Abstract
Several novel extractants based on the bis-succinamide (BisSCA) structure have been synthesized and characterized by NMR, IR and HRMS. Extraction distribution ratios of U(VI) have been studied as a function of popular diluents and aqueous concentrations of HNO3 as well as extractant concentration. In contrast with single succinamide extractants, the BisSCA extractants exhibited better extraction efficiency in the present system, and suggesting that BisSCAs could efficiently associate with uranyl ion in different mode of complexation. Based on the relationships between logD U(VI) and log[BisSCA] under different ionic strengths, the preferable compositions of extracted species were presumed to be the major [UO2(NO3)2]2·[BisSCA]2 and the minor UO2(NO3)2·[BisSCA]2.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Using chemical procedures to separate and recover the useful components from the spent fuel produced by nuclear reactor was playing a fatal role for the sustainable development of nuclear power [1–4]. Among the various separation methods at industrial scale, due to several outstanding advantages such as the ability for continuous operation, high throughput and solvent recycling, the solvent extraction is recognized as an essential technique in the concentration and purification of uranium in the nuclear fuel field [5, 6]. For treatment of high level radioactive waste, the extraction and separation of the useful components have extensively been studied using the novel extractants [7, 8]. For instance, originated from the early monoamides, many different structures of diamides have been developed for recovery of actinides from spent fuel, including oxalamide, succinamide, malonamide, glutalamide and diglycolamides [9–14]. The previous reports have revealed that the different structural backbone or substituent group of diamides has an impact to the actinide extraction abilities in liquid–liquid extraction [9, 15].
Based on our previous study in synthesis of amidic extractants [11], we attempted to attach two succinamide molecules to form new BisSCA backtone by several-step synthetic strategies. Due to these compounds offering the possibility of four oxygen donors that can chelated with the metal ion, these ligands were expected to improve affinity for actinides and lanthanides and enhance extraction efficiency compared to the previous single functional succinamides [16, 17]. The newly synthesized extractants, N 1,N 1,N 4,N 4-tetrabutyl-N 2,N 3-ethidene bis-succinamide (TBE-BisSCA), N 1,N 1,N 4,N 4-tetrahexyl-N 2,N 3-ethidene bis-succinamide (THE-BisSCA) and N 1,N 1,N 4,N 4-tetraoctyl-N 2,N 3-ethidene bis-succinamide (TOE-BisSCA) were summarized in Fig. 1. In this study, the detailed synthetic routes of the above BisSCA were described. The extraction behavior of uranium ions using the above ligands was investigated from nitric acid solution.
Experimental
Materials and equipments
All diluents and reagents were of analytical grades and used without any further purification. 1H NMR and 13C NMR spectra of extractants prepared were recorded with a Varian Mercury-400 spectrometer in CDCl3 by using TMS as the internal standard. Purification of all the extractants was further characterized by high-resolution mass spectra (HRMS) using a Bruker Esquire 6000 mass spectrometer. IR spectra were recorded with an FT-IR spectrometer and only major peaks were reported. Analytical grade U3O8 was used. The concentration of UO2 2+ in aqueous phase was determined by the Arsenazo-III spectrophotometric method using a 723 N model UV–Visible Spectrophotometer (Shanghai, China).
Synthesis of extractants
TBE-BisSCA and its two analogous THE-BisSCA and TOE-BisSCA were synthesized in our laboratory as described in Scheme 1. Commercially available succinic anhydride (20 mmol) was dissolved in CH2Cl2 (50 mL), and then the ethylenediamine (8 mmol) in CH2Cl2 was added dropwise to the above solution over 30 min. After stirred at room temperature for about 20 h, the mixture was filtered under vacuum and washed with acetone for several times. The obtained powder was dried overnight. Subsequently, the powder (5 mmol, no further purification) was poured into a round bottom flask with 50 mL of CH2Cl2, and then dicyclohexylcarbodiimide (DCC, 11 mmol) and 1-hydroxybenzotriazole (HOBT, 11 mmol) was added to the solution. After stirred for 30 min, an appropriate secondary amine (11 mmol) in CH2Cl2 was added to the reaction solution. After the further 20 h, the crude products were obtained by the appropriate procedure. The expected TBE-BisSCA, THE-BisSCA and TOE-BisSCA extractants were obtained in 70–85 % yields by the appropriate procedures and final silica gel column separation method.
