Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

e-Science Partnerships: Towards a Sustainable Framework for School–Scientist Engagement

  • Published:
Journal of Science Education and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In late 2006, the New Zealand Government embarked on a series of initiatives to explore how the resources and expertise of eight, small, state-owned science research institutes could be combined efficiently to support science teaching in schools. Programmes were developed to enable students and teachers to access and become involved in local science research and innovation, with the aim being to broaden their awareness of New Zealand science research contexts, adding authenticity and relevance to their school studies. One of these initiatives, known as Science-for-Life, partnered scientists with teachers and students in primary and secondary schools (K-12). A key output from the trial phase of Science-for-Life was the generation of a framework for guiding and coordinating the activities of the eight institutes within the education sector, to improve efficiency, effectiveness and promote sustainability. The framework, based on data gathered from a series of interviews with each institute’s Chief Executive Officer (CEO), an online questionnaire, and informed by findings from trial partnership case studies published as institute technical reports and published articles, is presented in this paper. While the framework is developed from New Zealand data, it is suggested that it may be useful for coordinating interactions between multiple small science organisations and the school sector in other small-nation or state contexts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Further information on Crown Research Institutes can be found at http://www.msi.govt.nz/get-connected/crown-research-institutes/.

  2. Please refer to: http://www.carboeurope.org/education/index.php.

References

  • Falloon G (2008). A review literature for the Science-for-Life project, 1–83. Scion Research Ltd. Technical Report No: 46876

  • Falloon G (2009a) A study of a Crown Research Institute (CRI)—school interaction: the Newstead experience, 1–27. Scion Research Ltd. Technical Report No: 48295

  • Falloon G (2009b) Establishing a school-scientist partnership in the primary school: findings from the Lynmore SSP, 1–23. Scion Research Ltd Technical Report No: 48294

  • Falloon G (in press) Using videoconferencing in a school-scientist partnership: Students’ perceptions and scientists’ challenges. Research in Learning Technology. Association for Learning Technology Journal (ALT-J). Co-Action

  • Braun V, Clarke V (2006) Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology 3(2):77–101. doi:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cannon KC, Sandler SR (2000) A successful model for an academic-industrial partnership for elementary science education. J Chem Educ 77(10):1291–1294. doi:10.1021/ed077p1291

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caton E, Brewer C, Brown F (2000) Building teacher-scientists partnerships: teaching about energy through inquiry. Sch Sci Math 100(1):7–15. doi:10.1111/j.1949-8594.2000.tb17315.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drayton B, Falk J (2006) Dimensions the shape teacher-scientist collaborations for teacher enhancement. Sci Educ 90(4):734–761. doi:10.1002/sce.20138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunningham A, Falloon G, Barnard T (2010) Science-for-life—fulfilling potential: programme description document, 1–55. Wellington: Ministry of Research, Science and Technology. Scion Technical Report No: 47029

  • Feldstein S, Benner M (2004) Assessing outcomes of a secondary-postsecondary partnership model for biology education outreach. Am Biol Teach 6(2):114–119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Finarelli M (1998) GLOBE: a worldwide environmental science and education partnership. J Sci Educ Technol 7(1):77–84. doi:10.1023/A:1022588216843

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howitt C, Rennie L (2009) Science has changed my life! evaluation of the scientists in schools project (2008–2009). Department of Education, Employment and Workplace Relations. ACT: CSIRO Education. Retrieved from www.deewr.gov.au/Schooling/Programs/Documents/FinalEvaluation.pdf

  • Morrison JA, Estes JC (2007) Using scientists and real-world scenarios in professional development for middle school science teachers. J Sci Teacher Educ 18(2):165–184. doi:10.1007/s10972-006-9034-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • New Zealand Government (1992) The Crown Research Institutes Act. Retrieved from http://www.legislation.govt.nz/act/public/1992/0047/latest/DLM265144.html

  • Rahm J, Miller H, Hartley L, Moore J (2003) The value of an emergent notion of authenticity: examples from two student/teacher-scientist partnership programs. J Res Sci Teach 40(8):737–756. doi:10.1002/tea.10109

    Google Scholar 

  • Scion Ltd (2008) Guidelines for ethical research in educational settings. Unpublished manuscript. Scion Research Ltd, Rotorua

    Google Scholar 

  • Spencer S, Huczek G, Muir B (1998) Developing a student-scientist partnership: Boreal Forest Watch. J Sci Educ Technol 7(1):31–43. doi:10.1023/A:1022532131864

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Falloon G, Trewern A (2012) Developing school-scientist partnerships: lessons for scientists from science-for-life. J Sci Educ Technol. Springer: Netherlands. Retrieved from http://www.springerlink.com/content/13j44005768257jj/DOI: 10.1007/s10956-012-9372-1

  • Wormstead S, Becker M, Congalton R (2002) Tools for successful student-teacher-scientist partnerships. J Sci Educ Technol 11(3):277–287. doi:10.1023/A:10160766037

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Garry Falloon.

Appendix: Semi-Structured Interview Schedule for Chief Executive Officers

Appendix: Semi-Structured Interview Schedule for Chief Executive Officers

CRI/Education Partnership Study 2010

This interview forms part of a study exploring the potential of CRIs to work more closely with the compulsory education sector to support teaching and learning in science. The questions below are intended to act as starters. Additional questions may be prompted in response to comments. Thank you for your willingness to be involved in this study.

  1. 1.

    First of all, could you please tell me a little of your role in (CRI/institution/organisation) and your background (experience in science/education/other sectors etc.).

  2. 2.

    Broadly speaking, do you see a role or duty for CRIs to support the development of science understanding or general science literacy in the wider community? (Follow up -elaborate why?/why not?)

  3. 3.

    Are you aware of any obligation or responsibility towards this in your statement of core purpose, charter, or other such document?

  4. 4.

    Does your CRI/institution/organisation presently have a programme involving it in any wider community activities of this nature, either as part of or in addition to its scientific and research activities? (Follow up—describe these. How are these accommodated/coordinated within your organisation?)

  5. 5.

    Are you aware of any challenges or issues facing the teaching and learning of science in schools? (primary or secondary).

  6. 6.

    Broadly speaking, do you see a role for CRIs in supporting science teaching and learning in schools? (Follow up -elaborate why?/why not? Would you see this being more appropriate at primary or secondary school level, or both?)

  7. 7.

    Does/has your CRI/institution/organisation ever worked with schools, either as a formal part of a community outreach programme (or similar), or informally, perhaps on an adhoc basis? (Follow up—describe these activities. Who was involved? How were they accommodated/coordinated within your organisation? What were the goals and outcomes? Were they ongoing or more ‘one-offs’?)

  8. 8.

    If your CRI/institution/organisation was to offer to support (or further support) science in schools, what form might this take?

  9. 9.

    If your CRI/institution/organisation was to offer to support (or further support) science in schools, what might be some of the issues and benefits for your organisation from doing this? Would you consider offering such support viable?

  10. 10.

    Finally, (without committing you to anything), do you consider your CRI/institution/organisation would be prepared to participate in any coordinated but limited/selective programme supporting science in schools?

Thank you once again for your time. If need be, would you be prepared to participate in a short (15 min) online survey following up on some of these questions?

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Falloon, G. e-Science Partnerships: Towards a Sustainable Framework for School–Scientist Engagement. J Sci Educ Technol 22, 393–401 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-012-9401-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-012-9401-0

Keywords

Navigation