Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Authentic Self and Last Resort: International Perceptions of Psychiatric Neurosurgery

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Culture, Medicine, and Psychiatry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Psychiatric neurosurgery has resurfaced over the past two decades for the treatment of severe mental health disorders, with improved precision and safety over older interventions alongside the development of novel ones. Little is known, however, about current public opinions, expectations, hopes, and concerns over this evolution in neurotechnology, particularly given the controversial history of psychosurgery. To fill this knowledge gap, we conducted a study with eight focus groups in Vancouver and Montreal (Canada; n = 14), Berlin (Germany; n = 22), and Madrid (Spain; n = 12). Focus group texts were transcribed and analyzed using qualitative content analysis in the language local to each city, guided by the theoretical framework of pragmatic neuroethics. Findings indicate that participants across all cities hold concerns about the last resort nature of psychiatric neurosurgery and the potential impact on the authentic self of patients who undergo these procedures. The views captured serve to advance discussion on the appropriate timing for psychiatric neurosurgery, promote sound health policy for the allocation of this resource, and foster scientific literacy about advances for mental health internationally.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Albert, Paul R. (2014) Light up Your Life: Optogenetics for Depression? Journal of Psychiatry & Neuroscience : JPN 39(1): 3–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrett, Kenneth (2017) Psychiatric Neurosurgery in the 21st Century: Overview and the Growth of Deep Brain Stimulation. BJPsych Bulletin 41(5):281–286.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, Emily, and Eric Racine 2012 Ethical Guidance for the Use of Deep Brain Stimulation in Psychiatric Trials and Emerging Uses: Review and Reflections. In Deep Brain Stimulation: A New Frontier in Psychiatry. Damiaan Denys, Matthijs Feenstra, and Rick Schuurman, eds., pp. 273–288. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-30991-5_25, accessed May 6, 2019.

  • Bosanac, Peter, Bridget Elizabeth Hamilton, James Lucak, and David Castle (2018) Identity Challenges and “Burden of Normality” after DBS for Severe OCD: A Narrative Case Study. BMC Psychiatry 18(1): 186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cabrera, Laura Y., Caitlin Courchesne, Zelma H. T. Kiss, and Judy Illes (2020) Clinical Perspectives on Psychiatric Neurosurgery. Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery, 97(5-6), 391–398.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cabrera, Laura Y., Merlin Bittlinger, Hayami Lou, Sabine Müller, and Judy Illes (2018a) The Re-Emergence of Psychiatric Neurosurgery: Insights from a Cross-National Study of Newspaper and Magazine Coverage. Acta Neurochirurgica 160(3): 625–635.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cabrera, Laura Y., Merlin Bittlinger, Hayami Lou, Sabine Müller, and Judy Illes (2018b) Reader Comments to Media Reports on Psychiatric Neurosurgery: Past History Casts Shadows on the Future. Acta Neurochirurgica 160(12): 2501–2507.

    Google Scholar 

  • Canadian Mental Health Association 2018 Mental Health in the Balance: Ending the Health Care Disparity in Canada. https://cmha.ca/ending-health-care-disparity-canada. Accessed 24 Apr 2020.

  • Carter, Adrian, Emily Bell, Eric Racine, and Wayne Hall (2011) Ethical Issues Raised by Proposals to Treat Addiction Using Deep Brain Stimulation. Neuroethics 4(2): 129–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cleary, Daniel R., Alp Ozpinar, Ahmed M. Raslan, and Andrew L. Ko (2015) Deep Brain Stimulation for Psychiatric Disorders: Where We Are Now. Neurosurgical Focus 38(6): E2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corrigan, Patrick W., Benjamin G. Druss, and Deborah A. Perlick (2014) The Impact of Mental Illness Stigma on Seeking and Participating in Mental Health Care. Psychological Science in the Public Interest 15(2), 37–70

    Google Scholar 

  • Haan, Sanneke de, Erik Rietveld, Martin Stokhof, and Damiaan Denys (2015) Effects of Deep Brain Stimulation on the Lived Experience of Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder Patients: In-Depth Interviews with 18 Patients. PLOS ONE 10(8): e0135524.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haan, Sanneke de, Erik Rietveld, Martin Stokhof, and Damiaan Denys (2017) Becoming More Oneself? Changes in Personality Following DBS Treatment for Psychiatric Disorders: Experiences of OCD Patients and General Considerations. PLOS ONE 12(4): e0175748.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deisseroth, Karl, Amit Etkin, and Robert C. Malenka (2015) Optogenetics and the Circuit Dynamics of Psychiatric Disease. JAMA 313(20): 2019–2020.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunn, Laura B, Paul E Holtzheimer, Jinger G Hoop, et al. (2011) Ethical Issues in Deep Brain Stimulation Research for Treatment-Resistant Depression: Focus on Risk and Consent. AJOB Neuroscience 2(1): 29–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • El-Hai, Jack (2005) The Lobotomist: A Maverick Medical Genius and His Tragic Quest to Rid the World of Mental Illness. Hoboken, NJ, US: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fins, Joseph J., Mayberg Helen S, Nuttin Bart, Kubu Cynthia S, Galert Thorsten, Sturm Volker Stoppenbrink Katja, Merkel Reinhard, and Schlaepfer Thomas E 2011 Misuse of the FDA’s Humanitarian Device Exemption in Deep Brain Stimulation for Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder. Health Affairs 30(2):302–311.