Extraction procedure
In each extraction experiment, 3.00 mL pre-equilibrated organic phase with the desired amount of BisSCA extractants was contacted with 3.00 mL nitric acid solution of variable concentrations (1.0–6.0 mol/L) containing uranyl ions. The mixture was placed in a 10 mL plastic vial and shaken mechanically for 30 min (it had been found in our previous experiments that this time was adequate to obtain equilibrium) at 298 ± 1 K. After centrifugation (2 min and 2000 rpm/min), duplicate 2.00 ml of aliquot was taken from the aqueous phases and the concentration of uranyl ions in the aqueous phase was determined by the Arsenazo-III spectrophotometric method. The concentration of uranyl ions in the organic phase was calculated by mass balance. The distribution ratio D U(VI) was defined as the ratio of the concentration of uranyl ions in the organic phase to that in the aqueous phase. The data reported in this study are the averages of at least two experiments, and the errors are no more than 5 %.
Results and discussion
Effect of nitric acid concentration in various diluents
Based on the constant molar concentration of TBE-BisSCA (50 mmol/L), various popular diluents were employed to evaluate the extraction behavior of uranyl ions at the different concentration of nitric acid. As shown in Fig. 2, the distribution ratios of U(VI) (D U(IV)) were clearly distinct in the different diluents. It varied from 0.003 to 2.85 depending upon the nature of diluents used and the concentration of nitric acid. It is worthwhile to compare the data generated in the present study. Generally, the non-polar and weak polar solvents for extraction exhibited the better extractability compared to the polar lauryl alcohol. In additional, it was observed that D U(IV) increased with increase in the concentration of nitric acid for all present diluents, reached a maximum value at 4 or 5 mol/L depending on the diluents used, and followed by decreased in D U(IV) values. On the other hand, these BisSCA extractants in solvents such as lauryl alcohol was also studied considering a future industrial application. However, only disappointed results was observed with lauryl alcohol in the range of 1–6 M nitric acid, where distribution ratios were one order of magnitude lower than those obtained in other solvents. In comparison with all solvents employed, xylene exhibited the excellent extraction behavior in nitric acid solution of relatively high acidity. Therefore, xylene was considered as the optimum diluent for further extraction experiments.
Optimization of extractant in various concentration of nitric acid
The extraction of uranyl ions with xylene as optimum diluent by the above extractants (0.05 mmol/L) was carried out under various concentration of nitric acid. As shown in Fig. 3 the distribution ratio of uranyl ions increased with increasing the concentration of nitric acid, reached the maximums at 4 M for TBE-BisSCA, at 5 M for THE-BisSCA and TOE-BisSCA, respectively. The further increase concentration of nitric acid to higher acidity resulted in a decrease of the distribution ratio of uranyl ions, which can be attributed to competition of U(VI) ions and HNO3 for the coordination sites of BisSCA. It is noteworthy that the distribution ratio of U(VI) ions obtained for all the present BisSCA extractants are higher than those determined for single succinamides including N,N,N′,N′-tetrabutylsuccinamide (TBSCA), N,N,N′,N′-tetrahexylsuccinamide (THSCA) and N,N,N′,N′-tetraoctylsuccinamide (TOSCA) under the same experimental conditions, even when they are used at double concentration to match the number of binding groups of BisSCA. It indicated that BisSCAs could be associated with the metal ion in other mode of complexation compared to single succinamides. Additionally, Fig. 3 also demonstrated that the extraction of uranyl ions using THE-BisSCA extractant gave the highest distribution ratio under the present condition compared to other two extractants. Therefore, the best extraction of uranyl ions from the aqueous phase can be proceeded at about 5.0 mol/L of nitric acid with THE-BisSCA as the optimum extractant, which was chosen for the following extraction experiments.
Effect of extractant and salting-out agent concentration
Based on the optimum THE-BisSCA extractant, the relations of logD versus. log[BisSCA] at the different ionic strengths are illustrated in Fig. 4. It is observed that the distribution ratio of uranyl ions increases with increasing the extractant loading and the salting-out agent (NaNO3) concentrations at 5.0 mol/L of nitric acid medium. The linear relationships of logD and log[BisSCA] were obtained in a slope of ca. 1.3 without or with NaNO3 in the present extraction system. It indicates that the stoichiometry of the extraction complex was one molecule UO2 2+ combining to one or two molecule BisSCA, and the major complex can be recognized as 1:1 complex. Due to the BisSCA extractants containing four oxygen atoms of amide, may show mutidentate features. As we all known, the U(VI) cation has a coordination numbers of 4–6 on the equatorial site. Therefore, the extraction reaction can be assumed to proceed by formation of the major UO2(NO3)2·(BisSCA)2 and minor UO2(NO3)2·(BisSCA)2 species as depicted in Fig. 5.
Figure 4 also show the effect of sodium nitrate concentrations (salting-out agent) on the distribution ratios of U(VI) while keeping acid concentration at 5.0 M. Although the above study exhibited that the distribution ratio of uranyl ions reached the maximums at 5M for THE-BisSCA, it is clear that the distribution ratios of U(VI) increase with loading of nitrate sodium. The lowering of D U(VI) when adding nitrate sodium into aqueous solution is not observed. This difference can be attributed to competition of U(VI) ions and HNO3 for the coordination sites of BisSCA, and the absence of NaNO3 competition for available BisSCA sites.
