Skip to main content
Log in

Evaluation of Self-Reported Work Ability and Usefulness of Interventions Among Sick-Listed Patients

  • Published:
Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Aim To describe the types of intervention offered, to investigate the relationship between the type of intervention given, patient-reported usefulness of interventions and the effect on self-reported work ability in a cohort of sick-listed patients with musculoskeletal disorders (MSD) or mental disorders (MD). Methods A prospective cohort study was performed including 810 newly sick-listed patients (MSD 62 % and MD 38 %). The baseline questionnaire included sociodemographic characteristics and measures of work ability. The 3-month follow-up questionnaire included measures of work ability, type of intervention received, and judgment of usefulness. Results Twenty-five percent received medical intervention modalities (MI) only, 45 % received a combination of medical and rehabilitative intervention modalities (CRI) and 31 % received work-related interventions combined with medical or rehabilitative intervention modalities (WI). Behavioural treatments were more common for patients with MD compared with MSD and exercise therapy were more common for patients with MSD. The most prevalent workplace interventions were adjustment of work tasks or the work environment. Among patients with MD, WI was found to be useful and improved work ability significantly more compared with only MI or CRI. For patients with MSD, no significant differences in improved work ability were found between interventions. Conclusions Patients with MD who received a combination of work-related and clinical interventions reported best usefulness and best improvement in work ability. There was no difference in improvements in work ability between rehabilitation methods in the MSD group. There seems to be a gap between scientific evidence and praxis behaviour in the rehabilitation process. Unimodal rehabilitation was widely applied in the early rehabilitation process, a multimodal treatment approach was rare and only one-third received work-related interventions. It remains a challenge to understand who needs what type of intervention.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Wahlin-Norgren C, Ekberg K, Oberg B. Is an expert diagnosis enough for assessment of sick leave for employees with musculoskeletal and mental disorders? Disabil Rehabil. 2011;33(13–14):1147–56.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Eriksson HG, von Celsing AS, Wahlstrom R, Janson L, Zander V, Wallman T. Sickness absence and self-reported health a population-based study of 43,600 individuals in central Sweden. BMC Public Health. 2008;8:426.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Lidwall U, Bergendorff S, Voss M, Marklund S. Long-term sickness absence: changes in risk factors and the population at risk. Int J Occup Med Environ Health. 2009;22(2):157–68.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Vaez M, Hagberg J, Alexanderson K. The panorama of future sick-leave diagnoses among young adults initially long-term sickness absent due to neck, shoulder, or back diagnoses. An 11-year prospective cohort study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2009;10:84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Anema JR, Schellart AJ, Cassidy JD, Loisel P, Veerman TJ, van der Beek AJ. Can cross country differences in return-to-work after chronic occupational back pain be explained? An exploratory analysis on disability policies in a six country cohort study. J Occup Rehabil. 2009;19(4):419–26.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Brouwers EP, Terluin B, Tiemens BG, Verhaak PF. Predicting return to work in employees sick-listed due to minor mental disorders. J Occup Rehabil. 2009;19(4):323–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Lambeek LC, van Mechelen W, Buijs PC, Loisel P, Anema JR. An integrated care program to prevent work disability due to chronic low back pain: a process evaluation within a randomized controlled trial. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2009;10:147.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Vlasveld MC, van der Feltz-Cornelis CM, Bultmann U, Beekman AT, van Mechelen W, Hoedeman R, Anema JR. Predicting return to work in workers with all-cause sickness absence >4 weeks: a prospective cohort study. J Occup Rehabil. 2012;22:118–26.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Kuoppala J, Lamminpaa A. Rehabilitation and work ability: a systematic literature review. J Rehabil Med. 2008;40(10):796–804.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Franche RL, Cullen K, Clarke J, Irvin E, Sinclair S, Frank J. Workplace-based return-to-work interventions: a systematic review of the quantitative literature. J Occup Rehabil. 2005;15(4):607–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Lotters FJ, Foets M, Burdorf A. Work and health, a blind spot in curative healthcare? A pilot study. J Occup Rehabil. 2011;21(3):304–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Shaw WS, van der Windt DA, Main CJ, Loisel P, Linton SJ. Early patient screening and intervention to address individual-level occupational factors (“blue flags”) in back disability. J Occup Rehabil. 2009;19(1):64–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Steenstra IA, Ibrahim SA, Franche RL, Hogg-Johnson S, Shaw WS, Pransky GS. Validation of a risk factor-based intervention strategy model using data from the readiness for return to work cohort study. J Occup Rehabil. 2010;20(3):394–405.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Anema JR, Jettinghoff K, Houtman I, Schoemaker CG, Buijs PC, van den Berg R. Medical care of employees long-term sick listed due to mental health problems: a cohort study to describe and compare the care of the occupational physician and the general practitioner. J Occup Rehabil. 