Abstract
Much of the workforce demand in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) in the United States goes unmet, and females and racial/ethnic minorities are vastly underrepresented in these fields. To understand the psychological antecedents for STEM career attainment, this study took an intersectional approach and examined racial/ethnic and gender differences in youth’s math-related ability beliefs—growth mindset, self-concept, and career expectancy—and their longitudinal relations to STEM career attainment. Specifically, the study utilized nationally representative data of 10th graders over 10 years (n ~ = 14,320, Mage = 16.46, 50.4% female; 60.6% White, 15.5% Latinx, 14.1% Black, 9.8% Asian). The results indicated that youth’s math-related ability beliefs positively predicted their later STEM career outcomes. Furthermore, female adolescents’ math self-concept was more negative than male adolescents among Whites and Latinxs but not among Blacks and Asians. Black adolescents did not fully garner the advantage of having positive self-concept. Finally, high school math achievement did not predict Latina and Black youth’s STEM career expectancy. The current findings inform future interventions that different ability beliefs may need to be targeted for each race/ethnicity and gender.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Race is conceptualized as a sociohistorical rather than biological construct, and the terms race and ethnicity are used interchangeably (for relevant discussion: Smedley and Smedley 2005). White, Black, and Asian Americans indicate those who do not ethnically self-categorize as Latinx. When indicating multiple racial/ethnic groups in a sentence, they are listed in descending order of sample size in the data (i.e., White, Latinx, Black, and Asian), which also aligns with the population size of each race/ethnicity in the United States as of 2017 (United States Census Bureau 2017).
The term Latinx is used as a gender inclusive alternative to Latino or Latino/a.
The internal frame of reference model (Marsh et al. 2017) provides potential explanation for these divergent functions of attribution processes in a school setting: Individuals form ability self-concepts based on their performance not only in the relevant domain but also in other domains. For example, a student with high verbal ability is likely to have a more negative math self-concept than a student with poor verbal ability given the same math achievement. Based on this model, it is plausible that White female adolescents who are negatively stereotyped in mathematics but positively stereotyped in verbal domains may develop less positive math self-concept than their male peers given the same achievement. Latino and Black male adolescents are negatively stereotyped in both math and verbal domains and thus less likely to be affected by the internal frame of reference effects.
Following the research publication guidelines of Institute of Education Sciences (see https://nces.ed.gov/statprog/rudman/chapter2.asp#srp), all unweighted sample size numbers were rounded to the nearest ten.
References
Ahmed, W., & Mudrey, R. R. (2018). The role of motivational factors in predicting STEM career aspirations. International Journal of School & Educational Psychology, https://doi.org/10.1080/21683603.2017.1401499.
Aronson, J., & Inzlicht, M. (2004). The ups and downs of attributional ambiguity: stereotype vulnerability and the academic self-knowledge of African American college students. Psychological Science, 15, 829–836.
Awad, G. H. (2007). The role of racial identity, academic self-concept, and self-esteem in the prediction of academic outcomes for African American students. Journal of Black Psychology, 33, 188–207.
Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84, 191–215.
Banerjee, M., Schenke, K., Lam, A., & Eccles, J. S. (2018). The roles of teachers, classroom experiences, and finding balance: a qualitative perspective on the experiences and expectations of females within STEM and non-STEM careers. International Journal of Gender, Science and Technology, 10, 287–307.
Bankston, C. L., & Zhou, M. (2002). Being well vs. doing well: Self‐Esteem and school performance among immigrant and nonimmigrant racial and ethnic groups. International Migration Review, 36, 389–415.
Bempechat, J., Graham, S. E., & Jimenez, N. V. (1999). The socialization of achievement in poor and minority students: a comparative study. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 30, 139–158.
Bender, R., & Lange, S. (2001). Adjusting for multiple testing—when and how? Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 54, 343–349.
Blackwell, L. S., Trzesniewski, K. H., & Dweck, C. S. (2007). Implicit theories of intelligence predict achievement across an adolescent transition: a longitudinal study and an intervention. Child Development, 78, 246–263.
Bui, Q. (2014). Who studies what? Men, women, and college majors. National Public Radio. Retrieved from https://www.npr.org/sections/money/2014/10/28/359419934/who-studies-what-men-women-and-college-majors.
Bui, Q., & Miller, C. C. (2017). The jobs you’re most likely to inherit from your mother and father. New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2017/11/22/upshot/the-jobs-youre-most-likely-to-inherit-from-your-mother-and-father.html.
