Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Return-To-Work Coordinator Role: Qualitative Insights for Nursing

  • Published:
Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction Few studies have examined the role of RTW Coordination from the perspective of RTW Coordinator’s. Furthermore there is little health specific literature on returning injured nurses to work despite the critical workforce shortages of these professionals. The study aimed to examine barriers and facilitators identified by the RTW Coordinator to returning injured nurses to work and influences on specific health sector or geographic location. The study sought to gain insights into the professional backgrounds and everyday work practices of RTW Coordinators. Method Five focus groups were conducted in metropolitan and rural areas of NSW, Australia. Twenty-five RTW Coordinators from 14 different organisations participated in the study. The focus groups included participants representing different health sectors (aged, disability, public and private hospital and community health). Results The data analysis identified information pertaining to the qualifications and backgrounds of RTW Coordinators; the role of RTW Coordinators’ within organisational structures; a range of technical knowledge and personal qualities for RTW Coordination and important elements of the case management style used to facilitate RTW. Conclusions The findings identified a wide range of professional backgrounds that RTW Coordinators bring to the role and the impact of organisational structures on the ability to effectively undertake RTW responsibilities. The study found that interpersonal skills of RTW Coordinators may be more important to facilitate RTW than a healthcare background. A collaborative case management style was also highlighted and the difficulties associated with juggling conflicts of interest, multiple organisational roles and the emotional impact of the work.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Nelson A, Fragala G, Mensel N. Myths and facts about back injuries in nursing. Am J Nurs. 2003;103:32–40.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Chang EM, Daly JW, Hancock KM, Bidewell J, Johnson A, Lambert VA, et al. The relationships among workplace stressors, coping methods, demographic characteristics, and health in Australian nurses. J Prof Nurs. 2006;22(1):30–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Duckett D. Health workforce design for the 21st century. Aust Health Rev. 2005;29(2):201–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Senate Community Affairs References Committee: The patient profession: time for action: report on the inquiry into nursing (2002) [cited 29/04/2009; Available from: http://www.aph.gov.au/Senate/Committee/clac_ctte/completed_inquiries/2002-04/nursing/report/index.htm.

  5. Hayes LJ, O’Brien-Pallas L, Duffield C, Shamian J, Buchan J, Hughes F, et al. Nurse turnover: a literature review. Int J Nurs Stud. 2006;43(2):237–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Shaw W, Hong QN, Pransky G, Loisel P. A literature review describing the role of return-to-work coordinators in trial programs and interventions designed to prevent workplace disability. J Occup Rehabil. 2008;18(1):2–15.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Franche RL, Cullen K, Clarke J, Irvin E, Sinclair S, Frank J. Workplace-based return-to-work interventions: a systematic review of the quantitative literature. J Occup Rehabil. 2005;15(4):607–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. MacEachen E, Clarke J, Franche RL, Irvin E. Systematic review of the qualitative literature on return to work after injury. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2006;32(4):257–69.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Foreman P, Murphy G, Swerissen H. Barriers and facilitators to return to work: a literature review. Melbourne: Australian Insitute for Primary Care, La Trobe University; 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Roberts-Yates C. Employers’ perceptions of claims/injury management and rehabilitation in South Australia. Asia Pac J Hum Resour. 2006;44(1):102–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Tjulin Å, MacEachen E, Ekberg K. Exploring workplace actors experiences of the social organization of return-to-work. J Occup Rehabil. 2010;20(3):311–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. WorkCover NSW. Guidelines for return to work programs. Sydney: WorkCover NSW; 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Powell RA, Single HM. Focus groups. Int J Qual Health Care. 1996;8(5):499–504.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Kitzinger J. The methodology of focus groups: the importance of interaction between research participants. Sociol Health Illn. 1994;16(1):103–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Merriam SB. Qualitative research: a guide to design and implementation. San Francisco: Wiley Press; 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Australian Bureau of Statistics: Census geography paper 03/01 ASGC remoteness classification—purpose and use (2001) [cited July 2008]; Available from: www.abs.gov.au/…/f9c96fb635cce780ca256d420005dc02!OpenDocument -.

  17. Fern E. Advanced focus group research. London: Sage; 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Kvale S. Interviews: an introduction to qualitative research interviewing. London: Sage; 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  19. QSRInternational. NVivo 7.0. Doncaster, Victoria:QSR International (2007).

  20. Erickson F, editor. Qualitative methods in research on teaching. New York: Macmillan; 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  21. WorkCover NSW. Guidelines for employers, return to work programs. Sydney: WorkCover NSW; 2003.

