Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Is CO2 flux from oil palm plantations on peatland controlled by soil moisture and/or soil and air temperatures?

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Measurements of carbon dioxide (CO2) flux at the soil surface of oil palm (Elaeis guineensis Jacq.) plantations on peatlands typically exhibit considerable temporal and spatial variation, which challenges the derivation of emission factors required in land use discussions. We tested 20 cm surface soil moisture content, and the diurnal patterns in soil and air temperatures as CO2 flux controls during an annual measurement schedule in a 15-year-old oil palm plantation in Jambi Province, Sumatra, Indonesia. A total of 480 CO2 flux measurements were obtained using an Infrared Gas Analyser (IRGA) at six different time intervals each day. Samples were recorded at 20 observation points distributed along four transects located 15, 42, 50, 70, and 84 m from the edge of the drainage canal. Results showed CO2 flux exhibited no relationship to soil and air temperature, however values tended to increase with volumetric soil moisture content; the highest annual flux of 55 Mg ha−1 yr−1 was observed at mid-day, when air temperature was highest, and lowest at dawn when soil and air temperatures were lowest. CO2 flux decreased consistent with distance from the drainage canal, suggesting a higher flux with a deeper water table. This result indicates a shallow water table must be maintained. The annual mean CO2 flux of 46 ± 30 Mg CO2 ha−1 yr−1 was comparable to other studies, and can be set as a baseline emissions factor for areas with similar land use and peat characteristics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aerts R, Ludwig F (1997) Water-table changes and nutritional status affect trace gas emissions from laboratory columns of peatland soils. Soil Biol Biochem 29:1691–1698

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Agus F, Handayani E, van Noordwijk M et al. (2010) Root respiration interferes with peat CO2 emission measurement. 19th World Congress of Soil Science, Soil Solutions for a Changing World. 1–6 August 2010, Brisbane, Australia

  • Agus F, Hairiah K, Mulyani A (2011) Measuring carbon stock in peat soil: practical guidelines. World agroforestry Centre-ICRAF Southeast Asia and Indonesian Centre for Agricultural Land Resources Research and Development, Bogor

    Google Scholar 

  • Berglund Ö, Berglund K, Klemedtsson L (2010) A lysimeter study on the effect of temperature on CO2 emission from cultivated peat soils. Geoderma 154:211–218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biasi C, Lind SE, Pekkarinen NM et al (2008) Direct experimental evidence for the contribution of lime to CO2 release from managed peat soil. Soil Biol Biochem 40:2660–2669

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blodau C, Moore TR (2002) Micro-scale CO2 and CH4 dynamics in a peat soil during a water fluctuation and sulfate pulse. Soil Biol Biochem 35:535–547

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chimner RA, Cooper DJ (2003) Influence of water table levels on CO2 emissions in a Colorado subalpine fen: an in situ microcosm study. Soil Biol Biochem 35:345–351

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clymo RS (1983) Peat. In: Gore AJP (ed) Ecosystems of the world, 4A. Mires: swamp, bog, fen and moor, generall studies. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 159–224

    Google Scholar 

  • Comeau L-P, Hergoualc’h K, Smith JU et al (2013) Conversion of intact peat swamp forest to oil palm plantation: effects on soil CO2 fluxes in Jambi, Sumatra. Working paper 110. CIFOR, Bogor

    Google Scholar 

  • Couwenberg J, Dommain R, Joosten H (2010) Greenhouse gas fluxes from tropical peat soils in south-east Asia. Glob Chang Biol 16:1715–1732

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dirks BOM, Hensen A, Goudriaan J (2000) Effect of drainage on CO2 exchange patterns in an intensively managed peat pasture. Clim Res 14:57–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gardner WH (1986) Water content. In: Klute A (ed) Methods of soil analysis. Part 1, 2nd ed. Agronomy 9:493–544. ASA, SSSA, Madison, WI

  • Gunarso P, Hartoyo ME, Agus F et al. (2013) Oil palm and land use change in Indonesia, Malaysia and Papua New Guinea. Roundtable on sustainable palm oil. Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia (In Press)

  • Hooijer A, Page S, Jauhiainen J et al (2012) Subsidence and carbon loss in drained tropical peatlands: reducing uncertainty and implications for CO2 emission reduction options. Biogeosciences 9:1053–1071

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Houghton RA (2003) Revised estimates of the annual net flux of carbon to the atmosphere from changes in land use and land management 1850–2000. Tellus 55B(2):378–390

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ICALRD (Indonesian Centre for Agricultural Land Resources Research and Development) (2011) Penelitian dan pengembangan teknologi pengelolaan lahan gambut berkelanjutan untuk meningkatkan sequestrasi karbon dan mitigasi gas rumah kaca. Indonesia Climate Change Trust Fund (ICCTF). Badan Litbang Pertanian, Bogor, Indonesia

  • Jauhainen J, Limin S, Silvennoinen H et al (2008) Carbon dioxide and methane fluxes in drained tropical peat before and after hydrological restoration. Ecology 89(12):3503–3514

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jauhiainen J, Takahashi H, Heikkinen JEP et al (2005) Carbon fluxes from a tropical peat swamp forest floor. Glob Chang Biol 11:1788–1797

