Skip to main content
Log in

The relationship between self-reported animal fear and ERP modulation: Evidence for enhanced processing and fear of harmless invertebrates in snake- and spider-fearful individuals

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Motivation and Emotion Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The present study used ERPs to compare processing of fear-relevant (FR) animals (snakes and spiders) and non-fear-relevant (NFR) animals similar in appearance (worms and beetles). EEG was recorded from 18 undergraduate participants (10 females) as they completed two animal-viewing tasks that required simple categorization decisions. Participants were divided on a post hoc basis into low snake/spider fear and high snake/spider fear groups. Overall, FR animals were rated higher on fear and elicited a larger LPC. However, individual differences qualified these effects. Participants in the low fear group showed clear differentiation between FR and NFR animals on subjective ratings of fear and LPC modulation. In contrast, participants in the high fear group did not show such differentiation between FR and NFR animals. These findings suggest that the salience of feared-FR animals may generalize on both a behavioural and electro-cortical level to other animals of similar appearance but of a non-harmful nature.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Carretié, L., Hinjosa, J. A., López-Martín, S., Albert, J., Tapia, M., & Pozo, M. A. (2009). Danger is worse when it moves: Neural and behavioral indices of enhanced attentional capture by dynamic threatening stimuli. Neuropsychologia, 47, 364–369.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Davey, G. C. L. (1992). Characteristics of individuals with fear of spiders. Anxiety Research, 4, 299–314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Esteves, F., Dimberg, U., & Ohman, A. (1994). Automatically elicited fear: Conditioned skin conductance responses to masked facial expressions. Cognition and Emotion, 8, 393–413.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flykt, A., Esteves, F., & Ohman, A. (2007). Skin conductance responses to masked conditioned stimuli: Phylogenetic/ontogenetic factors versus direction of threat? Biological Psychology, 74, 328–336.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Forster, K., & Forster, J. (2003). DMDX: A windows display program with millisecond accuracy. Behaviour Research Methods Instruments and Computers, 35(1), 116–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gerdes, A. B. M., Uhl, G., & Alpers, G. W. (2009). Spiders are special: Fear and disgust evoked by pictures of arthropods. Evolution and Human Behavior, 30, 66–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graham, F. K., & Hackley, S. A. (1991). Passive and active attention to input. In J. R. Jennings & M. G. H. Coles (Eds.), Handbook of cognitive psychophysiology (pp. 251–356). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hugdahl, K., & Öhman, A. (1977). Effects of instruction on acquisition and extinction of electrodermal responses to fear-relevant stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 3, 608–618.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobi, F., Wittchen, H.-U., Hölting, C., Höfler, M., Pfister, H., Müller, N., et al. (2004). Prevalence, co-morbidity and correlates of mental disorders in the general population: Results from the German Healthier Interview and Examination Survey (GHS). Psychological Medicine, 34, 597–611.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jasper, H. H. (1958). Recent advances in our understanding of ascending activities of the reticular system. In H. H. Jasper, L. D. Proctor, R. S. Knighton, W. C. Noshay, & R. T. Costello (Eds.), Reticular formation of the brain (pp. 319–331). Oxford, UK: Little, Brown.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klorman, R., Weerts, T. C., Hastings, J. E., Melamed, B. G., & Lang, P. J. (1974). Psychometric description of some specific fear questionnaires. Behavior Therapy, 5, 401–409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kolassa, I.-T., Buchmann, A., Lauche, R., Kolassa, S., Partchev, I., Miltner, W. H. R., et al. (2007). Spider phobics more easily see a spider in morphed schematic pictures. Behavioral and Brain Functions, 3, 59.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kolassa, I.-T., Musial, F., Kolassa, S., & Miltner, W. H. R. (2006). Event-related potentials when identifying or color-naming threatening schematic stimuli in spider phobic and non-phobic individuals. BMC Psychiatry, 6, 38.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kolassa, I.-T., Musial, F., Mohr, A., Trippe, R. H., & Miltner, W. H. R. (2005). Electrophysiological correlates of threat processing in spider phobics. Psychophysiology, 42, 20–530.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lipp, O. V. (2006). Of snakes and flowers: Does preferential detection of pictures of fear-relevant animals in visual search reflect on fear-relevance? Emotion, 6(2), 296–308.