Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

A Gender Discrepancy Analysis of Heterosexual Sexual Behaviors in Two University Samples

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Community Health Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The current study aimed to (1) offer a large-scale enumeration of college students’ lifetime sexual behaviors and sexual behaviors at last event, and (2) apply a gender discrepancy lens to college students’ sexual behaviors in order to examine potential gender differences in heterosexual college students’ experiences. Nine-hundred and seventy college students between the ages of 18 and 27 from two large universities in the United States participated in the current study. Participants filled out a paper–pencil questionnaire during the last 30 min of class. Measures of lifetime sexual behaviors and engagement in behaviors at last sexual event were replicated from the National Survey of Sexual Health Behavior. Most college students engaged in some form of sexual behavior (manual, oral, vaginal-penile, anal). Men more frequently reported engaging in receptive sexual behaviors (e.g., receiving oral sex) where as women were more likely to engage in performative sexual behaviors (e.g., performing oral sex). At most recent sexual event, men were more likely than women to report being the sexual initiator. Findings highlight gender differences in sexual behavior and provide a foundation for social norms interventions. Holistic sexual health promotion for young adults includes acknowledging and discouraging sites of disparity in equity and pleasure. Therefore, college-level sexual health educators should pay attention to the potential pleasure gap between men and women in heterosexual encounters, and to see pleasure as an important part of sexual health that should be included in social norms campaigns.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Albarracín, D., Johnson, B., Fishbein, M., & Muellerleile, P. (2001). Theories of reasoned action and planned behavior as models of condom use: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 127(1), 142–161 [serial online]. Available from: Psyc ARTICLES Ipswich, MA. Accessed 18 Dec 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  2. American college health association. (2013). College health resources: Sexual health/STIs. Retrieved 7 March 2013 from http://www.acha.org/Topics/sexualhlth.cfm.

  3. Arbour-Nicitopoulos, K. P., Kwan, M. Y. W., Lowe, D., Taman, S., & Faulkner, G. E. J. (2011). Social norms of alcohol, smoking and marijuana use within a Canadian university setting. Journal of American College Health, 59(3), 191–196.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Armstrong, E. A., England, P., & Fogarty, A. C. K. (2012). Accounting for women’s orgasm and sexual enjoyment in college hookups and relationships. American Sociological Review, 77(3), 435–462.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bogle, K. (2008). The campus as a sexual arena. In hooking up: Sex, dating, and relationships on campus (pp. 73–93). New York, NY: New York University Press.

  6. Brener, N., & Gowda, V. (2010). Us college students’ reports of receiving health information on college campuses. Journal of American College Health, 49(5), 223–228. doi:10.1080/07448480109596307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Brooks, M. (2010, August 29). ‘Sex week’ should arouse caution most of all. The chronicle of higher education.

  8. Bustamante, I.V., Carvalho, A.M.P., de Oliveira, E.B., de Oliveira, H.P., Figueroa, S.D.S., Vasquez, E.M.M., Cazenave, A., Chaname, E., Matallana, L. S. M., & Castillo, J. R. (2009). University students’ perceived norms of peers and drug use: A multicentric study in five Latin American countries. Revista Latino-Americana de Enfermagem, 17, 838–843.

  9. Centers for disease control and prevention (2012). CDC fact sheet: STD trends in the United States. Retrieved 27 January 2013 from http://www.cdc.gov/std/stats11/trends-2011.pdf.

  10. Chambers, W. C. (2007). Oral sex: Varied behaviors and perceptions in a college population. Journal of Sex Research, 44, 28–42.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. DeJong, W., Schneider, S. K., Towvim, L. G., Murphy, M. J., Doerr, E. E., Simonsen, N. R., et al. (2006). A multisite randomized trial of social norms marketing campaigns to reduce college student drinking. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 67(6), 868–879.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Downs, D.,& Hausenblas, H. The theories of reasoned action and planned behavior applied to exercise: A meta-analytic update. Journal of Physical Activity and Health [serial online] 2(1):76. Available from: SPORTDiscus with Full Text, Ipswich, MA. Accessed Oct 16, 2010.

  13. Edgar, T., & Fitzpatrick, M. A. (1993). Expectations for sexual interaction: A cognitive test of the sequencing of sexual communication behaviors. Health Communication, 5, 239–261. doi:10.1207/s15327027hc0504_1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Elliott, J. C., & Carey, K. B. (2012). Correcting exaggerated marijuana use norms among college abstainers: A preliminary test of a preventive intervention. Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs, 73(6), 976–980.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. Predicting and changing behavior: The reasoned action approach. New York, NY: Psychology Press (Taylor and Francis); 2010.

  16. Hagger, M., Chatzisarantis, N., & Biddle, S. The influence of autonomous and controlling motives on physical activity intentions within the theory of planned behaviour. British Journal of Health Psychology [serial online]. September 2002; 7(3):283. Available from: SPORT Discus with Full Text, Ipswich, MA. Accessed 11 Dec, 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Hardeman, W., Johnston, M., Johnston, D., Bonetti, D., Wareham, N., Kinmonth A. application of the theory of planned behaviour in behaviour change interventions: a systematic review. psychology and Health [serial online]. April 2002; 17(2):123–158. Available from: CINAHL Plus with Full Text, Ipswich, MA. Accessed 11 December 2010.

