Abstract
The Iowa Gambling Task (IGT) involves exploratory learning via rewards and penalties, where most advantageous task performance requires subjects to forego potential large immediate rewards for small longer-term rewards to avoid larger punishments. Pathological gambling (PG) subjects perform worse on the IGT compared to controls, relating to their persistence at high risk decisions involving the continued choice of potential large immediate rewards despite experiencing larger punishments. We wished to determine if neural processing of risk and reward within striatal and frontal cortex is associated with this behaviour observed in PG. Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) was used to assess brain activity in response to a computerized version of the IGT. Thirteen male PG subjects with no active comorbidities were compared to 13 demographically matched control subjects. In agreement with previous behavioural studies, PG subjects performed worse on the IGT and made more high-risk choices compared to controls, particularly after experiencing wins and losses. During high-risk gambling decisions, fMRI demonstrated that PG subjects exhibited relatively increased frontal lobe and basal ganglia activation, particularly involving the orbitofrontal cortex (OFC), caudate and amygdala. Increased activation of regions encompassing the extended reward pathway in PG subjects during high risk choices suggests that the persistence of PG may be due to the increased salience of immediate and greater potential monetary rewards relative to lower monetary rewards or potential future losses. Whether this over activation of the reward pathway is associated with the development of PG warrants further investigation.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
American Psychiatric Association. (2003). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, 4th edn. Text Revision. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.
Babor, T. F., Brown, J., & DelBoca, F. K. (1990). Validity of self-reports in applied research on addictive behaviors: Fact or fiction? Behavioral Assessment, 12, 5–31.
Ballard, K., & Knutson, B. (2009). Dissociable neural representations of future reward magnitude and delay during temporal discounting. Neuroimage, 45, 143–150.
Bechara, A., Damasio, A. R., Damasio, H., & Anderson, S. W. (1994). Insensitivity to future consequences following damage to human prefrontal cortex. Cognition, 50, 7–15.
Bechara, A., Damasio, H., Damasio, A. R., & Lee, G. P. (1999). Different contributions of the human amygdala and ventromedial prefrontal cortex to decision-making. Journal of Neuroscience, 19, 5473–5481.
Bechara, A., Damasio, H., Tranel, D., & Anderson, S. W. (1998). Dissociation of working memory from decision making within the human prefrontal cortex. Journal of Neuroscience, 18, 428–437.
Bechara, A., Damasio, H., Tranel, D., & Damasio, A. R. (1997). Deciding advantageously before knowing the advantageous strategy. Science, 275, 1293–1295.
Bechara, A., Dolan, S., Denburg, N., Hindes, A., Anderson, S. W., & Nathan, P. E. (2001). Decision-making deficits, linked to a dysfunctional ventromedial prefrontal cortex, revealed in alcohol and stimulant abusers. Neuropsychologia, 39, 376–389.
Bechara, A., Dolan, S., & Hindes, A. (2002). Decision-making and addiction (part II): Myopia for the future or hypersensitivity to reward? Neuropsychologia, 40, 1690–1705.
Bechara, A., & Martin, E. (2004). Impaired decision-making related to working memory deficits in substance addicts. Neuropsychology, 18, 152–162.
Bolla, K., Eldreth, D., London, E. D., Kiehl, K. A., Mouratidis, M., Contoreggi, C., et al. (2003). Orbitofrontal cortex dysfunction in abstinent cocaine abusers performing a decision-making task. Neuroimage, 19, 1085–1094.
Breiter, H. C., Aharon, I., Kahneman, D., Dale, A., & Shizgal, P. (2001). Functional imaging of neural responses to expectancy and experience at monetary gains and losses. Neuron, 30, 619–639.
Brewer, J. A., & Potenza, M. N. (2008). The neurobiology and genetics of impulse control disorders: Relationships to drug addictions. Biochemical Pharmacology, 7(5), 63–75.
Busemeyer, J. R., & Stout, J. C. (2002). A contribution of cognitive decision models to clinical assessment: Decomposing performance on the Bechara gambling task. Psychological Assessment, 14, 253–262.
Cavedini, P., Riboldi, G., Keller, R., D’Annucci, A., & Bellodi, L. (2002). Frontal lobe dysfunction in pathological gambling patients. Biological Psychiatry, 51, 334–341.
Crockford, D. N., Goodyear, B., Edwards, J., Quickfall, J., & el-Guebaly, N. (2005). Cue-induced brain activity in pathological gamblers. Biological Psychiatry, 58, 787–795.