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lipp, O. V., & Derakshan, N. (2005). Attentional bias to pictures of fear-relevant animals in a dot probe task. Emotion, 5(3), 365–369.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lipp, O. V., & Edwards, M. S. (2002). Effect of instructed extinction on verbal and autonomic indices of Pavlovian learning with fear-relevant and fear-irrelevant conditional stimuli. Journal of Psychophysiology, 16, 176–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lipp, O. V., & Waters, A. M. (2007). When danger lurks in the background: Attentional capture by animal fear-relevant distractors is specific and selectively enhanced by animal fear. Emotion, 7(1), 192–200.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Miltner, W. H. R., Trippe, R. H., Krieschel, S., Gutberlet, I., Hecht, H., & Weiss, T. (2005). Event-related brain potentials and affective responses to threat in spider/snake-phobic and non-phobic subjects. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 57, 43–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mühlberger, A., Wiedemann, G., Herrmann, M. J., & Pauli, P. (2006). Phylo- and ontogenetic fears and the expectation of danger: Differences between spider- and flight-phobic subjects in cognitive and physiological responses to disorder-specific stimuli. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 115, 580–589.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Öhman, A., Eriksson, A., & Olofsson, C. (1975a). One-trial learning and superior resistance to extinction of autonomic responses conditioned to potentially phobic stimuli. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 88, 619–627.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Öhman, A., Erixon, G., & Lofberg, I. (1975b). Phobias and preparedness: Phobic versus neutral pictures as conditioned stimuli for human autonomic responses. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 84, 41–45.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Öhman, A., Flykt, A., & Esteves, F. (2001). Emotion drives attention: Detecting the snake in the grass. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 130, 466–478.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Öhman, A., Fredrickson, M., Hugdahl, K., & Rimmö, P. A. (1976). The premise of equipotentiality in human classical conditioning: Conditioned electrodermal responses to potentially phobic stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 105, 131–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Öhman, A., & Mineka, S. (2001). Fears, phobias, and preparedness: toward an evolved module of fear and fear learning. Psychological Review, 108, 483–522.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Öhman, A., & Soares, J. J. F. (1994). “Unconscious anxiety”: Phobic responses to masked stimuli. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 103, 231–240.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Oldfield, R. C. (1971). The assessment and analysis of handedness: The Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia, 9(1), 97–113.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Purkis, H. M., & Lipp, O. V. (2009). Are snakes and spiders special? Acquisition of negative valence and modified attentional processing by non-fear-relevant animal stimuli. Cognition and Emotion, 23(3), 430–452.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schienle, A., Schäfer, A., & Naumann, E. (2008). Event-related brain potentials of spider phobics to disorder-relevant, generally disgust- and fear-inducing pictures. Journal of Psychophysiology, 22, 5–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schupp, H. T., Cuthbert, B. N., Bradley, M. M., & Lang, P. J. (2000). Affective picture processing: The late positive potential is modulated by motivational relevance. Psychophysiology, 37, 257–261.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schupp, H. T., Junghöfer, M., Weike, A. I., & Hamm, A. O. (2004). The selective processing of briefly presented affective pictures: An ERP analysis. Psychophysiology, 41, 441–449.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Seligman, M. E. P. (1970). On the generality of the laws of learning. Psychological Review, 77, 406–418.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seligman, M. E. P. (1971). Phobias and preparedness. Behavior Therapy, 2, 307–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tomarken, A. J., Mineka, S., & Cook, M. (1989). Fear-relevant selective associations and covariation bias. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 98, 381–394.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Grant DP0770844 from the Australian Research Council supported this work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kimberley M. Mallan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mallan, K.M., Lipp, O.V. The relationship between self-reported animal fear and ERP modulation: Evidence for enhanced processing and fear of harmless invertebrates in snake- and spider-fearful individuals. Motiv Emot 35, 474–483 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-011-9218-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-011-9218-9

Keywords

Navigation