Abstract
The kaolin sand containing 36 wt% of kaolinite was thermally transformed at 650 °C/L h to the burnt kaolin sand (BKS) with relevant content of metakaolinite. Thermal behaviour of composites with substitution of Portland cement (PC) by the BKS containing 0, 5, 10 and 15 wt% of metakaolinite and water-to-solid ratio of 0.5 kept for 90 days in 20 ± 1 °C water was studied by thermal analysis. TG/DTA/DTG studies concerned calciumsilicate hydrate and calciumaluminate hydrate formation, portlandite dehydroxylation and calcite decarbonation. The influence of curing time and metakaolinite content were estimated. The reduction in portlandite content was observed in PC–BKS composites opposite to that found in the reference PC system. Compressive strength uptakes were observed in PC–BKS composites relative to that of reference PC system. BKS is characterized as effective pozzolanic material giving cement composites of high performance. The above findings were confirmed by X-ray diffraction analysis (XRD) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) results.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Concrete structures are mostly manufactured with Portland cement. Beside other materials, each tonne of Portland cement requires ~1.5 tons of limestone, a considerable amount of fossil fuels and electrical energy. Thus, the cement industry is highly energy intensive and the emissions of CO2 during cement manufacturing have created enormous environmental concerns. Globally, cement companies are producing nearly two billion tonnes/year of their product and emitting nearly two billion tonnes of CO2 (or around 6–7% of planet’s total CO2 emissions) in the process. At this pace, by 2025 the cement industry will be emitting CO2 at a rate of 3.5 billion tonnes/year [1]. This forms pressures to reduce cement consumption through the use of artificial-made materials, industrial by-products as well as supplementary cementing materials substituting the Portland cement in concrete [2–6].
The most common cementitious materials that are used as constituents in composites with Portland cement (as substitution) are mainly silica fume, fly ash and blast furnace slag [7–9]. The utilization of calcined clay in the form of metakaolin has received considerable interest in recent years and is well documented [10–12]. The metakaolin use in cement industry seems to be intense [13–15].
Metakaolin is a highly active aluminosilicate material which is formed by the dehydroxylation of kaolin (Al2(OH)4Si2O5) precursor upon heating in the ca 650–800 °C temperature range [14, 16, 17]. This process is often well-known as calcination and can be in simplified form expressed as follows:
During heating, it is essential to convert unreactive kaolin to reactive metakaolin. Formed metakaolin contains usually ca 50–55% SiO2 and 40–45% Al2O3 and is naturally highly reactive [18]. The hydration reaction of cement with metakaolin depends on cement kind, substitution rate of cement by metakaolin, water-to-binder ratio as well as the relevant calcination temperature [19, 20].
The prime objective of a couple of presented works is the characterization of the compounds formed when metakaolin reacts with Ca(OH)2 in the process of pozzolanic reaction. The Ca(OH)2 is gradually removed in a similar way than in composites with other pozzolana, e.g., silica fume. However, the pozzolanic reaction increases the content of calciumsilicate hydrates (CSH gel) and calciumaluminate hydrates (CAH gel) in the hydrated matrix. Thermal analysis provides information on processes and phenomena in matrix composition. The main endothermic peaks were observed in the following temperature ranges [16, 21]: 120–145 °C dehydration of CSH; 180–200 °C dehydration of C2ASH8 gehlenite; 350–400 °C dehydration of C3AH6 hydrogarnet; 490–525 °C dehydroxylation of Ca(OH)2; 720–760 °C decarbonation of CaCO3 and 940–970 °C “precursors” of mullite and cristobalite.
Thus, the incorporation of metakaolin leads to the enhancement of utility properties of cement-based composites and consequently to the expansion in possibilities of their using in practice [22]. It has been reported that the substitution of Portland cement by 5–20% metakaolin results in significant increases in compressive strength for high-performance concretes and mortars up to 28 days [18, 23].
The critical factor affecting the performance of concrete structure is pore structure development—pore size distribution rather than the total porosity. The pore size distribution has been studied in metakaolin—Portland cement pastes [24, 25]. Partial substitution of metakaolin by the weight of cement (5–20%) affects pore size and consequently reduces permeability [26] due to the pore structure refinement [24, 27]. SEM microstructures indicate a good improvement for the matrix structure of the composites where a more dense structure is observed [28]. Since cement-based materials are often subjected to action of aggressive environment [29, 30], it is important the fact that composites with metakaolin exhibit high chemical resistance against sulphate attack and chloride diffusion [22, 28].
Kaolin from natural sources may be notably impure, even after beneficiation [18]. Poor Greek kaolins with a low kaolinite content (often ca 52%) exhibited similar properties than commercial metakaolin with 96% of metakaolinite [31]. The metakaolins derived from poor Greek kaolins when combined with Portland cement to produce blended cements, impart similar behaviour to that of commercial metakaolin especially with respect to cement strength development, setting times and hydration as well as durability [32]. The similar kaolins with relatively poor kaolinite content are in Slovakia denoted as kaolin sands [33–36].
The effect of cement substitution by burnt kaolin sand (with 36% of metakaolinite) on hydrated phases, pore structure development and mechanical properties in cement composites was evaluated and relevant results are presented in the paper.
Experimental
Materials
The materials used in this study include CEM I42.5R Portland cement (PC) in accordance with STN EN 197-1 [37] supplied by Holcim Rohožník (Slovakia) and burnt kaolin sand (BKS) prepared by heating raw material—kaolin sand mined at the Vyšný Petrovec deposit (Slovakia) for 1 h at 650 °C. The content of kaolinite (metakaolinite) in kaolin sand (burnt kaolin sand) was 36 wt% according to quantitative X-ray analysis realized by the Rock Jock program [38]. The PC was substituted with BKS including 0, 5, 10 and 15 wt% of metakaolinite for making the cement composites (CC). The CC was prepared with water-to-solids ratio of 0.5. The reference cement paste with 100% PC by weight (without BKS) was also prepared. The properties of the materials determined according to STN EN standards [39–41] are presented in Table 1.
Methods
The CC were cast into the 20 × 20 × 20 mm cubes. The moulds were stored at an atmosphere with 95% relative humidity at 20 ± 1 °C for the first 24 h and then the cubes were kept in water at 20 ± 1 °C until testing. The CC were studied on their 28- and 90-day compressive strengths and characterized by X-ray diffractometry (XRD), thermal analysis (TG/DTA/DTG), mercury intrusion porosimetry (MIP) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) techniques.
The X-ray diffraction tests were made on the Philips diffractometer (Eindhoven, The Netherlands) and run in a Θ range of 8°–18°. CuKα radiation and Ni filter was used. Thermal studies were performed on OD-102 Derivatograph MOM (Budapest, Hungary) in air; the heating range: 20–1,000 °C, heating rate 10 K/min, sample mass 400 mg and TG range 200 mg; the reference material was Al2O3. The pore structure was studied using a mercury intrusion porosimetry (MIP) by the high-pressure porosimeter mod. 2000 and macro-porosimeter unit mod. 120 (both Carlo Erba, Milan, Italy). The measured data give volume of micropores up to 7,500 nm, average micropore and pore median radius, total porosity and pore size distribution. Permeability coefficient of the matured CC composites and PC paste were calculated according to computation described in [42]. The calculated permeability coefficient is, however, not fully coincident with the actual and absolute value of permeability coefficient but serves as new pore structure indicator, which can be related to strength developments and bound water contents of the concretes, respectively [43]. The SEM studies were performed on SEM instrument Quanta 3D 200i (FEI Company, Hillsboro, USA). Small pieces of CC were appropriately treated and prepared for scanning electron mode of the microscope.
In order to investigate the effect of BKS, a deeper study of its use in CC with 5, 10 and 15 wt% substitution of PC by metakaolinite was carried out. The CC without BKS was applied as reference cement paste.
Results and discussion
Compressive strengths of the metakaolinite cement composites (MKCC) prepared at different substitution levels of PC by BKS cured in 20 ± 1 °C water are listed in Table 2. The highest 28-day strength enhancement opposite to the reference cement paste occurs in specimens with 15 wt% substitution of PC by metakaolinite in MKCC. By increasing curing time to 90 days, the maximum compressive strength belongs to the composite with 10 wt% substitution of PC by metakaolinite in MKCC. These results indicate that at shorter curing time of 28 days, the highest portion of Ca(OH)2 can be released from hydration products that could be consumed by BKS in MKCC with 15 wt% substitution of PC by metakaolinite. This results in the improvement in the formed microstructure and compressive strength of MKCC with 15 wt% substitution of PC by metakaolinite due to effective pozzolanic reaction. As curing time increases and more calcium hydroxide is produced within 90-day hydration process period, additional amounts of gel-like hydration products appear in the cement composite, which contribute to strength increase at later curing time. This is the expected reason for which the substitution of PC by 10 wt% of metakaolinite in MKCC gives the highest compressive strength after 90-day cure. The observed strength enhancements in the compressive strength of MKCC composites are attributed to the pozzolanic activity of BKS.