2006;16(1):41–52.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Waddell G, Burton AK. Concepts of rehabilitation for the management of low back pain. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2005;19(4):655–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Heijbel B, Josephson M, Jensen I, Vingard E. Employer, insurance, and health system response to long-term sick leave in the public sector: policy implications. J Occup Rehabil. 2005;15(2):167–76.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Kosny A, Franche RL, Pole J, Krause N, Cote P, Mustard C. Early healthcare provider communication with patients and their workplace following a lost-time claim for an occupational musculoskeletal injury. J Occup Rehabil. 2006;16(1):27–39.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. van Oostrom SH, van Mechelen W, Terluin B, de Vet HC, Knol DL, Anema JR. A workplace intervention for sick-listed employees with distress: results of a randomised controlled trial. Occup Environ Med. 2010;67(9):596–602.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Hubertsson J, Petersson IF, Arvidsson B, Thorstensson CA. Sickness absence in musculoskeletal disorders—patients’ experiences of interactions with the social insurance agency and health care. A qualitative study. BMC Public Health. 2011;11:107.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Haugli L, Maeland S, Magnussen LH. What facilitates return to work? Patients experiences 3 years after occupational rehabilitation. J Occup Rehabil. 2011;21(4):573–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. de Vries G, Koeter MW, Nabitz U, Hees HL, Schene AH. Return to work after sick leave due to depression. A conceptual analysis based on perspectives of patients, supervisors and occupational physicians. J Affect Disord. 2011;136(3):1017–26.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Noordik E, Nieuwenhuijsen K, Varekamp I, van der Klink JJ, van Dijk FJ. Exploring the return-to-work process for workers partially returned to work and partially on long-term sick leave due to common mental disorders: a qualitative study. Disabil Rehabil. 2011;33(17–18):1625–35.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. De Rijk A, Janssen N, Alexanderson K, Nijhuis F. Gender differences in return to work patterns among sickness absentees and their associations with health: a prospective cohort study in The Netherlands. Int J Rehabil Res. 2008;31(4):327–36.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Stein MB, Roy-Byrne PP, Craske MG, Campbell-Sills L, Lang AJ, Golinelli D, et al. Quality of and patient satisfaction with primary health care for anxiety disorders. J Clin Psychiatry. 2011;72(7):970–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Linton SJ, Hellsing AL, Hallden K. A population-based study of spinal pain among 35–45-year-old individuals. Prevalence, sick leave, and health care use. Spine. 1998;23(13):1457–63.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Picavet HS, Struijs JN, Westert GP. Utilization of health resources due to low back pain: survey and registered data compared. Spine. 2008;33(4):436–44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Mortimer M, Ahlberg G. To seek or not to seek? Care-seeking behaviour among people with low-back pain. Scand J Public Health. 2003;31(3):194–203.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Dionne CE, Bourbonnais R, Fremont P, Rossignol M, Stock SR, Nouwen A, et al. Determinants of “return to work in good health” among workers with back pain who consult in primary care settings: a 2-year prospective study. Eur Spine J. 2007;16(5):641–55.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Dwight-Johnson M, Sherbourne CD, Liao D, Wells KB. Treatment preferences among depressed primary care patients. J Gen Intern Med. 2000;15(8):527–34.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Åsenlöf P, Denison E, Lindberg P. Long-term follow-up of tailored behavioural treatment and exercise based physical therapy in persistent musculoskeletal pain: a randomized controlled trial in primary care. Eur J Pain. 2009;13(10):1080–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Mergl R, Henkel V, Allgaier AK, Kramer D, Hautzinger M, Kohnen R, et al. Are treatment preferences relevant in response to serotonergic antidepressants and cognitive-behavioral therapy in depressed primary care patients? Results from a randomized controlled trial including a patients’ choice arm. Psychother Psychosom. 2011;80(1):39–47.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Young AE, Roessler RT, Wasiak R, McPherson KM, van Poppel MN, Anema JR. A developmental conceptualization of return to work. J Occup Rehabil. 2005;15(4):557–68.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Stapelfeldt CM, Christiansen DH, Jensen OK, Nielsen CV, Petersen KD, Jensen C. Subgroup analyses on return to work in sick-listed employees with low back pain in a randomised trial comparing brief and multidisciplinary intervention. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2011;12:112.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Tuomi K, Ilmarinen J, Jahkola A, Katajarinne L, Tulkki A. Work ability index. 2nd ed. Helsinki: Finnish Institute of Occupational Health; 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Ahlstrom L, Grimby-Ekman A, Hagberg M, Dellve L. The work ability index and single-item question: associations with sick leave, symptoms, and health—a prospective study of women on long-term sick leave. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2010;36(5):404–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Alavinia SM, de Boer AG, van Duivenbooden JC, Frings-Dresen MH, Burdorf A. Determinants of work ability and its predictive value for disability. Occup Med (Lond). 