Skip to main content
Log in

Scheduling of parallel machines with sequence-dependent batches and product incompatibilities in an automotive glass facility

  • Published:
Journal of Scheduling Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This application is motivated by a complex real-world scheduling problem found in the bottleneck workstation of the production line of an automotive safety glass manufacturing facility. The scheduling problem consists of scheduling jobs (glass parts) on a number of parallel batch processing machines (furnaces), assigning each job to a batch, and sequencing the batches on each machine. The two main objectives are to maximize the utilization of the parallel machines and to minimize the delay in the completion date of each job in relation to a required due date (specific for each job). Aside from the main objectives, the output batches should also produce a balanced workload on the parallel machines, balanced job due dates within each batch, and minimal capacity loss in the batches. The scheduling problem also considers a batch capacity constraint, sequence-dependent processing times, incompatible product families, additional resources, and machine capability. We propose a two-phase heuristic approach that combines exact methods with search heuristics. The first phase comprises a four-stage mixed-integer linear program for building the batches; the second phase is based on a Greedy Randomized Adaptive Search Procedure for sequencing the batches assigned to each machine. We conducted experiments on instances with up to 100 jobs built with real data from the manufacturing facility. The results are encouraging both in terms of computing time—5 min in average—and quality of the solutions—less than 10 % relative gap from the optimal solution in the first phase and less than 5 % in the second phase. Additional experiments were conducted on randomly generated instances of small, medium, and large size.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

MILP:

Mixed-integer linear program

GRASP:

Greedy randomized adaptive search procedure

MES:

Manufacturing execution system

SBPSP:

Single batch-processing scheduling problem

\(\mathcal J \) :

Set of jobs

\(\mathcal H \) :

Set of machines

\(\mathcal I \) :

Set of possible batches on any machine

\(\mathcal C \) :

Set of existing additional resource (cast) references

\(\mathcal B \) :

Set of product families

\(\varOmega \) :

Set of constraints (2) through (8)

\(Z_s (s=1, ...,4)\) :

Objective function for stage \(s\) in the batching phase

\(Z_s^*\) :

Best objective function value found in stage \(s\) of the batching phase

\(T(S)\) :

Total tardiness incurred by solution \(S\)

\(\varphi (S)\) :

Utilization level penalty for solution \(S\)

\(f(S)\) :

Penalized objective value for solution \(S\)

\(a_h(S)\) :

Real makespan value for machine \(h\) for solution \(S\)

\(n\) :

Number of jobs (glass parts)

\(h\) :

Number of parallel batch processing machines (furnaces)

\(l_j\) :

Width of the part that corresponds to job \(j\)

\(d_j\) :

Due date for job \(j\)

\(f_j\) :

Product family of job \(j\)

\(w_h\) :

Capacity of the batches assigned to machine \(h\)

\(m_{jh}\) :

1 if job \(j\) can be processed in machine \(h;\) 0 otherwise

\(p_{jh}\) :

Processing time for job \(j\) if processed in machine \(h\)

\(s_c\) :

Quantity of available resources for reference \(c\)

\(r_{jc}\) :

1 if job \(j\) requires a cast of reference \(c;\) 0 otherwise

\(\eta \) :

Maximum deterioration allowed for \(Z_1^*\)

\(\vartheta \) :

Maximum deterioration allowed for \(Z_2^*\)

\(\chi \) :

Maximum deterioration allowed for \(Z_3^*\)

\(ns\) :

Number of iterations of the GRASP algorithm

\(V_h\) :

Makespan target value for machine \(h\) for each problem instance

\(\psi \) :

Pre-defined minimum relative utilization level

\(\lambda \) :

Pre-defined threshold for utilization level before stage 4 of the batching phase

\(x_{jhi}\) :

1 if job \(j\) is assigned to batch \(i\) on machine \(h;\) 0 otherwise

\(y_{hi}\) :

1 if any job is allocated to batch \(i\) on machine \(h;\) 0 otherwise

\(q\) :

Maximum workload that is assigned to any machine

\(g\) :

Maximum slack on any batch

\(s_{hi}\) :

Unused capacity (length) of batch \(i\) on machine \(h\)

References

  • Allahverdi, A., Gupta, J., & Aldowaisan, T. (1999). A review of scheduling research involving setup considerations. Omega: International Journal of Management Science, 27, 219–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Armentano, V., & Felizardo, M. (2007). Minimizing total tardiness in parallel machine scheduling with setup times: An adaptive memory-based GRASP approach. European Journal of Operational Research, 183, 100–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnes, J., & Vanston, L. (1981). Scheduling jobs with linear delay penalties and sequence dependent setup costs. Operations Research, 29, 146–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brucker, P., & Kravchenko, S. (2008). Scheduling jobs with equal processing times and time windows on identical parallel machines. Journal of Scheduling, 11, 229–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang, P., Chen, Y., & Wang, H. (2005). Dynamic scheduling problem of batch processing machine in semiconductor burn-in operations. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Proceedings of the ICCSA 2005, Part IV, Singapore.

