Abstract
Context
The Rainwater Basin region in south-central Nebraska supports a complex network of spatially-isolated wetlands that harbor diverse floral and faunal communities. Since European settlement, many wetlands have been lost from the network, which has increased distances among remaining wetlands. As a result, populations of wildlife species with limited dispersal capabilities may have become isolated and face greater local extinction risks.
Objectives
We compared the pre-European settlement and current extent of the Rainwater Basin network to assess the effects of wetland losses on network connectivity for a range of maximum dispersal distances.
Methods
We constructed network models for a range of maximum dispersal distances and calculated network metrics to assess changes in network connectivity and the relative importance of individual wetlands in regulating flow.
Results
Since European settlement, the number of wetlands in the Rainwater Basin has decreased by > 90%. The average distance to the nearest neighboring wetland has increased by 150% to ~ 1.2 km, and the dispersal distance necessary to travel throughout the whole network has increased from 3.5 to 10.0 km. Last, relative importance of individual wetlands depended on the maximum dispersal distance. Which wetlands to preserve to maintain connectivity might therefore depend on the dispersal capabilities of the species or taxa of interest.
Conclusions
To preserve a broad range of biodiversity, conservation efforts should focus on preserving dense clusters of wetlands at fine spatial scales to maintain current levels of network connectivity, and restoring connections between clusters to facilitate long-range dispersal of species with limited dispersal capabilities.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Albanese G, Haukos DA (2017) A network model framework for prioritizing wetland conservation in the Great Plains. Landscape Ecol 32:115–130
Barrat A, Barthélemy M, Vespignani A (2008) Dynamical processes on complex networks. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Becker CG, Fonseca CR, Haddad CFB, Batista RF, Prado PI (2007) Habitat split and the global decline of amphibians. Science 318:1775–1777
Bishop AA, Vrtiska M (2008) Effects of the Wetland Reserve Program on waterfowl carrying capacity in the Rainwater Basin region of south-central Nebraska. A conservation effects assessment project, wildlife component assessment. USDA NRCS Publication, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Grand Island, NE
Bunn AG, Urban DL, Keitt TH (2000) Landscape connectivity: a conservation application of graph theory. J Environ Manag 59:265–278
Burris L, Skagen SK (2013) Modeling sediment accumulation in North American playa wetlands in response to climate change. Clim Change 117:69–83
Clauset A, Moore C, Newman MEJ (2008) Hierarchical structure and the prediction of missing links in networks. Nature 453:98–101
Clergeau P, Burel F (1997) The role of spatio-temporal patch connectivity at the landscape level: an example in a bird distribution. Landsc Urban Plan 38:37–43
De Nooy W, Mrvar A, Batagelj V (2011) Exploratory social network analysis with Pajek, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, New York
ESRI (2015) ArcMap 10.3.1. Environmental Systems Research Institute, Redlands, CA
Fairbairn SE, Dinsmore JJ (2001) Local and landscape-level influences on wetland bird communities of the prairie pothole region of Iowa, USA. Wetlands 21:41–47
Foltête J, Clauzel C, Vuidel G, Tournant P (2012) Integrating graph-based connectivity metrics into species distribution models. Landscape Ecol 27:557–569
Fortuna MA, Gomez-Rodriguez C, Bascompte J (2006) Spatial network structure and amphibian persistence in a stochastic environment. Proc R Soc Lond B 273:1429–1434
Frye JC (1950) Origin of Kansas Great Plains depressions. State Geol Surv Kansas Bull 86:1–20
Galpern P, Manseau M, Fall A (2011) Patch-based graphs of landscape connectivity: a guide to construction, analysis and application for conservation. Biol Conserv 144:44–55
Graf RF, Kramer-Schadt S, Fenandez N, Grimm V (2007) What you see is where you go? Modeling dispersal in mountainous landscapes. Landscape Ecol 22:853–866
Hanski I, Gilpin M (1991) Metapopulation dynamics: brief history and conceptual domain. Biol J Linn Soc 42:3–16
Haukos DA, Smith LM (1993) Moist soil management of playa lakes for migrating and wintering ducks. Wildl Soc Bull 21:288–298
Haukos DA, Smith LM (1994) The importance of playa wetlands to biodiversity of the southern high plains. Landsc Urban Plan 28:83–98
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) (2014) Climate change 2014: impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Jetz W, Wilcove DS, Dobson AP (2007) Projected impacts of climate and land-use change on the global diversity of birds. PLoS Biol 5:1211–1219
Johnson LA, Haukos DA, Smith LM, McMurry ST (2012) Physical loss and modification of Southern Great Plains playas. J Environ Manag 112:275–283
Johnson WP, Rice MB, Haukos DA, Thorpe PP (2011) Factors influencing the occurrence of inundated playa wetlands during winter on the Texas High Plains. Wetlands 31:1287–1296
Kuzila MS, Lewis DT (1993) Soils in rain basins of south central Nebraska, properties, genesis and classification. Soil Sci Soc Am J 37:155–161
LaGrange TG (2005) Guide to Nebraska’s wetlands and their conservation needs, 2nd edn. Nebraska Game and Parks Commission, Lincoln, NE