  18. Herbenick, D., Reece, M., Sanders, S., Dodge, B., Ghassemi, A., & Fortenberry, J. D. (2009). Prevalence and characteristics of vibrator use by women in the United States: Results from a nationally representative study. Journal of Sexual Medicine, 6, 1857–1866.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Herbenick, D., Reece, M., Schick, V., Sanders, S. A., Dodge, B., and Fortenberry, J. D. (2010). Sexual behavior in the United States: Results from a national probability sample of men and women ages 14–94. Journal of Sexual Medicine, 7(S5), 255–265.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Hightow, L. B., MacDonald, P., Pilcher, C. D., Kaplan, A. H., Foust, E., Nguyen, T. Q., et al. (2005). The unexpected movement of the HIV epidemic in the southeastern United States: Transmission among college students. Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome, 38, 531–537. doi:10.1097/01.qai.0000155037.10628.cb.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Holm, S. (1979). A simple sequentially rejective multiple test procedure. Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, 6, 65–70.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Jozkowski, K. N., & Peterson, Z. D. (2012). College students and sexual consent: Unique findings. Journal of Sex Research. doi:10.1080/00224499.2012.700739.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Keeling, R. P. (2000). Social norms research in college health. Journal of American College Health, 49, 53–56.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Lewis, M. A., & Neighbors, C. (2006). Social norms approaches using descriptive drinking norms education: A review of the research on personalized normative feedback. Journal of American College Health, 54(4), 213–218.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Martens, M. P., Page, J. C., Mowry, E. S., Damann, K. M., Taylor, K. K., & Cimini, M. D. (2006). Differences between actual and perceived student norms: An examination of alcohol use, drug use, and sexual behavior. Journal of American College Health, 54, 295–300.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. McCave, E. L., Chertok, I. R. A., Winter, V. R., & Haile, Z. T. (2013). Sexual health behaviors in a random sample of students at a Mid-Atlantic university: 2010–2011. Journal of Community Health, 38, 310–319.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Moreira, M.T., Smith, L.A., Foxcroft, D. (2009). Social norms interventions to reduce alcohol misuse in University or College students. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 3.

  28. Muehlenhard, C. L., & Hollabaugh, L. C. (1988). Do women sometimes say no when they mean yes? The prevalence and correlates of women’s token resistance to sex. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 872–879. doi:10.1037=0022-3514.54.5.872.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Muehlenhard, C. L., & Rodgers, C. (1998). Token resistance to sex: New perspectives on an old stereotype. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 22, 443–463. doi:10.1111=j.1471-6402.1998.tb00167.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. National Social Norms Institute. (2013). Social norms: An introduction. http://www.socialnorms.org/FAQ/FAQ.php. Accessed 8 Mar 2013.

  31. Osman, S. L. (2003). Predicting men’s rape perceptions based on the belief that “no” really means “yes”. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 33, 683–692. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2003.tb01919.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Page, R. M., Hammermeister, J. J., & Scanlan, A. (2000). Everybody’s not doing it: Misperceptions of college students’ sexual activity. American Journal of Health Behavior, 24, 387–394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Pettijohn II, T., Dunlap, V. (2010). The effects of a human sexuality course on college students’ sexual attitudes and perceived course outcomes. Electronic Journal of Human Sexuality, 13.

  34. Reece, M., Herbenick, D., Sanders, S., Dodge, B., Ghassemi, A., & Fortenberry, J. D. (2009). Prevalence and characteristics of vibrator use by men in the United States. Journal of Sexual Medicine, 6, 1867–1874.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Richters, J., de Visser, R., Rissel, C., & Smith, A. (2006). Sexual practices at last heterosexual encounter and occurrence of orgasm in a national survey. Journal of Sex Research, 43(3), 217–226.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Scholly, K., Katz, A. R., Gascoigne, J., & Holck, P. S. (2005). Using social norms theory to explain perceptions and sexual health behaviors of undergraduate college students: An exploratory study. Journal of American College Health, 53, 159–166.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Vannier, S. A., & O’Sullivan, L. G. (2012). Who gives and who gets: Why, when, and with whom young people engage in oral sex. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 41(5), 572–582.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Wechsler, H., Nelson, T. F., Lee, J. E., Seibring, M., Lewis, C., & Keeling, R. P. (2003). Perception and reality: A national evaluation of social norms marketing interventions to reduce college students’ heavy alcohol use. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 64(4), 484–494.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Health, Human Performance and Recreation, College of Education and Health Professions, University of Arkansas, 308-V HPER Building, Fayetteville, AR, 72701, USA

    Kristen N. Jozkowski

  2. Department of Health, Sport, and Exercise Sciences, School of Education, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS, 66045, USA

    Sonya A. Satinsky

Authors
  1. Kristen N. Jozkowski
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Sonya A. Satinsky
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kristen N. Jozkowski.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jozkowski, K.N., Satinsky, S.A. A Gender Discrepancy Analysis of Heterosexual Sexual Behaviors in Two University Samples. J Community Health 38, 1157–1165 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10900-013-9728-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10900-013-9728-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation