Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Highlighting order and disorder in social–ecological landscapes to foster adaptive capacity and sustainability

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Landscape Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Landscape sustainability can be considered in terms of order and disorder, where order implies causality, well-defined boundaries and predictable outcomes, while disorder implies uncertain causality, shifting boundaries and often-unpredictable outcomes. We address the interplay of order and disorder in social–ecological landscapes (SELs) using spatiotemporal analysis of entropy-related indices of Normalized Difference Vegetation Index time-series. These indices can provide insights for complex systems analysis for the evaluation of adaptive capacity in SELs. In particular, our overarching aim is to help interpret what an increase of order/disorder means with regards to SELs and the underlying drivers and causes of conditions in SELs. The approach can be used to increase spatially explicit anticipatory capability in environmental science and natural resource management based on how the system has responded to stress in the past. Such capability is crucial to address SEL adaptive capacity and for sustainable planning given that surprises may increase as a consequence of both climate change and multiple interacting anthropogenic stressors. These advancements should greatly contribute to the application of spatial resilience strategies in general, and to sustainable landscape planning in particular, and for the spatially explicit adaptive comanagement of ecosystem services.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adger N (1999) Social vulnerability to climate change and extremes in coastal Vietnam. World Dev 2:249–269

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahern JF (2011) From fail-safe to safe-to-fail: sustainability and resilience in the new urban world. Landscape architecture & regional planning graduate research and creative activity. Paper 8 (online). http://scholarworks.umass.edu/larp_grad_research/8

  • Antrop M (2005) Why landscapes of the past are important for the future. Landsc Urban Plan 70(1–2):21–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Avery J (2003) Information theory and evolution. World Scientific, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Barnes JA, Allan DW (1966) A statistical model of flicker noise. Proc IEEE 54(2):176–178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bates JE, Shepard HK (1993) Measuring complexity using information fluctuation. Phys Lett A 172:416–425

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berkes F, Folke C (eds) (1998) Linking social and ecological systems: management practices and social mechanisms for building resilience. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Berkes F, Colding J, Folke C (eds) (2003) Navigating social–ecological systems: building resilience for complexity and change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Bogaert J, Farina A, Ceulemans R (2005) Entropy increase of fragmented habitats: a sign of human impact? Ecol Ind 5:207–212

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter SR, Brock WA (2008) Adaptive capacity and traps. Ecol Soc 13(2):40 (online). http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol13/iss2/art40/

    Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter SR, Walker BH, Anderies JM, Abel N (2001) From metaphor to measurement: resilience of what to what? Ecosystems 4:765–781

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen X, Li B-L, Collina SL (2005) Multiscale monitoring of a multispecies case study: two grass species at Sevilleta. Plant Ecol 179:149–154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark WC, Dickson NM (2003) Sustainability science: the emerging research program. PNAS 100(14):8059–8061

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Costanza R (2003) A vision of the future science: reintegrating the study of human and the rest of nature. Futures 35:651–671

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Costanza R, Graumlich L, Steffen W, Crumley C, Dearing J, Hibbard K, Leemans R, Redman C, Schimel D (2007a) Sustainability or collapse: what can we learn from integrating the history of humans and the rest of nature? Ambio 36(7):522–527

  • Costanza R, Fisher B, Mulder K, Shuang L, Treg C (2007b) Biodiversity and ecosystem services: a multi-scale empirical study of the relationship between species richness and net primary production. Ecol Econ 61:478–491

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Costanza R, Hart M, Posner S, Talberth J (2009) Beyond GDP: the need for new measures of progress. The Pardee papers no. 4. The Frederick S. Pardee Center for the Study of the Longer-Range Future, Boston University, Boston

  • Cumming GS (2011) Spatial resilience: integrating landscape ecology, resilience, and sustainability. Landscape Ecol 26:899–909

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daly H, Cobb J (1989) For the common good. Beacon Press, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Doak DF, Estes JA, Halpern BS, Jacob U, Lindberg DR, Lovvorn J, Monson DH, Tinker MT, Williams TM, Wootton JT, Carroll I, Emmerson M, Micheli F, Novak M (2008) Understanding and predicting ecological dynamics: are major surprises inevitable? Ecology 89:952–961

