Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Re-conceptualizing Neurosis as a Degree of Egocentricity: Ethical Issues in Psychological Theory

  • Psychological Exploration
  • Published:
Journal of Religion and Health Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Psychology’s historical rejection of ethics has led to an oversimplification of the origins and treatments of mental disorders. In this article, we present an analysis of how classical neurosis can be reformulated from an ethical and psychological interaction. We focus on the crucial role that egocentricity plays and argue that this term can help to clarify how ego defensive ethical decisions can undermine psychological capacities and contribute to a progressive depersonalization that can result in typical clinical disorders. In Christian anthropology, the virtues, especially humility and love have a crucial role in the positive growth of human affective and cognitive capacities. In addition, the person in his/her nature is endowed with the capacity to transcend the self and to escape egocentricity through self-giving love of God and of others. This capacity of self-giving is diametrically opposed to egocentricity and opens a new way for possible psychological recovery.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adler, A. (1912). The neurotic constitution. Outlines of a comparative individualistic psychology and psychotherapy. Aylesbury, UK: Chrysoma Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allers, R. (1931). The psychology of character. New York, NY: Sheed and Ward.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allers, R. (1990). Practical psychology in character development: An abridged version of the author´s psychology of character. Fort Collins, CO: Roman Catholic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aquinas, T. (1981). The summa theologica of St. Thomas Aquinas. New York: Christian Classics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benedict XVI. (2005). Encyclical Letter. Deus Caritas Est.

  • Caruso, I. (1954). Análisis psíquico y síntesis existencial: Relaciones entre el análisis psíquico y los valores de la existencia. Barcelona: Herder.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charland, L. C. (2004). Moral treatment and the personality disorders. In J. Radden (Ed.), The philosophy of psychiatry: A companion. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Echavarria, M. F. (2005). La praxis de la psicología y sus niveles epistemológicos según Santo Tomás de Aquino. Girona: Documenta Universitaria.

    Google Scholar 

  • Echavarria, M. F. (2008). De Aristóteles a Freud: Ensayo filosófico de historia de la psicología. Lima: Vida y Espiritualidad.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emmons, R. A., & McCullough, M. E. (2004). The psychology of gratitude. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • First, M. B. (2001). DSM-IV-TR. Manual diagnóstico y estadístico de los trastornos mentales. Texto Revisado. Arlington: APA (American Psychiatric Association).

    Google Scholar 

  • Frankfurt, H. (1988). The importance of what we care about: Philosophical essays. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Fromm, E. (1947). Man for himself: An inquiry into the psychology of ethics. New York, NY: Fawcett.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gudan, E. (2010). Gratitude-based interventions for treating ruminative depression. Dissertation. Arlington, VA: Institute for the Psychological Sciences.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hendin, H. (1975). The age of sensation: A psychoanalytic exploration. New York, NY: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horney, K. (1950). Neurosis and human growth: The struggle toward self-realization. New York, NY: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kunkel, F. (1984). The origin and nature of egocentricity. Selected writings (pp. 102–105). New York, NY: Paulist Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linley, P. A., & Joseph, S. (2004). Positive psychology in practice. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lopez, S. J., & Snyder, C. R. (2003). Positive psychological assessment. A handbook of models and measures. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • MacIntyre, A. (2007). After virtue: A study in moral theory (3rd ed.). Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oberst, U. E., & Stewart, A. E. (2003). Adlerian Psychotherapy. An advanced approach to individual psychology. New York, NY: Brunner-Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, C., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2004). Character strengths and virtues. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pieper, J. (2010). Las virtudes fundamentales (Tercera ed.). Madrid: Ediciones Rialp, S.A.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rielo, F. (2001). Psycho ethical treatment in education. The genetic model in my thought (D. Murray Trans.). Madrid: Fundación Fernando Rielo.

  • Seligman, M. P. E., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2000). Positive psychology: An introduction. American Psychologist, 55, 5–14.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Swanton, C. (2003). Virtue ethics: A pluralistic view. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Titus, C. S., & Moncher, F. (2009). A Catholic Christian positive psychology: A virtue approach. Edification: Journal of the Society for Christian Psychology, 3(1), 57–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trautman, L. J. (2006). Virtue as a support for psychological health in the treatment of narcissistic personality disorder. Dissertation. Arlington, VA: Institute for the Psychological Sciences.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vitz, P. C. (1994). Psychology as religion: The cult of self-worship (2nd ed.). Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vitz, P. C., & Gartner, J. (1984). Christianity and psychoanalysis, part 2: Jesus the transformer of the super-ego. Journal of Psychology and Theology, 12, 82–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vitz, P. C., & Gartner, J. (1989). The vicissitudes of original sin: A reply to Bridgman and Carter. Journal of Psychology and Theology, 17, 9–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Von Hildebrand, D. (1952). Christian ethics. New York, NY: David McKay Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Von Hildebrand, D. (1990). Humility: Wellspring of virtue. Manchester, NH: Sophia Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Von Hildebrand, D. (2006). Moralidad y conocimiento ético de los valores. Madrid: Ediciones Cristiandad, S.A.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waring, D. (2012). The virtuous patient: Psychotherapy and the cultivation of character. Philosophy, Psychiatry, and Psychology, 19(1), 25–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zachar, P., & Potter, N. N. (2010). Personality disorders: Moral or medical kinds—or both? Philosophy, Psychiatry, and Psychology, 17(2), 101–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. Alvarez-Segura.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Alvarez-Segura, M., Echavarria, M.F. & Vitz, P.C. Re-conceptualizing Neurosis as a Degree of Egocentricity: Ethical Issues in Psychological Theory. J Relig Health 54, 1788–1799 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10943-014-9939-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10943-014-9939-7

Keywords

Navigation