Abstract
Drought is the major abiotic constraint contributing to yield reduction in common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) worldwide. An increasing scarcity of water in the future will make improving adaptation to drought stress a major objective of most crop breeding efforts. Drought avoidance by increased extraction of soil moisture from greater depth under drought conditions is an adaptive mechanism of common bean. A recombinant inbred line population of DOR364 × BAT477 was evaluated for rooting pattern traits in soil cylinder tubes under soil drying (progressive water stress) and non-stress (well-watered with 80% of field capacity) treatments in a greenhouse. One of the parents, BAT 477, is a deep-rooting genotype while the other parent, DOR 364, is a commercial cultivar in Central America. The recombinant inbred line population expressed quantitative variation and transgressive segregation for ten rooting pattern traits as well as five shoot traits of 48-day-old plants. A mixed model quantitative trait locus (QTL) mapping analysis was carried out using a genetic map constructed with 165 genetic markers that covered 11 linkage groups of the common bean genome. Genotype estimates were calculated from best design and spatial effects model for each trait. A total of 15 putative QTL were identified for seven rooting pattern traits and four shoot traits. The QTL detected were scattered over five of the 11 linkage groups. The QTL detected for all the root traits except total root length and fine root length were main effect QTL and did not interact with the level of water supply. The total root length and fine root length QTL with significant QTL × environment interaction only differed in magnitude of effect, and interaction was of a non-crossover type. Other QTL for total root length, fine roots, thick roots, root volume and root biomass were co-localized and also explained relatively more genetic variance. This suggests that the QTL affecting root traits in common beans are based on constitutive expression of genes and that drought avoidance based on deep rooting, longer root length, thicker roots, increasing root length distribution with depth, root volume and root biomass can be used in molecular breeding. The positive alleles for most of the QTL detected in this study were derived from the paternal parent BAT477. The results from the present analyses highlighted the feasibility of marker-aided selection as an alternative to conventional labor-intensive, phenotypic screening of drought avoidance root traits.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- RD:
-
Rooting depth
- TRL:
-
Total root length
- FRL:
-
Fine root length
- TRL:
-
Thicker root length
- RV:
-
Root volume
- ARD:
-
Average root diameter
- SRL:
-
Specific root length
- RLD:
-
Root length distribution with depth
- Temp:
-
Leaf temperature
- SCMR:
-
SPAD chlorophyll meter reading
- LA:
-
Leaf area
- LTNC:
-
Leaf total nonstructural carbohydrate
- STNC:
-
Stem TNC
- SBDW:
-
Shoot biomass dry weight
- RBDW:
-
Root biomass dry weight
- R:S:
-
Root:shoot ratio
- RBMD:
-
Root biomass distribution with depth
References
Acosta-Gallegos JA, Adams MW (1991) Plant traits and yield stability of dry bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) cultivars under drought stress. J Agric Sci 117:213–219
Acosta-Gallegos JA, Kohashi-Shibata V (1989) Effect of water stress on growth and yield of indeterminate dry bean (Phaesolus vulgaris) cultivars. Field Crop Res 20:81–90
Beebe SE, Rojas-Pierce M, Yan X, Blair MW, Pedraza F, Munoz F, Tohme J, Lynch JP (2006) Quantitative trait loci for root architecture traits correlated with phosphorus acquisition in common bean. Crop Sci 46:413–423
Beebe S, Rao IM, Cajiao C, Grajales M (2008) Selection for drought resistance in common bean also improves yield in phosphorus limited and favorable environments. Crop Sc. 48:582–592
Beebe SE, Rao IM, Blair MW, Acosta-Gallegos JA (2010) Phenotyping common beans for adaptation to drought. In: Ribaut JM, Monneveux P (eds) Drought phenotyping in crops: from theory to practice. Generation challenge program special issue on phenotyping, pp 311–334
