Abstract
Context-based chemistry education aims at making connections between real life and the scientific content of chemistry courses. The purpose of this study was to evaluate context-based chemistry studies. In looking for the context-based chemistry studies, the authors entered the keywords ‘context-based’, ‘contextual learning’ and ‘chemistry education’ in well-known databases (i.e. Academic Search Complete, Education Research Complete, ERIC, Springer LINK Contemporary). Further, in case the computer search by key words may have missed a rather substantial part of the important literature in the area, the authors also conducted a hand search of the related journals. To present a detailed thematic review of context-based chemistry studies, a matrix was used to summarize the findings by focusing on insights derived from the related studies. The matrix incorporates the following themes: needs, aims, methodologies, general knowledge claims, and implications for teaching and learning, implications for curriculum development and suggestions for future research. The general knowledge claims investigated in this paper were: (a) positive effects of the context-based chemistry studies; (b) caveats, both are examined in terms of students’ attitudes and students’ understanding/cognition. Implications were investigated for practice in context-based chemistry studies, for future research in context-based chemistry studies, and for curriculum developers in context-based chemistry studies. Teachers of context-based courses claimed that the application of the context-based learning approach in chemistry education improved students’ motivation and interest in the subject. This seems to have generated an increase in the number of the students who wish to continue chemistry education at higher levels. However, despite the fact that the majority of the studies have reported advantages of context-based chemistry studies, some of them have also referred to pitfalls, i.e. dominant structure of out-of-school learning, tough nature of some chemistry topics, and teacher anxiety of lower-ability students.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Barker V, Millar R (1999) Students’ reasoning about chemical reactions: what changes occur during a context-based post-16 chemistry course? Int J Sci Educ 21:645–665
Barker V, Millar R (2000) Students’ reasoning about basic chemical thermodynamics and chemical bonding: what changes occur during a context-based post-16 chemistry course? Int J Sci Educ 22:1171–1200
Belt ST, Leisvik MJ, Hyde AJ, Overton TL (2005) Using a context-based approach to undergraduate chemistry teaching—a case study for introductory physical chemistry. Chem Educ Res Pract 6(3):166–179
Bennett J, Lubben F (2006) Context-based chemistry: the Salters approach. Int J Sci Educ 28(9):999–1015
Bennett J, Holman J, Lubben F, Nicolson P, Prior C (2002) Science in context: the Salters approach. Paper presented at the 2nd international IPN—YSEG symposium, Kiel, Germany
Bennett J, Hogarth S, Lubben F (2003) A systematic review of the effects of context-based and Science-Technology-Society (STS) approaches in the teaching of secondary science: review summary. University of York, UK
Bennett J, Gräsel C, Parchmann I, Waddington D (2005) Context-based and conventional approaches to teaching chemistry: comparing teachers’ views. Int J Sci Educ 27(13):1521–1547
Birgin O, Baki A (2007) The use of portfolio to assess student’s performance. J Turkish Sci Educ 4(2):75–90
Boström A (2008) Narratives as tools in designing the school chemistry curriculum. Interchange 39(4):391–413
Bulte A, Klaassen K, Westbroek H, Stolk M, Prins G, Genseberger G, de Jong O, Pilot A (2002) Modules for a new chemistry curriculum, research on a meaningful relation between contexts and concepts. Paper presented at the 2nd international IPN—YSEG symposium, Kiel, Germany
Bulte AMW, Westbroek HB, Van Rens EMM, Pilot A (2004) Involving students in meaningful chemistry education by adapting authentic practices. In: Eilks BRI (ed) Quality in practice-oriented research in science education (proceedings of the 17th symposium on chemical education in Dortmund). Shaker Publishing, Aachen, pp 105–116
Bulte AMW, Westbroek HB, de Jong O, Pilot A (2006) A research approach to designing chemistry education using authentic practices as contexts. Int J Sci Educ 28(9):1063–1086
Cahyadi V (2004) The effect of interactive engagement teaching on student understanding of introductory physics at the faculty of engineering, University of Surabaya, Indonesia. Higher Educ Res Dev 23(4):455–464
Çalik M (2010) A critical evaluation of the university entrance examination (ÖSS) in Turkey: a two-edged sword. In: Vlaardingerbroek B, Taylor N (eds) Getting Into Varsity – Comparability, Convergence and Congruence. Cambria Press Inc., New York, pp 187–196
Çalik M, Ayas A, Ebenezer JV (2005) A review of solution chemistry studies: Insights into students’ conceptions. J Sci Educ Technol 14(1):29–50
Çalik M, Ayas A, Coll RK (2010) Investigating the effectiveness of usage of different methods embedded with four-step constructivist teaching strategy. J Sci Educ Technol 19(1):32–48
Çalik M, Okur M, Taylor N (2011) A comparison of different conceptual change pedagogies employed within the topic of “sound propagation”. J Sci Educ Technol 20:729–742
Campbell B, Lubben F (2000) Learning science through contexts: helping pupils make sense of everyday situations. Int J Sci Educ 22:239–252
Campbell B, Lazonby J, Millar R, Nicolson P, Ramsden J, Waddington D (1994) Science: The Salters’ approach-a case study of the process of large scale curriculum development. Sci Educ 78(5):415–447
Coenders, F. (2010). Teachers’ professional growth during the development and class enactment of context-based chemistry student learning material. PhD Thesis, University of Twente, Enschede
DeBoer GE (1991) A history of ideas in science education: implications for practice. Teachers College Press, New York
Demircioğlu H, Demircioğlu G, Ayas A (2006) Hikayeler ve Kimya öğretimi. H.Ü. Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi 30:110–119
Demircioğlu H, Demircioğlu G, Çalik M (2009) Investigating effectiveness of storylines embedded within context based approach: a case for the periodic table. Chem Educ Res Pract 10:241–249
Dlamini B, Lubben F (1996) Liked and disliked learning activities: responses of Swazi students to science materials with a technological approach. Res Sci Technol Educ 14(2):221–236
Gilbert JK (2006) On the nature of “context” in chemical education. Int J Sci Educ 28(9):957–976
Glaser RE, Carson KM (2005) Chemistry is in the news: taxonomy of authentic news media-based learning activities. Int J Sci Educ 27(9):1083–1098
Gökdere M, Çalik M (2010) A cross-age study of Turkish students’ mental models: an “Atom” concept. Didactica Slovenica-Pedagoska Obzorja 25(2):185–199
Graber W, Erdmann T, Schlieker V (2002) ParCIS: partnership between chemical industry and schools. Paper presented at the 2nd international IPN—YSEG symposium. Kiel, Germany
Hofstein A, Kesner M (2006) Industrial chemistry and school chemistry: making chemistry studies more relevant. Int J Sci Educ 28(9):1017–1039
King D (2007) Teacher beliefs and constraints in implementing a context-based approach in chemistry. Teach Sci 53(1):14–18
King D (2009). Teaching and learning in a context-based chemistry classroom. PhD Thesis, Centre for Learning Innovation, Faculty of Education, Queensland University of Technology, Australia
King D, Ritchie SM (2007) Implementing a context-based approach in a chemistry class: Successes and dilemmas. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, New Orleans, LA
King D, Bellocchi A, Ritchie SM (2008) Making connections: learning and teaching chemistry in context. Res Sci Educ 38:365–384
King DT, Winner E, Ginns I (2011) Outcomes and implications of one teacher’s approach to context-based science in the middle years. Teach Sci 57(2):26–30
Kurnaz MA, Çalik M (2009) A thematic review of ‘energy’ teaching studies: focuses, needs, methods, general knowledge claims and implications. Energy Educ Sci Technol Part B Soc Educ Stud 1(1):1–26
Lubben F, Bennett J (2008) From novel approach to mainstream policy? The impact of context-based approaches on chemistry teaching. Educación química, Octubre de 2008:252–262
Lubben F, Bennett J, Hogarth S, Robinson A (2005) A systematic review of the effects of context-based and science-technology-society (STS) approaches in the teaching of secondary science on boys and girls, and on lower-ability pupils. Research evidence in education library. EPPI-Centre, Social Science Research Unit, Institute of Education, University of London, London
Markic S, Eilks I (2006) Cooperative and context-based learning on electrochemical cells in lower secondary science lessons—a project of participatory action research. Sci Educ Int 4(17):253–273
Mintzes JJ, Wandersee JH, Novak JD (2001) Assessing understanding in biology. J Biol Educ 35(3):118–125
Nentwig P, Parchmann I, Demuth R, Grasel C, Ralle B (2002) Chemie im Kontext—from situated learning in relevant contexts to a systematic development of basic chemical concepts. Paper presented at the 2nd international IPN—YSEG symposium. Kiel, Germany
O’Connor C, Hayden H (2008) Contextualising nanotechnology in chemistry education. Chem Educ Res Pract 9:35–42
Overton TL, Bradley JS (2010) Internationalisation of the chemistry curriculum: two problem-based learning activities for undergraduate chemists. Chem Educ Res Pract 11:124–128
Overton TL, Potter NM (2011) Investigating students’ success in solving and attitudes towards context-rich open-ended problems in chemistry. Chem Educ Res Pract 12:294–302
Parchmann I, The CHIK Team 1 (2009) Chemie im Kontext One approach to realize science standards in chemistry classes? Educació Química EduQ 2:24–31
