Abstract
Objective: Physicians typically receive little continuing medical education (CME) about their role in workplace injury management as well as on workplace injuries and disease. Although new technologies may help educate physicians in these areas, careful evaluation is required, given the understudied nature of these interventions. The objective of this study is to evaluate two promising new technologies to deliver CME (online learning and videoconferencing) and to compare the effectiveness of these delivery methods to traditional CME interventions (large urban traditional conference lectures and small group local face-to-face outreach) in their impact on physician knowledge related to workplace injury management. Methods: This study utilized a prospective, controlled evaluation of two educational programs for BC physicians: 1) The Diagnosis and Management of Lateral Epicondylitis; and 2) Is Return-to-Work Good Medicine? Each educational module was delivered in each of four ways (Outreach Visit, Videoconference Session, Conference Lecture, Online) and physicians self-selected their participation—both in terms of topic and delivery method. Questionnaires related to knowledge as well as learner attitude and satisfaction were administered prior (pre-test) and following (post-test) all educational sessions. Results: 581 physician encounters occurred as a result of the educational interventions and a significant percentage of the physicians participated in the research per se (i.e. there were 358 completed sets of pre-test and post-test ‘Knowledge’ questionnaires). Overall the results showed that the developed training programs increased physicians’ knowledge of both Lateral Epicondylitis and the physician’s role in Return-To-Work planning as reflected in improved post-test performance when compared to pre-test scores. Furthermore, videoconferencing and online training were at least as effective as conference lectures and instructor-led small group outreach sessions in their impact on physician knowledge. Conclusions: Use of effective videoconferencing and online learning activities will increase physician access to quality CME related to workplace injury management and will overcome access barriers intrinsic to types of CME interventions based on instructor-student face-to-face interactions.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bell DS, Fonarow GC, Hays RD, Mangione CM. Self-study from web-based and printed guideline materials: a randomized, controlled trial among resident physicians. Ann Inter Med 2000;132:938–46.
Mills A. Creating web-based, multimedia, and interactive courses for distance learning. Comput Nurs 2000;18:125–31.
Pereira J, Peden J, Campbell K. Instructional technology in medical education: lessons learnt. J Telemed Telecare 2000;6(supplement 2):S56–S58.
Davis D. Does CME work? An analysis of the effect of educational activities on physician performance or health care outcomes. Int J Psychiatry Med 1998;28:21–39.
Davis D, O’Brien MA, Freemantle N, Wolf FM, Mazmanian P, Taylor-Vaisey A. Impact of formal continuing medical education: do conferences, workshops, rounds, and other traditional continuing education activities change physician behavior or health care outcomes? JAMA 1999;282:867–74.
Oxman AD, Thomson MA, Davis DA, Haynes RB. No magic bullets: a systematic review of 102 trials on interventions to improve professional practice. CMAJ 1995;153:1423–1431.
Akyeampong EB, Usalcas J. Work absence rates, 1980 to 1997 (Analytic report no. 9). Ottawa, ON: Statistics Canada; 1998.
Canadian Medical Association. CMA policy summary: the physician’s role in helping patients return to work after an illness or injury. CMAJ 1997;156(5):680A–680F.
Canadian Medical Association. CMA policy: The physician’s role in helping patients return to work after an illness or injury (update 2000). Retrieved on March 21, 2006 from: http://pwr.ca/PDF/ReturnToWork.pdf; 2001.
National Institute of Disability Management and Research. The effects of disability on British Columbia’s economy. Port Alberni, BC: Author; 1997.
National Institute of Disability Management and Research. Workplace disability management: A Canadian perspective, presentation guide. Port Alberni, BC: Author; 1998.
National Institute of Disability Management and Research. Code of practice for disability management : Describing effective benchmarks for the creation of workplace-based disability management programs. Port Alberni, BC: Author; 2000.
Ontario Medical Association. Position in support of timely return to work programs and the role of the primary care physician. Retrieved January 6, 2005 from: http://www.oma.org/phealth/trtw.htm; (March 1994).
Black C, Cheung L, Cooper J, Curson-Prue S, Doupe L, Guirguis S, et al. Injury/illness and return to work/function: A practical guide for physicians. Toronto, ON: Workplace Safety and Insurance Board (Ontario); 2000.
Riessner S, Shrey D, (eds.) Strategies for success: Disability management in the workplace. Port Alberni, BC: National Institute of Disability Management and Research; 1997.
Sleeth JE. Return-to-work compliance toolkit. Scarborough, ON: Carswell; 2000.
Workplace Safety and Insurance Act, 1997. Statutes of Ontario 1997, Chapter 16.
Davis D, Thomson MA, Oxman AD, Haynes RB. Evidence for the effectiveness of CME: a review of 50 randomized controlled trials. JAMA 1992;268:1111–1117.
Cauffman JG, Forsyth RA, Clark VA, Foster JP, Martin KJ, Lapsys FX, et al. Randomized controlled trials of continuing medical education: what makes them most effective? J Contin Educ Health Prof 2002;22:214–221.
Mazmanian PE, Davis DA. Continuing medical education and the physician as a learner: guide to the evidence. JAMA 2002;288:1057–1060.
Thomson O’Brien MA, Freemantle N, Oxman AD, Wolf F, Davis DA, Herrin J. Continuing education meetings and workshops: effects on professional practice and health care outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2001;(2): CD003030.
Casebeer L, Kristofco RE, Strasser S, Reilly M, Krishnamoorthy P, Rabin A, et al. Standardizing evaluation of on-line continuing medical education: Physician knowledge, attitudes, and reflection on practice. J Contin Educ Health Prof 2004;24:68–75.
Grimshaw JM, Shirran L, Thomas R, Mowatt G, Fraser C, Bero L, et al. Changing provider behaviour: an overview of systematic reviews of interventions. Med Care 2001;39(suppl 2):112.
Bennett NL, Davis DD, Easterling WE, Friedmann P, Green JS, Koeppen BM, et al. Continuing medical education: a new vision of the professional development of physicians. Acad Med 2000;75:1167–1172.
Borenstein J, Chiou C-F, Henning JM, Wilson A, Hohlbauch AA, Richards MS, et al. Physician attitudes toward strategies to promote the adoption of medical evidence into clinical practice. Am J Manag Care 2003;9:225–234.
Acknowledgements
This study was conducted at WorkSafeBC, Richmond, British Columbia, Canada. The study was financially supported by the Research Secretariat Grant Competition, WorkSafeBC; however, all analyses and views are those of the authors and do not reflect official policies of WorkSafeBC. The study investigators thank the following for their contributions to the project: Dr. Sandra Jarvis-Selinger, Wendy Hunt, Michelle Purcell, Jill Musser, Shelley Myatovic, Joey Dabell, Emily Liu, those individuals acknowledged in the credits of the Lateral Epicondylitis and Is Return-to-Work Good Medicine CD-ROMs and to anonymous reviewers selected by the Research Secretariat.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This study was financially supported by the Research Secretariat Grant Competition, WorkSafeBC, Workers’ Compensation Board of British Columbia.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Karlinsky, H., Dunn, C., Clifford, B. et al. Workplace injury management: using new technology to deliver and evaluate physician continuing medical education. J Occup Rehabil 16, 719–730 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-006-9047-y
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-006-9047-y