Abstract
For a sample of 367 middle-school students in the USA, learning environment criteria were used to evaluate two alternative science curriculum sequences (generalised/integrated and topic-based) and to investigate the differential effectiveness of the alternative sequences for two different ethnic groups (Caucasian and Hispanic). The six scales used were Personal Relevance, Student Cohesiveness, Teacher Support, Investigation/Involvement, Task Orientation, and Enjoyment of Science. Science was enjoyed more by both Caucasian and Hispanic students experiencing the topic-based sequence (effect size of 0.74 standard deviations). In terms of task orientation, Hispanic students benefitted more from the general curriculum model, but the two curriculum sequences were equally effective for Caucasian students.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Afari, E., Aldridge, J. M., Fraser, B. J., & Khine, M. S. (2013). Students’ perceptions of the learning environment and attitudes in game-based mathematics classrooms. Learning Environments Research,16(1), 131–150.
Aldridge, J. M., & Fraser, B. J. (2008). Outcomes-focused learning environments: Determinants and effects. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Aldridge, J. M., Fraser, B. J., & Huang, I. T.-C. (1999). Investigating classroom environments in Taiwan and Australia with multiple research methods. Journal of Educational Research,93, 48–62.
Aldridge, J. M., Fraser, B. J., & Ntuli, S. (2009). Utilising learning environment assessments to improve teaching practices among in-service teachers undertaking a distance education programme. South African Journal of Education,29, 147–170.
Bell, L. M., & Aldridge, J. M. (2014). Student voice, teacher action research and classroom improvement (advances in learning environments research series). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
California State Board of Education. (1998). Science content standards for california public schools. Retrieved from https://www.cde.ca.gov/BE/ST/SS/documents/sciencestnd.pdf. Accessed 26 Feb 2019.
Creswell, J. W. (2008). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.
Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika,16, 297–335.
Ferguson, P. D., & Fraser, B. J. (1999). Changes in learning environment during the transition from primary to secondary school. Learning Environments Research,1, 369–383.
Fraser, B. J. (1978). Development of a test of science-related attitudes. Science Education,62(4), 509–515.
Fraser, B. J. (1981a). Test of science-related attitudes (TOSRA). Melbourne, Australia: Australian Council for Educational Research.
Fraser, B. J. (1981b). Using environmental assessments to make better classrooms. Journal of Curriculum Studies,13(2), 131–144.
Fraser, B. J. (1986). Classroom environment. London: Croom Helm.
Fraser, B. J. (2012). Classroom learning environments: Retrospect, context and prospect. In B. J. Fraser, K. G. Tobin, & C. J. McRobbie (Eds.), Second international handbook of science education (pp. 1191–1239). New York: Springer.
Fraser, B. J. (2014). Classroom learning environments: Historical and contemporary perspectives. In N. G. Lederman & S. K. Abell (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (Vol. II, pp. 104–117). New York: Routledge.
Fraser, B. J. (2019). Milestones in the evolution of the learning environments field over the past three decades. In D. B. Zandvleit & B. J. Fraser (Eds.), Thirty years of learning environments research: Looking back and looking forward (pp. 1–19). Leiden: Brill-Sense.
Fraser, B. J., & Aldridge, J. M. (2017). Improving classrooms through assessment of learning environments. In J. P. Bakken (Ed.), Classrooms volume 1: Assessment practices for teachers and student improvement strategies (pp. 91–107). New York: Nova.
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Kaiser, H. F. (1960). The application of electronic computers to factor analysis. Educational and Psychological Measurement,20, 141–151.
Koh, N. K., & Fraser, B. J. (2014). Learning environment associated with use of mixed mode delivery model among secondary business studies students in Singapore. Learning Environments Research,17(2), 157–171.
Krajcik, J., Codere, S., Dahsah, C., Bayer, R., & Mun, K. (2014). Planning instruction to meet the intent of the next generation science standards. Journal of Science Teacher Education,25(2), 157–175. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-014-9383-2.
Lee, O. (2005). Science education with English language learners: Synthesis and research agenda. Review of Educational Research,75(4), 491–530.
