Skip to main content
Log in

Dimensions of Peer Influences and Their Relationship to Adolescents’ Aggression, Other Problem Behaviors and Prosocial Behavior

  • Empirical Research
  • Published:
Journal of Youth and Adolescence Aims and scope Submit manuscript

A Publisher Correction to this article was published on 30 November 2017

This article has been updated

Abstract

Although peers are a major influence during adolescence, the relative importance of specific mechanisms of peer influence on the development of problem behavior is not well understood. This study investigated five domains of peer influence and their relationships to adolescents’ problem and prosocial behaviors. Self-report and teacher ratings were obtained for 1787 (53 % female) urban middle school students. Peer pressure for fighting and friends’ delinquent behavior were uniquely associated with aggression, drug use and delinquent behavior. Friends’ prosocial behavior was uniquely associated with prosocial behavior. Friends’ support for fighting and friends’ support for nonviolence were not as clearly related to behavior. Findings were generally consistent across gender. This study highlights the importance of studying multiple aspects of peer influences on adolescents’ behavior.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Change history

  • 30 November 2017

    Correction to: J Youth Adolescence (2017) 46:1351–1369. 10.1007/s10964-016-0601-4

References

  • Akers, R. L. (1998). Social learning and social structure: a general theory of crime and deviance. Boston, MA: Northeastern University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allen, J. P., Porter, M. R., & McFarland, F. C. (2006). Leaders and followers in adolescent close friendships: susceptibility to peer influence as a predictor of risky behavior, friendship instability, and depression. Development and Psychopathology, 18(1), 155–172. doi:10.1017/S0954579406060093.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Allison, K. W., Edmonds, T., Wilson, K., Pope, M., & Farrell, A. D. (2011). Connecting youth violence prevention, positive youth development, and community mobilization. American Journal of Community Psychology, 48(1–2), 8–20. doi:10.1007/s10464-010-9407-9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Assink, M., van der Put, C. E., Hoeve, M., de Vries, S. L., Stams, G. J. J., & Oort, F. J. (2015). Risk factors for persistent delinquent behavior among juveniles: a meta-analytic review. Clinical Psychology Review, 42, 47–61. doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2015.08.002.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Barry, C. M., & Wentzel, K. R. (2006). Friend influence on prosocial behavior: the role of motivational factors and friendship characteristics. Developmental Psychology, 42(1), 153–163. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.42.1.153.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bastiaensens, S., Pabian, S., Vandebosch, H., Poels, K., Van Cleemput, K., DeSmet, A., & De Bourdeaudhuij, I. (2016). From normative influence to social pressure: how relevant others affect whether bystanders join in cyberbullying. Social Development, 25(1), 193–211. doi:10.1111/sode.12134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bell, N. J., & Baron, E. K. (2015). Resistance to peer influence during adolescence: proposing a sociocultural-developmental framework. New Ideas in Psychology, 39, 53–62. doi:10.1016/j.newideapsych.2015.07.005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boman, IV, J. H., Stogner, J. M., Miller, B. L., Griffin, III, O. H., & Krohn, M. D. (2012). On the operational validity of perceptual peer delinquency: exploring projection and elements contained in perceptions. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 49(4), 601–621. doi:10.1177/0022427811419367.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bornstein, M. H., Hahn, C., & Haynes, O. M. (2010). Social competence, externalizing, and internalizing behavioral adjustment from early childhood through early adolescence: developmental cascades. Development and Psychopathology, 22(4), 717–735. doi:10.1017/S0954579410000416.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Boxer, P., Tisak, M. S., & Goldstein, S. E. (2004). Is it bad to be good? An exploration of aggressive and prosocial behavior subtypes in adolescence. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 33(2), 91–100. doi:10.1023/B:JOYO.0000013421.02015.ef.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). Contexts of child rearing: problems and prospects. American Psychologist, 34(10), 844–850. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.34.10.844.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, B. B. (1990). Peer groups and peer cultures. In S. S. Feldman,& G. R. Elliott (Eds.), At the threshold: the developing adolescent. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, B. B. (2004). Adolescents’ relationships with peers. In R. M. Lerner, & L. Steinberg (Eds.), Handbook of adolescent psychology. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brumley, L. D., & Jaffee, S. R. (2016). Defining and distinguishing promotive and protective effects for childhood externalizing psychopathology: a systematic review. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 51(6), 803–815. doi:10.1007/s00127-016-1228-1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Caprara, G. V., Luengo Kanacri, B. P., Zuffianò, A., Gerbino, M., & Pastorelli, C. (2015). Why and how to promote adolescents’ prosocial behaviors: direct, mediated and moderated effects of the CEPIDEA school-based program. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 44(12), 2211–2229. doi:10.1007/s10964-015-0293-1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Card, N. A., Stucky, B. D., Sawalani, G. M., & Little, T. D. (2008). Direct and indirect aggression during childhood and adolescence: a meta-analytic review of gender differences, intercorrelations, and relations to maladjustment. Child Development, 79(5), 1185–1229. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2008.01184.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Carson, D. C. (2013). Perceptions of prosocial and delinquent peer behavior and the effect on delinquent attitudes: a longitudinal study. Journal of Criminal Justice, 41(3), 151–161. doi:10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2013.01.005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Catalano, R. F., Hawkins, J. D., Berglund, L. M., Pollard, J. A., & Arthur, M. W. (2002). Prevention science and positive youth development: competitive or cooperative frameworks? Journal of Adolescent Health, 31, 230–239.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, T. T., Belgrave, F. Z., & Abell, M. (2012). The mediating and moderating effects of parent and peer influences upon drug use among African American adolescents. Journal of Black Psychology, 38(1), 52–80. doi:10.1177/0095798411403617.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheung, G. W., & Rensvold, R. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 9(2), 233–255. doi:10.1207/S15328007SEM0902_5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coie, J. D., Watt, N. F., West, S. G., Hawkins, J. D., Asarnow, J. R., Markman, H. J., ... & Long, B. (1993). The science of prevention: A conceptual framework and some directions for a national research program. American Psychologist, 48(10), 1013–1022. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.48.10.10.

  • Conduct Problems Prevention Research Group. (2000). Merging universal and indicated prevention programs: the fast track model. Addictive Behaviors, 25(6), 913–927. doi:10.1016/S0306-4603(00)00120-9.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Coyle, C., Bramham, J., Dundon, N., Moynihan, M., & Carr, A. (2016). Exploring the positive impact of peers on adolescent substance misuse. Journal of Child & Adolescent Substance Abuse, 25(2), 134–143. doi:10.1080/1067828X.2014.896761.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crick, N. R., & Dodge, K. A. (1994). A review and reformulation of social information-processing mechanisms in children’s social adjustment. Psychological Bulletin, 115(1), 74–101. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.115.1.74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Los Reyes, A., & Kazdin, A. E. (2005). Informant discrepancies in the assessment of childhood psychopathology: a critical review, theoretical framework, and recommendations for further study. Psychological Bulletin, 131(4), 483–509. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.131.4.483.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Eccles, J. S. (2008). Agency and structure in human development. Research in Human Development, 5(4), 231–243. doi:10.1080/15427600802493973.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Eisenberg, N., Fabes, R. A., & Spinrad, T. L. (2006). Prosocial develop ment. In N. Eisenberg, W. Damon, & R. M. Lerner (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology: vol. 3, social, emotional, and personality development. 6th edn (pp. 646–718). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elliott, S. N., & Gresham, F. M. (2008). Social skills improvement system: intervention guide. Minneapolis, MN: Pearson Assessments.