Chen, X., & Soldner, M. (2013). STEM Attrition: College Students’ Paths into and out of STEM Fields. Washington, DC: NCES, IES, U.S Department of Education. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED544470.
Cheung, C. S., Monroy, J. A., & Delany, D. E. (2017). Learning-related values in young children’s storybooks: an investigation in the United States, China, and Mexico. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 48, 532–541.
Cokley, K. O. (2002). Ethnicity, gender and academic self-concept: a preliminary examination of academic disidentification and implications for psychologists. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 8, 378–388.
Cole, E. R. (2009). Intersectionality and research in psychology. American Psychologist, 64, 170–180.
Crocker, J., & Major, B. (1989). Social stigma and self-esteem: The self-protective properties of stigma. Psychological Review, 96, 608–630. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.96.4.608.
Cvencek, D., Meltzoff, A. N., & Greenwald, A. G. (2011). Math–gender stereotypes in elementary school children. Child Development, 82, 766–779.
Daempfle, P. A. (2003). An analysis of the high attrition rates among first year college science, math, and engineering majors. Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory & Practice, 5, 37–52.
Dai, T., & Cromley, J. G. (2014). Changes in implicit theories of ability in biology and dropout from STEM majors: a latent growth curve approach. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 39, 233–247.
DeCuir-Gunby, J. T., & Schutz, P. A. (2014). Researching race within educational psychology contexts. Educational Psychologist, 49, 244–260.
Degol, J. L., Wang, M. T., Zhang, Y., & Allerton, J. (2018). Do growth mindsets in math benefit females? Identifying pathways between gender, mindset, and motivation. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 47, 976–990.
Dweck, C. S., Chiu, C.-Y., & Hong, Y.-Y. (1995). Implicit theories: elaboration and extension of the model. Psychological Inquiry, 6, 322–333.
Fan, X., & Chen, M. (2001). Parental involvement and students’ academic achievement: a meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 13, 1–22.
Fan, X., Chen, M., & Matsumoto, A. R. (1997). Gender differences in mathematics achievement: findings from the National Education Longitudinal Study of 1988. The Journal of Experimental Education, 65, 229–242.
Garg, R., Melanson, S., & Levin, E. (2007). Educational aspirations of male and female adolescents from single-parent and two biological parent families: acomparison of influential factors. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 36, 1010–1023.
Greene, B. A., & DeBacker, T. K. (2004). Gender and orientations toward the future: Links to motivation. Educational Psychology Review, 16, 91–120.
Guo, J., Parker, P. D., Marsh, H. W., & Morin, A. J. (2015). Achievement, motivation, and educational choices: a longitudinal study of expectancy and value using a multiplicative perspective. Developmental Psychology, 51, 1163–1176.
Holman, L., Stuart-Fox, D., & Hauser, C. E. (2018). The gender gap in science: How long until women are equally represented? PLoS Biology, 16. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.2004956.
Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55.
Ingels, S. J., Pratt, D. J., Rogers, J. E., Siegel, P. H., & Stutts, E. S. (2004). Education Longitudinal Study of 2002: Base year data file user’s manual (NCES 2004-405). Washington, DC: US. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics.
Jacobs, J. E., Lanza, S., Osgood, D. W., Eccles, J. S., & Wigfield, A. (2002). Changes in children’s self-competence and values: gender and domain differences across grades one through twelve. Child Development, 73, 509–527.
Jeynes, W. H. (2005). Effects of parental involvement and family structure on the academic achievement of adolescents. Marriage & Family Review, 37, 99–116.
Johnson, O. J. (2008). Ecology in educational theory: thoughts on stratification, social mobility & proximal capital. The Urban Review, 40, 227–246.
Jones, M. H., Irvin, M. J., & Kibe, G. W. (2012). Does geographic setting alter the roles of academically supportive factors? African American adolescents’ friendships, math self-concept, and math performance. Journal f Negro Education, 81, 319–337.
Komarraju, M., & Nadler, D. (2013). Self-efficacy and academic achievement: why do implicit beliefs, goals, and effort regulation matter? Learning and Individual Differences, 25, 67–72.
Karunanayake, D., & Nauta, M. M. (2004). The relationship between race and students’ identified career role models and perceived role model influence. The Career Development Quarterly, 52, 225–234.
Lauermann, F., Tsai, Y. M., & Eccles, J. S. (2017). Math-related career aspirations and choices within Eccles et al.’s expectancy–value theory of achievement-related behaviors. Developmental Psychology, 53, 1540–1559.
