Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Waddell’s Symptoms as Indicators of Psychological Distress, Perceived Disability, and Treatment Outcome

  • Published:
Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction Waddell’s signs and symptoms have been described as patient presentations not within usual anatomic patterns of injury pathology. Waddell’s signs were thought to indicate psychological distress and were termed “non-organic findings”; similarly, Waddell’s symptoms were described as inappropriate and attributable to psychological features. Endorsement of more than two of Waddell’s symptoms is thought to be associated with psychological distress, disability, and poor treatment outcomes; however, this has not been empirically assessed. Methods The current study used a sample of patients (n = 108; 30% women) involved in a multi-disciplinary work hardening program provided by a third-party insurer. Patients who endorsed more than two of Waddell’s symptoms were compared with those who did not on demographic variables as well as self-report measures of psychological distress, disability, and treatment outcome. Results Patients who endorsed more than two of Waddell’s symptoms reported higher levels of psychological distress, perceived disability, pain intensity, and pain durations. Moreover, consistent with previous research on Waddell’s symptoms, patients endorsing more than two symptoms were also less likely to return to work. Conclusions Waddell’s symptoms were associated with increased perceived disability and pervasive pain interference. Patients who endorsed more than two symptoms were significantly less likely to return to work than those who endorsed zero, one, or two symptoms. Patients who endorsed more than two symptoms may indeed be affected by factors beyond tissue pathology that nonetheless warrant clinical attention. Waddell’s symptoms appear to have promise as a quick indicator of treatment complexity and outcome.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Main CJ. The nature of chronic pain: a clinical and legal challenge. In: Hallingan PW, Bass C, Oakley DA, editors. Malingering and illness deception. New York: Oxford University Press; 2003. p. 171–83.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Asmundson GJG, Wright KD. Biopsychosocial approaches to pain. In: Hadjistavropoulos T, Craig KD, editors. Pain: psychological perspectives. Mawah: Erlbaum; 2004. p. 13–34.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Hadjistavropoulos T, Craig KD, editors. Pain: psychological perspectives. Mahwah: Erlbaum; 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Vlaeyen JW, Linton SJ. Fear-avoidance and its consequences in chronic musculoskeletal pain: a state of the art. Pain. 2000;85:317–32. doi:10.1016/S0304-3959(99)00242-0.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Turk DC, Meichenbaum D, Genest M. Pain and behavioral medicine: a cognitive-behavioral perspective. New York: Guilford Press; 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Asmundson GJG, Vlaeyen JWS, Crombez G, editors. Understanding and treating fear of pain. New York: Oxford; 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Waddell G, McCulloch JA, Kummel E, Venner RM. Nonorganic physical signs in low-back pain. Spine. 1980;5:117–25. doi:10.1097/00007632-198003000-00005.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Collie J. Malingering and feigned sickness. London: Edward Arnold; 1913.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Main CJ, Waddell G. Behavioral responses to examination. A reappraisal of the interpretation of “nonorganic signs”. Spine. 1998;23:2367–71. doi:10.1097/00007632-199811010-00025.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Thompson E. Psychogenic pain and somatization: past history and present status. Canadian pain society conference. Halifax, NS; 2005.

