Abstract
Two-scale tests, microscale and bench scale, are conducted to analyze the flammability of a flexible polyurethane foam. Microscale tests include simultaneous thermal analysis coupled to Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, and microscale combustion calorimeter (MCC). Evolved gas components, heat release rate per unit mass, total heat release, derived heat release capacity, and minimum ignition temperature are obtained. Bench scale tests are performed on cone calorimeter. Peak heat release rate per unit area, effective heat of combustion, minimum incident heat flux for ignition, and total heat release per unit area of different incident heat fluxes are obtained. FO-category of the PU foam is estimated by multiple discriminant function analysis based on the results of cone calorimeter test. The relationship between the two-scale tests is analyzed. The minimum ignition temperatures derived from multi heating rate MCC tests are used to predict the time to ignition and compared with the results from cone calorimeter tests. This PU foam is evaluated as a high fire hazard polymer having low heat release capacity, low ignition temperature, and short ignition time.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- EHC:
-
Effective heat of combustion
- h g :
-
Combustion heat
- MCC:
-
Microscale combustion calorimeter
- pHRR:
-
Maximum HRR per unit mass
- PU:
-
Polyurethane
- T onset :
-
Onset temperature
- T pHRR :
-
Temperature at maximum HRR per unit mass
- THR:
-
Total heat release
- t ig :
-
Time to ignition
- t pHRR :
-
Time to peak HRR
- TRP:
-
Thermal response parameter
- q r :
-
Incident heat flux
- q min :
-
Minimum heat flux for ignition
- q net :
-
Net heat flux
- β :
-
Heating rate
- h g :
-
The total heat of gasification per unit mass
- κ :
-
Heat conductivity
- ρ :
-
Density
- η c :
-
Heat release capacity
References
Torvi D, Weckman B. Guest editorial: special issue on polyurethane foam combustion. Fire Technol. 2014;50:633–4.
Pitts WM. Applied heat flux distribution and time response effects on cone calorimeter characterization of a commercial flexible polyurethane foam. Fire Technol. 2014;50:635–72. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10694-011-0235-8.
Fire Safe Europe-White paper, Dec 2014. www.firesafeeurope.eu.
Checchin M, Cecchini C, Cellarosi B, Sam FO. Use of cone calorimeter for evaluating fire performances of polyurethane foams. Polym Degrad Stab. 1999;64:573–6.
Hadden R, Alkatib A, Rein G, Torero JL. Radiant ignition of polyurethane foam: the effect of sample size. Fire Technol. 2014;50:673–91. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10694-012-0257-x.
Ezinwa JU, Robson LD, Obach MR, Torv DA. Evaluating models for predicting full-scale fire behaviour of polyurethane foam using cone calorimeter data. Fire Technol. 2014;50:693–719. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10694-011-0239-4.
Lefebvre J, Bastin B, Le Bras M, Duquesne S, Ritter C, Paleja R, Poutch F. Flame spread of flexible polyurethane foam: comprehensive study. Polym Test. 2004;23:281–90.
Govmark Datasheet of Micro-scale Combustion Calorimeter (MCC2), the Govmark Organization, Inc.
Standard Test Method for Determining Flammability Characteristics of Plastics and Other Solid Materials Using Microscale Combustion Calorimetry, ASTM D7309-13; 2013.
Snegirev AY, Talalov VA, Stepanov VV, Harris JN. A new model to predict pyrolysis, ignition and burning of flammable materials in fire tests. Fire Saf J. 2013;59:132–50.
Walters RN, Safronava N, Lyon RE. A microscale combustion calorimeter study of gas phase combustion of polymers. Combust Flame. 2015;162:855–63.
Stoliarov SI, Crowley S, Walters RN, Lyon RE. Prediction of the burning rates of charring polymers. Combust Flame. 2010;157:2024–34.
Liu Y, Zhang Y, Cao Z, Fang Z. Synthesis and performance of three flame retardant additives containing diethyl phosphite/phenyl phosphonic moieties. Fire Saf J. 2013;61:185–92.
Chen X, Zhuo J, Jiao C. Thermal degradation characteristics of flame retardant polylactide using TG-IR. Polym Degrad Stab. 2012;97:2143–7.
Wu K, Zhang YK, Zhang K, Shen MM, Hu Y. Effect of microencapsulation on thermal properties and flammability performance of epoxy composite. J Anal Appl Pyrolysis. 2012;94:196–201.
Jiang L, He JJ, Sun JH. Sample width and thickness effects on upward flame spread over PMMA surface. J Hazard Mater. 2018;342:114–20.
Jiang L, Miller C, Gollner M, Sun JH. Sample width and thickness effects on horizontal flame spread over a thin PMMA surface. Proc Combust Inst. 2017;36(2):2987–94.
ISO 5660-1, Reaction to fire tests- Heat release, smoke production and mass loss rate, Part 1: Heat release rate (cone calorimeter method); 2002.
Oprea S. Effect of structure on the thermal stability of crosslinked poly (ester-urethane). Polimery. 2009;54(2):120–5.
Zieleniewska M, Leszczyński MK, Szczepkowski L, et al. Development and applicational evaluation of the rigid polyurethane foam composites with egg shell waste. Polym Degrad Stab. 2016;132:78–86.
Salasinska K, Borucka M, Leszczyńska M, et al. Analysis of flammability and smoke emission of rigid polyurethane foams modified with nanoparticles and halogen-free fire retardants. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2017;130(1):131–41.
Jiang L, Zhang D, Li M, et al. Pyrolytic behavior of waste extruded polystyrene and rigid polyurethane by multi kinetics methods and Py-GC/MS. Fuel. 2018;222:11–20.
He JJ, Jiang L, Sun JH, et al. Thermal degradation study of pure rigid polyurethane in oxidative and non-oxidative atmospheres. J Anal Appl Pyrolysis. 2016;120:269–83.
Jiang L, Xiao HH, He JJ, et al. Application of genetic algorithm to pyrolysis of typical polymers. Fuel Process Technol. 2015;138:48–55.
Xu Q, Jin C, Griffin GJ, Matala A, Hostikka S. A PMMA flammability analysis using the MCC effect of specimen mass. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2016;126(3):1831–40. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-016-5688-z.
Xu Q, Jin C, Jiang Y. Compare the flammability of two extruded polystyrene foams with microscale combustion calorimeter and cone calorimeter tests. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2017;127(3):2359–66. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-016-5754-6.
Xu Q, Jin C, Jiang Y. Analysis of the relationship between MCC and thermal analysis results in evaluating flammability of EPS foam. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2014;118(2):687–93. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-014-3736-0.
Schartel B, Pawlowski KH, Lyon RE. Pyrolysis combustion flow calorimeter: a tool to assess flame retarded PC/ABS materials. Thermochim Acta. 2007;462:1–14.
Principles and Practice of Microscale Combustion Calorimetry, DOT/FAA/TC-12/53; 2013.
Lyon RE, Walters RN, Stoliarov SI. A new methodology for measuring flammability parameters of plastics. In: Proceedings of the 64th annual conference of the society of plastics engineers, May 7–11. Charlotte; 2006. p. 1626–30.
Janssens ML. Improved method of analysis for the LIFT apparatus, Part I: ignition. In: Proceedings of 2nd fire and materials conf. interscience communications, London, England; 1993. p. 37–46.
Hansen SH, Hovde PJ. Prediction of time to flashover in the ISO 9705 room corner test based on cone calorimeter test results. Fire Mater. 2002;26(2):77–86.
Lyon RE. Heat release kinetics. Fire Mater. 2000;24:179–86.
Tewarson A. Flammability Parameters of Materials: ignition, combustion, and fire propagation. J Fire Sci. 1994;12:329. https://doi.org/10.1177/073490419401200401.
Acknowledgements
This research is funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China, No. 51776098, and supported by the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities, no. 30918015101 and China-Slovak joint research project 8-8.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Xu, Q., Jin, C., Majlingova, A. et al. Evaluate the flammability of a PU foam with double-scale analysis. J Therm Anal Calorim 135, 3329–3337 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-018-7494-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-018-7494-2