The pozzolanic activity of BKS is confirmed by XRD analyses (Figs. 1, 2). According to these diffractograms, less calcium hydroxide—Ca(OH)2 was detected in MKCC relative to the reference cement paste without BKS. The XRD study clearly indicates that BKS exhibits pozzolanic activity. The Ca(OH)2 is mostly consumed in the composite with 15 wt% substitution of PC by metakaolinite that is present in BKS.
The results of TG/DTA/DTG analysis are evaluated in Table 3 and Figs. 3 and 4. The lowest temperature range between 120 and 260 °C is connected with decomposition of CSH gel and C2ASH8 (gehlenite). The presence of CSH gel and gehlenite is more significant with the increased curing time (90 days). The amount of Ca(OH)2 is decreased with the elevated substitution of PC by metakaolinite because of portlandite consumption in the pozzolanic reaction of BKS. The decarbonation process is accompanied with the gradual reduction of calcite CaCO3 amount with the increased content of metakaolinite in CC. This statement is valid for evolution of total ignition values too.
The MIP findings for the studied cement composites are summarized in Table 4. The results show that for 28- and 90-day composites the average micropore and pore radii, total porosity and permeability coefficients are lower than in the reference cement paste without BKS. Moreover, the average pore radii, total porosity and permeability coefficient values are reduced with curing time. The observed pore structure refinement of MKCC relative to those in reference cement paste is contributed to the reduced Ca(OH)2 contents after 28- and 90-day cure in 20 ± 1 °C water. The reason of this fact lies in pozzolanic reaction of metakaolinite with the cement. The MIP results are also consistent with strength developments (Table 2). Thus, the cement composites with BKS are characterized by lower total porosity, smaller mean micropore and pore radius as well as lower permeability on the one hand, but by higher compressive strength on the other hand than the reference cement paste. This result represents valuable indication that PC substitutions by 5–15 wt% metakaolinite in MKCC effectively refine the formed pore structures.
Figures 5, 6, 7 show SEM images of MKCC with 15 wt% substitution of PC by metakaolinite and reference cement paste without BKS prepared at different magnifications after 28- and 90-day water curing. Microstructure of cement composite appears to be more uniform considering the content of crystalline constituents than that of reference cement paste. The MKCC with 15 wt% substitution of PC by metakaolinite is characterized by lower content of platy and needle-like calcium hydroxide—Ca(OH)2 crystals of smaller size opposite to the reference cement paste. Careful observations in the case of MKCC reveal a composite microstructure consisting of a dense matrix, whose surface is covered by extremely small nanoparticles of honeycomb-like CSH gel of different sizes and shapes. This confirms the pozzolanic reaction of BKS by the effective consumption of Ca(OH)2, which results in the higher compressive strengths of MKCC relative to the reference cement paste on the one hand and lower mean pore median radii, total porosities and permeability coefficients values relative to those in the reference cement paste on the other hand.
Conclusions
Based on the performed tests, the following conclusions were drawn:
-
1.
Substitution of Portland cement by burnt kaolin sand containing 36 wt% of metakaolinite in cement composites corresponding to 5–15 wt% substitution of Portland cement by metakaolinite shows 24% for 28-day and 46% for 90-day compressive strength increase compared to the reference cement paste.
-
2.
Burnt kaolin sand with the metakaolinite content of 36 wt% exhibits a strong pozzolanic activity by consuming Ca(OH)2 and represents an efficient pozzolana.
-
3.
Substitution of Portland cement by burnt kaolin sand containing 5–15 wt% of metakaolinite in cement composites results in following changes happening in the formed microstructure and pore structure: (a) significant positive effect on compressive strength due to reduction in Ca(OH)2 content and (b) pore structure refinement presented by decreased mean pore radii, total porosity and permeability coefficient opposite to reference cement paste without burnt kaolin sand.
-
4.
