Skip to main content
Log in

Effect of Pore Structure on Proton Conductivity and Water Uptake in Nanoporous TiO2

  • Published:
Journal of Porous Materials Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper reports on an investigation involving water content, water properties and proton conductivity in nanoporous TiO2 materials fabricated through sol-gel processing techniques. TiO2 nanoparticles having a primary particle diameter of less than 5 nm are packed into xerogels at room temperature and at 50C. The resulting xerogels are fired at temperatures of 200, 300 and 400C to alter the structural properties of these materials. Further alteration in the surface chemistry of the pore walls of these materials are made by equilibrating these porous wafers at pH 1.5 and 4.0 using nitric acid. Porosity, pore size, and surface area are evaluated with nitrogen adsorption techniques. Water content is calculated using data from thermogravimetric methods and water adsorption isotherms. Proton conductivity is measured using impedance spectroscopy. Of all variables affecting water content, water structure, and proton conductivity, the pH of pre-equilibrating the fired xerogels is the most important. However, porous structures of TiO2 arising from the open packing of nanoparticles, that have less tortuosity, are substantially different in the uptake of water with relative humidity than samples obtained from the close-packing of these same particles regardless of firing temperature. Also, the material with the smallest pore size (a close-packed structure fired at 200C) has the highest proton conductivity when measured between 20–60% relative humidity making this system the most favorable in terms of proton exchange membrane systems. Lastly, it is interesting to note that the density of water in these pores can vary between 1.2 and 1.6 g/l which is different than the 1.0 g/l of bulk water. This result likely comes from a combination of surface charge and surface roughness that affects the structure of interfacial water. These findings have importance not only for proton exchange membrane systems but also for other membrane technologies, cements, sensors, fabrication of wetting surfaces and in other areas that might benefit from the use of nanoporous materials.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. K.A. Mauritz and R.M. Warren, Macromolecules 22, 1730 (1989).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. S.P. Nunes, B. Ruffmann, E. Rikowski, S. Vetter, and K. Richau, J. Membrane Sci. 203, 215 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. S. Li and M. Liu, Electrochim. Acta 48, 4271 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Y.S. Kim, F. Wang, M. Hickner, T.A. Zawodzinski, and J.E. McGrath, J. Membrane Sci. 212, 263 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. S. Malhotra and R. Datta, J. Electrochem. Soc. 144, 123 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  6. B. Tazi and O. Savadogo, Electrochim. Acta 45, 4329 (2000).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. B. Tazi and O. Savadogo, J. New Mater. Electrochem. Systems 4, 187 (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  8. G. Alberti and M. Casciola, Annu. Rev. Mater. Res. 33, 129 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. S.M. Haile, D.A. Boysen, C.R.I. Chisholm, and R.B. Merle, Nature 410, 910 (2001).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. R.B. Merle, C.R.I. Chisholm, D.A. Boysen, and S.M. Haile, Energy Fuels 17, 210 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. F.M. Vichi, M.T. Colomer, and M.A. Anderson, Electrochem. Solid State Lett. 2, 313 (1999).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. F.M. Vichi, M.I. Tejedor-Tejedor and M.A. Anderson, Chem. Mater. 12, 1762 (2000).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Q. Xu and M.A. Anderson, Mater. Res. 6, 1074 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  14. I.I. Salame and T.J. Bandosz, Langmuir 15, 3632 (1999).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Y.M. Chiang, D. Birnie III, and W.D. Kingery, Physical Ceramics: Principles for Ceramic Sciences and Engineering (John Wiley and Sons, New York, 1997).

    Google Scholar 

  16. F. Roquerol, J. Roquerol, K. Sing, Adsorption by Powders and Porous Solids (Academic Press, Yew York, 1999), Chap. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  17. P.I. Ravikovitch, D. Wei, W.T. Chueh, G.L. Haller, and A.V. Neimark, J. Phys. Chem B. 101, 3671 (1997).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. L.D. Tickanen, M.I. Tejedor–Tejedor, and M.A. Anderson, Langmuir 13, 4829 (1997).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. L.K. Iler, The Chemistry of Silica (John Wiley and Sons, New York, 1979), Chap. 6

    Google Scholar 

  20. N. Bonanos, B.C.H. Steele, E.P. Butler, W.B. Johnson, W.L. Worrel, D.D. Macdonald, and M.C.H. McKubre, Impedance Spectroscopy, edited by J.R. Macdonald (John Wiley and Sons, New York, 1987).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. Isabel Tejedor-Tejedor.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tejedor-Tejedor, M.I., Vichi, F.M. & Anderson, M.A. Effect of Pore Structure on Proton Conductivity and Water Uptake in Nanoporous TiO2. J Porous Mater 12, 201–214 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10934-005-1649-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10934-005-1649-9

Keywords

Navigation