Lent, R. W., Brown, S. D., & Hackett, G. (2002). Social cognitive career theory. In D. Brown (Ed.), Career choice and development (pp. 255–311). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Lent, R. W., Sheu, H. B., Singley, D., Schmidt, J. A., Schmidt, L. C., & Gloster, C. S. (2008). Longitudinal relations of self-efficacy to outcome expectations, interests, and major choice goals in engineering students. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 73, 328–335.
Li, W., Harrison, L., & Solmon, M. (2004). College students’ implicit theories of ability in sports: race and gender differences. Journal of Sport Behavior, 27, 291–304.
Lindberg, S. M., Hyde, J. S., Petersen, J. L., & Linn, M. C. (2010). New trends in gender and mathematics performance: a meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 136, 1123–1135.
Linnenbrink-Garcia, L., Perez, T., Barger, M. M., Wormington, S. V., Godin, E., & Snyder, K. E., et al. (2018). Repairing the leaky pipeline: a motivationally supportive intervention to enhance persistence in undergraduate science pathways. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 53, 181–195.
Marsh, H. W., Pekrun, R., Murayama, K., Arens, K. A., Parker, P. D., Guo, J., & Dicke, T. (2017). An integrated model of academic self-concept development: academic self-concept, grades, test scores, and tracking over six years. Developmental Psychology, 54, 263–280.
Marsh, H. W., Pekrun, R., Parker, P. D., Murayama, K., Guo, J., Dicke, T., & Arens, A. K. (2018). The murky distinction between self-concept and self-efficacy: beware of lurking jingle-jangle fallacies. Journal of Educational Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000281.
McNeish, D., Stapleton, L. M., & Silverman, R. D. (2017). On the unnecessary ubiquity of hierarchical linear modeling. Psychological Methods, 22, 114–140.
Miller, P., & Votruba-Drzal, E. (2013). Early academic skills and childhood experiences across the urban–rural continuum. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 28, 234–248.
Muenks, K., Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J. S. (2018). I can do this! The development and calibration of children’s expectations for success and competence beliefs. Developmental Review, 48, 24–39.
Muthén, L. K. (2010). Indicators on different scales [Online forum comment]. Retrieved from http://www.statmodel.com/discussion/messages/11/5266.html?1312503676.
Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2017). Mplus user’s guide (8th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.
Neuhauser, A., & Cook, L. (2016). 2016 U.S. News/Raytheon STEM index shows uptick in hiring, education. U.S. News. https://www.usnews.com/news/articles/2016-05-17/the-new-stem-index-2016.
Osborne, J. W. (1997). Race and academic disidentification. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 728–735.
Parker, P. D., Van Zanden, B., & Parker, R. B. (2017). Girls get smart, boys get smug: Historical changes in gender differences in math, literacy, and academic social comparison and achievement. Learning and Instruction, 54, 125–137.
Pew Research Center (2018). Racial and ethnic group representation in STEM occupations. Pew Research Center. http://www.pewsocialtrends.org/2018/01/09/women-and-men-in-stem-often-at-odds-over-workplace-equity/ps_2018-01-09_stem_a-06/
Riegle‐Crumb, C., Moore, C., & Ramos‐Wada, A. (2011). Who wants to have a career in science or math? Exploring adolescents’ future aspirations by gender and race/ethnicity. Science Education, 95, 458–476.
Robnett, R. D., & Leaper, C. (2013). Friendship groups, personal motivation, and gender in relation to high school students’ STEM career interest. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 23, 652–664.
Sadler, P. M., Sonnert, G., Hazari, Z., & Tai, R. (2012). Stability and volatility of STEM career interest in high school: a gender study. Science Education, 96, 411–427.
Shih, M., Pittinsky, T. L., & Ambady, N. (1999). Stereotype susceptibility: Identity salience and shifts in quantitative performance. Psychological Science, 10, 80–83.
Shin, J., Lee, H., McCarthy-Donovan, A., Hwang, H., Yim, S., & Seo, E. (2015). Home and motivational factors related to science-career pursuit: gender differences and gender similarities. International Journal of Science Education, 37, 1478–1503.
Sirin, S. R. (2005). Socioeconomic status and academic achievement: a meta-analytic review of research. Review of Educational Research, 75, 417–453.
Sisk, V. F., Burgoyne, A. P., Sun, J., Butler, J. L., & Macnamara, B. N. (2018). To what extent and under which circumstances are growth mind-sets important to academic achievement? Two meta-analyses. Psychological Science, 29, 549–571.
