Skip to main content
Log in

Revisiting Fluctuations in L2 Article Choice in L1-Korean L2-English Learners

  • Published:
Journal of Psycholinguistic Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The current study investigated the distinction of L2 (second language) English article choice sensitivity in fifty-three L1-Korean L2-English learners in semantic contexts. In the context of English as a foreign language, the participants were divided into two groups based on grammatical ability as determined by their performance on a cloze test. In addition, a forced-choice elicitation test and a writing production test were administered to assess, respectively, the participants’ receptive and productive article choice abilities. Regardless of grammatical ability, the results disclosed the overuse of the indefinite a in the [\(+\)definite, −specific] context and the definite the in the [−definite, \(+\)specific] context on the forced-choice elicitation test. In the [\(+\)definite, \(+\)specific] and [−definite, −specific] contexts, however, the overuse of either the indefinite a or the definite the, respectively, was less likely. Furthermore, it was revealed on the writing test that the participants more accurately used the definite the than the indefinite a, and they were also found to unreasonably omit more articles than to add or substitute articles on the writing production test. The findings across the two tests indicate that L1-Korean L2-English learners are more likely to have intrinsic difficulties transferring their L1 noun phrase (NP) knowledge to L2 NP knowledge owing to structural discrepancies and complex interfaces between L1 NPs and L2 NPs with respect to syntactic, semantic and pragmatic/discourse language subsystems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The examples were adopted from the writing production test.

  2. The examples in 8 (a), (b), (c) and (d) were taken from the writing production test.

References

  • Alderson, J. C., Clapham, C., & Steel, D. (1997). Metalinguistic knowledge, language aptitude and language proficiency. Language Teaching Research, 1, 93–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baek, S., & Sarker, K. B. (2013). Accouting for L2 article choice sensitivity in Korean EFL learner. Studies in English Education, 18(2), 83–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Celce-Murcia, M. Larsen, & Freeman, D. (1999). The grammar book: An ESL/EFL teacher’s course. Boston, MA: Heinle & Heinle.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chierchia, G. (1998). Reference to kinds across languages. Natural Language Semantics, 6, 339–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, N. (1981). Lectures on Government and Binding. Dordrecht: Foris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Franceschina, F. (2001). Morphological or syntactic deficits in near-native speakers? An assessment of some current proposals. Second Language Research, 17, 213–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hawkins, R., & Chan, Y. (1997). The partial availability of UG in SLA: The failed functional features hypothesis. Second Language Research, 13, 187–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hawkins, R. (2001). A second language syntax, a generative introduction. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawkins, R. (2005). Explaining full and partial success in the acquisition of second language grammatical properties. Second Language, 4, 7–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawkins, R., Al-Eid, S., Almahboob, I., Athanasopoulos, P., Chaengchenkit, R., Hu, J., et al. (2006). Accounting for English article interpretation by L2 speakers. In S. Foster-Cohen, H. Marta Medved Krajnovic, & J. Mihaljević Djigunović (Eds.), EUROSLA Yearbook (Vol. 6, pp. 7–25). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huebner, T. (1983). A longitudinal analysis of the acquisition of English. Ann Arbor: Karoma.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hwang, M. O. (1983). Topic continuity and discontinuity in Korean narrative. Korean Linguistics, 3, 47–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ionin, T., Ko, H., & Wexler, K. (2004). Article semantics in L2-acquisition: The role ofspecificity. Language Acquisition, 12, 3–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jarvis, S. (2002). Topic continuity in L2 English article use. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24, 387–418.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jung, E., & Sarah, H. (2004). Topic and subject prominence in interlanguage development. Language Learning, 54(4), 713–738.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kellerman, E. (1979). Transfer and non-transfer: Where we are now. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 2(1), 37–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kellerman, E. (1983). Now you see it, now you do not. In S. Gass & L. Selinker (Eds.), Language transfer in language learning (pp. 112–134). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kharma, N. (1981). Analysis of errors committed by Arab University students in the use of definite and indefinite article. IRAL, 19, 333–345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, C. (2005). Order and meaning: Numeral classifiers and specificity in Korean. In John, A., et al. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 24th west coast conference on formal linguistics (pp. 218–226). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.

  • Kim, H. Y. (1989). Nominal reference in discourse: Introduction and tracking referents in Korean spoken narratives. In S. Kuno (Ed.), Proceedings of harvard workshop on Korean linguistics. Seoul: Hanshin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, H. Y. (1997). Referential choice for third persons in Korean Conversation. Tamhwawa Iinci [Discourse and Cognition], 4, 121–158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lardiere, D. (2005). On morphological competence. In L. Dekydtspotter, et al. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 7th generative approaches to second language acquisition conference (pp. 178–192). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.

  • Lee, C. (2000). Numeral classifiers, (In-)definites and incremental theme in Korean. In C. Lee & J. Whitman (Eds.), Korean syntax and semantics: LSA Institute Workshop, Santa Cruz, ’91. Seoul: Thaehaksa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leung, Y.-K. (2001). The initial state of L3A: Full transfer and failed features? In X. Bonch-Bruevich, W. J. Crawford, J. Hellermann, C. Higgins, & H. Nguyen (Eds.), The past, present and future of second language research: selected proceedings of the 2000 Second Language Research Forum (pp. 55–75). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, C., & Thompson, S. (1976). A new typology of language. In C. Li (Ed.), Subject and topic (pp. 457–489). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lu, C. F.-C. (2001). The acquisition of English articles by Chinese learners. Second Language Studies, 20, 43–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyons, C. (1999). Definiteness. Cambridge: CUP.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Master, P., (1987). A cross-linguistic interlanguage analysis of the acquisition of the English article system. Ph.D. Thesis.University of California, Los Angeles.