    Google Scholar 

  • Embretson, S. E., & Reise, S. P. (2000). Item response theory for psychologists. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Faris, R., & Felmlee, D. (2011). Status struggles: network centrality and gender segregation in same- and cross-gender aggression. American Sociological Review, 76(1), 48–73. doi:10.1177/0003122410396196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farrell, A.D., Sullivan, T.N., Kliewer, W., Allison, K., Erwin, E. H., Meyer, A. L., & Esposito, L.E. (2006). Peer and school problems in the lives of urban adolescents: frequency, difficulty, and relation to adjustment. Journal of School Psychology, 44, 169–190. doi:10.1016/j.jsp.2006.02.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farrell, A. D., Henry, D. B., Mays, S. A., & Schoeny, M. E. (2011). Parents as moderators of the impact of school norms and peer influences on aggression in middle school students. Child Development, 82(1), 146–161. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2010.01546.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Farrell, A. D., Mays, S., Bettencourt, A., Erwin, E. H., Vulin-Reynolds, M., & Allison, K. W. (2010). Environmental influences on fighting versus nonviolent behavior in peer situations: a qualitative study with urban African American adolescents. American Journal of Community Psychology, 46(1–2), 19–35. doi:10.1007/s10464-010-9331-z.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Farrell, A. D., Mehari, K. R., Kramer-Kuhn, A., Mays, S. A., & Sullivan, T. N. (2015). A qualitative analysis of factors influencing middle school students’ use of skills taught by a violence prevention curriculum. Journal of School Psychology, 53(3), 179–194. doi:10.1016/j.jsp.2015.03.001.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Farrell, A. D., Sullivan, T. N., Goncy, E. A., & Le, A. H. (2016). Assessment of adolescents’ victimization, aggression, and problem behaviors: evaluation of the problem behavior frequency scale. Psychological Assessment, 28(6), 702–714. doi:10.1037/pas0000225.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fraley, R. C., Waller, N. G., & Brennan, K. A. (2000). An item response theory analysis of self-report measures of adult attachment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78(2), 350–365. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.78.2.350.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Galambos, N. L. (2004). Gender and gender role development in adolescence. In R. M. Lerner, & L. Steinberg (Eds.), Handbook of adolescent psychology (pp. 233–262). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gottfredson, M. R., & Hirschi, T. (1990). A general theory of crime. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hay, C., Wang, X., Ciaravolo, E., & Meldrum, R. C. (2015). Inside the black box: identifying the variables that mediate the effects of an experimental intervention for adolescents. Crime & Delinquency, 61(2), 243–270. doi:10.1177/0011128711398030.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haynie, D. L. (2002). Friendship networks and delinquency: the relative nature of peer delinquency. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 18(2), 99–134. doi:10.1023/A:1015227414929.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henry, D., Guerra, N., Huesmann, R., Tolan, P., VanAcker, R., & Eron, L. (2000). Normative influences on aggression in urban elementary school classrooms. American Journal of Community Psychology, 28(1), 59–81. doi:10.1023/A:1005142429725.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hill, J. P., & Lynch, M. W. (1983). The intensification of gender-related role expectations during early adolescence. In J. Brooks-Gunn, & A. C. Petersen (Eds.), Girls at puberty: biological and psychosocial perspectives (pp. 201–228). New York: Plenum Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Lipsey, M. W., & Derzon, J. H. (1998). Predictors of violent or serious delinquency in adolescence and early adulthood: a synthesis of longitudinal research. In R. Loeber, & D. P. Farrington (Eds.), Serious and violent juvenile offenders: risk factors and successful interventions (pp. 86–105). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marks, G., & Miller, N. (1987). Ten years of research on the false-consensus effect: an empirical and theoretical review. Psychological Bulletin, 102(1), 72–90. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.102.1.72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCord, J., Widom, C. S., Crowell, N. A. (Eds.) (2001). Juvenile crime, juvenile justice. panel on juvenile crime: prevention, treatment, and control.. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meter, D. J., Casper, D. M., & Card, N. A. (2015). Perceptions of intimacy and friendship reciprocity moderate peer influence on aggression. Aggressive Behavior, 41(5), 432–442. doi:10.1002/ab.21577.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Monahan, K. C., & Booth-LaForce, C. (2016). Deflected pathways: becoming aggressive, socially withdrawn, or prosocial with peers during the transition to adolescence. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 26(2), 270–285. doi:10.1111/jora.12190.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Monahan, K. C., & Steinberg, L. (2011). Accentuation of individual differences in social competence during the transition to adolescence. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 21(3), 576–585. doi:10.1111/j.1532-7795.2010.00705.x.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Moretti, M., & Odgers, C. (2002). Aggressive and violent girls: prevalence, profiles and contributing factors. NATO Science Series Sub Series I Life and Behavioural Sciences, 324, 116–129.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muthén, B., & Asparouhov, T. (2006). Item response mixture modeling: application to tobacco dependence criteria. Addictive Behaviors, 31(6), 1050–1066. doi:10.1016/j.addbeh.2006.03.026.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Padilla-Walker, L., & Carlo, G. (2007). Personal values as a mediator between parent and peer expectations and adolescent behaviors. Journal of Family Psychology, 21(3), 538–541. doi:10.1037/0893-3200.21.3.538.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Polce-Lynch, M., Myers, B. J., Kliewer, W., & Kilmartin, C. (2001). Adolescent self-esteem and gender: exploring relations to sexual harrassment, body image, media influence, and emotional expression. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 30(2), 225–244. doi:10.1023/A:1010397809136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pratt, T. C., Cullen, F. T., Sellers, C. S., Winfree, Jr, L. T., Madensen, T. D., & Daigle, L. E., et al. (2010). The empirical status of social learning theory: a meta‐analysis. Justice Quarterly, 27(6), 765–802. doi:10.1080/07418820903379610.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rose, A. J., & Rudolph, K. D. (2006). A review of sex differences in peer relationship processes: potential trade-offs for the emotional and behavioral development of girls and boys. Psychological Bulletin, 132(1), 98–131. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.132.1.98.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Sandstrom, M., Makover, H., & Bartini, M. (2013). Social context of bullying: do misperceptions of group norms influence children’s responses to witnessed episodes? Social Influence, 8(2–3), 196–215. doi:10.1080/15534510.2011.651302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Santor, D. A., Messervey, D., & Kusumakar, V. (2000). Measuring peer pressure, popularity, and conformity in adolescent boys and girls: predicting school performance, sexual attitudes and substance abuse. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 29, 163–182. doi:10.1023/A:1005152515264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sentse, M., Kretschmer, T., & Salmivalli, C. (2015). The longitudinal interplay between bullying, victimization, and social status: age-related and gender differences. Social Development, 24(3), 659–677. doi:10.1111/sode.12115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stoltz, S., Cillessen, A. H. N., van, dB., & Gommans, R. (2016). Popularity differentially predicts reactive and proactive aggression in early adolescence. Aggressive Behavior, 42(1), 29–40. doi:10.1002/ab.21603.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan, C. J. (2006). Early adolescent delinquency assessing the role of childhood problems, family environment, and peer pressure. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 4(4), 291–313. doi:10.1177/1541204006292656.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sumter, S. R., Bokhorst, C. L., Steinberg, L., & Westenberg, P. M. (2009). The developmental pattern of resistance to peer influence in adolescence: will the teenager ever be able to resist? Journal of Adolescence, 32(4), 1009–1021. doi:10.1016/j.adolescence.2008.08.010.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tomeo, C. A., Field, A. E., Berkey, C. S., Colditz, G. A., & Frazier, A. L. (1999). Weight concerns, weight control behaviors, and smoking initiation. Pediatrics, 104(4), 918–924.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Underwood, M. K., & Rosen, L. H. (2009). Gender, peer relations, and challenges for girlfriends and boyfriends coming together in adolescence. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 33, 16–20. doi:10.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.2008.01468.x.

