV40 immortalized porcine ameloblast-like cell line. Eur J Oral Sci 107:276–281

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Abe K, Miyoshi K, Muto T, Ruspita I, Horiguchi T, Nagata T, Noma T (2007) Establishment and characterization of rat dental epithelial derived ameloblast-lineage clones. J Biosci Bioeng 103:479–485

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Lace MJ, Anson JR, Thomas GS, Turek LP, Haugen TH (2008) The E8–E2 gene product of human papillomavirus type 16 represses early transcription and replication but is dispensable for viral plasmid persistence in keratinocytes. J Virol 82:10841–10853

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Testa JR, Giordano A (2001) SV40 and cell cycle perturbations in malignant mesothelioma. Semin Cancer Biol 11:31–38

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Papoutsakis ET (1991) Fluid-mechanical damage of animal cells in bioreactors. Trends Biotechnol 9:427–437

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Hammond TG, Hammond JM (2001) Optimized suspension culture: the rotating-wall vessel. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 281:12–25

    Google Scholar 

  14. Goodwin TJ, Schroeder WF, Wolf DA, Moyer MP (1993) Rotating-wall vessel coculture of small intestine as a prelude to tissue modeling: aspects of simulated microgravity. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med 202:181–192

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Klement BJ, Young QM, George BJ, Nokkaew M (2004) Skeletal tissue growth, differentiation and mineralization in the NASA rotating wall vessel. Bone 34:487–498

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Sanford GL, Ellerson D, Melhado-Gardner C, Sroufe AE, Harris-Hooker S (2002) Three-dimensional growth of endothelial cells in the microgravity-based rotating wall vessel bioreactor. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim 38:493–504

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Molnar G, Schroedl NA, Gonda SR, Hartzell CR (1997) Skeletal muscle satellite cells cultured in simulated microgravity. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim 33:386–391

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Slentz DH, Truskey GA, Kraus WE (2001) Effects of chronic exposure to simulated microgravity on skeletal muscle cell proliferation and differentiation. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim 37:148–156

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Torgan CE, Burge SS, Collinsworth AM, Truskey GA, Kraus WE (2000) Differentiation of mammalian skeletal muscle cells cultured on microcarrier beads in a rotating cell culture system. Med Biol Eng Comput 38:583–590

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Sytkowski AJ, Davis KL (2001) Erythroid cell growth and differentiation in vitro in the simulated microgravity environment of the NASA rotating wall vessel bioreactor. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim 37:79–83

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Kaeffer B, Briollais S (1998) Primary culture of colonocytes in rotating bioreactor. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim 34:622–625

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Pazzano D, Mercier KA, Moran JM, Fong SS, DiBiasio DD, Rulfs JX, Kohles SS, Bonassar LJ (2000) Comparison of chondrogensis in static and perfused bioreactor culture. Biotechnol Prog 16:893–896

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Wang Q, Slegers H, Clauwaert J (1999) Isolation of plasma membranes from rat C6 glioma cells cultivated on microcarriers. Acta Histochem 101:327–339

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Brown B, Lindberg K, Reing J, Stolz DB, Badylak SF (2006) The basement membrane component of biologic scaffolds derived from extracellular matrix. Tissue Eng 12:519–526

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Daoud J, Petropavlovskaia M, Rosenberg L, Tabrizian M (2010) The effect of extracellular matrix components on the preservation of human islet function in vitro. Biomaterials 31:1676–1682

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Koller MR, Bradley MS, Palsson BO (1995) Growth factor consumption and production in perfusion cultures of human bone marrow correlate with specific cell production. Exp Hematol 23:1275–1283

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Nyberg SL, Remmel RP, Mann HJ, Peshwa MV, Hu WS, Cerra FB (1994) Primary hepatocytes outperform Hep G2 cells as the source of biotransformation functions in a bioartificial liver. Ann Surg 220:59–67

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Ning F, Guo Y, Tang J, Zhou J, Zhang H, Lu W, Gao Y, Wang L, Pei D, Duan Y, Jin Y (2010) Differentiation of mouse embryonic stem cells into dental epithelial-like cells induced by ameloblasts serum-free conditioned medium. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 394:342–347

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Huang Z, Sargeant TD, Hulvat JF, Mata A, Bringas P Jr, Koh CY, Stupp SI, Snead ML (2008) Bioactive nanofibers instruct cells to proliferate and differentiate during enamel regeneration. J Bone Miner Res 23:1995–2006

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Tabata MJ, Matsumura T, Liu JG, Wakisaka S, Kurisu K (1996) Expression of cytokeratin 14 in ameloblast-lineage cells of the developing tooth of rat, both in vivo and in vitro. Arch Oral Biol 41:1019–1027

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Oida S, Nagano T, Yamakoshi Y, Ando H, Yamada M, Fukae M (2002) Amelogenin gene expression in porcine odontoblasts. J Dent Res 81:103–108

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Papagerakis P, MacDougall M, Hotton D, Bailleul-Forestier I, Oboeuf M, Berdal A (2003) Expression of amelogenin in odontoblasts. Bone 32:228–240

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Li S, Ma Z, Niu Z, Qian H, Xuan D, Hou R, Ni L (2009) NASA-approved rotary bioreactor enhances proliferation and osteogenesis of human periodontal ligament stem cells. Stem Cells Dev 18:1273–1282

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Sheyn D, Pelled G, Netanely D, Domany E, Gazit D (2010) The effect of simulated microgravity on human mesenchymal stem cells cultured in an osteogenic differentiation system: a bioinformatics study. Tissue Eng A 16:3403–3412

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Kedong S, Xiubo F, Tianqing L, Macedo HM, LiLi J, Meiyun F, Fangxin S, Xuehu M, Zhanfeng C (2010) Simultaneous expansion and harvest of hematopoietic stem cells and mesenchymal stem cells derived from umbilical cord blood. J Mater Sci Mater Med 21:3183–3193

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Suzawa T, Itoh N, Takahashi N, Katagiri T, Morimura N, Kobayashi Y, Yamamoto T, Kamijo R (2006) Establishment of primary cultures for mouse ameloblasts as a model of their lifetime. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 345:1247–1253

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Bu Ling Wu or Chang Yong Wang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Li, P., Zhang, Y., Wang, Y.M. et al. RCCS enhances EOE cell proliferation and their differentiation into ameloblasts. Mol Biol Rep 39, 309–317 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11033-011-0740-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11033-011-0740-3

Keywords

Navigation