  • Chankong, V., & Haimes, Y. (1983). Multiobjective decision making: Theory and methodology. New York: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, B., Deng, X., & Zang, W. (2004). On-line scheduling a batch processing system to minimize total weighted job completion time. Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, 8, 85–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chou, F. D. (2007). A joint GA+DP approach for single burn-in oven scheduling problems with makespan criterion. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 35, 587–595.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Condotta, A., Knust, S., & Shakhlevich, N. (2010). Parallel batch scheduling of equal-length jobs with release and due dates. Journal of Scheduling, 13, 463–477.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dang, C., & Kang, L. (2004). Batch-processing scheduling with setup times. Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, 8, 137–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Detienne, B., Dauzère-Pérès, S., & Yugma, C. (2011). Scheduling jobs on parallel machines to minimize a regular step total cost function. Journal of Scheduling, 14, 523–538.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Du, J., & Leung, J. (1990). Minimizing total tardiness on one machine is NP-hard. Mathematics of Operations Research, 15, 483–495.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feo, T., & Resende, M. (1995). Greedy randomized adaptive search procedures. Journal of Global Optimization, 6, 109–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feo, T., Sarathy, K., & McGahan, J. (1996). A GRASP for single machine scheduling with sequence dependent setup costs and linear delay penalties. Computers and Operations Research, 23, 881–895.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fu, R., Tian, J., & Yuan, J. (2009). On-line scheduling on an unbounded parallel batch machine to minimize makespan of two families of jobs. Journal of Scheduling, 12, 91–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garey, M., & Johnson, D. (1979). Computers and intractability: A guide to the theory of NP-completeness. New York: W.H. Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham, R., Lawler, E., Lenstra, J., & Rinnooy, A. (1979). Optimization and approximation in deterministic sequencing and scheduling: A survey. Annals of Discrete Mathematics, 5, 287–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hochbaum, D. (1996). Approximation algorithms for NP-hard problems. Boston: PWS Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kashan, A., Karimi, B., & Jenabi, M. (2008). A hybrid genetic heuristic for scheduling parallel batch processing machines with arbitrary job sizes. Computers and Operations Research, 35, 1084–1098.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koh, S., Koo, P., Kim, D., & Hur, W. (2005). Scheduling a single batch processing machine with arbitrary job sizes and incompatible job families. International Journal of Production Economics, 98, 81–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lozano, A., Santa, S., Jiménez, D., & Mejía, G. (2010). Programación de máquinas en paralelo por lotes con familias incompatibles. Technologies in logistics and manufacturing for small and medium enterprises, Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Production Research (ICPR) Americas 2010, Bogotá, Colombia.

  • Manjeshwar, P., Damodaran, P., & Srihari, K. (2009). Minimizing makespan in a flow shop with two batch-processing machines using simulated annealing. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, 25, 667–679.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mathirajan, M., Chandru, V., & Sivakumar, A. (2007). Heuristic algorithms for scheduling heat-treatment furnaces of steel casting industries. Sadhana, 32(5), 479–500.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mönch, L., Unbehaun, R., & Choung, Y. I. (2006). Minimizing earliness–tardiness on a single burn-in oven with a common due date and maximum allowable tardiness constraint. OR Spectrum, 28, 177–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perez, I., Fowler, J., & Carlyle, M. (2005). Minimizing total weighted tardiness on a single batch process machine with incompatible job families. Computers and Operations Research, 32, 327–341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Potts, C., & Kovalyov, M. (2000). Scheduling with batching: A review. European Journal of Operational Research, 120, 228–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sefair, J. A., Molano, A., Medaglia, A. L., & Sarmiento, O. L. (2011). Locating neighborhood parks with a lexicographic multiobjective optimization method. Community-Based Operations Research: Decision Modeling for Local Impact and Diverse Populations. Michael P. Johnson (Ed.). International Series in Operations Research and Management Science, 167(2), 143–171.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shim, S., & Kim, Y. (2006). Scheduling on parallel identical machines to minimize total tardiness. European Journal of Operational Research, 177, 135–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steuer, R. (1989). Multiple criteria optimization: Theory, computation and application. Melbourne: Krieger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toth, P., & Vigo, D. (2001). The vehicle routing problem. Philadelphia, PA: Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ventura, J., & Kim, D. (2000). Parallel machine scheduling about an unrestricted due date and additional resource constraints. IIE Transactions, 32, 147–153.

    Google Scholar 

  • Villegas, J. G., Palacios, F., & Medaglia, A. L. (2006). Solution methods for the bi-objective (cost-coverage) unconstrained facility location problem with an illustrative example. Annals of Operations Research, 147(1), 109–141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, H., & Chou, F. (2010). Solving the parallel batch-processing machines with different release times, job sizes, and capacity limits by metaheuristics. Expert Systems with Applications, 37(2), 1510–1521.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yalaoui, F., & Chu, C. (2003). An efficient heuristic approach for parallel machine scheduling with job splitting and sequence-dependent setup times. IIE Transactions, 35(2), 183–190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zee, D. J., Harten, A., & Schuur, P. C. (2001). On-line scheduling of multi-server batch operations. IIE Transactions, 33, 569–586.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was partially funded by the Industrial Engineering Department at Universidad de los Andes. We also thank Fair Isaac Corporation for providing us with access to Xpress-MP optimization software under the Academic Partner Program subscribed with Universidad de los Andes.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andrés L. Medaglia.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lozano, A.J., Medaglia, A.L. Scheduling of parallel machines with sequence-dependent batches and product incompatibilities in an automotive glass facility. J Sched 17, 521–540 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10951-012-0308-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10951-012-0308-7

Keywords

Navigation