  • van Rijsewijk, L., Dijkstra, J. K., Pattiselanno, K., Steglich, C., & Veenstra, R. (2016). Who helps whom? Investigating the development of adolescent prosocial relationships. Developmental Psychology, 52(6), 894–908. doi:10.1037/dev0000106.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, C., Hipp, J. R., Butts, C. T., Jose, R., & Lakon, C. M. (2016). Coevolution of adolescent friendship networks and smoking and drinking behaviors with consideration of parental influence. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 30(3), 312–324. doi:10.1037/adb0000163.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Young, J. T. N., Rebellon, C. J., Barnes, J. C., & Weerman, F. M. (2014). Unpacking the black box of peer similarity in deviance: understanding the mechanisms linking personal behavior, peer behavior, and perceptions. Criminology: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 52(1), 60–86. doi:10.1111/1745-9125.12029.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zuffianò, A., Alessandri, G., Luengo Kanacri, B. P., Pastorelli, C., Milioni, M., & Ceravolo, R., et al. (2014). The relation between prosociality and self-esteem from middle-adolescence to young adulthood. Personality and Individual Differences, 63, 24–29. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2014.01.041.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors’ Contributions

AF conceived of the study, completed the statistical analyses, participated in its design and coordination, and drafting of the manuscript; ET participated in the design and interpretation of the data and drafting of the manuscript; KM participated in the development of the measures and interpretation of the data, and drafting of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Funding

This study was funded by the National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, CDC Cooperative Agreements 5U01CE001956 and 1 U49 CE000730. The findings and conclusions in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Albert D. Farrell.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Additional information

A correction to this article is available online at https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-017-0788-z.

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Farrell, A.D., Thompson, E.L. & Mehari, K.R. Dimensions of Peer Influences and Their Relationship to Adolescents’ Aggression, Other Problem Behaviors and Prosocial Behavior. J Youth Adolescence 46, 1351–1369 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-016-0601-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-016-0601-4

Keywords

Navigation