Abstract
Previous studies of temporal changes in fragmentation have focused almost exclusively on patch and edge statistics, which might not detect changes in the spatial scale at which forest occurs in or dominates the landscape. We used temporal land-cover data for the Chesapeake Bay region and the state of New Jersey to compare patch-based and area–density scaling measures of fragmentation for detecting changes in the spatial scale of forest that may result from forest loss. For the patch-based analysis, we examined changes in the cumulative distribution of patch sizes. For area–density scaling, we used moving windows to examine changes in dominant forest. We defined dominant forest as a forest parcel (pixel) surrounded by a neighborhood in which forest occupied the majority of pixels. We used >50% and ≥60% as thresholds to define majority. Moving window sizes ranged from 2.25 to 5,314.41 hectares (ha). Patch size cumulative distributions changed very little over time, providing no indication that forest loss was changing the spatial scale of forest. Area–density scaling showed that dominant forest was sensitive to forest loss, and the sensitivity increased nonlinearly as the spatial scale increased. The ratio of dominant forest loss to forest loss increased nonlinearly from 1.4 to 1.8 at the smallest spatial scale to 8.3 to 11.5 at the largest spatial scale. The nonlinear relationship between dominant forest loss and forest loss in these regions suggests that continued forest loss will cause abrupt transitions in the scale at which forest dominates the landscape. In comparison to the Chesapeake Bay region, dominant forest loss in New Jersey was less sensitive to forest loss, which may be attributable the protected status of the New Jersey Pine Barrens.
References
Braun EL (1950) Deciduous forests of eastern North America. Blakiston, Philadelphia, PA, USA
Clark SC, Starr J, Acevedo W, Solomon C (1996) Development of the temporal transportation database for the analysis of urban development in the Baltimore–Washington Region. In: Proceedings, ASPRS/ACSM Annual Convention and Exhibition, Baltimore, MD, Vol III, pp 77–87
Daubenmire R (1978) Plant geography with special reference to North America. Academic Press, New York
Fahrig L (2002) Effect of habitat fragmentation on the extinction threshold. Ecol Appl 12:346–353
Forman RTT (1979) Pine Barrens: ecosystem and landscape. Academic Press, New York
Foster CHW, Foster DR (1999) Thinking in forest time: a strategy for the Massachusetts forest. Harvard Forest Paper No. 24, Harvard University, Petersham, Massachusetts
Gagne SA, Fahrig L (2006) Effect of landscape context on anuran communities in breeding ponds in the National Capital Region, Canada. Landsc Ecol: DOI 10.1007/s10980-006-9012-3
Gardner RH, Milne BT, Turner MG, O’Neill RV (1987) Neutral models for the analysis of broad-scale landscape pattern. Landsc Ecol 1:19–28
Gardner RH, Urban DL (2006) Neutral models for testing landscape hypotheses. Landsc Ecol: DOI 10.1007/s10980-006-9011-4
Hall FG, Botkin DB, Strebel DE, Woods KD, Goetz SJ (1991) Large-scale patterns of forest succession as determined by remote sensing. Ecology 72:628–640
Harper KA, MacDonald SA, Burton PJ, Chen J, Brosofske KD, Saunders SC, Euskirchen ES, Roberts D, Malanding SJ, and Essen PA (2005) Edge influence on forest structure and composition in fragmented landscapes. Conserv Biol 19:768–782
Hayden BP (1998) Ecosystem feedbacks on climate at the landscape scale. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B 353:5–18
Hunsaker CT, O’Neill RV, Jackson BL, Timmins SP, Levine DA, Norton DJ (1994) Sampling to characterize landscape pattern. Landsc Ecol 9:207–226
Keddy PA, Drummond CG (1996) Ecological properties for the evaluation, management, and restoration of temperate deciduous forest ecosystems. Ecol Appl 6:748–762
Kennedy RSH, Spies TA (2005) Dynamics of hardwood patches in a conifer matrix: 54 years of change in a forested landscape in coastal Oregon, USA. Biol Conserv 122:363–374
Kuchler AW (1964) Potential natural vegetation of the United States. American Geographical Society, Special Publication No. 36
Laurance WF, Lovejoy TE, Vasconcelos HL, Burna EM, Didham RK, Stouffer PC, Gascon C, Bierregaard RO, Laurance SG, Sampaio E (2001) Ecosystem decay of Amazonian forest fragments: a 22-year investigation. Conserv Biol 16:605–618
Li H, Reynolds JF (1995) On definition and quantification of heterogeneity. Oikos 73: 280–284
Lucy WH , Phillips DL (1997) The post-suburban era comes to Richmond: city decline, suburban transition and exurban growth. Landsc Urban Plan 36:259–275
Luque SS, Lathrop RG, Bognar JA (1994) Temporal and spatial changes in an area of the New Jersey Pine Barrens landscape. Landsc Ecol 9:287–300