The micropore and total pore radii, total porosities and permeability coefficients are decreasing with curing time.
References
Caijun S, Jimenez AF, Palomo A. New cements for 21st century: the pursuit of an alternative to Portland cement. Cem Concr Res. 2011;41:750–63.
Mojumdar SC. Processing-moisture resistance and thermal analysis of macrodefect-free materials. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2001;64:1133–9.
Palou M, Majling J, Dováľ M, Kozánková J, Mojumdar SC. Formation and stability of crystallohydrates in the non-equilibrium system during hydration SAB cements. Ceramics Silikaty. 2005;49:230–6.
Souza PSL, Molin DCCD. Viability of using calcined clays from industrial by-products as pozzolans of high reactivity. Cem Concr Res. 2005;35:1993–8.
Papadakis VG, Tsimas S. Supplementary cementing materials in concrete part I: efficiency and design. Cem Concr Res. 2002;32:1035–41.
Rahhal V, Talero R. Fast physics–chemical and calorimetric characterization of natural pozzolans and other aspects. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2009;99:479–86.
Thomas MDA, Shehata MH, Shashiprakash SG, Hopkins DS, Cail K. Use of ternary cementitious systems containing silica fume and fly ash in concrete. Cem Concr Res. 1999;29:1207–14.
Ashraf M, Khan AN, Ali Q, Mirza J, Goyal A, Anwar AM. Physico–chemical, morphological and thermal analysis for the combined pozzolanic activities of minerals additives. Constr Build Mater. 2009;23:2207–13.
Gesoglu M, Güneyisi E, Özbay E. Properties of self-compacting concretes made with binary, ternary and quaternary cementitious blends of fly ash, blastfurnace slag and silica fume. Constr Build Mater. 2009;23:1847–54.
da Cunha ALC, Goncalves JP, Büchler PM, Dweck J. Effect of metakaolin pozzolanic activity in the early stages of cement type II paste and mortar hydration. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2008;92:115–9.
Talero R, Rahhal V. Calorimetric comparison of Portland cements containing silica fume and metakaolin. Is silica fume, like metakaolin characterized by pozzolanic activity that is more specific than generic? J Therm Anal Calorim. 2009;96:383–93.
Moser RD, Jayapalan AR, Garas VY, Kurtis KE. Assessment of binary and ternary blends of metakaolin and class C fly ash for alkali–silica reaction mitigation in concrete. Cem Concr Res. 2010;40:1664–72.
Schebl SS. Development of new efficient premixed blended metakaolin–cementitious fireproofing compounds. Cement Wapno Beton. 2010;15(/77):279–88.
Cassagnabere F, Mouret M, Escadeillas G, Broillard P. Metakaolin, a solution for the precast industry to limit the clinker content in concrete: mechanical aspects. Constr Build Mater. 2010;24:1109–18.
Shekarchi M, Benakdas A, Bakhshi M, Mirdamadi A, Mobasher B. Transport properties in metakaolin blended concrete. Constr Build Mater. 2010;24:2217–23.
Bakolas A, Aggelakopoulou E, Moropoulou A, Anagnostopoulou S. Evaluation of pozzolanic activity and physico-mechanical characteristics in metakaolin-lime pastes. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2006;84:157–63.
Samet B, Mnif T, Chaabouni M. Use of kaolinitic clay as a pozzolanic material for cements: formulation of blended cement. Cem Concr Comp. 2007;29:741–9.
Parande AK, Babu BR, Karthik MA, Kumaar D, Palaniswamy N. Study on strength and corrosion performance for steel embedded in metakaolin blended concrete/mortar. Constr Build Mater. 2008;22:127–34.
Chakchouk A, Trifi L, Samet B, Bouaziz S. Formulation of blended cement: effect of process variables on clay pozzolanic activity. Constr Build Mater. 2009;23:1365–73.
Bich CH, Ambroise J, Pera J. Influence of degree of dehydroxylation on the pozzolanic activity of metakaolin. Appl Clay Sci. 2009;44:194–200.
Sha W. Differential scanning calorimetry study of the hydration products in Portland cement pastes with metakaolin replacement. In: Anson M, Ko JM, Lam ESS, editors. Proceedings of the international conference on advances in building technology (vol. 1). Hong Kong: ABT; 2002. p. 881–888.