  11. Gallagher RM. Waddell signs: objectifying pain and the limits of medical altruism. Pain Med. 2003;4:113–5. doi:10.1046/j.1526-4637.2003.03023.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Centeno CJ, Elkins WL, Freeman M. Waddell’s signs revisited? Spine. 2004;29:1392. doi:10.1097/01.BRS.0000128771.48789.FB. (discussion 3).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Giles LG. Re: Centeno CJ, Elkins WL, Freeman M. Editorial. Waddell’s signs revisited? Spine 2004;29:1392. Spine. 2005;30:265–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Fishbain DA, Cole B, Cutler RB, Lewis J, Rosomoff HL, Rosomoff RS. A structured evidence-based review on the meaning of nonorganic physical signs: Waddell signs. Pain Med. 2003;4:141–81. doi:10.1046/j.1526-4637.2003.03015.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Fishbain DA. Waddell Signs. Pain Med. 2003;4:386–7. doi:10.1111/j.1526-4637.2003.3043b.x. (reply).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Waddell G, Bircher M, Finlayson D, Main CJ. Symptoms and signs: physical disease or illness behaviour? Br Med J. 1984;289:739–41.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Waddell G, Main CJ, Morris EW, Di Paola M, Gray IC. Chronic low-back pain, psychologic distress, and illness behavior. Spine. 1984;9:209–13. doi:10.1097/00007632-198403000-00013.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Matheson L. The functional capacity evaluation program. In: Andersson G, Demeter S, Smith G, editors. Disability evaluation. 2nd ed. Chicago: Mosby Yearbook; 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Schultz IZ, Crook J, Berkowitz J, Milner R, Meloche GR. Predicting return to work after low back injury using the psychosocial risk for occupational disability instrument: a validation study. J Occup Rehabil. 2005;15:365–76. doi:10.1007/s10926-005-5943-9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Asmundson GJG, Carleton RN, Ekong J. Dot-probe evaluation of selective attentional processing of pain cues in patients with chronic headaches. Pain. 2005;114:250–6. doi:10.1016/j.pain.2004.12.025.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Norton PJ, Asmundson GJ. Anxiety sensitivity, fear, and avoidance behavior in headache pain. Pain. 2004;111:218–23. doi:10.1016/j.pain.2004.06.018.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Reesor KA, Craig KD. Medically incongruent chronic back pain: physical limitations, suffering, and ineffective coping. Pain. 1988;32:35–45. doi:10.1016/0304-3959(88)90021-8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Dalton JA, Feuerstein M. Fear, alexithymia and cancer pain. Pain. 1989;38:159–70. doi:10.1016/0304-3959(89)90234-0.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Miller MB. Coefficient alpha: a basic introduction from the perspectives of classical test theory and structural equation modeling. Struct Equ Modeling. 1995;2:255–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Lawlis GF, Cuencas R, Selby D, McCoy CE. The development of the Dallas pain questionnaire. An assessment of the impact of spinal pain on behavior. Spine. 1989;14:511–6. doi:10.1097/00007632-198905000-00007.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Hudson-Cook N, Tomes-Nicholson K, Breen AA. Revised oswestry disability questionnaire. In: Roland MO, Jenner JR, editors. Back pain: new approaches to rehabilitation and education. New York: Manchester University Press; 1989. p. 187–204.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Melzack R, Perry C. Self-regulation of pain: the use of alpha-feedback and hypnotic training for the control of chronic pain. Exp Neurol. 1975;46:452–69. doi:10.1016/0014-4886(75)90119-3.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Melzack R. The McGill pain questionnaire. In: Melzack R, editor. Pain measurement and assessment. New York: Raven Press; 1983. p. 41–7.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Williamson A, Hoggart B. Pain: a review of three commonly used pain rating scales. J Clin Nursing. 2005;14:798–804. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2702.2005.01121.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Gallagher EJ, Bijur PE, Latimer C, Silver W. Reliability and validity of a visual analog scale for acute abdominal pain in the ED. Am J Emerg Med. 2002;20:287–90. doi:10.1053/ajem.2002.33778.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Bijur PE, Silver W, Gallagher EJ. Reliability of the visual analog scale for measurement of acute pain. Acad Emerg Med. 2001;8:1153–7. doi:10.1111/j.1553-2712.2001.tb01132.x.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Jamison RN, Gracely RH, Raymond SA, Levine JG, Marino B, Herrmann TJ, et al. Comparative study of electronic versus paper VAS ratings: a randomized, crossover trial using healthy volunteers. Pain. 2002;99:341–7. doi:10.1016/S0304-3959(02)00178-1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. 2nd ed. Mawah: Erlbaum; 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Tabachnick BG, Fidell LS. Using multivariate statistics. 4th ed. New York: Harper and Row; 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Judd CM, McClelland GH, Culhane SE. Data analysis: continuing issues in the everyday analysis of psychological data. Annu Rev Psychol. 1995;46:433–65. doi:10.1146/annurev.ps.46.020195.002245.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Groth-Marnat G. Handbook of psychological assessment. 4th ed. New York: Wiley; 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Asmundson GJG, Norton PJ, Vlaeyen JWS. Fear-avoidance models of chronic pain: an overview. In: Asmundson GJG, Vlaeyen JWS, Crombez G, editors. Understanding and treating fear of pain. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2004. p. 3–24.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Radloff LS. The CES-D scale: a self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Appl Psych Meas. 1977;1:385–401. doi:10.1177/014662167700100306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. McCracken LM, Dhingra L. A short version of the pain anxiety symptoms scale (PASS-20): preliminary development and validity. Pain Res Manag. 2002;7:45–50.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Abrams MP, Carleton RN, Asmundson GJG. An exploration of the psychometric properties of the PASS-20 with a nonclinical sample. J Pain. 2007;8:879–86. doi:10.1016/j.jpain.2007.06.004.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Asmundson GJG, Carleton RN. Fear of pain. In: Antony MM, Stein MB, editors. Handbook of anxiety and the anxiety disorders. New York: Oxford University Press; 2008. p. 551–61.

  42. Asmundson GJG, Norton PJ, Veloso F. Anxiety sensitivity and fear of pain in patients with recurring headaches. Behav Res Ther. 1999;37:703–13. doi:10.1016/S0005-7967(98)00172-7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Carleton RN, Sharpe D, Asmundson GJG. Anxiety sensitivity and intolerance of uncertainty: requisites of the fundamental fears? Behav Res Ther. 2007;45:2307–16. doi:10.1016/j.brat.2007.04.006.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Carleton RN, Asmundson GJG, Taylor S. Fear of physical harm: factor structure and psychometric properties of the injury/illness sensitivity index. J Psychopathol Behav. 2005;27:235–41. doi:10.1007/s10862-005-2403-y.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Carleton RN, Park I, Asmundson GJG. The illness/injury sensitivity index: an examination of construct validity. Depress Anxiety. 2006;23:340–6. doi:10.1002/da.20138.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Dr. Asmundson is supported by a Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) Investigator Award; R. N. Carleton is supported by a CIHR Canada Graduate Scholarship Doctoral Research Award; and M. P. Abrams is supported by a CIHR Canada Graduate Scholarship Doctoral Research Award.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to G. J. G. Asmundson.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Carleton, R.N., Kachur, S.S., Abrams, M.P. et al. Waddell’s Symptoms as Indicators of Psychological Distress, Perceived Disability, and Treatment Outcome. J Occup Rehabil 19, 41–48 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-009-9165-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-009-9165-4

Keywords

Navigation