Skip to main content
Log in

Market Viability and Martingale Measures under Partial Information

  • Published:
Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We consider a financial market model with a single risky asset whose price process evolves according to a general jump-diffusion with locally bounded coefficients and where market participants have only access to a partial information flow. For any utility function, we prove that the partial information financial market is locally viable, in the sense that the optimal portfolio problem has a solution up to a stopping time, if and only if the (normalised) marginal utility of the terminal wealth generates a partial information equivalent martingale measure (PIEMM). This equivalence result is proved in a constructive way by relying on maximum principles for stochastic control problems under partial information. We then characterize a global notion of market viability in terms of partial information local martingale deflators (PILMDs). We illustrate our results by means of a simple example.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aase K, Øksendal B, Privault N, Ubøe J (2000) White noise generalizations of the Clark-Haussmann-Ocone theorem, with application to mathematical finance. Finance Stochast 4:465–496

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Baghery F, Øksendal B (2007) A maximum principle for stochastic control with partial information. Stoch Anal Appl 25:705–717

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Barucci E (2003) Financial markets theory: equilibrium, efficiency and information. Springer, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Björk T, Davis M, Landen C (2010) Optimal investment under partial information. Math Methods Oper Res 71:371–399

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Choulli T, Deng J, Ma J (2012) The fundamental theorem of utility maximization and numéraire portfolio. Preprint, available at: arXiv:1211.4598

  • Delbaen F, Schachermayer W (1994) A general version of the fundamental theorem of asset pricing. Math Ann 300:463–520

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Delbaen F, Schachermayer W (1995) Arbitrage possibilities in Bessel processes and their relations to local martingales. Probab Theory Relat Fields 102:357–366

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Delbaen F, Schachermayer W (1998) The fundamental theorem of asset pricing for unbounded stochastic processes. Math Ann 312:215–250

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Di Nunno G, Øksendal B, Proske F (2009) Malliavin calculus for Lévy processes with applications to finance. Springer, Berlin - Heidelberg

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Elworthy KD, Li XM, Yor M (1999) The importance of strictly local martingales; applications to radial Ornstein-Uhlenbeck processes. Probab Theory Relat Fields 115:325–355

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Fontana C, Runggaldier WJ (2013) Diffusion-based models for financial markets without martingale measures. In: Biagini F, Richter A, Schlesinger H (eds) Risk measures and attitudes, EAA series. Springer, London, pp 45–81

  • Frittelli M (2004) Some remarks on arbitrage and preferences in securities market models. Math Financ 14:351–357

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Harrison JM, Kreps D (1979) Martingales and arbitrage in multiperiod securities markets. J Econ Theory 20:381–408

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • He S, Wang J, Yan J (1992) Semimartingale theory and stochastic calculus. CRC Press, Hong Kong

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Hu Y, Imkeller P, Müller M (2005) Utility maximization in incomplete markets. Ann Appl Probab 15:1691–1712

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Jacod J, Shiryaev AN (2003) Limit theorems for stochastic processes, 2nd edn. Springer, Berlin - Heidelberg

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Karatzas I, Kardaras C (2007) The numéraire portfolio in semimartingale financial models. Finance Stochast 11:447–493

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Kardaras C (2012) Market viability via absence of arbitrage of the first kind. Finance Stochast 16:651–667

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Korn R, Oertel F, Schäl M (2003) The numeraire portfolio in financial markets modeled by a multi-dimensional jump diffusion process. Decisions Econ Finan 26:153–166

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Kramkov D, Schachermayer W (1999) The asymptotic elasticity of utility functions and optimal investment in incomplete markets. Ann Appl Probab 9(3):904–950

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Kreps D (1981) Arbitrage and equilibrium in economies with infinitely many commodities. J Math Econ 8:15–35

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Lakner P (1995) Utility maximization with partial information. Stoch Process Appl 56:247–273

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Lakner P (1998) Optimal trading strategy for an investor: the case of partial information. Stoch Process Appl 76:77–97

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Loewenstein M, Willard G (2000) Local martingales, arbitrage and viability. Economic Theory 16:135–161

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Morlais MA (2009) Utility maximization in a jump market model. Stochastics 81:1–27

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Øksendal B, Sulem A (2007) Applied stochastic control of jump diffusions, 2nd edn. Springer, Berlin - Heidelberg - New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Øksendal B, Sulem A (2012) Forward-backward stochastic differential games and stochastic control under model uncertainty. J Optim Theory Appl. doi:10.1007/s10957-012-0166-7

  • Pascucci A, Runggaldier WJ (2012) Financial mathematics: theory and problems for multi-period models. Springer, Milan

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pliska S (1997) Introduction to mathematical finance. Blackwell, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Rasony M, Stettner L (2005) On utility maximization in discrete-time financial market models. Ann Appl Probab 15(2):1367–1395

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Revuz D, Yor M (1999) Continuous Martingales and Brownian motion. Springer, Berlin - Heidelberg - New York

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Runggaldier WJ (2003) Jump-diffusion models. In: Rachev ST (ed) Handbook of heavy tailed distributions in finance. Elsevier - North Holland, Amsterdam, pp 169–209

  • Schachermayer W (2001) Optimal investment in incomplete markets when wealth may become negative. Ann Appl Probab 11(3):694–734

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Schäl M (2000a) Price systems constructed by optimal dynamic portfolios. Math Methods Oper Res 51:375–397

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Schäl M (2000b) Portfolio optimization and martingale measures. Math Financ 10(2):289–303

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Stettner L (2012) Asymptotics of utility from terminal wealth for partially observed portfolios. Applicationes Math 39:445–461

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Stricker C (1977) Quasimartingales, martingales locales, semimartingales et filtration naturelle. Z Wahrscheinlichkeit 39:55–63

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Xing H (2012) On backward stochastic differential equations and strict local martingales. Stoch Process Appl 122:2265–2291

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bernt Øksendal.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fontana, C., Øksendal, B. & Sulem, A. Market Viability and Martingale Measures under Partial Information. Methodol Comput Appl Probab 17, 15–39 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11009-014-9397-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11009-014-9397-4

Keywords

AMS 2000 Subject Classifications

Navigation