Skip to main content
Log in

Multihazard Design: Structural Optimization Approach

  • Published:
Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The objective of multihazard structural engineering is to develop methodologies for achieving designs that are safe and cost-effective under multiple hazards. Optimization is a natural tool for achieving such designs. In general, its aim is to determine a vector of design variables subjected to a given set of constraints, such that an objective function of those variables is minimized. In the particular case of structural design, the design variables may be member sizes; the constraints pertain to structural strength and serviceability (e.g., keeping the load-induced stresses and deflections below specified thresholds); and the objective function is the structure cost or weight. In a multihazard context, the design variables are subjected to the constraints imposed by all the hazards to which the structure is exposed. In this paper, we formulate the multihazard structural design problem in nonlinear programming terms and present a simple illustrative example involving four design variables and two hazards: earthquake and strong winds. Results of our numerical experiments show that interior-point methods are significantly more efficient than classical optimization methods in solving the nonlinear programming problem associated with our illustrative example.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Potra, F.A., Simiu, E.: Optimization and structural multihazard design. J. Eng. Mech. (2009, accepted for publication)

  2. Wright, M.H.: The interior-point revolution in optimization: history, recent developments, and lasting consequences. Bull. Am. Math. Soc. (N.S.) 42(1), 39–56 (2005) (electronic)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Bertsimas, D., Popescu, I.: On the relation between option and stock prices: a convex optimization approach. Oper. Res. 50(2), 358–374 (2002)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. de Klerk, E.: Aspects of Semidefinite Programming. Applied Optimization, vol. 65. Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht (2002)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Freund, R.W., Jarre, F., Vogelbusch, C.H.: Nonlinear semidefinite programming: sensitivity, convergence, and an application in passive reduced-order modeling. Math. Program., Ser. B 109(2–3), 581–611 (2007)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Wolkowicz, H., Saigal, R., Vandenberghe, L. (eds.): Handbook of Semidefinite Programming. International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, vol. 27. Kluwer Academic, Boston (2000)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to F. A. Potra.

Additional information

Communicated by A. Miele.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Potra, F.A., Simiu, E. Multihazard Design: Structural Optimization Approach. J Optim Theory Appl 144, 120–136 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10957-009-9586-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10957-009-9586-4

Keywords

Navigation