  • Foley JA, DeFries R, Asner GP, Barford C, Bonan G, Carpenter SR, Chapin FS, Coe MT, Daily GC, Gibbs HK, Helkowski JH, Holloway T, Howard EA, Kucharik CJ, Monfreda C, Patz JA, Prentice JC, Ramankutty N, Snyder PK (2005) Global consequences of land use. Science 309(5734):570–574

    Google Scholar 

  • Folke C, Hahn T, Olsson P, Norberg J (2005) Adaptive governance of social–ecological systems. Annu Rev Environ Resour 30:441–473

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Folke C, Carpenter SR, Walker B, Scheffer M, Chapin T, Rockström J (2010) Resilience thinking: integrating resilience, adaptability and transformability. Ecol Soc 15(4):20 (online). http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol15/iss4/art20/

    Google Scholar 

  • Green JL, Hastings A, Arzberger P, Ayala FJ, Cottingham KL, Cuddington K, Davis F, Dunne JA, Fortin M-J, Gerber L, Neubert M (2005) Complexity in ecology and conservation: mathematical, statistical, and computational challenges. Bioscience 55:501–510

    Google Scholar 

  • Guerschman JP, Paruelo JM, Burke IC (2003) Land use impacts on the Normalized Difference Vegetation Index in temperate Argentina. Ecol Appl 13:616–628

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gunderson LH, Holling CS (eds) (2002) Panarchy: understanding transformations in human and natural systems. Island Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Holling CS (2001) Understanding the complexity of economic, ecological, and social systems. Ecosystems 4:390–405

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holling CS, Meffe GK (1996) Command and control, and the pathology of natural-resource management. Conserv Biol 10:328–337

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hrabik TR, Greenfield BK, Lewis DB, Pollard AI, Wilson KA, Kratzet TK (2005) Landscape-scale variation in taxonomic diversity in four groups of aquatic organisms: the influence of physical, chemical, and biological properties. Ecosystems 8:301–317

    Google Scholar 

  • Jassby AD, Powell TM (1990) Detecting changes in ecological time series. Ecology 71:2044–2052

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson GD, Myers WL, Patil GP, Taillie C (2001) Characterizing watershed delineated landscapes in Pennsylvania using conditional entropy profiles. Landscape Ecol 16:597–610

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kates RW, Clark WC, Corell R (2001) Sustainability science. Science 292(5517):641–642

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kerr JT, Ostrovsky M (2003) From space to species: ecological applications for remote sensing. Trends Ecol Evol 18:299–305

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim J, Oki T (2011) Visioneering: an essential framework in sustainability science. Sustain Sci 6:247–251

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lambin EF, Turner BL, Geist HJ (2001) The causes of land-use and land-cover change: moving beyond the myths. Glob Environ Chang 11:261–269

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leitão Botequilha A, Ahern J (2002) Applying landscape ecological concepts and metrics in sustainable landscape planning. Landsc Urban Plan 59:65–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levin SA (1999) Fragile dominions: complexity and the commons. Basic Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin SA, Clark WC (2010) Toward a science of sustainability, CID working paper No. 196. Center for International Development, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA

  • Li B-L (2000) Fractal geometry applications in description and analysis of patch patterns and patch dynamics. Ecol Model 132:33–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li H, Reynolds JF (1994) A simulation experiment to quantify spatial heterogeneity in categorical maps. Ecology 75(8):2446–2455

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindenmayer DB, Likensa GE, Krebsc CJ, Hobbs RJ (2010) Improved probability of detection of ecological “surprises”. PNAS 107(51):21957–21962

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Magurran AE (2004) Measuring biological diversity. Blackwell Science, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • McAlpine CA, Seabrook LM, Rhodes JR, Maron M, Smith C, Bowen ME, Butler SA, Powell O, Ryan JG, Fyfe CT, Adams-Hosking C, Smith A, Robertson O, Howes A, Cattarino L (2010) Can a problem-solving approach strengthen landscape ecology’s contribution to sustainable landscape planning? Landscape Ecol 25:1155–1168

    Google Scholar 

  • Meadows D (2008) Thinking in systems: a primer. Chelsea Green, Vermont

    Google Scholar 

  • Mildrexler DJ, Zhao M, Heinsch FA, Running SW (2007) A new satellite-based methodology for continental scale disturbance detection. Ecol Appl 17(1):235–250

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Millennium Ecosystem Assessment [MEA] (2005) Ecosystems and human wellbeing: synthesis. Island Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Musacchio L (2009) The scientific basis for the design of landscape sustainability: a conceptual framework for translational landscape research and practice for designed landscapes and the six Es of landscape sustainability. Landscape Ecol 24:993–1013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Musacchio L (2011) The grand challenge to operationalize landscape sustainability and the design-in-science paradigm. Landscape Ecol 26:1–5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nassauer JI, Opdam P (2008) Design in science: extending the landscape ecology paradigm. Landscape Ecol 23:633–644

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naveh Z (2007) Landscape ecology and sustainability. Landscape Ecol 22:1437–1440

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olsson P, Folke C, Berkes F (2004) Adaptive comanagement for building resilience in social–ecological systems. Environ Manag 34:75–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Opdam P, Wascher D (2004) Climate change meets habitat fragmentation: linking landscape and biogeographical scale levels in research and conservation. Biol Conserv 117:285–297

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Opdam P, Foppen R, Vos CC (2002) Bridging the gap between ecology and spatial planning in landscape ecology. Landscape Ecol 16:767–779

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parrott L (2005) Quantifying the complexity of simulated spatiotemporal population dynamics. Ecol Complex 2:175–184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parrott L (2010) Measuring ecological complexity. Ecol Ind 10:1069–1076

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peterson GD (2002) Estimating resilience across landscapes. Conserv Ecol 6(1):17 (online). http://www.consecol.org/vol6/iss1/art17/

    Google Scholar 

  • Petrosillo I, Müller F, Jones KB, Zurlini G, Krauze K, Victorov S, Li B-L, Kepner WG (2008) Use of landscape sciences for the assessment of environmental security. Springer, Dordrecht

  • Petrosillo I, Zaccarelli N, Zurlini G (2010a) Multiscale vulnerability of natural capital. Ecol Complex 7:359–367

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petrosillo I, Vassallo P, Valente D, Mensa JA, Fabiano M, Zurlini G (2010b) Mapping the environmental risk of a tourist harbor in order to foster environmental security: objective vs. subjective assessments. Marine Pollut Bull 60:1051–1058

    Google Scholar 

  • Pettorelli N, Vik JO, Mysterud A, Gaillard J-M, Tucker CJ, Stenseth NC (2005) Using the satellite-derived NDVI to assess ecological responses to environmental change. Trends Ecol Evol 20(9):503–510

    Google Scholar 

  • Potter C, Tan PN, Steinbach M, Klooster S, Kumar V, Myneni R, Genovese V (2003) Major disturbance events in terrestrial ecosystems detected using global satellite data sets. Glob Change Biol 9:1005–1021

    Google Scholar 

  • Rocchini D, Andreini Butini S, Chiarucci A (2005) Maximizing plant species inventory efficiency by means of remotely sensed spectral distances. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 14:431–437

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rockström J, Steffen W, Noone K, Persson Å, Chapin FS III, Lambin E, Lenton TM, Scheffer M, Folke C, Schellnhuber HJ, Nykvist B, de Wit CA, Hughes T, van der Leeuw S, Rodhe H, Sörlin S, Snyder PK, Costanza R, Svedin U, Falkenmark M, Karlberg L, Corell RW, Fabry VJ, Hansen J, Walker B, Liverman D, Richardson K, Crutzen P, Foley J (2009) Planetary boundaries: exploring the safe operating space for humanity. Ecol Soc 14(2):32 (online). http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol14/iss2/art32/

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodríguez-Arias M, Rodó X (2004) A primer on the study of transitory dynamics in ecological series using the scale-dependent correlation analysis. Oecologia 138:485–504

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Scheffer M, Carpenter SR (2003) Catastrophic regime shifts in ecosystems: linking theory to observation. Trends Ecol Evol 18(12):648–656

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scheffer M, Brock WA, Westley F (2000) Socioeconomic mechanisms preventing optimum use of ecosystem services: an interdisciplinary theoretical analysis. Ecosystems 3:451–471

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Scheffer M, Bascompte J, Brock WA, Brovkin V, Carpenter SR, Dakos V, Held H, van Nes EH, Rietkerk M, Sugihara G (2009) Early-warning signals for critical transitions. Nature 461:53–59

    Google Scholar 

  • Shuman B, Henderson AK, Plank C, Stefanova I, Ziegler SS (2009) Woodland-to-forest transition during prolonged drought in Minnesota after ca. AD 1300. Ecology 90:2792–2807