Infrared spectra
To detailed insight into the bonding of the extracted species of U(VI) by BisSCA, the Infrared spectra of the organic phase were investigated before and after U(VI) extraction from 5M HNO3. The free C=O stretching vibration of THE-BisSCA is found at 1641 cm−1. Two vibration bands appearing at 1464 and 1429 cm−1 are due to the C–N group of the extractant. The IR spectra of U(VI) extracted by THE-BisSCA showed that the relative intensity of the free C=O group at 1641 cm−1 decreased with the appearance of new bands at 1583 cm−1 of the complexed carbonyl vibration for U(VI). The shift of 58 cm−1 in the C=O frequency suggests that a strong binding of THE-BisSCA with U(VI) after the extraction of UO2 2+. The C–N band at 1464 cm−1 is shifted to a higher frequency at 1472. These data indicated that U(VI) are mainly coordinated to the oxygen of carbonyl group of BisSCA. The present results are in good agreement with the previous reports [18].
Spectroscopic data
After purification and identification, the purity of three BisSCA extractants was found to be >97 %. For THE-BisSCA, 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz): δ 7.18 (s, 2H), 3.29(t, J = 7.6 Hz, 8H), 3.23 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 4H), 2.70 (t, J = 6.4 Hz, 4H), 2.50 (t, J = 6.4 Hz, 4H), 1.43–1.59 (m, 8H), 1.25–1.35 (m, 8H), 0.88–0.97 (m, 12H) ppm; 13C NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz): δ 173.65, 171.50, 47.65, 45.82, 38.77, 31.41, 30.83, 29.82, 28.83, 20.17, 20.08, 13.78 ppm; IR (KBr): 3317, 2958, 2929, 2869, 2374, 1704, 1631, 1559, 1547, 1459, 1429, 1376, 1257, 1211, 1143, 1115 cm−1; HRMS (ESI, C26H50N4O4): Calcd. m/z: 505.3730 [M + Na]+; Found m/z: 505.3720[M + Na] + . For THE-BisSCA, 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz): δ 7.21 (s, 2H), 3.20–3.30 (m, 12H), 2.70 (t, J = 5.6 Hz, 4H), 2.50 (t, J = 6.0 Hz, 4H), 1.48–1.56 (m, 8H), 1.26–1.30 (m, 24H), 0.85–0.90 (m, 12H) ppm; 13C NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz): δ 173.60, 171.40, 47.85, 46.07, 38.69, 31.50, 31.40, 28.80, 28.70, 27.64, 26.62, 26.52, 22.48, 13.91 ppm; IR (KBr): 3314, 2956, 2928, 2858, 1641, 1549, 1464, 1429, 1377, 1256, 1183, 1142 cm−1; HRMS (ESI, C34H66N4NaO4): Calcd. m/z: 595.5162 [M + H]+, 617.4982 [M + Na]+; Found m/z: 595.5156 [M + H]+, 617.4972 [M + Na]+. For TOE-BisSCA, 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz): δ 7.27 (s, 2H), 3.20–3.31 (m, 12H), 2.69 (t, J = 6.0 Hz, 4H), 2.50 (t, J = 5.6 Hz, 4H), 1.47–1.55 (m, 8H), 1.25–1.28 (m, 40H), 0.86–0.88 (m, 12H) ppm; 13C NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz): δ 173.63, 171.55, 47.97, 46.18, 38.76, 31.72, 31.42, 29.30, 29.15, 28.78, 27.70, 27.01, 26.89, 22.54, 13.99 ppm; IR (KBr): 3315, 2926, 2856, 1704, 1634, 1547, 1463, 1430, 1377, 1354, 1258, 1175, 1141 cm−1; HRMS (ESI, C42H83N4O4): Calcd. m/z: 707.6414 [M + H]+, 729.6234 [M + Na]+; Found m/z: 707.6417 [M + H]+, 729.6234 [M + Na]+.
Conclusions
The three novel extractants based on the BisSCA structure have been synthesized and studied for U(VI) extraction from nitric acid medium. The present method for synthesis of BisSCA extractants has simple process and easy post-treatment procedures, and is especially suitable for production at large scale. The extraction experience demonstrated that compared to the other diluents employed, the best distribution ratio of uranyl ion was observed in xylene medium. The extraction efficiency of U(VI) using BisSCA increased with increase in the concentration of nitric acid, and the best D U(IV) values were obtained when THE-BisSCA was exploited as extractant at 5 M HNO3 solution. Unlike the single succinamides, BisSCA extractant exhibited the better extraction behavior, which could be attributed that BisSCAs associated with the UO2 2+ ion in different mode of complexation. Further extension of the present study must be of interest, and the results obtained will inspire us to synthesize more new extractants, and extract the other actinides and lanthanides.