  • Gilbert, Frederic, Mark Cook, Terence O’Brien, and Judy Illes (2017) Embodiment and Estrangement: Results from First-in-Human “Intelligent BCI” Trial. Science and Engineering Ethics 25(1): 83-96

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, Frederic (2015) Self-Estrangement & Deep Brain Stimulation: Ethical Issues Related to Forced Explantation. Neuroethics 8(2): 107–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, Frederic (2018) Deep Brain Stimulation: Inducing Self-Estrangement. Neuroethics 11(2): 157–165.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glannon, Walter (2010) Consent to Deep Brain Stimulation for Neurological and Psychiatric Disorders. The Journal of Clinical Ethics 21(2): 104–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goering, Sara (2015) Stimulating Autonomy: DBS and the Prospect of Choosing to Control Ourselves Through Stimulation. AJOB Neuroscience 6(4): 1–3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Golenkov, Andrei, Gabor S. Ungvari, and Gábor Gazdag (2012) Public Attitudes towards Electroconvulsive Therapy in the Chuvash Republic. The International Journal of Social Psychiatry 58(3): 289–294.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hsieh, Hsiu-Fang, and Sarah E. Shannon (2005) Three Approaches to Qualitative Content Analysis. Qualitative Health Research 15(9): 1277–1288.

    Google Scholar 

  • Illes, Judy, and Hayami Lou (2019) A Cross-Cultural Neuroethics View on the Language of Disability. AJOB Neuroscience 10(2): 75–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobsen, Torsten B. (2012) Involuntary Treatment in Europe: Different Countries, Different Practices. Current Opinion in Psychiatry 25(4): 307–310.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johansson, Veronica, Martin Garwicz, Martin Kanje, et al. (2011) Authenticity, Depression, and Deep Brain Stimulation. Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience 5: 21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, Jenell M. (2014) American Lobotomy: A Rhetorical History Corporealities: Discourses of Disability. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, R. Burke, and Anthony J. Onwuegbuzie (2004) Mixed Methods Research: A Research Paradigm Whose Time Has Come. Educational Researcher 33(7): 14–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kitzinger, Jenny (1995) Qualitative Research: Introducing Focus Groups. BMJ 311(7000): 299–302.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, Eran, Sara Goering, Josh Gagne, et al. (2016) Brain-Computer Interface-Based Control of Closed-Loop Brain Stimulation: Attitudes and Ethical Considerations. Brain-Computer Interfaces 3(3): 140–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kraemer, Felicitas (2013a) Me, Myself and My Brain Implant: Deep Brain Stimulation Raises Questions of Personal Authenticity and Alienation. Neuroethics 6(3): 483–497.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kraemer, Felicitas (2013b) Authenticity or Autonomy? When Deep Brain Stimulation Causes a Dilemma. Journal of Medical Ethics 39(12): 757–760.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krippendorff, Klaus (2004) Reliability in Content Analysis. Human Communication Research 30(3): 411–433.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kubu, Cynthia S, Thomas Frazier, Scott E Cooper, et al. (2018) Patients’ Shifting Goals for Deep Brain Stimulation and Informed Consent. Neurology 91(5): e472–e478.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, Jens, Wolfgang Gaebel, Joachim Klosterkoetter, and Christiane Woopen (2009) Deep Brain Stimulation as a New Therapeutic Approach in Therapy-Resistant Mental Disorders: Ethical Aspects of Investigational Treatment. European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience 259(2): 135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lauber, Christoph, Carlos Nordt, Luis Falcato, and Wulf Rössler (2005) Can a Seizure Help? The Public’s Attitude toward Electroconvulsive Therapy. Psychiatry Research 134(2): 205–209.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lenton, Alison P., Letitia Slabu, Martin Bruder, and Constantine Sedikides 2014 Identifying Differences in the Experience of (in)Authenticity: A Latent Class Analysis Approach. Frontiers in Psychology 5. Frontiers. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00770/full, accessed April 27, 2020.

