Abstract
Corn lines with improved culturability and transformability were produced using Marker Assisted Breeding (MAB) to introgress specific regions from the highly transformable hybrid, Hi-II, into the elite line, FBLL that responds very poorly in culture. FBLL is a female inbred parental stiff-stalk line that has been used to produce a series of some of DEKALB’s historically best selling hybrids. Five unlinked regions important for culturability and transformability were identified by segregation distortion analysis and introgressed into FBLL to produce the highly transformable FBLL-MAB lines. Agrobacterium mediated transformation was used to screen the FBLL-MAB lines and select the most efficient lines for transformation using immature embryo explants. Two highly efficient transformation systems were developed using kanamycin and glyphosate as selective agents. To evaluate agronomics, two testcross hybrids were produced for each of the three lead FBLL-MAB lines. A 25-location, 3-replication yield trial was used to evaluate grain yield, yield stability, and agronomic characteristics of the hybrids. Yields were found to be 2–5% lower and more stable (across a diverse set of environments) among hybrids produced with the FBLL-MAB lines as compared to the same hybrids produced with FBLL.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
An G, Ebert PR, Mitra A, Ha SB (1988) Binary vectors. In: Gelvin SB, Schilperoort RA (eds) Plant molecular biology manual. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, pp 1–19
Armstrong C, Green C, Phillips R (1991) Development and availability of germplasm with high type II culture formation response. Maize Genet Coop Newslett 65:92–93
Armstrong C, Romero-Severson, Hodges T (1992) Improved tissue culture response of an elite maize inbred through backcross breeding, and identification of chromosomal regions important for regeneration by R.F.L.P. analysis. Theor Appl Genet 84:755–762
Armstrong C (1999) The first decade of maize transformation: a review and future perspective. Maydica 44:101–109
Cheng M, Lowe B, Spencer TM, Ye X, Armstrong C (2004) Factors influencing Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of monocotyledonous species. In vitro Cell Dev Biol-Plant 40:31–45
Dellaporta SL (1994) Plant DNA miniprep and microprep: version 2. In: Freeling M, Walbot V (eds) The maize handbook. Springer, Berlin, Heildelberg, New York, pp 522–525
D’Halluin K, Bonne E, Bossut M, De Beuckeleer M, Leemans J (1992) Transgenic maize plants by tissue electroporation. Plant Cell 4:1495–1505
Dufour P, Johnsson C, Antoine-Michard S, Cheng R, Murigneux A, Beckert M (2001) Segregation distortion at marker loci: variation during microspore embryogenesis in maize. Theor Appl Genet 102:993–1001
Frame B, Shou H, Chikwamba R, Zhang Z, Xiang C, Fonger T, Pegg S, Li B, Nettleton D, Pei D, Wang K (2002) Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated transformation of maize embryos using standard binary vector system. Plant Physiol 129:13–22
Fromm M, Morrish F, Armstrong C, Williams R, Thomas J, Klein T (1990) Inheritance and expression of chimeric genes in the progeny of transgenic maize plants. Biotechnology 8:833–839
Gordon-Kamm W, Spencer M, Mangano M, Adams T, Daines R, Start W, Krueger R, Kausch A, Lemaux P (1990) Transformation of maize cells and regeneration of fertile transgenic plants. Plant Cell 2:603–618
Gordon-Kamm W, Baszczynski C, Bruce W, Tomes D (1999) Transgenic Cereals- Zea mays (maize). In: Vasil I (eds) Molecular improvement of cereal crops. Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp 189–253
IshidaY, Saito H, Ohta S, Hiei Y, Komari T, Kumashiro T (1996) High efficiency transformation of maize (Zea mays L.) mediatd by Agrobacterium tumefaciens. Nat Biotechnol 14:745–750
Koncz C, Schell J (1986) The promoter of TL-DNA gene 5 controls the tissue-specific expression of chimaeric genes carried by a novel type of Agrobacterium binary vector. Mol Gen Gen 204:383–396
Landi P, Chiappetta L, Salvi S, Frascaroli E, Lucchese C, Tuberosa R (2002) Responses and alleleic frequency changes associated with recurrent selection for plant regeneration from callus cultures in maize. Maydica 47:21–32
Lowe B, Chomet P (2004) Methods and compositions for production of maize lines with increased transformability. US 2004/0016030
Lupotto E, Reali A, Passera S, Chan M-T (1999) Maize elite inbred lines are susceptible to Agrobacterium tumefaciens- mediated transformation. Maydica 44:211–218
Lupotto E, Conti E, Reali A, Lanzanova C, Baldoni E, Allegri L (2004) Improving in vitro culture and regeneration conditions for Agrobacterium-mediated maize transformation. Maydica 49:21–29
Rosati C, Landi P, Tuberosa R (1994) Recurrent selection for regeneration capacity from immature embryos-derived callus in maize. Crop Sci 34:343–347
Rout J, Armstrong C (2001) A novel Agrobacterium-mediated plant transformation method. Intl Pat Appl Publ No. WO 01/09302 A2
Shure M, Wessler S, Fedoroff N (1983) Molecular identification and isolation of the Wazy locus in maize. Cell 35:225–233
Snedecor GW, Cochran WG (1989) Statistical methods. 8th edn. Section 13.11 Iowa State University Press, Ames
Walters D, Vetsch C, Potts D, Lundquist R (1992) Transformation and inheritance of a hygromycin phosphotransferase gene in maize plants. Plant Mol Biol 18:189–200
Zhao Z, Gu W, Cai T, Tagliani L, Hondred D, Bond D, Schroeder S, Rudert M, Pierce D (2001) High throughput genetic transformation mediated by Agrobacterium tumefaciens. Mol Breed 8:323–333
Germplasm is available from ATCC Accession No. PTA-5182 and PTA-5183
Acknowledgements
Many people have contributed to this research publication. The authors would like to acknowledge the Corn Transformation group in Mystic, CT, and the Molecular Marker group in Ankeny, IA. The authors would also like to thank Shihshieh Huang, Phillip Miller, and Bob Bensen for their critical reading of the manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lowe, B.A., Way, M.M., Kumpf, J.M. et al. Marker assisted breeding for transformability in maize. Mol Breeding 18, 229–239 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11032-006-9031-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11032-006-9031-4