LaGrange TG, Stutheit R, Gilbert M, Shurtliff D, Whited PM (2011) Sedimentation of Nebraska’s playa wetlands: a review of current knowledge and issues. Nebraska Game and Parks Commission, Lincoln, NE
Levins R (1970) Extinction. In: Gerstenhaber M (ed) Lectures on mathematics in the life sciences. American Mathematical Society, Providence, pp 77–107
Luo H, Smith LM, Allen BL, Haukos DA (1997) Effects of sedimentation on playa wetland volume. Ecol Appl 7:247–252
MacArthur RH, Wilson EO (1967) The theory of island biogeography. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ
McIntyre NE, Strauss RA (2013) A new, multi-scaled graph visualization approach: an example within the playa wetland network of the Great Plains. Landscape Ecol 28:769–782
Mrvar A, Batagelj V (2016) Analysis and visualization of large networks with program package Pajek. Complex Adapt Syst Model 4:6
Naugle DE, Higgins KF, Nusser SM, Johnson WC (1999) Scale-dependent habitat use in three species of prairie wetland birds. Landscape Ecol 14:267–276
Nugent E, Bishop A, Grosse R, LaGrange T, Varner D, Vrtiska M (2015) An assessment of landscape carrying capacity for waterfowl and shorebirds in Nebraska’s Rainwater Basin. A conservation effects assessment project wildlife component assessment report. Rainwater Basin Joint Venture, Wood River, NE
Opdam P, Wascher D (2004) Climate change meets habitat fragmentation: linking landscape and biogeographical scale levels in research and conservation. Biol Conserv 117:285–297
Orloff SG (2011) Movement patterns and migration distances in an upland population of California tiger salamander (Ambystoma californiense). Herp Conserv Biol 6:266–276
Osterkamp WR, Wood WW (1987) Playa-lake basins on the Southern High Plains of Texas and New Mexico: part I. Hydrologic, geomorphic, and geologic evidence for their development. Geol Soc Am Bull 99:215–223
Palla G, Der’enyi I, Farkas I, Vicsek T (2005) Uncovering the overlapping community structure of complex networks in nature and society. Nature 435:814–818
R Development Core Team (2017) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna
Rainwater Basin Joint Venture (2013) The Rainwater Basin Joint Venture implementation plan. Rainwater Basin Joint Venture, Grand Island, NE
Rayfield B, Fortin M, Fall A (2011) Connectivity for conservation: a framework to classify network measures. Ecology 92:847–858
Ruiz LJ, Parikh NN, Heintzman LJ, Collins SD, Starr SM, Wright CK, Henebry GM, van Gestel N, McIntyre NE (2014) Dynamic connectivity of temporary wetlands in the Southern Great Plains. Landscape Ecol 29:507–516
Samson F, Knopf F (1994) Prairie conservation in North America. Bioscience 44:418–421
Schick RS, Lindley ST (2007) Directed connectivity among fish populations in a riverine network. J Appl Ecol 44:1116–1126
Schildman G, Hurt J (1984) Update of Rainwater Basin wetland survey. Survey of habitat work plan K-83, W-15-R-40. Nebraska Game and Parks Commission, Lincoln, NE
Smith LM (2003) Playas of the Great Plains. University of Texas Press, Austin, TX
Smith LM, Haukos DA, McMurry ST (2012) High plains playas. In: Batzer D, Baldwin A (eds) Wetland habitats of North America: ecology and conservation concerns. University of California Press, Berkeley, CA, pp 299–311
Smith LM, Haukos DA, McMurry ST, LaGrange T, Willis D (2011) Ecosystem services provided by playas in the high plains: potential influences of USDA conservation programs. Ecol Appl 21:S82–S92
Tang Z, Li Y, Gu Y, Jiang W, Xue Y, Hu Q, LaGrange T, Bishop A, Drahota J, Li R (2016) Assessing Nebraska playa wetland inundation status during 1985–2015 using Landsat data and Google Earth Engine. Environ Monit Assess 188:654
Uden DR, Allen CR, Bishop AA, Grosse R, Jorgensen CF, LaGrange TG, Stutheit G, Vrtiska MP (2015) Predictions of future ephemeral springtime waterbird stopover habitat availability under global change. Ecosphere 6:215.
Uden DR, Hellman ML, Angeler DG, Allen CR (2014) The role of reserves and anthropogenic habitats for functional connectivity and resilience of ephemeral wetlands. Ecol Appl 24:1569–1582
Urban DL, Keitt TH (2001) Landscape connectivity: a graph-theoretic perspective. Ecology 82:1205–1218
Urban DL, Minor ES, Treml EA, Schick RS (2009) Graph models of habitat mosaics. Ecol Lett 12:260–273
Vicsek T (2002) The big picture. Nature 418:131
Acknowledgements
This study was funded by U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Great Plains Landscape Conservation Cooperative research and National Science Foundation Macrosystems (1544083) grants administered through the U.S. Geological Survey Fort Collins Science Center and Kansas Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit. We are grateful for additional support provided by Gene Albanese, Chris Wright, and the Division of Biology at Kansas State University. We thank J.S. Lamb, L.E. Rosen, B.E. Ross, E.L. Weiser, and two anonymous reviewers for helpful suggestions and feedback on previous versions of the manuscript. The use of trade names or products does not constitute an endorsement by the United States Government, the United States Department of Interior, or other sponsoring or participating agencies.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Verheijen, B.H.F., Varner, D.M. & Haukos, D.A. Effects of large-scale wetland loss on network connectivity of the Rainwater Basin, Nebraska. Landscape Ecol 33, 1939–1951 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-018-0721-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-018-0721-1