Skip to main content
Log in

Functional Capacity Evaluation: Performance of Patients with Chronic Non-specific Low Back Pain Without Waddell Signs

  • Published:
Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the effect of Waddell signs (WS) on Functional Capacity Evaluation (FCE) in patients with chronic non-specific low back pain (CNSLBP) undergoing fitness for work evaluation. If an effect is observed, the secondary objective is to report performance of patients without WS in a standardized 1 day FCE protocol. Methods Survey of patients with CNSLBP as their primary complaint, referred for fitness for work evaluation, age between 20 and 60 years. Main outcome measures were WS and performance during manual handling assessed with lifting from floor to waist, waist to crown, horizontal and one handed carry; grip strength with Jamar hand held Dynamometer; ambulation with stair climbing and six minute walking test; work postures with elevated work, forward bend standing, kneeling, and sitting. Results 145 male with a mean age of 44.5 years (±10.1), and 53 females with a mean age of 43.6 years (±11.0) were included. Mean days off work were in male 658 (±1,056) and in female 642 (±886). 33 % of all patients presented positive WS. FCE performance in male and female patients with positive and negative WS differed significantly in all comparisons except grip strength of the dominant hand and sitting in female. Performance of patients with negative WS indicated a mean physical capacity corresponding to lightmedium work in females and medium work in males for both age groups. Conclusions WS should be assessed for interpretation of FCE results. Despite long work absence, patients with CNSLBP with negative WS demonstrated a physical capacity corresponding to substantial physical work demands.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Woolf AD, Pfleger B. Burden of major musculoskeletal conditions. Bull World Health Organ. 2003;81(9):646–56.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Wieser S, Horisberger B, Schmidhauser S, Eisenring C, Brugger U, Ruckstuhl A, et al. Cost of low back pain in Switzerland in 2005. Eur J Health Econ. 2011;12(5):455–67.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. OECD. Sickness, disability and work: breaking the barriers. A synthesis of findings across OECD countries. France: OECD Publishing; 2010.

  4. Fordyce W. Back pain in the workplace: management of disability in nonspecific conditions a report of the task force on pain in the workplace of the international association for the study of pain. Seattle, WA: IASP Press; 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Airaksinen O, Brox JI, Cedraschi C, Hildebrandt J, Klaber-Moffett J, Kovacs F et al. Chapter 4. European guidelines for the management of chronic nonspecific low back pain. Eur Spine J. 2006;15 Suppl 2:S192–300.

  6. Balague F, Mannion AF, Pellise F, Cedraschi C. Non-specific low back pain. Lancet. 2012;379(9814):482–91.

  7. Abenhaim L, Rossignol M, Valat JP, Nordin M, Avouac B, Blotman F, et al. The role of activity in the therapeutic management of back pain. Report of the International Paris Task Force on Back Pain. Spine. 2000;25(4 Suppl):1S–33S.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Koes BW, van Tulder M, Lin CW, Macedo LG, McAuley J, Maher C. An updated overview of clinical guidelines for the management of non-specific low back pain in primary care. Eur Spine J. 2010;19(12):2075–94.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Milhous RL, Haugh LD, Frymoyer JW, Ruess JM, Gallagher RM, Wilder DG, et al. Determinants of vocational disability in patients with low back pain. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1989;70(8):589–93.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Cocchiarella L, Turk MA, Andersson G. Improving the evaluation of permanent impairment. J Am Med Assoc. 2000;283(4):532–3.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Hunt DG, Zuberbier OA, Kozlowski AJ, Berkowitz J, Schultz IZ, Milner RA, et al. Are components of a comprehensive medical assessment predictive of work disability after an episode of occupational low back trouble? Spine. 2002;27(23):2715–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Bolderson H, Mabbett D, Hvinden B. Definitions of disability in Europe: a comparative analysis. Brussels: European Commission Directorate General for Employment and Social Affairs; 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Isernhagen SJ. Functional capacity evaluation. Work injury: management and prevention. Gaithersburg: Aspen Publishers Inc; 1988. p. 139–91.

  14. Isernhagen S. Contemporary issues in functional capacity evaluation. In: Isernhagen S, editor. The comprehensive guide to work injury management. Gaithersburg, MD: Aspen Publishers; 1995. p. 410–29.

    Google Scholar 

  15. SAR. Functional Capacity Evaluation—Course Manual. Bellikon, Switzerland: Verein IG Ergonomie SAR; 2007.

  16. Oesch PR, Kool JP, Bachmann S, Devereux J. The influence of a functional capacity evaluation on fitness for work certificates in patients with non-specific chronic low back pain. Work. 2006;26(3):259–71.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Wind H, Gouttebarge V, Kuijer PP, Sluiter JK, Frings-Dresen MH. Complementary value of functional capacity evaluation for physicians in assessing the physical work ability of workers with musculoskeletal disorders. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2009;82(4):435–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. USDL. DOT—Dictionnairy of Occupational Titles. Washington: United States Department of Labor (USDoL) 1981.

  19. Soer R, van der Schans CP, Geertzen JH, Groothoff JW, Brouwer S, Dijkstra PU, et al. Normative values for a functional capacity evaluation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2009;90(10):1785–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Reneman MF, Kool J, Oesch P, Geertzen JH, Battie MC, Gross DP. Material handling performance of patients with chronic low back pain during functional capacity evaluation: a comparison between three countries. Disabil Rehabil. 2006;28(18):1143–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Lackner JM, Carosella AM. The relative influence of perceived pain control, anxiety, and functional self efficacy on spinal function among patients with chronic low back pain. Spine. 1999;24(21):2254–60 (discussion 60-1).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Reneman MF, Jorritsma W, Schellekens JM, Goeken LN. Concurrent validity of questionnaire and performance—based disability measurements in patients with chronic nonspecific low back pain. J Occup Rehabil. 2002;12(3):119–29.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Gross DP, Battie MC. Construct validity of a kinesiophysical functional capacity evaluation administered within a worker’s compensation environment. J Occup Rehabil. 2003;13(4):287–95.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Oesch P, Meyer K, Jansen B, Mowinckel P, Bachmann S, Hagen KB. What is the role of “nonorganic somatic components” in functional capacity evaluations in patients with chronic nonspecific low back pain undergoing fitness for work evaluation? Spine. 2012;37(4):E243–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Waddell G, McCulloch JA, Kummel E, Venner RM. Nonorganic physical signs in low-back pain. Spine. 1980;5(2):117–25.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Main CJ, Waddell G. Behavioral responses to examination. A reappraisal of the interpretation of “nonorganic signs”. Spine. 1998;23(21):2367–71.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Apeldoorn AT, Bosselaar H, Blom-Luberti T, Twisk JW, Lankhorst GJ. The reliability of nonorganic sign-testing and the Waddell score in patients with chronic low back pain. Spine. 2008;33(7):821–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Isernhagen SJ. Functional capacity evaluation: rationale, procedure, utility of the Kinesiophysical approach. J Occup Rehabil. 1992;2(3):157–68.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Isernhagen SJ, Hart DL, Matheson LM. Reliability of independent observer judgments of level of lift effort in a kinesiophysical functional capacity evaluation. Work. 1999;12(2):145–50.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Reneman MF, Jaegers SM, Westmaas M, Goeken LN. The reliability of determining effort level of lifting and carrying in a functional capacity evaluation. Work. 2002;18(1):23–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Reneman MF, Dijkstra PU, Westmaas M, Goeken LN. Test–retest reliability of lifting and carrying in a 2-day functional capacity evaluation. J Occup Rehabil. 2002;12(4):269–75.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Brouwer S, Reneman MF, Dijkstra PU, Groothoff JW, Schellekens JM, Goeken LN. Test–retest reliability of the Isernhagen work systems functional capacity evaluation in patients with chronic low back pain. J Occup Rehabil. 2003;13(4):207–18.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Reneman MF, Brouwer S, Meinema A, Dijkstra PU, Geertzen JH, Groothoff JW. Test–retest reliability of the Isernhagen work systems functional capacity evaluation in healthy adults. J Occup Rehabil. 2004;14(4):295–305.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Gross D, Battié M. Reliability of safe maximum lifting determinations of a functional capacity evaluation. Phys Ther. 2002;82(4):364–71.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Mathiowetz V, Weber K, Volland G, Kashman N. Reliability and validity of grip and pinch strength evaluations. J Hand Surg [Am]. 1984;9(2):222–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Mathiowetz V, Kashman N, Volland G, Weber K, Dowe M, Rogers S. Grip and pinch strength: normative data for adults. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1985;66(2):69–74.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. ATS statement: guidelines for the six-minute walk test. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2002;166(1):111–7.

  38. King MB, Judge JO, Whipple R, Wolfson L. Reliability and responsiveness of two physical performance measures examined in the context of a functional training intervention. Phys Ther. 2000;80(1):8–16.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Kennedy DM, Stratford PW, Wessel J, Gollish JD, Penney D. Assessing stability and change of four performance measures: a longitudinal study evaluating outcome following total hip and knee arthroplasty. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2005;6(1):3.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Shephard R. Aging and exercise. In: Fahey T, editor. Encyclopedia of Sports Medicine and Science. Internet Society for Sport Science; 1998.

  41. Jay MA, Lamb JM, Watson RL, Young IA, Fearon FJ, Alday JM, et al. Sensitivity and specificity of the indicators of sincere effort of the EPIC lift capacity test on a previously injured population. Spine. 2000;25(11):1405–12.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Robinson ME, Dannecker EA. Critical issues in the use of muscle testing for the determination of sincerity of effort. Clin J Pain. 2004;20(6):392–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Oesch P, Meyer K, Bachmann S, Hagen KB, Vollestad NK. Comparison of two methods for interpreting lifting performance during functional capacity evaluation. Phys Ther. 2012;92(9):1130–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. De Beeck R, Hermans V, editors. Research on work-related low back disorders. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities; 2000.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Ethical standards

Ethical approval was obtained from the responsible regional ethics committees (EKSG 08/029/2B; SPUK N°. 784, EKAG 08/058).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peter Oesch.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Oesch, P., Meyer, K., Jansen, B. et al. Functional Capacity Evaluation: Performance of Patients with Chronic Non-specific Low Back Pain Without Waddell Signs. J Occup Rehabil 25, 257–266 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-014-9533-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-014-9533-6

Keywords

Navigation