Skip to main content
Log in

Comprehensive evaluation of solution nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy sample preparation for helical integral membrane proteins

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Structural and Functional Genomics

Abstract

The preparation of high quality samples is a critical challenge for the structural characterization of helical integral membrane proteins. Solving the structures of this diverse class of proteins by solution nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy (NMR) requires that well-resolved 2D 1H/15N chemical shift correlation spectra be obtained. Acquiring these spectra demands the production of samples with high levels of purity and excellent homogeneity throughout the sample. In addition, high yields of isotopically enriched protein and efficient purification protocols are required. We describe two robust sample preparation methods for preparing high quality, homogeneous samples of helical integral membrane proteins. These sample preparation protocols have been combined with screens for detergents and sample conditions leading to the efficient production of samples suitable for solution NMR spectroscopy. We have examined 18 helical integral membrane proteins, ranging in size from approximately 9 kDa to 29 kDa with 1–4 transmembrane helices, originating from a number of bacterial and viral genomes. 2D 1H/15N chemical shift correlation spectra acquired for each protein demonstrate well-resolved resonances, and >90% detection of the predicted resonances. These results indicate that with proper sample preparation, high quality solution NMR spectra of helical integral membrane proteins can be obtained greatly enhancing the probability for structural characterization of these important proteins.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Korepanova A, Gao FP, Hua Y, Qin H, Nakamoto RK, Cross TA (2005) Protein Sci 14:148–158

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Mohanty AK, Wiener MC (2004) Protein Expr Purif 33:311–325

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Drew D, Froderberg L, Baars L, de Gier J-WL (2003) Biochim Biophys Acta, Biomembr 1610:3–10

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Wallin E, von Heijne G (1998) Protein Sci 7:1029–1038

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Liu J, Rost B (2001) Protein Sci 10:1970–1979

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. White SH, Wimley WC (1999) Annu Rev Biophys Biomol Struct 28:319–365

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Cole ST (2002) Eur Respir J 36:78s–86s

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Berman HM, Westbrook J, Feng Z, Gilliland G, Bhat TN, Weissig H, Shindyalov IN, Bourne PE (2000) Nucleic Acids Res 28:235–242

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. White SH (2004) Protein Sci 13:1948–1949

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Wang D-N, Safferling M, Lemieux MJ, Griffith H, Chen Y, Li X-D (2003) Biochim Biophys Acta, Biomembr 1610:23–36

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Loll PJ (2003) J Struct Biol 142:144–153

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Miroux B, Walker JE (1996) J Mol Biol 260:289–298

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Rogl H, Kosemund K, Kuhlbrandt W, Collinson I (1998) FEBS Lett 432:21–26

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Gorzelle BM, Nagy JK, Oxenoid K, Lonzer WL, Cafiso, DS, Sanders CR (1999) Biochemistry 38:16373–16382

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Baneres JL, Martin A, Hullot P, Girard JP, Rossi JC and Parello J (2003) J Mol Biol 329:801–814

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Brusca JS, Radolf JD (1994) Methods Enzymol 228:182–193

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Tian C, Karra MD, Ellis CD, Jacob J, Oxenoid K, Sonnichsen F, Sanders CR (2005) Methods Enzymol 394:321–334

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Beswick V, Guerois R, Cordier-Ochsenbein F, Coic Y, Huynh-Dinh T, Tostain J, Noel J, Sanson A, Neumann J (1998) Eur Biophys J 394:321–334

    Google Scholar 

  19. Vinogradova O, Sonnichsen F, Sanders CR 2nd (1998) J Biomol NMR 11:381–386

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Howell SC, Mesleh MF, Opella SJ (2005) Biochemistry 44:5196–5206

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Park SH, Mrse AA, Nevzorov AA, Mesleh MF, Oblatt-Montal M, Montal M, Opella SJ (2003) J Mol Biol 333:409–424

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Zamoon J, Mascioni A, Thomas DD, Veglia G (2003) Biophys J 85:2589–2598

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Oxenoid K, Chou JJ (2005) Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102:10870–10875

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Krueger-Koplin RD, Sorgen PL, Krueger-Koplin ST, Rivera-Torres IO, Cahill SM, Hicks DB, Grinius L, Krulwich TA, Girvin ME (2004) J Biomol NMR 28:43–57

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. http://www.targetdb.pdb.org/statistics/TargetStatistics.html

  26. Kay L, Keif P, Saarinen T (1992) J Am Chem Soc 114:10663–10665

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Fernandez C, Hilty C, Bonjour S, Adeishvili K, Pervushin K, Wuthrich K (2001) FEBS Lett 504:173–178