References
Hlushak SP, Simonin JP, Caniffi B, Moisy P, Sorel C, Bernard O (2011) Description of partition equilibria for uranyl nitrate, nitric acid and water extracted by tributyl phosphate in dodecane. Hydrometallurgy 109:97–105
Kumar JR, Kim J-S, Lee J-Y, Yoon H-S (2011) A brief review on solvent extraction of uranium from acidic solutions. Sep Purif Rev 40:77–125
Pan D, Sun T, Ye G, Chen J (2015) Extraction of U(VI) by a novel polyazamacrocycle extractant. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 303:771–776
Pathak PN (2014) N, N-dialkyl amides as extractants for spent fuel reprocessing: an overview. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 300:7–15
Mathur JN, Murali MS, Nash KL (2007) Actinide partitioning—a review. Solvent Extr Ion Exch 19:357–390
Paiva AP, Malik P (2004) Recent advances on the chemistry of solvent extraction applied to the reprocessing of spent nuclear fuels and radioactive wastes. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 261:485–496
Lumetta GJ, Gelis AV, Vandegrift GF (2010) Review: solvent systems combining neutral and acidic extractants for separating trivalent lanthanides from the transuranic elements. Solvent Extr Ion Exch 28:287–312
Seike M, Eguchi M, Shinohara A, Yoshimura T (2015) Solvent extraction behaviors of americium(iii) and europium(iii) using 2-hydroxy-2-methyloctanoic acid and 2-hydroxy- 2-trifluoromethyloctanoic acid. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 303:1413–1416
Sasaki Y, Tachimori S (2002) Extraction of actinides(iii), (iv), (v), (vi), and lanthanides(iii) by structurally tailored diamides. Solvent Extr Ion Exch 20(1):21–34
Sasaki Y, Kitatsuji Y, Sugo Y, Tsubata Y, Kimura T, Morita Y (2012) Actinides extractability trends for multidentate diamides and phosphine oxides. Solvent Extr Res Dev Jpn 19:51–61
Ren P, Yue Y-Z, Wang K, Wu W-S, Yan Z-Y (2014) synthesis and characterization of N N N′ N′′tetraalkyl-4-oxaheptanediamide as extractant for extraction of uranium(vi) and thorium(iv) ions from nitric acid solution. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 300(3):1099–1103
Liu X, Sun G, Cai X, Yang X, Li Y, Sun Z, Cui Y (2015) Extraction of u(vi) with N, N, N′, N′-tetraoctyl diglycolamide from nitric acid solution. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 306:1–5
Charbonnel MC, Musikas C (1988) The extraction by N, N′-tetrabutylglutaramides i. hno3 and other inorganic acids extraction. Solvent Extr Ion Exch 6:461–478
El-Reefy SA, Mowafy EA, Abdel-Badei MM, Aly HF (1997) Extraction of uranium and selected fission products from nitric acid medium by certain diamides. Radiochim Acta 77:195–200
Iqbal M, Huskens J, Verboom W, Sypula M, Modolo G (2010) Synthesis and am/eu extraction of novel todga derivatives. Supramol Chem 22:827–837
Mowafy EA, Aly HF (2001) Synthesis and characterization of N N N′ N′- tetrabutylsuccinamide as extractant for uranium(VI) and thorium(IV) ions from nitric acid solution. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 250:199–203
Tan X-F, Wang Y-S, Tan T-Z, Zhou G-F, Bao B-R (1999) N N N′ N′-tetrahexylsuccinylamide as a new extractant for the extraction of nitric acid, uranium(Vi) and thorium(Iv) ions. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 242:123–126
Yan Z-Y, Ren P, Huang Q-G, He M-J, Li Y, Wu Z-M, Wu W-S (2016) Solvent extraction of uranyl ion with 4-oxaheptanediamide into ionic liquid system from HNO3 solution. J Radioanal Nucl Chem. doi:10.1007/s10967-016-4836-z
Acknowledgments
The authors thank National Natural Science Foundation of China (21471072, J1210001) and the National Key Scientific Instrument and Equipment Development Project of China (21327801), and Natural Science Foundation of Gansu Province, China (1308RJZA145) for the financial support of this work.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Yan, ZY., He, MJ., Huang, QG. et al. Synthesis and characterization of bis-succinamides for extraction of UO2 2+ from nitric acid solution. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 310, 1101–1106 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10967-016-4863-9
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10967-016-4863-9