  • Lévêque, Marc, Romain Carron, and Jean Régis (2013) Radiosurgery for the Treatment of Psychiatric Disorders: A Review. World Neurosurgery 80(3–4): 32

    Google Scholar 

  • Leykin, Yan, Paul P. Christopher, Paul E. Holtzheimer, et al. (2011) Participants’ Perceptions of Deep Brain Stimulation Research for Treatment-Resistant Depression: Risks, Benefits, and Therapeutic Misconception. AJOB Primary Research 2(4): 33–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipsman, Nir, Mark Bernstein, and Andres M Lozano (2010) Criteria for the Ethical Conduct of Psychiatric Neurosurgery Clinical Trials. Neurosurgical Focus 29(2): E9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lombera, Sofia, and Judy Illes (2009) The International Dimensions of Neuroethics. Developing World Bioethics 9(2): 57–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lozano, Andres M., Nir Lipsman, Hagai Bergman, et al. (2019) Deep Brain Stimulation: Current Challenges and Future Directions. Nature Reviews Neurology 15(3): 148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luigjes, Judy, Bart P. de Kwaasteniet, Pelle P. de Koning, et al. (2013) Surgery for Psychiatric Disorders. World Neurosurgery 80(3–4): 17-28

    Google Scholar 

  • Markus, Hazel R, and Shinobu Kitayama (1991) Culture and the Self: Implications for Cognition, Emotion, and Motivation. Psychological Review 98(2), 224

    Google Scholar 

  • Meng, Ying, Suganth Suppiah, Karim Mithani, et al. 2017 Current and Emerging Brain Applications of MR-Guided Focused Ultrasound. Journal of Therapeutic Ultrasound 5(26).

  • Mian, Matthew K, Michael Campos, Sameer A Sheth, and Emad N Eskandar (2010) Deep Brain Stimulation for Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder: Past, Present, and Future. Neurosurgical Focus 29(2): E10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Müller, Sabine (2017) Ethical Challenges of Modern Psychiatric Neurosurgery. In: Illes J (ed) Neuroethics: Anticipating the Future, pp. 235–263. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nudeshima, Jiro, and Takaomi Taira (2017) A Brief Note on the History of Psychosurgery in Japan. Neurosurgical Focus 43(3): E13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nuttin, Bart, Jan Gybels, Paul Cosyns, et al. (2002) Deep Brain Stimulation for Psychiatric Disorders. Neurosurgery 51(2): 519–519.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pressman, Jack D. (1998) Last Resort: Psychosurgery and the Limits of Medicine Last Resort: Psychosurgery and the Limits of Medicine. New York, NY, US: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raboch, Jirí, Lucie Kalisová, Alexander Nawka, et al. (2010) Use of Coercive Measures during Involuntary Hospitalization: Findings from Ten European Countries. Psychiatric Services (Washington, DC) 61(10): 1012–1017.

    Google Scholar 

  • Racine, Eric (2008) Interdisciplinary Approaches for a Pragmatic Neuroethics. The American Journal of Bioethics 8(1): 52–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Racine, Eric (2010) Pragmatic Neuroethics: Improving Treatment and Understanding of the Mind-Brain. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robillard, Julie, Emanuel Cabral, and Tanya L. Feng (2018) Online Health Information-Seeking: The Case of Deep Brain Stimulation in Social Media. Care Weekly 2018(2): 14–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salize, Hans Joachim, Wulf Rössler, and Thomas Becker (2007) Mental Health Care in Germany: Current State and Trends. European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience 257(2): 92–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salvador-Carulla, L., M. Garrido, D. McDaid, and J. M. Haro (2006) Financing Mental Health Care in Spain: Context and Critical Issues. The European Journal of Psychiatry 20(1): 29–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sample, Matthew, Sebastian Sattler, Stefanie Blain-Moraes, David Rodríguez-Arias, and Eric Racine (2019) Do Publics Share Experts’ Concerns about Brain–Computer Interfaces? A Trinational Survey on the Ethics of Neural Technology. Science, Technology, & Human Values. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243919879220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sankary, Lauren, and Ford Paul 2019 Ongoing Consent in Situations of Cognitive Vulnerability: Special Considerations in Implanted Neural Device Trials. In M. A. Cascio and E. Racine (eds.) Research Involving Participants with Cognitive Disability and Differences: Ethics, Autonomy, Inclusion, and Innovation, 3–14. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press.

  • Slabu, Letitia, Alison P. Lenton, Constantine Sedikides, and Martin Bruder (2014) Trait and State Authenticity Across Cultures. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 45(9). 1347–1373.