Parchmann I, Gräsel C, Baer A, Nentwig P, Demuth R, Ralled B (2006) “Chemie im Kontext”: a symbiotic implementation of a context-based teaching and learning approach. Int J Sci Educ 28(9):1041–1062
Pilling GM, Waddington DJ (2005) Implementation of large-scale science curricula: a study in seven European countries. J Sci Educ Technol 14(4):393–407
Pilot A, Bulte AMW (2006a) Why do you “need to know”? Context-based education. Int J Sci Educ 28(9):953–956
Pilot A, Bulte AMW (2006b) The use of “contexts” as a challenge for the chemistry curriculum: its successes and the need for further development and understanding. Int J Sci Educ 28(9):1087–1112
Potter NM, Overton TL (2006) Chemistry in sport: context-based e-learning in chemistry. Chem Educ Res Pract 7:195–202
Ramsden J (1992) If it’s enjoyable, is it science? School Sci Rev 73:65–71
Ramsden J (1997) How does a context-based approach influence understanding of key chemical ideas at 16? Int J Sci Educ 19:697–710
Sadler TD (2004) Informal reasoning regarding socioscientific issues: a critical review of research. J Res Sci Teach 41(5):513–536
Sanger MJ, Greenbowe TJ (1996) Science-technology-society (STS) and ChemCom courses versus college chemistry courses: is there a mismatch? J Chem Educ 73(6):532–536
Schwartz AT (2006) Contextualized chemistry education: the American experience. Int J Sci Educ 28(9):977–998
Smith LA, Bitner BL (1993) Comparison of formal operations: students enrolled in ChemCom versus a traditional chemistry course. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the national science teachers association. Kansas City, MO, USA
Stolk MJ, Bulte AMW, de Jong O, Pilot A (2009a) Towards a framework for a professional development programme: empowering teachers for context-based chemistry education. Chem Educ Res Pract 10:164–175
Stolk MJ, Bulte AMW, de Jong O, Pilot A (2009b) Strategies for a professional development programme: empowering teachers for context-based chemistry education. Chem Educ Res Pract 10:154–163
Sutman F, Bruce M (1992) Chemistry in the community—Chemcom. J Chem Educ 69:564–567
Tan KCD, Goh KN, Chia SL, Treagust DF (2002) Development and application of a two-tier multiple choice diagnostic instrument to assess high school students’ understanding of inorganic chemistry qualitative analysis. J Res Sci Teach 39(4):283–301
The Physical Sciences Initiative (TPSI) (1991) Social and applied aspects; what is meant by “social and applied”? www.psi-net.org/chemistry/s1/socialandapplied.pdf
Tinnesand M (2002) ChemCom contribution to the 2nd international IPN-YSEG symposium. Paper presented at the 2nd international IPN—YSEG symposium. Kiel, Germany
Treagust DF (1988) Development and use of diagnostic tests to evaluate students’ misconceptions in science. Int J Sci Educ 10(2):159–169
Tsai C-C (2000) The effects of STS oriented instructions on female tenth graders’ cognitive structure outcomes and the role of student scientific epistemological beliefs. Int J Sci Educ 22:1099–1115
Ünal S, Çalik M, Ayas A, Coll RK (2006) A review of chemical bonding studies: needs, aims, methods of exploring students’ conceptions, general knowledge claims and students’ alternative conceptions. Res Sci Technol Educ 24(2):141–172
Van den Akker J (1998) The science curriculum: between ideals and outcomes. In: Frazer B, Tobin K (eds) International handbook of science education, vol 1. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 421–447
van Driel JH (2005) The conceptions of chemistry teachers about teaching and learning in the context of a curriculum innovation. Int J Sci Educ 27(3):303–322
Vos MAJ (2010). Interaction between teachers and teaching materials on the implementation of context-based chemistry education. Doctoral Thesis. Eindhoven University of Technology, The Netherlands
Vos MAJ, Taconis R, Jochems WMG, Pilot A (2010) Teachers implementing context-based teaching materials: a framework for case-analysis in chemistry. Chem Educ Res Pract 11:193–206
Winther AA, Volk TL (1994) Comparing achievement of inner-city high school students in traditional versus STS-based chemistry courses. J Chem Educ 71:501–505
Wu HK (2003) Linking the microscopic view of chemistry to real-life experiences: intertextuality in a high-school science classroom. Sci Educ 87:868–891
Yager RE, Weld JD (1999) Scope, sequence and co-ordination: the Iowa project, a national reform effort in the USA. Int J Sci Educ 21:169–194
Zeidler DL, Sadler TD, Simmons ML, Howes EV (2005) Beyond STS: a research-based framework for socioscientific issues education. Sci Educ 89:357–377
Acknowledgments
We are glad to Dr. Barend Vlaardingerbroek from American University of Beirut, Lebanon for his kind help in language polishing.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ültay, N., Çalık, M. A Thematic Review of Studies into the Effectiveness of Context-Based Chemistry Curricula. J Sci Educ Technol 21, 686–701 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-011-9357-5
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-011-9357-5