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jauhiainen J, Hooijer A, Page SE (2012) Carbon dioxide emissions from an Acacia plantation on peatland in Sumatra, Indonesia. Biogeosciences 9:617–630

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kechavarzi C, Dawson Q, Bartlet M et al (2010) The role of soil moisture, temperature and nutrient amandment on CO2 fluks from agricultural peat soil microcosm. Geoderma 154:203–210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kutzbach L, Schneider J, Sachs T et al (2007) CO2 flux determination by closed-chamber methods can be seriously biased by inappropriate application of linear regression. Biogeosciences 4:1005–1025

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lim KH, Lim SS, Parish F, Suharto R (eds) (2012) RSPO manual on best management practices (BMPs) for existing oil palm cultivation on peat. RSPO, Kuala Lumpur

    Google Scholar 

  • Madsen R, Xu L, Claassen B et al (2009) Surface monitoring method for carbon capture and storage projects. Energy Procedia 1:2161–2168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maswar (2011) Kajian cadangan karbon pada lahan gambut tropika yang didrainase untuk tanaman tahunan. Ph. D Dissertation, Bogor Agricultural University, Bogor, Indonesia

  • Melling L, Goh KJ, Beauvais C et al (2007) Carbon flow and budget in a young mature oil palm agroecosystem on deep tropical peat. In: Rieley JO, Banks CJ, Radjagukguk B (eds) Proceedings of the International Symposium and Workshop on Tropical Peatland. Yogyakarta, Indonesia

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore TR, Dalva M (1993) The influence of temperature and water table position on carbon dioxide and methane emissions from laboratory columns of peatland soil. J Soil Sci 44:651–664

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murdiyarso D, Hergoualc’h K, Verchot LV (2010) Opportunities for reducing greenhouse gas emission in tropical peatlands. PNAS 107(46):19655–19660

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Page AL (ed) (1982) Methods of soil analysis. Part 2. Agronomy 9, 2nd edn. ASA and SSSA, Madison

    Google Scholar 

  • Page SE, Morrison R, Malins C et al. (2011) Review of peat surface greenhouse gas emissions from oil palm plantations. In: Southeast Asia. White paper number 15. Indirect effects of biofuel production series. International Council on Clean Transportation, Washington, D.C, USA

  • Schlesinger WH (1997) Biogeochemistry: an analysis of global change, 2nd edn. Academic, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Silvola J, Alm J, Ahlholm U et al (1996) The contribution of plant roots to CO2 fluxes from organic soils. Biol Fertil Soils 23:126–131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Statsoft Inc. (2004) STATISTICA (data analysis software system). Version 7. www.statsoft.com

  • Thomas KL, Benstead J, Davies KL et al (1996) Role of wetland plants in the diurnal control of CH4 and CO2 fluxes in peat. Soil Biol Biochem 28:17–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Updegraff K, Bridgham SD, Pastor J et al (2001) Response of CO2 and CH4 emissions from peatlands to warming and water table manipulations. Ecol Appl 11:311–326

    Google Scholar 

  • van Huissteden J, van den Bos R, Alvarez IM (2006) Modelling the effect of water-table management on CO2 and CH4 fluxes from peat soils. Neth J Geosci Geol Mijnbouw 85(1):3–18

    Google Scholar 

  • Verville JH, Hobbie SE, Champin FS III et al (1998) Respone of tundra CH4 and CO2 flux to manipulation of temperature and vegetation. Biogeochemistry 41:215–235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vien DM, Phuong NM, Jauhiainen J et al. (2010) Humification at the Vo Doi National Park, Vietnam. 19th World Congress of Soil Science, Soil Solutions for a Changing World. 1–6 August 2010, Brisbane, Australia

  • Wösten JHM, Ritzema HP (2001) Land and water management options for peatland development in Sarawak, Malaysia, Int. Peat J 11:59–66

    Google Scholar 

  • Wösten JHM, Ismail AB, Van Wijk ALM (1997) Peat subsidence and its practical implications: a case study in Malaysia. Geoderma 78:25–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yavitt J, Williams C, Wieder R (2004) Soil chemistry versus environmental controls on production of CH4 and CO2 in northern peatlands. Eur J Soil Sci 56(2):169–178

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The European Community’s Seventh Framework Programme [FP7/2007-2013] supported this research under grant agreement no. 226310 as part of the REDD-ALERT project. We thank Ms. Jenny Farmer (Aberdeen University) and Dr. Meine van Noordwijk from the World Agroforestry Centre (ICRAF) for their valuable input.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Indonesian Ministry of Agriculture, Indonesian Soil Research Institute, Jl. Tentara Pelajar No 12 A, Bogor, West Java, 16114, Indonesia

    Setiari Marwanto & Fahmuddin Agus

Authors
  1. Setiari Marwanto
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Fahmuddin Agus
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Setiari Marwanto.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Marwanto, S., Agus, F. Is CO2 flux from oil palm plantations on peatland controlled by soil moisture and/or soil and air temperatures?. Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Change 19, 809–819 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-013-9518-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-013-9518-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation