Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Multiclassifier Systems for Predicting Neurological Outcome of Patients with Severe Trauma and Polytrauma in Intensive Care Units

  • Patient Facing Systems
  • Published:
Journal of Medical Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper presents an ensemble based classification proposal for predicting neurological outcome of severely traumatized patients. The study comprises both the whole group of patients and a subgroup containing those patients suffering traumatic brain injury (TBI). Data was gathered from patients hospitalized in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) of the University Hospital in Salamanca. Predictive models were induced from both epidemiologic and clinical variables taken at the emergency room and along the stay in the ICU. The large number of variables leads to a low accuracy in the classifiers even when feature selection methods are used. In addition, the presence of a much larger number of instances of one of the classes in the subgroup of TBI patients produces a significantly lesser precision for the minority class. Usual ways of dealing with the last problem is to use undersampling and oversampling strategies, which can lead to the loss of valuable data and overfitting problems respectively. Our proposal for dealing with these problems is based in the use of ensemble multiclassifiers as well as in the use of an ensemble playing the role of base classifier in multiclassifiers. The proposed strategy gave the best values of the selected quality measures (accuracy, precision, sensitivity, specificity, F-measure and area under the Receiver Operator Characteristic curve) as well as the closest values of precision for the two classes under study in the case of the classification from imbalanced data.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Berikol, G.B., Yildiz, O., and Özcan, I.T., Diagnosis of acute coronary syndrome with a support vector machine. J. Med. Syst. 40:84, 2016.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Boyd, C.R., Tolson, M.A., and Copes, W.S., Evaluating trauma care: The TRISS method. J. Trauma. 27:370–378, 1984.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Breiman, L., Bagging predictors. Mach. Learn. 24(2):123–140, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Breiman, L., Random forests. Mach. Learn. 45(1):5–32, 2001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Chawda, M.N., Hildebrand, F., Pape, H.C., and Giannoudis, P.V., Predicting outcome after multiple trauma: Which scoring system. Injury. 35(4):347–358, 2004.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Chen, H., Tan, C., Lin, Z., and Wu, T., The diagnostics of diabetes mellitus based on ensemble modeling and hair/urine element level analysis. Comput. Biol. Med. 50(2014):70–75, 2014.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Chen, D., Wang, H., Sheng, L., Hueman, M.T., Henson, D.E., Schwartz, A.M., and Patel, J.A., An algorithm for creating prognostic Systems for Cancer. J. Med. Syst. 40:160, 2016.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Cohen, N.H., The real reasons not to rely on severity scores. Crit. Care Med. 38(2010):334–335, 2010.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Cooper, G.F., and Herskovits, E., A Bayesian method for the induction of probabilistic networks from data. Mach. Learn. 9:309–347, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Dossett, L.A., Redhage, L.A., Sawyer, R.G., and May, A.K., Revisiting the validity of APACHE II in the trauma ICU: Improved risk stratification in critically injured adults. Injury. 40(9):993–998, 2009.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Freund, Y., and Schapire, R.E., Experiments with a new boosting algorithm. Proceedings 13th International Conference on Machine Learning:148–156, 1996.

  12. Gama, J., and Brazdil, P., Cascade Generalization. Mach. Learn. 41(3):315–343, 2000.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Hall, M. A. Correlation-based Feature Selection for Machine Learning. PhD Thesis, University of Waikato, Hamilton, Nueva Zelanda, 1999.

  14. Hemmila, M. R., Jakubus, J. L., Maggio, P. M., et al. Real money: Complications and hospital costs in trauma patients. Surgery 144(2):307–316, 2008.

  15. Hoffmann, M., Lefering, R., Rueger, J.M., Kolb, J.P., Izbicki, J.R., Ruecker, A.H., Rupprechtz, M., and Lehmann, W., Pupil evaluation in addition to Glasgow coma scale components in prediction of traumatic brain injury and mortality. Br J Surg. 99(1):122–130, 2012.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Hulse, J., Khoshgoftaar, T., and Napolitano, A., Experimental perspectives on learning from imbalanced data. Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on Machine learning:935–942, 2007.

  17. Hunter, A., Kennedy, L., Henry, J., and Ferguson, I., Application of neural networks and sensitivity analysis to improved prediction of trauma survival. Comput. Methods Prog. Biomed. 62(2000):11–19, 2000.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Kuncheva, L.I., Combining pattern classifiers: Methods and algorithms. John Wiley & Sons, 2004.

  19. Li, S., Tang, B., and He, H., An imbalanced learning based MDR-TB early warning system. J. Med. Syst. 40:164, 2016.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Marmarou, A., Lu, J., Butcher, I., et al., Prognostic value of the Glasgow coma scale and pupil reactivity in traumatic brain injury assessed pre-hospital and on enrollment: An IMPACT análisis. J. Neurotrauma. 24(2):270–280, 2007.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Martín, F., González, J., Sánchez, F., and Moreno, M.N., Success/failure prediction of noninvasive mechanical ventilation in intensive care units. Using multiclassifiers and feature selection methods. Methods Inf. Med. 55(3):234–241, 2016.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. NAEMT, PHTLS: Prehospital Trauma Life Support. Mosby/JEMS, 2010. isbn:0-323-06502-3.

  23. Özcift, A., Random forests ensemble classifier trained with data resampling strategy to improve cardiac arrhythmia diagnosis. Comput. Biol. Med. 41(2011):265–271, 2011.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Platt, J. Fast. Training of support vector machines using sequential minimal optimization. In: Schoelkopf B, Burges C and Smola A (Eds.), Advances in Kernel Methods. Support Vector Learning. MIT Press, 1998.

  25. Quinlan JR (1993) C4.5: Programs for machine learning. Morgan Kaufmann, San Mateo, CA., USA, 1993.

  26. Schetinin, V., Jakaite, L., Jakaitis, J., and Krzanowski, W., Bayesian decision trees for predicting survival of patients: A study on the US national trauma data bank. Comput. Methods Prog. Biomed. 111(2013):602–612, 2013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Wagholikar, K.B., Sundararajan, V., and Deshpande, A.W., Modeling paradigms for medical diagnostic decision support: A survey and future directions. J. Med. Syst. 36:3029–3049, 2012.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Wolpert, D., and Stacked, H., Generalization. Neural Netw. 5:241–259, 1992.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the staff of the Medical Records Department of the University Hospital of Salamanca for their support in providing patient data.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to María N. Moreno-García.

Additional information

This article is part of the Topical Collection on Patient Facing Systems

Electronic supplementary material

Online resource 1

(DOCX 44 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

González-Robledo, J., Martín-González, F., Sánchez-Barba, M. et al. Multiclassifier Systems for Predicting Neurological Outcome of Patients with Severe Trauma and Polytrauma in Intensive Care Units. J Med Syst 41, 136 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-017-0789-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-017-0789-1

Keywords

Navigation