Marshall CH, Pielke RA Sr., Steyaert LT, Willard DA (2004) The impact of anthropogenic land-cover change on the Florida peninsula sea breezes and warm season sensible weather. Mon Weather Rev 132:28–52
McGarigal K, Marks BJ (1995) FRAGSTATS: spatial pattern analysis program for quantifying landscape structure. USDA Forest Service General Technical Report PNW-351
Milne BT (1992) Spatial aggregation and neutral models in landscapes. Am Nat 139:32–57
New Jersey Pinelands Commission, n.d., last accessed September 1, 2006, URL: http://www.state.nj.us/pinelands
O’Neill RV, Hunsaker CT, Timmins SP, Jackson BL, Jones KB, Riitters KH,. Wickham JD (1996) Scale problems in reporting landscape pattern at the regional scale. Landsc Ecol 11:169–180
Pindar JE III, Rea TE, Funsch DE (1999) Deforestation, reforestation and forest fragmentation on the upper Coastal Plain of South Carolina and Georgia. Am Midl Nat 142:213–228
Plotnick RE, Gardner RH, O’Neill RV (1993) Lacunarity indices as measures of landscape texture. Landsc Ecol 8:201–211
Ramaharitra T (2006) The effects of anthropogenic disturbances on the structure and composition of rain forest vegetation. Trop Resour Bull 25:32–37
Riitters KH, Wickham JD, O’Neill RV, Jones KB, Smith ER (2000) Global-scale patterns of forest fragmentation. Conserv Ecol 4(2):3. [online] URL: http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol4/iss2/art3
Riitters KH, Wickham JD, O’Neill R., Jones KB, Smith ER, Coulston JW, Wade T, Smith JH (2002) Fragmentation of continental United States forests. Ecosystems 5:815–822
Riitters KH, Wickham JD, Coulston JW (2004) Use of road maps in United States national assessments of forest fragmentation. Ecol Soc 9(2):13. [online] URL: http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol9/iss2/art13
Robinson SK, Thompson FR III, Donovan TM, Whitehead DR, Faaborg R (1995) Regional forest fragmentation and the nesting success of migratory songbirds. Science 267:1987–1990
Rutgers University, n.d., last accessed September 1, 2006, URL: http://deathstar.rutgers.edu/projects/lc/urbangrowth/index.html
Sampson N, Decoster J (2000) Forest fragmentation: implications for sustainable private forests. J Forest 98:4–8
Skole D, Tucker C (1993) Tropical deforestation and habitat fragmentation in the Amazon: Satellite data from 1978 to 1988. Science 260:1905–1910
Staus NL, Strittholt JR, DellaSala DA, Robinson R (2002) Rates and patterns of forest disturbance in the Klamath–Siskiyou ecoregion, USA between 1972 and 1992. Landsc Ecol 17:455–470
Turner MG, Pearson SM, Bolstad P, Wear DN (2003) Effects of land-cover change on spatial pattern of forest communities in the Southern Appalachian Mountains (USA). Landsc Ecol 18:449–464
Urban DL, O’Neill RV, Shugart HH (1987) Landscape ecology. BioScience 37:119–127
Vogelmann JE (1994) Assessment of forest fragmentation in southern New England using remote sensing and geographic information systems technology. Conserv Biol 9:439–449
Walter H (1979) Vegetation of the earth and ecological systems of the geo-biosphere, 2nd edn. Springer-Verlag, New York
Weathers KC, Lovett GM, Pickett STA (2001) Forest edges as nutrient and pollutant concentrators: potential synergisms between fragmentation, forest canopies, and the atmosphere. Conserv Biol 15:1506–1514
Whittaker RH (1975) Communities and ecosystems. MacMillan Publishing Company, New York
Wickham JD, Norton DJ (1994) Mapping and analyzing landscape patterns. Landsc Ecol 9:7–23
Wickham JD, O’Neill RV, Jones KB (2000a) A geography of ecosystem vulnerability. Landsc Ecol 15:495–504
Wickham JD, O’Neill RV, Jones KB (2000b) Forest fragmentation as an economic indicator. Landsc Ecol 15:171–179
Wilcove DS, McLellan CH, Dobson AP (1986) Habitat fragmentation in the temperate zone. In: Soulè M (ed) Conservation biology: science of scarcity and diversity. Sunauer Associates, Sunderland, MA, pp 237–256
Williams M (1982) Clearing the United States forests: pivotal years 1810–1860. J Hist Geogr 8:12–28
Acknowledgments
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), through its Office of Research and Development (ORD), and the United States Forest Service (USFS) funded the research reported herein. The authors thank The Center for Landscape Pattern Analysis for their support during manuscript preparation and two anonymous reviewers for comments on previous versions. The manuscript has been subjected to EPA’s administrative review, and approved for publication. No endorsement of publication should be inferred. Mention of trade names does not confer endorsement or recommendation.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wickham, J., Riitters, K., Wade, T. et al. Temporal change in forest fragmentation at multiple scales. Landscape Ecol 22, 481–489 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-006-9054-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-006-9054-6