    Google Scholar 

  • Souery, Daniel, Pierre Oswald, Isabelle Massat, et al. (2007) Clinical Factors Associated with Treatment Resistance in Major Depressive Disorder: Results from a European Multicenter Study. The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry 68(7): 1062–1070.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steel, Zachary, Claire Marnane, Changiz Iranpour, et al. (2014) The Global Prevalence of Common Mental Disorders: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis 1980-2013. International Journal of Epidemiology 43(2): 476–493.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steinert, Tilman, Peter Lepping, Renate Bernhardsgrütter, et al. (2010) Incidence of Seclusion and Restraint in Psychiatric Hospitals: A Literature Review and Survey of International Trends. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology 45(9): 889–897.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan, Laura Specker (2019) Insight and the No-Self in Deep Brain Stimulation. Bioethics 33(4): 487–494.

    Google Scholar 

  • Synofzik, Matthis, and Thomas E. Schlaepfer (2011) Electrodes in the Brain—Ethical Criteria for Research and Treatment with Deep Brain Stimulation for Neuropsychiatric Disorders. Brain Stimulation 4(1): 7–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teh, Serene P. C., Edward Helmes, and Deidre G. Drake (2007) A Western Australian Survey on Public Attitudes toward and Knowledge of Electroconvulsive Therapy. The International Journal of Social Psychiatry 53(3): 247–273.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trivedi, Madhukar H., A. John Rush, Stephen R. Wisniewski, et al. (2006) Evaluation of Outcomes with Citalopram for Depression Using Measurement-Based Care in STAR*D: Implications for Clinical Practice. The American Journal of Psychiatry 163(1): 28–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Udwadia, Farhad R. and Illes, Judy. in press An Ethicolegal Analysis of Involuntary Treatment for Opioid use Disorders. Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics.

  • Valenstein, Elliot S. (1986) Great and Desperate Cures: The Rise and Decline of Psychosurgery and Other Radical Treatments for Mental Illness. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, Elizabeth Reisinger, Robin E. McGee, and Benjamin G. Druss (2015) Mortality in Mental Disorders and Global Disease Burden Implications. JAMA Psychiatry 72(4): 334–341.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whiteford, Harvey A., Louisa Degenhardt, Jürgen Rehm, et al. (2013) Global Burden of Disease Attributable to Mental and Substance Use Disorders: Findings from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. The Lancet 382(9904): 1575–1586.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiles, Nicola, Laura Thomas, Anna Abel, et al. 2014 The Prevalence of Treatment-Resistant Depression in Primary Care. In Clinical Effectiveness and Cost-effectiveness of Cognitive Behavioural Therapy as an Adjunct to Pharmacotherapy for Treatment-resistant Depression in Primary Care: The CoBalT Randomised Controlled Trial. Southampton (UK): NIHR Journals Library. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK261988/. Accessed 1 Apr 2019.

  • Wilhelmy, Saskia, Vasilija Rolfes, Michael Grozinger, et al. (2018) Knowledge and Attitudes on Electroconvulsive Therapy in Germany: A Web Based Survey. Psychiatry Research 262: 407–412.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woopen, Christiane 2012 Chapter Fourteen - Ethical Aspects of Neuromodulation. In International Review of Neurobiology. Clement Hamani and Elena Moro, eds. Pp. 315–332. Emerging Horizons in Neuromodulation. Academic Press. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B9780124047068000164. Accessed 9 Apr 2019.

Download references

Funding

This study was funded by ERA-NET NEURON Team Grant: Ethical, Legal and Social Issues (ELSI) #ERN-144241 (JI) and the Federal Ministry of Education and Research of Germany (01GP1621A) (SM and MB). JI is the Canada Research Chair in Neuroethics. ER receives a career award from the Fonds de recherche du Québec – Santé (FRQ-S).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

LC led the project. CC participated in data collection and led data analysis for Canada; LC participated in data collection and led data analysis for Madrid. MB participated in data collection and led data analysis for Berlin. SM and RM participated in data collection for Berlin and Madrid; ER participated in data collection for Montreal. All authors contributed to the writing. JI is the study Principal and participated in the conceptualization of the work, data analysis, and writing.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to L. Y. Cabrera or J. Illes.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

L. Y. Cabrera, C. Courchesne, M. Bittlinger, S. Müller, R. Martinez, E. Racine, and J. Illes declare that they have no conflict of interest

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cabrera, L.Y., Courchesne, C., Bittlinger, M. et al. Authentic Self and Last Resort: International Perceptions of Psychiatric Neurosurgery. Cult Med Psychiatry 45, 141–161 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11013-020-09679-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11013-020-09679-1

Keywords

Navigation