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Cole ST, Brosch R, Parkhill J, Garnier T, Churcher C, Harris D, Gordon SV, Eiglmeier K, Gas S, Barry CE 3rd, Tekaia F, Badcock K, Basham D, Brown D, Chillingworth T, Connor R, Davies R, Devlin K, Feltwell T, Gentles S, Hamlin N, Holroyd S, Hornsby T, Jagels K, Krogh A, McLean J, Moule S, Murphy L, Oliver K, Osborne J, Quail MA, Rajandream MA, Rogers J, Rutter S, Seeger K, Skelton J, Squares R, Squares S, Sulston JE, Taylor K, Whitehead S and Barrell BG (1998) Nature 393:537–544

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Tian C, Tobler K, Lamb RA, Pinto LH, Cross TA (2002) Biochemistry 41:11294–11300

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Ma C, Marassi FM, Jones DH, Straus SK, Bour S, Strebel K, Schubert U, Oblatt-Montal M, Montal M, Opella SJ (2002) Protein Sci 11:546–557

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Sonnhammer EL, von Heijne G, Krogh A (1998) Proc Int Conf Intell Syst Mol Biol 6:175–182

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Krogh A, Larsson B, von Heijne G, Sonnhammer EL (2001) J Mol Biol 305:567–580

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Oxenoid K, Kim HJ, Jacob J, Sonnichsen FD, Sanders CR (2004) J Am Chem Soc 126:5048–5049

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Kay LE, Nicholson LK, Delaglio F, Bax A, Torchia DA (1992) J Magn Reson 97:359–375

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Weigelt J (1998) J Am Chem Soc 120:10778–10779

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Delaglio F, Grzesiek S, Vuister GW, Zhu G, Pfeifer J and Bax A (1995) J Biomol NMR 6:277–293

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Goddard T, Kneller D, SPARKY 3. University of California, San Francisco

  38. Lian L-Y, Middleton DA (2001) Prog Nucl Magn Reson Spectrosc 39:171–190

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Cai M, Huang Y, Sakaguchi K, Clore GM, Gronenborn AM and Craigie R (1998) J Biomol NMR 11:97–102

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Marley J, Lu M, Bracken C (2001) J Biomol NMR 20:71–75

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Arechaga I, Miroux B, Karrasch S, Huijbregts R, de Kruijff B, Runswick MJ, Walker JE (2000) FEBS Lett 482: 215–219

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Hwang PM, Kay LE (2005) Methods Enzymol 394:335–350

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. McDonnell PA, Shon K, Kim Y, Opella SJ (1993) J Mol Biol 233:447–463

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Otzen DE (2002) Biophys J 83:2219–2230

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Fisher LE, Engelman DM, Sturgis JN (1999) J Mol Biol 293:639–651

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Kanelis V, Forman-Kay JD, Kay LE (2001) IUBMB Life 52:291–302

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Arora A, Tamm LK (2001) Curr Opin Struct Biol 11:540–547

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank T.M. Logan of Florida State University for his helpful discussion concerning initial solution NMR spectroscopy of helical IMPs from M. tuberculosis. The authors also thank B. Xu, D.H. Jones, and S.H. Park of University of California, San Diego, and H. Qin and Y. Hua of Florida State University for their contributions to the work. This work was supported by NIH grant PO1 GM064676 and NSF grant MCB-0235774. A portion of this work was performed at the National High Magnetic Field Laboratory funded by the National Science Foundation (DMR 0084173) and the State of Florida. Parts of this research were performed in the Environmental Molecular Sciences Laboratory (a national scientific user facility sponsored by the U.S. DOE Office of Biological and Environmental Research) located at Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, operated by Battelle for the DOE. This research benefited from activities at the Southeast Collaboratory for High-Field Biomolecular NMR, a research resource at the University of Georgia, funded by the National Institute of General Medical Sciences (NIGMS grant number P41 GM066340) and the Georgia Research Alliance. The research utilized the Biomedical Technology Resource for NMR Molecular Imaging of Proteins supported by NIH grant P41 EB002031. C.K. Mobley was supported by NIH training grant T32GM008320. J.D. Moore was supported by NIH predoctoral fellowship F31NS054494. R.C. Page and H.B. Nguyen were supported by American Heart Association predoctoral fellowships.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Timothy A. Cross.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Page, R.C., Moore, J.D., Nguyen, H.B. et al. Comprehensive evaluation of solution nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy sample preparation for helical integral membrane proteins. J Struct Funct Genomics 7, 51–64 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10969-006-9009-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10969-006-9009-9

Keywords

Navigation