Blair MW, Pedraza F, Buendia HF, Gaitan-Solis E, Beebe SE, Gepts P, Tohme J (2003) Development of a genome-wide anchored microsatellite map for common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L). Theor Appl Genet 107:1362–1374
Blair MW, Munoz C, Garza R, Cardona C (2006) Molecular mapping of genes for resistance to the bean pod weevil (Apion goldmani Wagner) in common bean. Theor Appl Genet 112:913–923
Blair MW, Buendía HF, Giraldo MC, Métais I, Peltier D (2008) Characterization of AT-rich microsatellite markers for common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) based on screening of non-enriched small insert genomic libraries. Genome 52:772–782
Blair MW, Galeano CH, Tovar E, Muñoz-Torres MC, Castrillón AV, Beebe SE, Rao IM (2010) Development of a Mesoamerican intra-genepool genetic map for quantitative trait loci detection in a drought tolerant × susceptible common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) cross. Mol Breed. doi:10.1007/sl1032-010-9527-9
Boer MP, Wright D, Feng L, Podlich DW, Luo L, Cooper M, Eeuwijk FA (2007) A mixed-model quantitative trait loci (QTL) analysis for multi-environment trial data using environmental covariables for QTL-by-environment interactions, with an example in maize. Genetics 177:1801–1813
Boyer JS (1982) Plant productivity and environment. Science 218:443–448
Broughton WJ, Hernandez G, Blair MW, Beebe SE, Gepts P, Vanderleyden J (2003) Beans (Phaseolus spp.)—model food legumes. Plant Soil 252:55–128
Cichy K, Blair MW, Mendoza CHG, Snapp SS, Kelly JD (2009) QTL analysis of root architecture traits and low phosphorus tolerance in an Andean bean population. Crop Sci 49:59–68
Courtois B, Ahmadi N, Khowaja F, Price AH, Rami JF, Frouin J, Hamelin C, Ruiz M (2009) Rice root genetic architecture: meta-analysis from drought QTL database. Rice 2:115–128
Cullis B, Smith AB, Coombes NE (2006) On the design of early generation variety trails with correlated data. J Agric Biol Environ Stat 11:381–393
Frahm MA, Rosas JC, Mayek-Pérez N, López-Salinas E, Acosta-Gallegos JA, Kelly JD (2004) Breeding beans for resistance to terminal drought in the lowland tropics. Euphytica 136:223–232
Gale MR, Grigal DF (1987) Vertical root distribution of northern tree species in relation to successional status. Can J Forest Res 17:829–834
Gaur PM, Krishnamurthy L, Krishiwagi J (2008) Improving drought-avoidance root traits in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.): current status of research at ICRSAT. Plant Prod Sci 11:3–11
Gilmour AR, Cullis BR, Verbyla AP (1997) Accounting for natural and extraneous variation in the analysis of field experiments. J Agric Biol Environ Stat 2:269–293
Guida dos Santos M, Vasconcelos R, Ferraz R, Pimentel C (2004) Gas exchange and yield response to foliar phosphorus application in Phaseolus vulgaris L. under drought. Brazil J Plant Physiol 16:171–179
Harris RW (1992) Root-shoot ratios. J Arboricult 18:31–42
Ho MD, Rosas JC, Brown KM, Lynch JP (2005) Root architectural tradeoffs for water and phosphorus acquisition. Funct Plant Biol 32:737–748
Huang B, Gao H (2000) Root physiological characteristics associated with drought resistance in tall fescue cultivars. Crop Sci 40:196–203
Huang B, Duncan RR, Carrow RN (1997) Drought-resistance mechanisms of seven warm-season turf grasses under surface soil drying: II. Root aspects. Crop Sci 37:1863–1869
Jones PG, Thornton PK (2003) The potential impacts of climate change on maize production in Africa and Latin America in 2055. Global Environ Change 13:51–59
Kamoshita A, Babu RC, Manikanda Boopathi N, Fukai S (2008) Phenotypic and genotypic analysis of drought-resistance traits for development of rice cultivars adapted to rainfed environments. Field Crops Res 109:1–23
Kang JH, Brink GE (1995) White clover morphology and physiology in response to defoliation interval. Crop Sci 35:264–269
Lander ES, Green P (1987) Construction of multilocus genetic linkage maps in humans. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 84:2363–2367
Levitt J (1972) Responses of plant to environmental stresses. Academic Press, New York
Liao H, Yan X, Rubio G, Beebe S, Blair M, Lynch J (2004) Genetic mapping of basal root gravitropism and phosphorus acquisition efficiency in common bean. Funct Plant Biol 33:959–970