Delgado, M. R., Nystrom, L. E., Fissell, C., Noll, D. C., & Fiez, J. A. (2000). Tracking the hemodynamic response to reward and punishment in the striatum. Journal of Neurophysiology, 84, 3072–3077.
Elliott, R., Newman, J. L., Longe, O. A., & Deakin, J. F. (2003). Differential response patterns in the striatum and orbitofrontal cortex to financial reward in humans: A parametric functional magnetic resonance imaging study. Journal of Neuroscience, 23, 303–307.
Ernst, M., Bolla, K., Mouratidis, M., Contoreggi, C., Matochik, J. A., Kurian, V., et al. (2002). Decision-making in a risk-taking task: A PET study. Neuropsychopharmacology, 26(5), 682–691.
Everitt, B. J., & Robbins, T. W. (2005). Neural systems of reinforcement for drug addiction: From actions to habits to compulsion. Nature Neuroscience, 8, 11.
First, M. B., Spitzer, R. L., Gibbon, M., & William, J. B. W. (1988). Structured clinical iInterview for DSM-IV aAxis I disorders–patient edition (SCID-I/P, version 2.0). New York: Biometrics Research Department, New York State Psychiatric Institute.
Forbush, K. T., Shaw, M., Graeber, M. A., Hovick, L., Meyer, V. J., Moser, D. J., et al. (2008). Neuropsychological characteristics and personality traits in pathological gambling. CNS Spectrums, 13, 306–315.
Fukui, H., Murai, T., Fukuyama, H., Hayashi, T., & Hanakawa, T. (2005). Functional activity related to risk anticipation during performance of the Iowa gambling task. Neuroimage, 24, 253–259.
Goldstein, R. Z., & Volkow, N. D. (2002). Drug addiction and its underlying neurobiological basis: Neuroimaging evidence for the involvement of the frontal cortex. American Journal of Psychiatry, 159, 1642–1652.
Goudriaan, A., Oosterlaan, J., Beursc, E., & Van den Brink, W. (2004). Pathological gambling: A comprehensive review of biobehavioral findings. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 28, 123–141.
Goudriaan, A., Oosterlaan, J., de Beurs, E., & van den Brink, W. (2006a). Neurocognitive functions in pathological gambling: A comparison with alcohol dependence, Tourette syndrome and normal controls. Addiction, 101, 534–547.
Goudriaan, A., Oosterlaan, J., de Beurs, E., & van den Brink, W. (2006b). Psychophysiological determinants and concomitants of deficient decision making in pathological gamblers. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 84, 231–239.
Grant, S., Contoreggi, C., & London, E. D. (2000). Drug abusers show impaired performance on a laboratory test of decision-making. Neuropsycholgia, 38, 1180–1187.
Grant, J. E., Steinberg, M. A., Kim, S. W., Rounsaville, B. J., & Potenza, M. N. (2004). Preliminary validity and reliability testing of a structured clinical interview for pathological gambling. Psychiatry Research, 128, 79–88.
Heatherton, T. F., Kozlowski, L. T., Frecker, R. C., & Fagerstrom, K. O. (1991). The Fagerstrom test for nicotine dependence: A revision of the Fagerstrom tolerance questionnaire. British Journal of Addiction, 86, 1119–1127.
Hollander, E., Pallanti, S., Baldini Rossi, N., Sood, E., Baker, B. R., & Buchsbaum, M. S. (2005). Imaging monetary reward in pathological gamblers. World Journal of Biological Psychiatry, 6(2), 113–120.
Kalivas, P. W., & Volkow, N. D. (2005). The neural basis of addiction: A pathology of motivation and choice. American Journal of Psychiatry, 162, 03–13.
Knutson, B., Fong, G. W., Bennett, S. M., Adams, C. M., & Hommer, D. (2003). A region of mesial prefrontal cortex tracks monetarily rewarding outcomes: Characterization with rapid event related fMRI. Neuroimage, 18, 263–272.
Koob, G. (2007). The neurobiology of addiction: A neuroadaptational view relevant for diagnosis. Addiction, 101(Suppl 1), 23–30.
Lakey, C. E., Goodie, A. S., & Campbell, W. K. (2007). Frequent card playing and pathological gambling: The utility of the Georgia gambling task and the Iowa gambling task for predicting pathology. Journal of Gambling Studies, 23, 285–297.
Lesieur, H. R., & Blume, S. B. (1987). The South Oaks Gambling Screen (SOGS): A new instrument for the identification of pathological gamblers. American Journal of Psychiatry, 144, 1184–1188.