Asbridge AH, Jones TR, Osborne GJ. High performance metakaolin concrete: results of large scale trials in aggressive environments. In: Dhir RK, Hewlett PC, editors. Proceedings of the international conference on concrete in the service of mankind. Dundee: Radical Concrete Technology; 1996. p. 13–24.
Caldarone MA, Gruber KA, Burg RG. High reactivity metakaolin: a new generation mineral admixture. Concr Int. 1994;16:37–40.
Frias M, Cabrera J. Pore size distribution and degree of hydration of metakaolin–cement pastes. Cem Concr Res. 2000;30:561–9.
Rojas MF, de Rojas MIS. Influence of metastable hydrated phases on the pore size distribution and degree of hydration of metakaolin-blended cements cured at 60 °C. Cem Concr Res. 2005;35:1292–8.
Siddique R, Klaus J. Influence of metakaolin on the properties of mortars and concrete: a review. Appl Clay Sci. 2009;44:194–200.
Khatib JM, Wild S. Pore size distribution of metakaolin paste. Cem Concr Res. 1996;26:1545–53.
Khater AM. Influence of metakaolin on resistivity of cement mortar to magnesium chloride solution. Ceramics Silikaty. 2010;54:325–33.
Jerga J, Halas P. Ingress of chloride into the prestressed concrete structure. In: Proceedings of the 5th international conference on concrete. Prague: ICC; 1990. p. 400–404.
Jerga J. Physico-mechanical properties of carbonated concrete. Constr Build Mater. 2004;18:645–52.
Badogiannis E, Tsivilis S. Exploitation of poor Greek kaolins: durability of metakaolin concrete. Cem Concr Comp. 2009;31:128–33.
Badogiannis E, Kakali G, Dimopoulou G, Chaniotakis E, Tsivilis S. Metakaolin as a main cement constituent. Exploitation of poor Greek kaolins. Cem Concr Comp. 2005;27:197–203.
Kraus I, Uhlík P, Dubíková, M, Manfredini T, Pavlíková J, Šucha V, Hanisková M, Honty M. Mineralogical, chemical and technological characterization of kaolin sands. In: Proceedings of the international conference Euroclay (book of abstracts). Modena: ICE; 2003. p. 160–161.
Krajči L’, Janotka I, Kraus I, Jamnický P. Burnt kaolin sand as pozzolanic material for cement hydration. Ceramics Silikaty. 2007;51:217–24.
Janotka I, Krajči L’, Kuliffayová M, Kraus I. Metakaolin sand—a prospective substitute for Portland cement. In: Proceedings of the 4th mid-European clay conference MECC 2008. Zakopane: ECC; 2008. p. 72.
Janotka I, Puertas F, Palacios M, Varga C, Krajči L’. Metakaolin sand—a promising addition for Portland cement. Mater de Constr. 2010;60:73–88.
STN EN 197-1 Cement. Part I: Composition, specifications and conformity criteria for common cements. 2002. Accessed 1 April 2002.
Eberl DD User’s guide to Rock Jock—a program for determining quantitative mineralogy from powder X-ray diffraction data. In: U.S. geological survey, open-file report 03-78; 2003. p. 47.
STN EN 196-3 + A1. Methods of testing cements. Part 3: determination of setting time and soundness. 2009. Accessed 1 May 2009.
STN EN 196-1. Methods of testing cement. Part 1: determination of strength. 2005. Accessed 22 March 2005.
STN EN 196-2. Methods of testing cement. Part 2: chemical analysis of cement. 2005. Accessed 1 November 2005.
Bágeľ Ľ, Živica V. Relationship between pore structure and permeability of hardened cement mortars. Cem Concr Res. 1997;27:1225–35.
Janotka I, Bágeľ Ľ. Bound water content, permeability and residual compressive strength at high temperatures. In: Dhir RK, editor. Proceedings of the 6th international symposium on global constructions and ultimate concrete opportunities, section: role of concrete in nuclear facilities. Dundee: GGBS; 2005. p. 51–58.
Acknowledgements
The authors are thankful to the Slovak Grant Agency (projects No. 2/0064/12 and No. 2/0053/11) for the financial support of this work.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kuliffayová, M., Krajči, L., Janotka, I. et al. Thermal behaviour and characterization of cement composites with burnt kaolin sand. J Therm Anal Calorim 108, 425–432 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-011-1964-0
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-011-1964-0