Lŏpez-Marĩn H, Rao IM, Blair MW (2009) Quantitative trait loci for root morphology traits under aluminum stress in common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Theor Appl Genet 119:449–458
Ludlow MM (1989) Strategies of response to water stress. In: Kreeb KH, Richter H, Hinckley TM (eds) Structural and functional responses to environmental stresses. SPB Academic, The Hague, pp 269–281
Lynch JP, Beebe SE (1995) Adaptation of beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) to low phosphorus availability. Hort Sci 30:1165–1171
Lynch M, Walsh B (1998) Genetics and analysis of quantitative traits. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland
Masaya P, White JW (1991) Adaptation to photoperiod and temperature. In: Schoonhoven A, Voysest O (eds) Common beans: research for crop improvement. CAB Int, CIAT, Cali, Wallingford, pp 445–500
Mathews L, Malosetti M, Chapman S, McIntyre L, Reynolds M, Shorter R, Eeuwijik F (2008) Multi-environment QTL mixed models for drought stress adaptation in wheat. Theor Appl Genet 117:1077–1091
Miklas PN, Kelly JD, Beebe SE, Blair MW (2006) Common bean breeding from resistance against biotic and abiotic stresses: from classical to MAS breeding. Euphytica 147:105–131
Muñoz LC, Blair MW, Duque MC, Tohme J, Roca W (2004) Introgression in common bean x tepary bean interspecific congruity-backcross lines as measured by AFLP markers. Crop Sci 44:637–645
Muñoz-Perea CG, Terán H, Allen RG, Wright JL, Westermann DT, Singh SP (2006) Selection for drought resistance in dry bean landraces and cultivars. Crop Sci 46:2111–2120
Nielsen DC, Nelson N (1998) Black bean sensitivity to water stress at various growth stages. Crop Sci 38:422–427
Oakey H, Verbyla A, Pitchford W, Cullis B, Kuchel H (2006) Joint modeling of additive and non-additive genetic line effects in single field trials. Theor Appl Genet 113:809–819
Ochoa I, Blair MW, Lynch J (2006) QTL analysis of adventitious root formation in common bean under contrasting phosphorus availability. Crop Sci 46:1609–1621
Passioura J (2007) The drought environment: physical, biological and agricultural perspectives. J Exp Bot 58:113–117
Payne RW, Harding SA, Murray DA, Soutar DM, Bird DB et al (2009) The guide to GenStat release 12, statistics. VSN International, Hemel Hempstead
Polanía JA, Rao IM, Beebe S, García R (2009) Desarrollo y distribución de raíces bajo estrés por sequía en fríjol común (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) en un sistema de tubos con suelo. Agron Colomb 27:25–32
Prince AH, Steel KA, Moore BJ, Barraclough PB, Clark LJ (2000) A combined RFLP and AFLP linkage map of upland rice (Oryza sativa L.) used to identify QTLs for root penetration ability. Theor Appl Genet 100:49–56
Ramĩrez-Vallejo P, Kelly JD (1998) Traits related to drought resistance in common bean. Euphytica 99:127–138
Rao IM (2001) Role of physiology in improving crop adaptation to abiotic stresses in the tropics: The case of common bean and tropical forages. In: Pessarakli M (ed) Handbook of plant and crop physiology. Marcel Dekker, Inc, New York, pp 583–613
Remans R, Beebe S, Blair MW, Manrique G, Tovar E, Rao IM, Croonenborghs A, Torres-Gutierrez R, El-Howeity M, Michiels J, Vanderleyden J (2008) Physiological and genetic analyses of root responsiveness to auxin-producing plant growth-promoting bacteria in common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Plant Soil 302:149–161
Ruta N, Stamp P, Liedgens M, Fracheboud Y, Hund A (2010) Co-locations of QTL for seedling traits and yield components of tropical maize under water stress conditions. Crop Sci 50:1385–1392
Salekdeh GH, Reynolds M, Bennett J, Boyer J (2009) Conceptual framework for drought phenotyping during molecular breeding. Trends Plant Sci 14:488–496
Schoonhoven A, Pastor-Corrales MP (1987) Standard system for the evaluation of bean germplasm. CIAT, Cali
Schwarz G (1979) Estimating the dimension of model. Ann Stat 6:461–464
Serraj R, Sinclair TR (1998) N2 fixation response to drought In common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Ann Bot 82:229–234
Singh SP (1995) Selection for water-stress tolerance in interracial populations of common bean. Crop Sci 35:118–124