    Google Scholar 

  • Snowden DJ, Boone ME (2007) A leader’s framework for decision making. Harv Bus Rev 85:68–76

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Steel JH (1985) A comparison of terrestrial and marine ecological systems. Nature 313:355–358

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Termorshuizen JW, Opdam P (2009) Landscape services as a bridge between landscape ecology and sustainable development. Landscape Ecol 24:1037–1052

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner BL II, Lambin EF, Reenberg A (2007) The emergence of land change science for global environmental change and sustainability. PNAS 104(52):20666–20671

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ulanowicz RE (2001) Information theory in ecology. Comput Chem 25:393–399

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wackerbauer R, Witt A, Atmanspacher H, Kurths J, Scheingraber H (1994) A comparative classification of complexity measures. Chaos Soliton Fract 4(1):133–173

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner HH, Wildi O, Ewald KC (2000) Additive partitioning of plant species diversity in an agricultural mosaic landscape. Landscape Ecol 15:219–227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walker BH, Salt D (2006) Resilience thinking: sustaining ecosystems and people in a changing world. Island Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker BH, Carpenter SR, Anderies J, Abel N, Cumming G, Janssen M, Lebel L, Norberg J, Peterson GD, Pritchard R (2002) Resilience management in social–ecological systems: a working hypothesis for a participatory approach. Conserv Ecol 6(1):14 (online). http://www.consecol.org/vol6/iss1/art14

    Google Scholar 

  • Westley F, Zimmerman B, Patton M (2006) Getting to maybe. Random House of Canada, Toronto

    Google Scholar 

  • White PS, Jentsch A (2001) The search for generality in studies of disturbance and ecosystem dynamics. Prog Bot 62:399–450

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams JW, Jackson ST (2007) Novel climates, no-analog communities, and ecological surprises. Front Ecol Environ 5:475–482

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu J (2006) Landscape ecology, cross-disciplinarity, and sustainability science. Landscape Ecol 21:1–4

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wu J (2010) Urban sustainability: an inevitable goal of landscape research. Landscape Ecol 25:1–4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wylie BK, Zhang L, Bliss N, Ji L, Tieszen LL, Jolly WM (2008) Integrating modelling and remote sensing to identify ecosystem performance anomalies in the boreal forest, Yukon River Basin, Alaska. Int J Digit Earth 1(2):196–220

    Google Scholar 

  • Young SS, Harris R (2005) Changing patterns of global-scale vegetation photosynthesis, 1982–1999. Int J Remote Sens 26(20):4537–4563

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zaccarelli N, Petrosillo I, Zurlini G, Riitters KH (2008) Source/sink patterns of disturbance and cross-scale effects in a panarchy of social–ecological landscapes. Ecol Soc 13(1):26. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol13/iss1/art26/

    Google Scholar 

  • Zaccarelli N, Li B-L, Petrosillo I, Zurlini G (2012) Order and disorder in ecological time-series: introducing normalized spectral entropy. Ecol Ind. doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.07.008

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang X, Friedl MA, Schaaf CB, Strahler AH, Hodges JCF, Gao F, Reed BC, Huete A (2003) Monitoring vegetation phenology using MODIS. Remote Sens Environ 84:471–475

    Google Scholar 

  • Zurlini G, Zaccarelli N, Petrosillo I (2006a) Indicating retrospective resilience of multi-scale patterns of real habitats in a landscape. Ecol Ind 6:184–204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zurlini G, Riitters KH, Zaccarelli N, Petrosillo I, Jones KB, Rossi L (2006b) Disturbance patterns in a social–ecological system at multiple scales. Ecol Complex 3(2):119–128

    Google Scholar 

  • Zurlini G, Riitters KH, Zaccarelli N, Petrosillo I (2007) Patterns of disturbance at multiple scales in real and simulated landscapes. Landscape Ecol 22:705–721

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The paper benefited from many conversations with Bai-Lian Li and Felix Müller over several years. We also thank three anonymous reviewers and the editor for their helpful thought-provoking comments and suggestions that much improved the original version of the paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Irene Petrosillo.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zurlini, G., Petrosillo, I., Jones, K.B. et al. Highlighting order and disorder in social–ecological landscapes to foster adaptive capacity and sustainability. Landscape Ecol 28, 1161–1173 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-012-9763-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-012-9763-y

Keywords

Navigation