Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Issues and Biases in Matching Medicaid Pregnancy Episodes to Vital Records Data: The Arkansas Experience

  • Published:
Maternal and Child Health Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objectives This study examines the extent of selection biases identified in the process of linking Medicaid claims with evidence of pregnancy to vital records. Methods Two years of Medicaid claims were scanned to identify pregnancy-related diagnoses and procedures. Information on 55,764 Medicaid recipients was provided to the Division of Health Statistics, which linked the information to vital records data on a range of identifying characteristics. Claims were then clustered by date and then into episodes of care surrounding the birth date of the infant. We identified 38,222 pregnancy episodes matched to vital records; 8,474 episodes unmatched to vital records that appeared to terminate before a delivery; and 5,278 episodes that appeared to include a delivery but did not match to vital records. The characteristics of matched episodes and unmatched episodes and the characteristics of matched episodes with and without delivery claims are compared. Results Unmatched episodes spanned fewer weeks than matched episodes, included more diagnostic indicators of elevated risk, and occurred more frequently in more impoverished populations. Among the matched records, 13% did not include claims for delivery services. These episodes occurred more frequently among Hispanic women, women delivering out of hospitals and women with preterm births and infant deaths. Conclusions The results provide evidence, as other studies have demonstrated, that matching Medicaid claims and vital records data is feasible. However, the matched analytic data set does tend to under-represent the outcomes of high-risk pregnancies. An additional source of selection bias can be avoided by using evidence of pregnancy as the Medicaid index for matching against vital records, rather than using only index cases with evidence of delivery.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Piper, J. M., Ray, W. A., & Griffin, M. R., et al. (1990). Methodological issues in evaluating expanded medicaid coverage for pregnant women. American Journal of Epidemiology, 132(3), 561–571.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Bell, R. M., Keesey, J., & Richards, T. (1994). The urge to merge: Linking vital statistics records and medicaid claims. Medical Care, 32(10), 1004–1018. doi:10.1097/00005650-199410000-00003.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Ray, W. A., Mitchel, E. F., & Piper J. M. (1997). Effects of medicaid expansions on preterm birth. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 13(4), 292–297.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Howell, E. M., Heiser, N., Cherlow, A., et al. (2000). Identifying pregnant substance abusers and studying their treatment using birth certificates, medicaid claims, and state substance abuse treatment data. Journal of Drug Issues, 20(1), 205–224.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Howell, E. M. (2001). The impact of the medicaid expansions for pregnant women: A synthesis of the evidence. Medical Care Research and Review, 58(1), 3–30.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Rogowski, J. (1998). Cost-effectiveness of care for very low birth weight infants. Pediatrics, 102(1), 35–43. doi:10.1542/peds.102.1.35.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. HRSA Maternal and Child Health Bureau. The Maternal and Child Health Servicestitle V Block Grant to States Program, Application/Annual Report/Guidance. Fourth Edition, Section F, Health System Capacity Indicators. ftp://ftp.hrsa.gov/guidance06/mchblock2006.doc. Accessed 28 April 2008.

  8. Gyllstrom, M. E., Jensen, J. L., & Vaughan, J. N., et al. (2002). Linking birth certificates with medicaid data to enhance population health assessment: methodological issues addressed. Journal of Public Health Management Practice, 8(4), 38–44.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Lowery, C., Bronstein, J. M., & McGhee, J., et al. (2007). ANGELS & University of Arkansas for medical sciences paradigm for distant obstetrical care delivery. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 196(6), 534.e1–534.e9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Hornbrook, M. C., Hurtado, A. V., & Johnson, R. E. (1985). Health care episodes: Definition, measurement and use. Medical Care Review, 42(2), 163. doi:10.1177/107755878504200202.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Wingert, T. D., Kralewski, J. E., Lindquist, T. J., et al. (1995) Constructing episodes of care from encounter and claims data: Some methodological issues. Inquiry, 32, 430–443.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Shulman, K. A., Yabroff, R., Kong, J., et al. (1999). A claims data approach to defining an episode of care. Health Services Research, 34(2), 603–621.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Silver, R. M. (2007). Fetal death. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 109(1), 153–167.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Grisso, J. A., Carson, J. L., Feldman, H. I., et al. (1997). Epidemiological pitfalls using medicaid data in reproductive health research. Journal of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, 6, 230–236. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1520-6661(199707/08)6:4≤230::AID-MFM9≥3.0.CO;2-K.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Paulson, J., Ramsini, W., Conrey, E., et al. (2007). Unregistered deaths among extremely low birthweight infants—Ohio, 2006. MMWR Weekly, October 26, 56(42), 1101–1103.