2009;59(1):32–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. George SZ, Robinson ME. Preference, expectation, and satisfaction in a clinical trial of behavioral interventions for acute and sub-acute low back pain. J Pain. 2010;11(11):1074–82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Wickizer TM, Franklin G, Fulton-Kehoe D, Turner JA, Mootz R, Smith-Weller T. Patient satisfaction, treatment experience, and disability outcomes in a population-based cohort of injured workers in Washington State: implications for quality improvement. Health Serv Res. 2004;39(4 Pt 1):727–48.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Sieurin L, Josephson M, Vingard E. Positive and negative consequences of sick leave for the individual, with special focus on part-time sick leave. Scand J Public Health. 2009;37(1):50–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Michie S, Williams S. Reducing work related psychological ill health and sickness absence: a systematic literature review. Occup Environ Med. 2003;60(1):3–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Hultin H, Hallqvist J, Alexanderson K, Johansson G, Lindholm C, Lundberg I, et al. Work-related psychosocial events as triggers of sick leave—results from a Swedish case-crossover study. BMC Public Health. 2011;11:175.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Schultz IZ, Stowell AW, Feuerstein M, Gatchel RJ. Models of return to work for musculoskeletal disorders. J Occup Rehabil. 2007;17(2):327–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Burstrom B, Nylen L, Clayton S, Whitehead M. How equitable is vocational rehabilitation in Sweden? A review of evidence on the implementation of a national policy framework. Disabil Rehabil. 2011;33(6):453–66.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Karlson B, Jonsson P, Palsson B, Abjornsson G, Malmberg B, Larsson B, et al. Return to work after a workplace-oriented intervention for patients on sick-leave for burnout—a prospective controlled study. BMC Public Health. 2010;10:301.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Carroll C, Rick J, Pilgrim H, Cameron J, Hillage J. Workplace involvement improves return to work rates among employees with back pain on long-term sick leave: a systematic review of the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of interventions. Disabil Rehabil. 2010;32(8):607–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Lambeek LC, van Mechelen W, Knol DL, Loisel P, Anema JR. Randomised controlled trial of integrated care to reduce disability from chronic low back pain in working and private life. BMJ. 2010;340:c1035.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Wåhlin C, Ekberg K, Persson J, Bernfort L, Öberg B. Association between clinical and work-related interventions and return-to-work for patients with musculoskeletal or mental disorders. J Rehabil Med. 2012;44:355–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Coole C, Watson PJ, Drummond A. Low back pain patients’ experiences of work modifications; a qualitative study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2010;11:277.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Lang AJ. Mental health treatment preferences of primary care patients. J Behav Med. 2005;28(6):581–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Krogh J, Nordentoft M, Sterne JA, Lawlor DA. The effect of exercise in clinically depressed adults: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Clin Psychiatry. 2011;72(4):529–38.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Socialstyrelsen. Nationella riktlinjer för vård vid depression och ångestsyndrom 2010. Stockholm: Socialstyrelsen; 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Wetherell JL, Afari N, Rutledge T, Sorrell JT, Stoddard JA, Petkus AJ, et al. A randomized, controlled trial of acceptance and commitment therapy and cognitive-behavioral therapy for chronic pain. Pain. 2011;152(9):2098–107.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Koes BW, van Tulder M, Lin CW, Macedo LG, McAuley J, Maher C. An updated overview of clinical guidelines for the management of non-specific low back pain in primary care. Eur Spine J. 2010;19(12):2075–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Statens beredning för medicinsk utvärdering, Rehabilitering vid långvarig smärta. En systematisk litteraturöversikt [Rehabilitation of patients with chronic pain conditions. A systematic review]. Stockholm: The Swedish Council on Technology Assessment in Health Care; 2010.

  55. Smeets RJ, Severens JL, Beelen S, Vlaeyen JW, Knottnerus JA. More is not always better: cost-effectiveness analysis of combined, single behavioral and single physical rehabilitation programs for chronic low back pain. Eur J Pain. 2009;13(1):71–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Braathen TN, Veiersted KB, Heggenes J. Improved work ability and return to work following vocational multidisciplinary rehabilitation of subjects on long-term sick leave. J Rehabil Med. 2007;39(6):493–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Satterfield JM, Spring B, Brownson RC, Mullen EJ, Newhouse RP, Walker BB, et al. Toward a transdisciplinary model of evidence-based practice. Milbank Q. 2009;87(2):368–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by grants from the Swedish Council for Working Life and Social Research (FAS) and from the County Council of Östergötland. The authors would like to thank all the participants in the Return to Work East Sweden Study, health care providers who were involved in the study and Henrik Magnusson for statistical support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Charlotte Wåhlin.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wåhlin, C., Ekberg, K., Persson, J. et al. Evaluation of Self-Reported Work Ability and Usefulness of Interventions Among Sick-Listed Patients. J Occup Rehabil 23, 32–43 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-012-9376-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-012-9376-y

Keywords

Navigation