Smedley, A., & Smedley, B. D. (2005). Race as biology is fiction, racism as a social problem is real: anthropological and historical perspectives on the social construction of race. American Psychologist, 60, 16–26.
Spinath, B., & Steinmayr, R. (2008). Longitudinal analysis of intrinsic motivation and competence beliefs: Is there a relation over time? Child Development, 79, 1555–1569.
Steele, C. M., & Aronson, J. (1995). Stereotype threat and the intellectual test performance of African Americans. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 797–811.
Stump, G. S., Husman, J., & Corby, M. (2014). Engineering students’ intelligence beliefs and learning. Journal of Engineering Education, 103, 369–387.
Twenge, J. M., & Campbell, W. K. (2002). Self-esteem and socioeconomic status: a meta-analytic review. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 6, 59–71.
United States Census Bureau (2017). Quick Facts: United States. United States Census Bureau. https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/fact/table/US/PST045217#viewtop
Usher, E. L. (2018). Acknowledging the Whiteness of motivation research: seeking cultural relevance. Educational Psychologist, 53, 131–144.
Valentine, J. C., DuBois, D. L., & Cooper, H. (2004). The relation between self-beliefs and academic achievement: a meta-analytic review. Educational Psychologist, 39, 111–133.
van Laar, C. (2000). The paradox of low academic achievement but high self-esteem in African American students: an attributional account. Educational Psychology Review, 12, 33–61.
Wang, M. T., & Degol, J. (2013). Motivational pathways to STEM career choices: using expectancy–value perspective to understand individual and gender differences in STEM fields. Developmental Review, 33, 304–340.
Wang, M. T., Eccles, J. S., & Kenny, S. (2013). Not lack of ability but more choice: individual and gender differences in choice of careers in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. Psychological Science, 24, 770–775.
Watt, H. M. (2004). Development of adolescents’ self‐perceptions, values, and task perceptions according to gender and domain in 7th‐through 11th‐grade Australian students. Child Development, 75, 1556–1574.
Watt, H. M., Hyde, J. S., Petersen, J., Morris, Z. A., Rozek, C. S., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (2017). Mathematics—a critical filter for STEM-related career choices? A longitudinal examination among Australian and US adolescents. Sex Roles, 77, 254–271.
Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J. S. (2000). Expectancy–value theory of achievement motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 68–81.
Xue, Y., & Larson, R. C. (2015). STEM crisis or STEM surplus? Yes and yes. Monthly Labor Review. https://www.bls.gov/opub/mlr/2015/article/stem-crisis-or-stem-surplus-yes-and-yes.htm#_edn32.
Yeager, D. S., Purdie‐Vaughns, V., Hooper, S. Y., & Cohen, G. L. (2017). Loss of institutional trust among racial and ethnic minority adolescents: a consequence of procedural injustice and a cause of life‐span outcomes. Child Development, 88, 658–676.
Authors’ Contributions
E.S. conceived of the study, designed the theoretical model, performed the statistical analyses, interpreted the results, and drafted the manuscript. Y.S. secured the data, participated in designing the study, oversaw the process of data analyses, provided interpretation of the results, and revised the manuscript. E.C.A. participated in designing the study, provided interpretation of the results, and revised the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Data Sharing and Declaration
The data that support the findings of this study are available from the National Center for Education Statistics, but restrictions apply to the availability of these data, which were used under license for the current study, and so are not publicly available. However, most of the data analyzed in this study are available in the public-use data at https://nces.ed.gov/EDAT. Descriptions of the differences between the restricted- and public-use data files can be found at https://nces.ed.gov/surveys/els2002/avail_data.asp.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethical Approval
All procedures performed in the study involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed Consent
The current study is a secondary data analysis of the Education Longitudinal Study of 2002 conducted through the RTI International and sponsored by the National Center for Education Statistics. Prior to data collection, permissions to contact the schools were obtained from leaders of each state and school district/diocese. Parental consent was obtained through mails for all participating students. Detailed information about the data collection procedure is available at https://nces.ed.gov/pubs2004/2004405.pdf.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Seo, E., Shen, Y. & Alfaro, E.C. Adolescents’ Beliefs about Math Ability and Their Relations to STEM Career Attainment: Joint Consideration of Race/ethnicity and Gender. J Youth Adolescence 48, 306–325 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-018-0911-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-018-0911-9