  • Master, P. (1997). The English article system: Acquisition, function, and pedagogy. System, 30, 331–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, S. (1987). Knowledge and production of English articles by advanced second language learners. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Texas at Austin.

  • Ortega, L. (2009). Understanding second language acquisitions. London: Hodder Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parrish, B. (1987). A new look at methodologies in the study of article acquisition for learners of ESL. Language Learning, 37, 361–383.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, D. (2000). Variability in the use of the English article system by Chinese learners of English. Second Language Research, 16, 135–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roehr, K. (2006). Metalinguistic knowledge and language-analytic ability in university-level L2 learners. Essex Research Reports in Linguistics, 51, 41–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarker, K. B., & Baek, S. (2013). L2-English article use in semantic contexts. Studies in Foreign Language Education, 27(1), 21–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snape, N. (2006). The Acquisition of determiner Phrase by Japanese and Spanish Learners of English. Ph.D Thesis, University of Essex.

  • Smith, N., & Tsimpli, I.-M. (1995). The mind of a servant. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sohn, H.-M. (1980). Theme-prominence in Korea. Korean Linguistics, 2, 1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sohn, H.-M. (1999). The Korean language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, M. (1989). The acquisition of English articles by first- and second-language learners. Applied Psycholinguistics, 10, 335–355.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trademan, J. (2002). The acquisition of English articles by first-and secondlanguage of English. Applied Psycholinguistics, 10, 335–355.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trenkic, D. (2008). The representation of English articles in second language grammar: Determiners or adjectives? Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 11(1), 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsimpli, I. M., & Roussou, A. (1991). Parameter-resetting in L2? UCL Working Papers in Linguistics, 3, 149–170.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The subjects recruited from Baek and Sarker (2013) also participated in the current study; the data of cloze test and writing production test, adopted from Baek and Sarker (2013), were reanalyzed and then reorganized.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Seunghyun Baek.

Appendix: Cloze Test

Appendix: Cloze Test

Fill in the blanks given in the following passages. You have to use one word for each blank.

Passage A

Many of us do not know_______ Abraham might _______ deserved the right to be treated as one of the best presidents in the history of the U.S.A. Abraham Lincoln was born on February 12, 1809, in _______ log cabin in Kentucky. A cabin is a small house made _______wood. When he was seven years old, his family moved to Indiana. In 1830, the family moved to Illinois. As a boy, Abraham Lincoln _______ loved books and always borrowed books from his neighbors. He read_______ for a short time and then took them back to their owners. _______ grew very tall. He was 6’4” tall. He weighed 180 pounds.

Abe Lincoln _______ law in his free time, He was interested in politics. He ran _______ political office. He lost in 1832. Later, he was elected to _______ Illinois legislature 4 times _______, in 1834, 1836, 1838, and 1840. People in the legislature make the laws. He became president of the United States in 1861. He was the 16th president of the U.S.

There was a war between the North and the South in the U.S. It was the Civil War. Lincoln called men to fight for the North. The North won the war. There were slaves in the South. Slaves work for no money. They must work. They are not free to do _______they want. Lincoln set the slaves free in 1863. He let them go _______they did not have to be slaves anymore. Lincoln is famous for that.

Passage B

The first flags were probably _______China. People flew flags in China over 4,000 years ago. Each part _______ army had its own flag so the soldiers _______ see their leaders. Early flags were sticks of wood. _______ had pictures cut into the wood.

Iran had metal flags about 3,000 years ago. Old Greek coins show pictures of flags. People in Rome also used flags over 2,000 years ago. People first made flags of cloth _______ 2,000 years ago. Those flags looked like today’s flags.

Flags are important at sea. Most ships fly their own country’s flags and the flag of the country they _______visiting. When a ship _______ only its own flag, _______ is ready to fight.

Railway lines also use flags. Railway flags tell the trains what to do. For example, a red flag tells the train to stop, just like a stop sign. A blue, white, or green flag tells the train that it can go. A blue flag on the side of a train means someone _______working on the train. It means nobody can move the train.

Passage C

In past, there was nothing like modern means of entertainment _______ if was, it was not surely like the present situation. Many people _______ have worked to create television. In 1862, Abbe Giovanna Caselli invented a machine _______ the Pantelograph. Casella was the first person to send a picture over wires. By the 1880s, _______Alexander Graham Bell invented a machine _______ transmitted pictures and sound over wires. His machine was called the Photophone. The World’s Fair _______ held in Paris, France, in the year 1900. The first International Congress of Electricity was held _______ the World’s Fair. That was when the word television was first used by _______ Russian named Constantin Perskyi. ______ name stuck, and _______ now shortened to “TV.”

At the beginning of TV history, there were several types of TV technology. One system was a mechanical model based on a rotating disc (rotating discs are discs that spin like CDs). The other system was an electronic model. In 1906, Boris Rosing built the first working mechanical TV in Russia. In the 1920s, John Logie Baird in England and Charles Francis Jenkins in the United States demonstrated improved mechanical systems. Philo Taylor Farnsworth also showed an electronic system in San Francisco in 1927. _______ TV was the forerunner of today’s TV, and _______ is ______ electronic system based on his ideas.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sarker, B.K., Baek, S. Revisiting Fluctuations in L2 Article Choice in L1-Korean L2-English Learners. J Psycholinguist Res 46, 367–393 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-016-9440-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-016-9440-4

Keywords

Navigation