Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

In silico evaluation, molecular docking and QSAR analysis of quinazoline-based EGFR-T790M inhibitors

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Molecular Diversity Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Mutated epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR-T790M) inhibitors hold promise as new agents against cancer. Molecular docking and QSAR analysis were performed based on a series of fifty-three quinazoline derivatives to elucidate key structural and physicochemical properties affecting inhibitory activity. Molecular docking analysis identified the true conformations of ligands in the receptor’s active pocket. The structural features of the ligands, expressed as molecular descriptors, were derived from the obtained docked conformations. Non-linear and spline QSAR models were developed through novel genetic algorithm and artificial neural network (GA-ANN) and multivariate adaptive regression spline techniques, respectively. The former technique was employed to consider non-linear relation between molecular descriptors and inhibitory activity of quinazoline derivatives. The later technique was also used to describe the non-linearity using basis functions and sub-region equations for each descriptor. Our QSAR model gave a high predictive performance \((R_{\mathrm{p}}^{2}=0.881, Q_{\mathrm{LOO}}^{2}=0.923, R^{2}_{\mathrm{LSO}}=0.828\) and \(r_{\mathrm{m}}^{2}=0.772\)) using diverse validation techniques. Eight new compounds were designed using our QSAR model as potent EGFR-T790M inhibitors. Overall, the proposed in silico strategy based on docked derived descriptor and non-linear descriptor subset selection may help design novel quinazoline derivatives with improved EGFR-T790M inhibitory activity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Wang C, Gao H, Dong J, Wang F, Li P, Zhang J (2014) Insight into the medicinal chemistry of EGFR and HER-2 inhibitors. Curr Med Chem 21:1336–1350. doi:10.2174/0929867320666131119124646

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Chaft JE, Oxnard GR, Sima CS, Kris MG, Miller VA, Riely GJ (2011) Disease flare after tyrosine kinase inhibitor discontinuation in patients with EGFR-mutant lung cancer and acquired resistance to erlotinib or gefitinib: implications for clinical trial design. Clin Cancer Res 17:6298–6303. doi:10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-11-1468

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Suda K, Onozato R, Yatabe Y, Mitsudomi T (2009) EGFR T790M mutation: a double role in lung cancer cell survival? J Thorac Oncol 4:1–4. doi:10.1097/JTO.0b013e3181913c9f

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Lacouture ME (2006) Mechanisms of cutaneous toxicities to EGFR inhibitors. Nat Rev Cancer 6:803–812. doi:10.1038/nrc1970

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Choong NW, Dietrich S, Seiwert TY, Tretiakova MS, Nallasura V, Davies GC, Lipkowitz S, Husain AN, Salgia R, Ma PC (2006) Gefitinib response of erlotinib-refractory lung cancer involving meninges role of EGFR mutation. Nat Clin Pract Oncol 3:50–57. doi:10.1038/ncponc0400

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Zhang L, Yang Y, Zhou H, Zheng Q, Li Y, Zheng S, Zhao S, Chen D, Fan C (2015) Structure-activity study of quinazoline derivatives leading to the discovery of potent EGFR-T790M inhibitors. Eur J Med Chem 102:445–463. doi:10.1016/j.ejmech.2015.08.026

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Muratov EN, Varlamova EV, Artemenko AG, Polishchuk PG, Kuz’min VE (2012) Existing and developing approaches for QSAR analysis of mixtures. Mol Inform 31:202–221. doi:10.1002/minf.201100129

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Kovalishyn V, Poda G (2015) Efficient variable selection batch pruning algorithm for artificial neural networks. Chemom Intell Lab Syst 149:10–16. doi:10.1016/j.chemolab.2015.10.005

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Kooperberg C (2006) Multivariate adaptive regression splines, in encyclopedia of environmetrics. Wiley, Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  10. Heinzerling L, Klein R, Rarey M (2012) Fast force field-based optimization of protein-ligand complexes with graphics processor. J Comput Chem 33:2554–2565. doi:10.1002/jcc.23094

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. VCCLAB, Virtual Computational Chemistry Laboratory, Milan. http://www.vcclab.org/lab/edragon/

  12. Todeschini R, Consonni V, Mannhold R, Kubinyi H, Folkers G (2009) Molecular descriptors for chemoinformatics, vol 41. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  13. Asadollahi-Baboli M, Mani-Varnosfaderani A (2015) Therapeutic index modeling and predictive QSAR of novel thiazolidin-4-one analogs against \(Toxoplasma\,gondii\). Eur J Pharm Sci 70:117–124. doi:10.1016/j.ejps.2015.01.014

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Jalali-Heravi M, Asadollahi-Baboli M (2008) QSAR analysis of platelet-derived growth inhibitors using GA-ANN and shuffling crossvalidation. QSAR Comb Sci 27:750–757. doi:10.1002/qsar.200710138

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Yamashita N, Fukushima M (2001) On the rate of convergence of the Levenberg-Marquardt Method. In: Alefeld G, Chen X (eds) Topics in numerical analysis. Springer, Vienna, pp 239–249

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  16. Friedman JH (1991) Multivariate adaptive regression splines. Ann Stat 19:1–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. MATLAB 11.1. The Mathworks, Inc., Natick. http://www.mathworks.com/

  18. Von Lilienfeld OA, Ramakrishnan R, Rupp M, Knoll A (2015) Fourier series of atomic radial distribution functions: a molecular fingerprint for machine learning models of quantum chemical properties. Int J Quantum Chem 115:1084–1093. doi:10.1002/qua.24912

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Todeschini R, Gramatica P (1998) New 3D molecular descriptors: the WHIM theory and QSAR applications. In: Kubinyi H, Folkers G, Martin YC (eds) 3D QSAR in drug design. Springer, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  20. Devinyak O, Havrylyuk D, Lesyk R (2014) 3D-MoRSE descriptors explained. J Mol Graph Modell 54:194–203. doi:10.1016/j.jmgm.2014.10.006

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Saíz-Urra L, Pérez González M, Teijeira M (2007) 2D-autocorrelation descriptors for predicting cytotoxicity of naphthoquinone ester derivatives against oral human epidermoid carcinoma. Biorg Med Chem 15:3565–3571. doi:10.1016/j.bmc.2007.02.032

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Gramatica P (2014) External Evaluation of QSAR Models, in Addition to Cross-Validation: Verification of Predictive Capability on Totally New Chemicals. Mol Inform 33:311–314. doi:10.1002/minf.201400030

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Asadollahi-Baboli M (2012) Quantitative structure-activity relationship analysis of human neutrophil elastase inhibitors using shuffling classification and regression trees and adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference systems. SAR & QSAR Environ Res 23:505–520. doi:10.1080/1062936X.2012.696552

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Sagrado S, Cronin MTD (2008) Application of the modelling power approach to variable subset selection for GA-PLS QSAR models. Anal Chim Acta 609:169–174. doi:10.1016/j.aca.2008.01.013

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Roy K, Kar S, Ambure P (2015) On a simple approach for determining applicability domain of QSAR models. Chemom Intell Lab Syst 145:22–29. doi:10.1016/j.chemolab.2015.04.013

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. Asadollahi-Baboli.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The author declares that there are no conflicts of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Asadollahi-Baboli, M. In silico evaluation, molecular docking and QSAR analysis of quinazoline-based EGFR-T790M inhibitors. Mol Divers 20, 729–739 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11030-016-9672-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11030-016-9672-0

Keywords

Navigation