Lewin, K. (1936). Principles of topological psychology. New York: McGraw.
Lightburn, M. E., & Fraser, B. J. (2007). Classroom environment and student outcomes among students using anthropometry activities in high-school science. Research in Science & Technological Education,25(2), 153–166.
Long, C. S. (2013). Relative effectiveness of alternative sequencing of middle-school science curriculum in terms of classroom learning environment and student attitudes. Unpublished doctoral thesis, Curtin University. Retrieved from https://espace.curtin.edu.au/handle/20.500.11937/1150.
Murray, H. A. (1938). Explorations in personality. New York: Oxford University Press.
National Academies of Science (NAS). (2011). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. Retrieved from http://sites.nationalacademies.org/dbasse/bose/framework_k12_science/index.htm. Accessed 26 Feb 2019.
National Science Teachers Association. (nd). Map of adoption by state. Retrieved from https://ngss.nsta.org/about.aspx.
NGSS Lead States. (2013). Next generation science standards: For states, by states. Retrieved from https://www.nextgenscience.org/.
Nix, R. K., Fraser, B. J., & Ledbetter, C. E. (2005). Evaluating an integrated science learning environment using the Constructivist Learning Environment Survey. Learning Environments Research,8(2), 109–133.
Oser, R., & Fraser, B. J. (2015). Effectiveness of virtual laboratories in terms of learning environment, attitudes, and achievement among high-school genetics students. Curriculum and Teaching,30(2), 65–80.
Rijken, P. E., & Fraser, B. J. (2015, April). The effectiveness of project-based mathematics in terms of learning environment, attitudes, academic efficacy and achievement. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago.
Sirrakos, G., Jr., & Fraser, B. J. (2017). A cross-national mixed-method study of reality pedagogy. Learning Environments Research,20, 153–174.
Spinner, H., & Fraser, B. J. (2005). Evaluation of an innovative mathematics program in terms of classroom environment, student attitudes, and conceptual development. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education,3(2), 267–293.
Stern, G. G., Stein, M. I., & Bloom, B. S. (1956). Methods in personality assessment. Glencoe, IL: The Free Press.
Taylor, P. C., Fraser, B. J., & Fisher, D. L. (1997). Monitoring constructivist classroom learning environments. International Journal of Educational Research,27(4), 293–302.
Teh, G. P. L., & Fraser, B. J. (1995). Development and validation of an instrument for assessing the psychosocial environment of computer-assisted learning classrooms. Journal of Educational Computing Research,12(2), 177–193.
Texas Education Agency. (nd). Texas administrative code (TAC), title 19, part II chapter 112. Texas Essential Knowledge and Skills for Science. Retrieved August 22, 2018 from http://ritter.tea.state.tx.us/rules/tac/chapter112/ch112b.html.
Tobin, K., & Fraser, B. J. (1998). Qualitative and quantitative landscapes of classroom learning environments. In B. J. Fraser & K. G. Tobin (Eds.), International handbook of science education (pp. 623–640). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Tobin, K., & McRobbie, C. J. (1996). Significance of limited english proficiency and cultural capital to the performance in science of Chinese-Australians. Journal of Research in Science Teaching,33, 265–282.
Walberg, H. J., & Anderson, G. J. (1968). Classroom climate and individual learning. Journal Educational Psychology,59, 414–419.
Wolf, S. J., & Fraser, B. J. (2008). Learning environment, attitudes and achievement among middle-school science students using inquiry-based laboratory activities. Research in Science Education,38(3), 321–341.
Wyoming Department of Education. (nd). 2016 science standards. Retrieved from https://edu.wyoming.gov/downloads/standards/2016/2016WYScienceCPS.pdf.
Zaragoza, J., & Fraser, B. J. (2017). Field-study science classrooms as positive and enjoyable learning environments. Learning Environments Research,20, 1–20.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendix
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Long, C.S., Fraser, B.J. & Sinclair, B. Differential effectiveness of alternative middle-school science sequences for students of different ethnicities. Learning Environ Res 23, 87–99 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-019-09291-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-019-09291-0