Skip to main content
Log in

Comparison Between Experimental Measurements and Numerical Simulations of Spheromak Formation in SSPX

  • Published:
Journal of Fusion Energy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Data from a recently installed insertable magnetic probe array in the Sustained Spheromak Physics Experiment (SSPX) [E. B. Hooper, L. D. Pearlstein, and R. H. Bulmer, Nucl. Fusion 39, 863 (1999)] is combined with high-speed images and compared against NIMROD [C. R. Sovinec, A. H. Glasser, T. A. Gianakon, D. C. Barnes, R. A. Nebel, S. E. Kruger, D. D. Schnack, S. J. Plimpton, A. Tarditi, and M. S. Chu, J. Comp. Phys. 195, 355 (2004)], a 3D resistive magnetohydrodynamic code that is used to simulate SSPX plasmas. The experiment probe consists of a linear array of chip inductors arranged in clusters that are spaced every 2 cm, and spans the entire machine radius at the flux conserver midplane. Both the experiment and the numerical simulations show the appearance, shortly after breakdown, of a column with a hollow current profile that precedes magnetic reconnection, a process essential to the formation of closed magnetic flux surfaces. However, there are differences between the experiment and the simulation in how the column evolves after it is formed. These differences are studied to help identify the mechanisms that eventually lead to closed-flux surfaces (azimuthally averaged) and flux amplification, which occur in both the experiment and the simulation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 4.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hooper E. B., Pearlstein L. D., Bulmer R. H. (1999) Nucl. Fusion 39:863

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. McLean H. S., Ahmed A., Buchenauer D., et al. (2001) Rev. Sci. Instrum. 72:556

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Wang Z., Wurden G. A., Barnes C. W., Buchenauer C. J., McLean H. S., Hill D. N., Hooper E. B., Wood R. D., Woodruff S. (2001) Rev. Sci. Instrum. 72(1):1059

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Roh Y., Domier C. W., Luhmann N. C. Jr. (2003) Rev. Sci. Instrum. 74(3):1518

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Romero-Talamás C. A., Holcomb C., Bellan P. M., Hill D. N. (2006) Phys. Plasmas 13:022502

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. C. A. Romero-Talamás, Investigations of Spheromak Plasma Dynamics: High-speed Imaging at the Sustained Spheromak Physics Experiment and Magnetic Diagnostics at the Caltech Spheromak Experiment. (PhD thesis, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California, 2005)

  7. Romero-Talamás C. A., Bellan P. M., Hsu S. C. (2004) Rev. Sci. Instrum. 75:2664

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Sovinec C. R., Glasser A. H., Gianakon T. A., Barnes D. C., Nebel R. A., Kruger S. E., Schnack D. D., Plimpton S. J., Tarditi A., Chu M. S. (2004) J. Comp. Phys. 195:355

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work performed under the auspices of the USDOE by LLNL under Contract 7405-Eng-48.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to C. A. Romero-Talamás.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Romero-Talamás, C., Hooper, E., Hill, D. et al. Comparison Between Experimental Measurements and Numerical Simulations of Spheromak Formation in SSPX. J Fusion Energ 26, 169–172 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10894-006-9040-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10894-006-9040-7

Keywords

Navigation