Li, X., Lu, Z. L., D’Arbembeau, A., Ng, M., & Bechara, A. (2010). The Iowa Gambling Task in fMRI images. Human Brain Mapping, 31, 410–423.
Linnet, J., Moller, A., Peterson, E., Gjedde, A., & Doudet, D. (2010). Dopamine release in ventral striatum during Iowa gambling task performance is associated with increased excitement levels in pathological gambling. Addiction, 106, 383–390.
Linnet, J., Moller, A., Peterson, E., Gjedde, A., & Doudet, D. (2011). Inverse association between dopaminergic neurotransmission and Iowa gambling task performance in pathological gamblers and healthy controls. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 52, 28–34.
Linnet, J., Rojskjaer, S., Nygaard, J., & Maher, B. A. (2006). Episodic chasing in pathological gamblers using the Iowa gambling task. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 47, 43–49.
McClure, S. M., York, M. K., & Montague, P. R. (2004). The neural substrates of reward processing in humans: The modern role of fMRI. Neuroscientist, 10, 260–268.
Petry, N. M. (2001). Pathological gamblers, with and without substance use disorders, discount delayed rewards at high rates. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 110, 482–487.
Petry, N. M. (2005). Pathological gambling: Etiology, comorbidity, and treatments. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Pomerleau, C. S., Carton, S. M., Lutzke, M. L., Flessland, K. A., & Pomerleau, O. F. (1994). Reliability of the Fagerstrom tolerance questionnaire and the Fagerstrom test for nicotine dependence. Addictive Behaviors, 19, 33–39.
Potenza, M. N. (2006). Should addictive disorders include non-substance related conditions? Addiction, 101(Suppl 1), 142–151.
Potenza, N. M. (2008). The neurobiology of pathological gambling and drug addiction: An overview and new findings. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 363, 3181–3189.
Potenza, M. N., Leung, H. C., Blumberg, H. P., Peterson, B. S., Fulbright, R. K., Lacadie, C. M., et al. (2003a). An fMRI Stroop task study of ventromedial prefrontal cortical function in pathological gamblers. American Journal of Psychiatry, 160(11), 1990–1994.
Potenza, M. N., Steinberg, M. A., Skudlarski, P., Fulbright, R. K., Lacadie, C. M., Wilber, M. K., et al. (2003b). Gambling urges in pathological gambling: A functional magnetic resonance imaging study. Archives of General Psychiatry, 60(8), 828–836.
Reuter, J., Raedler, T., Rose, M., Hand, I., Glascher, J., & Buchel, C. (2005). Pathological gambling is linked to reduced activation of the mesolimbic reward system. Nature Neuroscience, 8(2), 147–148.
Roca, M., Torralva, T., Lopez, P., Cetkovitch, M., Clark, L., & Manes, F. (2008). Executive functions in pathologic gamblers selected in an ecologic setting. Cognitive and Behavioral Neurology, 21, 1–4.
Rolls, E. T. (2000). The orbitofrontal cortex and reward. Cerebral Cortex, 10, 284–294.
Tanabe, J., Thompson, L., Claus, E., Dalwani, M., Hutchison, K., & Banish, M. (2007). Prefrontal cortex activity is reduced in gambling and nongambling substance users during decision making. Human Brain Mapping, 28, 1276–1286.
van Holst, R. J., van den Brink, W., Veltman, D. J., & Goudriaan, A. E. (2010). Why gamblers fail to win: A review of cognitive and neuroimaging findings in pathological gambling. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 34, 87–107.
Verdejo-Garcia, A., Benbrook, A., Funderburk, F., David, P., Cadet, J. L., & Bolla, K. I. (2007). The differential relationship between cocaine use and marijuana use on decision-making performance over repeat testing with the Iowa gambling task. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 90, 2–11.
Zink, C. F., Pagnoni, G., Martin-Skurski, M. E., Chappelow, J. C., & Berns, G. S. (2004). Human striatal responses to monetary reward depend on saliency. Neuron, 42, 509–517.
Acknowledgments
Funding for the study was provided by the Alberta Gaming Research Institute. We would also like to acknowledge Daniel Pittman for technical help in developing the IGT task for fMRI.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Power, Y., Goodyear, B. & Crockford, D. Neural Correlates of Pathological Gamblers Preference for Immediate Rewards During the Iowa Gambling Task: An fMRI Study. J Gambl Stud 28, 623–636 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10899-011-9278-5
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10899-011-9278-5