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was made possible by the support and cooperation of the Arkansas Division of Medical Assistance, by Judith McGhee, M.D., M.P.H., Medical Director, DMA, The Arkansas Department of Public Health, and by the ANGELS Program, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Janet M. Bronstein.

Appendix

Appendix

Flag used in analysis

Condition

ICD9 CM Diagnostic codes on Medicaid claims used to identify occurrence

Fetal demise (identifying incomplete pregnancy)

Fetal demise, ectopic pregnancy, spontaneous abortion, papyraceous fetus, intrauterine death

632, 633, 634, 646.0–646.03, 656.4

Labor and delivery complications (absence suggests incomplete pregnancy)

Malposition, disproportion, pelvic abnormality, fetal distress, complications during labor and delivery, obstructed, abnormal or long labor, umbilical cord complications, obstetrical trauma, postpartum complications

652, 653, 654, 655.7, 656.3, 659, 660,661,662, 663,664,665, 666–674

High-risk obstetrics history

Prior history of: early or threatened labor, fetal abnormality, fetal or neonatal death, preterm or low birth weight infant, uterine malformation

V23.4 or V23.5 with: 644, 655 or 740–759, 779.9, 656.4 or 658, 765 or 656.5

High-risk current pregnancy

Incompetent cervix, rubella, pre-eclampsia, suspected fetal abnormality, habitual aborter, hydramnios, hyperemesis beyond first trimester, gestation >3, conjoined twins, oligohydramnios, PROM before 34 weeks, deep phlebothrombosis

654.5, 056 or 647.5, 642.5–642.7, 655.0–655.63 or 655.8–655.93, 646.3, 657, 643, 651.1,−651.2 or 651.4–9, 653.7, 658.0, 658.1–658.3, 671.3

High-risk pregnancy due to medical conditions

Severe asthma, cardiac disease, diabetes, epilepsy, hemoglobinapathy, hypertension, prior pulmonary embolism, pulmonary disease, chronic renal disease, coagulation defects, severe systemic disease, connective tissue disease, hemorrhagic conditions, history of cranial injury, cervical cancer, HIV, syphilis

493, 390–399 or 410 or 414–414.9 or 416–417 or 424.0–425.9 or 648.6 or 426.0–427.9 or 428.0–429.9, 250, 250.1–250.9, 345 or 780.39, 282.60–282.69 or 282.0–282.5 or 282.7–285.9, 401–405.9 or 642.0–642.2, V23.4 and 671.2, 671.3, or 673, 136.3 or 415–417 or 492 or V46.1 or 496 or 500–519.9 or 494 or 010–018 or 647.3 or 481–486, 582–588.9 or 592 or 646.2, 286, 242–244.9 or 648.1 or 695.4 or 710.0 or 038 or 575.0–575.9 or 577.0–577.1 or 288.8–288.9 or 571.4 or 647.4 or 646.7 or 174, 759.82, 287, 430–434 or 437.0–437.6, 233.1, 180–184 or 622.1, 042 or V08, 090.0–097.9 or 647.0

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bronstein, J.M., Lomatsch, C.T., Fletcher, D. et al. Issues and Biases in Matching Medicaid Pregnancy Episodes to Vital Records Data: The Arkansas Experience. Matern Child Health J 13, 250–259 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10995-008-0347-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10995-008-0347-z

Keywords

Navigation