Skip to main content
Log in

Steady state shift damage localization

  • Nonlinear Dynamics, Identification and Monitoring of Structures
  • Published:
Meccanica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The accuracy of the identified modal model is the weak link in many vibration based damage localization schemes. This paper presents a localization approach that avoids identification by operating with two frequency domain subspaces, one obtained by Fourier transformation of output measurements and the other from a model of the reference state and a postulated damage distribution. The approach differs from a model updating framework in that only the damage distribution, and not the extent, enters the formulation. The method operates on the premise that the loads are time limited, have an invariant distribution in space and requires that the histories be repeatable, or that the excitation be a single history, in which case repeatability is not necessary. The time histories of the excitation are not used in the technique and therefore need not be known. It is shown that multiple damages can be considered without combinatorics if \(e \ge \kappa\) where e is the number of available actuators and \(\kappa\) is the rank of the change in the transfer matrix due to damage. The constraint on the number of measurements, m, is \(m \ge \kappa .\) The method, designated as the steady state shift damage localization (S3DL) is experimentally tested on an aluminum plate where damage is simulated by mass additions and by an edge cut.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Worden K (1997) Structural fault detection using a novelty measure. J Sound Vib 201:85–101

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Sohn H, Law KH (1997) Bayesian probabilistic approach for structural damage detection. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 26:1259–1281

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Lim TM, Kashangaki TA (1994) Structural damage detection of space truss using best achievable eigenvectors. AIAA J 32(5):1049–1057

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. Lim TW (1995) Structural damage detection using a constrained eigenstructure assignment. J Guid Control Dyn 18(3):411–418

    Article  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Choudhury R, He J (1996) Structural damage location using expanded measured frequency response data. In: Proceedings of the 14th modal analysis conference, IMAC-XIV, Society of Experimental Mechanics, Bethel, CT, pp 934–942

  6. Bernal D (2002) Load vectors for damage localization. J Eng Mech 128(1):7–14

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Bernal D (2007) Damage localization from the null space of changes in the transfer matrix. AIAA J 45:374–381

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. Bernal D (2006) Flexibility-based damage localization from stochastic realization results. J Eng Mech 132(6):651–658

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Bernal D (2010) Load vectors for damage location in systems identified from operational loads. J Eng Mech 136:31–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to D. Bernal.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bernal, D., Kunwar, A. Steady state shift damage localization. Meccanica 51, 2861–2871 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11012-016-0501-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11012-016-0501-4

Keywords

Navigation