Singh SP, Gepts P, Debouck DG (1991) Races of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris, Fabaceae). Econ Bot 45:379–396
Singh SP, Terán H, Lema M, Dennis MF, Hayes R, Robinson C (2008) Breeding for slow-darkening, high-yielding, broadly adapted dry bean pinto ‘Kimberly’ and ‘Shoshone’. J Plant Reg 2:180–186
Smucker AJM, Nunez-Barrios A, Ritchie JT (1991) Root dynamics in drying soil environments. Below-ground Ecol 1:1–5
Sponchiado B, White J, Castillo J, Jones P (1989) Root growth of four common bean cultivars in relation to drought tolerance in environments with contrasting soil types. Exp Agric 25:249–257
Steel KA, Pnrice AH, Shashidhar HE, Witcombe JR (2006) Marker assisted selection to introgress rice QTLs controlling root traits into Indian upland variety. Theor Appl Genet 109:1247–1260
Terán H, Singh SP (2002) Comparison of sources and lines selected for drought resistance in common bean. Crop Sci 42:64–70
Thung M, Rao IM (1999) Integrated management of abiotic stresses. In: Singh SP (ed) Common bean improvement in the twenty-first century. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 331–370
Tuberosa R, Salvi S, Giulani S, Sanguineti MC, Bellotti M, Conti S, Landi P (2007) Genome-wide approach to investigative and improve maize response to drought. Crop Sci 47:2120–5141
Turner NC (1979) Drought resistance and adaptation to water deficits in crop plants. In: Mussell H, Staples RC (eds) Stress physiology in crop plants. Wiley Interscience, New York, pp 343–372
Vadez V, Rao S, Kholova J, Krishnamurthy L, Kashiwagi J, Ratnakumar P, Sharma KK, Bhatnagarmathur P, Basu PS (2008) Root research for drought tolerance in legumes: Quo vadis? J Food Leg 21:77–85
Verbeke G, Molenberghs G (2000) Linear mixed models for longitudinal data. Springer, New York
White JW (1987) Preliminary results of the bean international drought yield trial (BIDYT). In: White J, Hoogenboom G, Ibarra F, Singh SP (eds) Proceedings of the international bean drought workshop. 19–21 October 1987. Cali, Colombia, pp 126–145
White J, Castillo JA (1989) Relative effect of root and shoot genotypes on yield of common bean under drought stress. Crop Sci 29:360–362
White JW, Castillo JA (1992) Evaluation of diverse shoot genotypes on selected root genotypes of common bean under soil water deficits. Crop Sci 32:762–765
White JW, Castillo JA, Ehleringer JR, Garcia-C JA, Singh SP (1994a) Relations of carbon isotope discrimination and other physiological traits to yield in common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) under rainfed conditions. J Agric Sci 122:275–284
White JW, Ochoa RM, Ibarra FP, Singh SP (1994b) Inheritance of seed yield, maturity and seed weight of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) under semi-arid rainfed conditions. J Agric Sci 122:265–273
Wortmann CS, Kirkby RA, Eledu CA, Allen DJ (1998) Atlas of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) production in Africa. CIAT Pan-African Bean Research Alliance, CIAT Publication No. 293, Cali, p 133
Yan X, Liao H, Beebe SE, Blair MW, Lynch JP (2004) QTL mapping of root hairs and acid exudation traits and their relationship to phosphorus uptake in common bean. Plant Soil 265:17–29
Acknowledgments
We thank CIAT bean breeding and physiology teams for assistance with lab analysis and greenhouse root phenotyping, respectively, and Idupulapati Rao and Paul Struick for advice on physiological analysis, José Polonía for technical support, Carmen de Vicente for training funds and Conny Almekinders for study leave. This research was supported by funding from the Generation Challenge Program developing country scientists program, the Tropical Legume (TL1) project from the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation through Generation Challenge Program and a NUFFIC fellowship to Asrat Asfaw.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Asfaw, A., Blair, M.W. Quantitative trait loci for rooting pattern traits of common beans grown under drought stress versus non-stress conditions. Mol Breeding 30, 681–695 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11032-011-9654-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11032-011-9654-y