Skip to main content
Log in

Removal of 90Sr and 241Am from concentrated Hanford chelate-bearing waste by precipitation with strontium nitrate and sodium permanganate

  • Published:
Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Hanford Nuclear Site, near Richland, Washington, is developing a method to simultaneously remove chelated 90Sr and 241Am from the liquid phase of high-level nuclear waste using sodium permanganate and cold strontium nitrate. This method has been reported previously for treating diluted waste in the Hanford Waste Treatment and Immobilization facility (WTP) that is currently under construction. This method had not been verified previously for treating the more concentrated waste as it sits in the tank farm. There are a number of logistical advantages to performing this process in the tank farm. Therefore, the present study was undertaken to compare the removal of 90Sr and 241Am in diluted waste (WTP conditions) and more concentrated waste (tank farm conditions). Both diluted and more concentrated waste from Hanford tank AN-107 was treated with 3.0 M Sr(NO3)2 and 3.8 M NaMnO4, at a constant cold chemical to radionuclide ratio. The amount of 90Sr and 241Am removed was monitored through alpha and beta counting. The removal of 90Sr was essentially identical at both levels of dilution. The removal of 241Am was slightly better in the diluted sample than in the tank farm sample, but the difference was not large (77 % versus 67 % removed). These results indicate that it is reasonable to expect this 90Sr and 241Am removal process can be employed in the tank farm.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Edgemon GL, Anda VS, Berman HS, Johnson ME, Boomer KD (2009) History and operation of the Hanford high-level waste storage tanks. J Sci Eng Corros 65(3):163–174

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Hill RCP, Reynolds JG, Rutland PL (2011) A comparison of Hanford and Savannah river site high-level wastes. In: Proceedings of the 13th international high-level waste management conference, (CD-ROM). American Nuclear Society, La Grange Park, pp 114–117

  3. Wilmarth WR, Lumetta GJ, Johnson ME, Poirier MR, Thompson MC, Suggs PC, Machara NP (2011) Review: waste-pretreatment technologies for remediation of legacy defense nuclear wastes. Solvent Extr Ion Exch 29:1–48

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Toste AP (1999) Detailed study of the γ-radiolysis of nitrlotriacetic acid in a simulated, mixed nuclear waste. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 239:433–439

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Toste AP, Polach KJ, White TW (1994) Degradation of citric acid in a simulated, mixed nuclear waste: radiolytic versus chemical forces. Waste Manag (Oxf) 14:27–34

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Toste AP, Osborn BC, Polach KJ, Lechner-Fish TJ (1995) Organic analyses of an actual and simulated mixed waste: Hanford’s organic complexant waste revisited. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 194:25–34

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Toste AP, Polach KJ, Ohnuki T (2005) Chemodynamics of EDTA in a simulated, mixed waste: chemo-degradation versus gamma-radiolysis. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 263:559–565

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Toste AP, Pilot T (2008) Detailed study of HEDTA’s chemodynamics upon gamma-radiolysis in a simulated, mixed waste. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 277:5–10

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Delegard CH, Barney GS, Gallagher SA (1984) Effects of Hanford high-level waste components on the solubility and sorption of cobalt, strontium, neptunium, plutonium, and americium. In: Barney GS, Navratil JD, Shulz WW (eds) Geochemical behavior of disposed radioactive waste. American Chemical Society, La Grange Park, pp 95–112

  10. Felmy AR, Mason MJ (2003) An aqueous thermodynamic model for the complexation of sodium and strontium with organic chelates valid to high ionic strength. I. Ethylenedinitrilotetraacetic acid (EDTA). J Solut Chem 32:283–300

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Nash CA, Rosencrance SW, Wilmarth WR, Saito HH, Johnson ME (2001) Transuranic/strontium precipitation and filtration of Hanford complexant waste. In: Proceedings of waste management 2001. Waste Management Symposia, Inc., Tucson

  12. Nash CA, Saito HH, Wilmarth WR (2003) Strontium and transuranic precipitation and crossflow filtration of a large Hanford tank 241-AN-102 sample. Sep Sci Technol 38:3189–3213

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Hallen RT, Geeting JGH, Liga MA, Hard TR, Hoopes FV (2005) Assessment of the mechanisms for Sr-90 and TRU removal from complexant-containing tank wastes at Hanford. Sep Sci Technol 40:171–183

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Chang HS, Korshin GV, Fergusan JF (2006) Investigation of mechanisms of oxidation of EDTA and NTA by permanganate at high pH. Environ Sci Technol 40:5088–5094

    Google Scholar 

  15. Korshin GV, Chang HS, Frenkel AI, Ferguson JF (2007) Structural study of the incorporation of heavy metals into solid phase formed during the oxidation of EDTA by permanganate at high pH. Environ Sci Technol 41:2560–2565

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Crespo MT, Gascon JL, Acena ML (1993) Techniques and analytical methods in the determination of uranium, thorium, plutonium, americium and radium by adsorption on manganese dioxide. Sci Total Environ 130–131:383–391

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Koulouris G, Slowikowski B, Pilvio R, Bostron T, Bickel M (2000) Pre-concentration of actinoids from waters: a comparison of various sorbents. Appl Radiat Isot 53:279–287

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Johnson ME, Swanson L, Boechler GN (2005) Strontium and TRU separation process in the DST system. RPP-24809, CH2M Hill Hanford Group, Inc., Richland, WA

  19. Schroeder NC, Ashley KR (2005) Separation of non-pertechnetate species from Hanford AN-107 tank waste. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 263:67–573

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Reynolds JG, Cooke GA, Herting DL, Warrant RW (2012) Evidence for dawsonite in Hanford high-level nuclear waste tanks. J Hazard Mater 209–210:186–192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Martin KB, Coleman CJ, Hay MS (2003) Compositing, homogenization, and characterization of samples from Hanford tank 241-AN-107, WSRC-TR-2003-00210 SRT-RPP-2003-00091. Westinghouse Savannah River Company, Savannah River Site, Aiken

    Google Scholar 

  22. Rapko BM, Lumetta GJ, Deschane JR, Peterson RA (2008) Process development for permanganate addition during oxidative leaching of Hanford tank sludge simulants. Sep Sci Technol 43:2840–2858

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Hrma P (1994) Towards optimization of nuclear waste glasses: constraints, property models, and waste loading. Ceram Trans 45:391–401

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Vienna JD, Hrma P, Crum JV, Piepel GF, Mika M (2001) Liquidus temperature–composition model for multi-component glasses in the Fe, Cr, Ni, and Mn spinel primary phase field. J Non-Crystalline Solids 292:1–24

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Warrant RW, Cooke GA (2003) Characterization of solids waste in the Hanford waste tanks using a combination of XRD, SEM and PLM. Adv X-Ray Anal 46:251–256

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jacob G. Reynolds.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Warrant, R.W., Reynolds, J.G. & Johnson, M.E. Removal of 90Sr and 241Am from concentrated Hanford chelate-bearing waste by precipitation with strontium nitrate and sodium permanganate. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 295, 1575–1579 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10967-012-1948-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10967-012-1948-y

Keywords

Navigation