Skip to main content
Log in

Appearance-Based Trait Inferences and Voting: Evolutionary Roots and Implications for Leadership

  • Commentary
  • Published:
Journal of Nonverbal Behavior Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper examines the evolutionary roots of research findings that demonstrate that rapid judgments of political candidates’ faces predict electoral success. Also discussed are the implications of these findings for the election and selection of leaders. We argue that rapid judgments of facial competence are a result of immediate, automatic assessment of the strength of a target, reflected in facial cues of dominance/threat; and assessment of facial cues of trust/approachability. As a result, research participants and uninvolved voters select the same candidates—those that appear relatively strong and trustworthy at a glance. The votes of highly involved voters are not influenced by such facial qualities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ambady, N., & Rosenthal, R. (1992). Thin slices of expressive behavior as predictors of interpersonal consequences: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 111, 256–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andrew, R. J. (1963). The origin and evolution of the calls and facial expressions of primates. Behaviour, 20, 1–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Antonakis, J., & Dalgas, O. (2009). Predicting elections: Child’s play!. Science, 323, 1183.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Arvey, R. D., & Campion, J. E. (1982). The employment interview: A summary and review of recent research. Personnel Psychology, 74, 187–192.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ballew, C. C., & Todorov, A. (2007). Predicting political elections from rapid and unreflective face judgments. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 104, 17948–17953.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Banducci, S. A., Karp, J. A., Thrasher, M., & Rallings, C. (2008). Ballot photographs as cues in low-information elections. Political Psychology, 29, 903–917.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chevalier-Skolnikoff, S. (1973). Facial expressions of emotion in non-human primates. In P. Ekman (Ed.), Darwin and facial expression (pp. 11–90). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chiao, J. Y., Bowman, N. E., & Gill, H. (2008). The political gender gap: Gender bias in facial inferences that predict voting behavior. PLoS ONE, 3, 1–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darwin, C. (1872/1998). The expression of the emotions in man and animals. New York: John Murray/Oxford University Press.

  • Dictionary.com. (2009). Competence. Retrieved August 03, 2009, from Dictionary.com website: http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/competence.

  • Eibl-Eibesfeldt, I., & Pitcairn, T. K. (1976). Concerning the evolution of nonverbal communication in man. In E. C. Simmel & M. Hahn (Eds.), Communicative behavior and evolution (pp. 81–113). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiske, S. T., & Taylor, S. E. (1991). Social cognition (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, H. S., & Zebrowitz, L. A. (1992). The contribution of typical sex differences in facial maturity to sex role stereotypes. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 18, 430–438.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gerbner, G. L. (1984). Attribution of feminine and masculine traits to opposite sex dyads. Psychological Reports, 55, 907–918.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gladwell, M. (2005). Blink: The power of thinking without thinking. New York: Little, Brown.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodall, J. (1988). In the shadow of man. New York: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heilman, M. E. (2001). Description and prescription: How gender stereotypes prevent women’s ascent up the organizational ladder. Journal of Social Issues, 57, 657–674.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaufmann, K. M., Petrocik, J. R., & Shaw, D. R. (2008). Unconventional wisdom: Facts and myths about American voters. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keating, C. F., Mazur, A., Segall, M. H., Cysneiros, P. G., Kilbride, J. E., Leahy, P., et al. (1981). Culture and the perception of social dominance from facial expression. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 40, 615–626.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mazur, A., & Stevens, G. (1975, August). Human dominance and submission gestures. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Sociological Association, San Francisco, CA.

  • McArthur, L. Z., & Apatow, K. (1983–1984). Impressions of baby-faced adults. Social Cognition, 2, 315–342.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, A. E., MacDougall, J. D., Tarnopolsky, M. A., & Sale, D. G. (1993). Gender differences in strength and muscle fiber characteristics. European Journal of Applied Occupational Physiology, 66, 254–262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olivola, C. Y., & Todorov, A. (2010). Elected in 100 milliseconds: Appearance-based trait inferences and voting. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior.

  • Perrett, D. I., Lee, K. J., Penton-Voak, I. S., Rowland, D. R., Yoshikawa, S., Burt, D. M., et al. (1998). Effects of sexual dimorphism on facial attractiveness. Nature, 394, 884–887.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Petty, R. E., & Wegener, D. T. (1998). Attitude change: Multiple roles for persuasion variables. In D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The handbook of social sychology (Vol. 1, pp. 323–390). New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riggio, H. R. (2008a). Political party, strength of identification, and knowledge and evaluation of Bush v Gore. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 38, 234–279.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riggio, R. E. (2008b). Introduction to industrial/organizational psychology (5th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Senior, C., Barnes, J., Jenkins, R., Landau, S., Phillips, M. S., & David, A. S. (1999). Attribution of social dominance and maleness to schematic faces. Social Behavior & Personality, 27, 331–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sherif, M., & Cantril, H. (1947). Some experimental facts concerning the basis of attitudes. In M. Sherif & H. Cantril (Eds.), The psychology of ego-involvements: Social attitudes and identifications (pp. 29–59). Hoboken, NJ, US: Wiley & Sons.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Spezio, M. L., Rangel, A., Alvarez, R. M., O’Doherty, J. P., Mattes, K., Todorov, A., et al. (2008). A neural basis for the effect of candidate appearance on election outcomes. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 3, 344–352.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tajfel, H. (1982). Social psychology of intergroup relations. Annual Review of Psychology, 33, 1–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, J. E., & Best, D. L. (1990). Measuring sex stereotypes: A multination study. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zuckerman, M., Miyake, K., & Elkin, C. S. (1995). Effects of attractiveness and maturity of face and voice on interpersonal impressions. Journal of Research in Personality, 29, 253–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ronald E. Riggio.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Riggio, H.R., Riggio, R.E. Appearance-Based Trait Inferences and Voting: Evolutionary Roots and Implications for Leadership. J Nonverbal Behav 34, 119–125 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10919-009-0083-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10919-009-0083-0

Keywords

Navigation