  22. Holmgren K, Ivanoff SD. Supervisors’ views on employer responsibility in the return to work process. A focus study group. J Occup Rehabil. 2007;17:93–106.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Institute for Work & Health. Seven ‘principals’ for successful return to work. March 2007 [cited 31/03/2009; Available from: http://www.iwh.on.ca/seven-principles-for-rtw.

  24. Friesen MN, Yassi A, Cooper J. Return-to-work: the importance of human interactions and organizational structures. Work. 2001;17(1):11–22.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Roberts-Yates C. Examining the role of rehabilitation in the South Australian workers compensation system. Aust J Rehabil Couns. 2003;9(2):82–101.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Kenny D. Barriers to return to work in New South Wales: research findings and theoretical considerations. Sydney: WorkCover NSW; 1995.

  27. Langford E. Buried but not dead: a survey of occupational illness and injury incurred by nurses in the Victorian health service industry. The Australian Nursing Federation (Victorian Branch); 1997.

  28. Case Management Society of America: What is a case manager and how do I find one? (2009) [cited 2009 18 August]; Available from: http:www.cmsa.org/Consumer/tabid/61/Default.aspx.

  29. Beardwood B, Kirsh B, Clark N. Victims twice over: perceptions and experiences of injured workers. Qual Health Res. 2005;15(1):30–48.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Baril R, Clarke J, Friesen M, Stock S, Cole D. Management of the return to work programs for workers with musculoskeletal disorders: a qualitative study in three Canadian provinces. Soc Sci Med. 2003;57(11):2101–14.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Parrish M, Schofield T. Injured workers experiences of the workers compensation claims process: institutional disrespect and the noeliberal state. Health Sociol Rev. 2005;14(1):33–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Nadler SF, Mulford GJ, Wagner KL, Stitik TP, Malanga GA, Levy AS, et al. Improving the workers compensation system: case management perspective. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2000;79(1):97–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Roberts-Yates C. The Dilemma of the case manager in workers’ compensation : decision-maker, system player, para legal/medical specialist, mediator or enermy? Aust J Rehabil Couns. 2002; 8(2); 99–113.

  34. Hochschild A. The managed heart: commercialization of human feeling. Berkeley: University of California Press; 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Shaw WS, Robertson MM, Pransky G, McLellan RK. Employee perspectives on the role of supervisors to prevent workplace disability after injuries. J Occup Rehabil. 2003;13(3):129–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Andersen LP, Kines P, Hasle P. Owner attitudes and self reported behavior towards modified work after occupational injury absence in small enterprises: a qualitative study. J Occup Rehabil. 2007;17(1):107–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Seland K, Cherry N, Beach J. A study of factors influencing return to work after wrist or ankle fractures. Am J Ind Med. 2006;49(3):197–203.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. MacEachen E, Kosny A, Ferrier S. Unexpected barriers in return to work: lessons learned from injured worker peer support groups. Work. 2007;29:155–64.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Jansson I, Bjorklund A. The experience of returning to work. Work. 2007;28(2):121–34.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Higgs J. Communicating in the health sciences. 2nd ed. South Melbourne: Oxford University Press; 2008.

  41. Kenny D. Case management in occupational rehabilitation: would the real case manager please stand up? Aust J Rehabil Couns. 1995;1(2):104–17.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Sager L, James C. Injured workers’ perspectives of their rehabilitation process under the New South Wales workers compensation system. Aust Occup Ther J. 2005;52(2):127–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Gard G, Larsson A. Focus on motivation in the work rehabilitation planning process: a qualitative study from the employer’s perspective. J Occup Rehabil. 2003;13(3):159–67.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was funded under the WorkCover NSW WorkCover Assist Program. The research conclusions are those of the authors and any views expressed are not necessarily those of WorkCover NSW.

Conflicts of interests

The authors were employees of the University of Newcastle during the conduct of this study. These authors and organisation have no financial interests that may be affected by the content of the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Health, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW, 2308, Australia

    Carole James, Darren A. Rivett, Maya Guest & Joanna Bohatko-Naismith

  2. School of Education, Faculty of Education and Arts, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW, Australia

    Erica Southgate

  3. School of Nursing and Midwifery, Faculty of Health, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW, Australia

    Ashley Kable

Authors
  1. Carole James
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Erica Southgate
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ashley Kable
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Darren A. Rivett
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Maya Guest
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Joanna Bohatko-Naismith
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Carole James.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

James, C., Southgate, E., Kable, A. et al. The Return-To-Work Coordinator Role: Qualitative Insights for Nursing. J Occup Rehabil 21, 220–227 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-010-9270-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-010-9270-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation