Skip to main content
Log in

Plant Volatiles Influence Electrophysiological and Behavioral Responses of Lygus hesperus

  • Published:
Journal of Chemical Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Previous laboratory studies have shown that the mirid Lygus hesperus is attracted to volatiles emitted from alfalfa; feeding damage increases the amounts of several of these volatiles, and visual cues can enhance attraction further. The present study tested single plant volatiles in electrophysiological and behavioral trials with L. hesperus. Electroantennogram (EAG) analyses indicated that antennae responded to most plant volatiles included in the test, and that when gender differences were observed, males usually were more responsive than females. Antennal responses to the alcohols ((E)-3-hexenol, (Z)-3-hexenol, 1-hexanol), the acetate (E)-2-hexenyl acetate, and the aldehyde (E)-2-hexenal were among the strongest. Moderate responses were observed for (E)-β-ocimene, (E,E)-α-farnesene, (±)-linalool, and methyl salicylate. A dose dependent response was not observed for several terpenes (β-myrcene, β-caryophyllene, (+)-limonene, or both (R)-(+)- and (S)-(−)-α-pinenes). EAG responses, however, were not always consistent with behavioral assays. In Y-tube bioassays, males did not exhibit a positive behavioral response to any of the compounds tested. Instead, males were repelled by (E)-2-hexenyl acetate, (±)-linalool, (E,E)-α-farnesene, and methyl salicylate. In contrast, female L. hesperus moved upwind towards (R)-(+)-α-pinene, (E)-β-ocimene, and (E,E)-α-farnesene, and showed a negative response towards (Z)-3-hexen-1-ol, (S)-(−)-α-pinene, and methyl salicylate. This study emphasizes the use of multiple approaches to better understand host plant finding in the generalist herbivore L. hesperus.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson, P., Hilker, M., Hansson, B. S., Bombosch, S., Klein, B., and Schildknecht, H. 1993. Oviposition deterring components in larval frass of Spodoptera littoralis (Boisd.) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae): a behavioral and electrophysiological evaluation. J. Insect Physiol. 39:129–137.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bernays, E. A., and Chapman, R. F. 1994. Host-Plant Selection by Phytophagous Insects. Chapman & Hall, New York. 312 pg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bjostad, L. B. 1998. Electrophysiological methods, pp. 339–369, in. J. G. Millar and K. F. Haynes (eds.). Methods in Chemical Ecology: Chemical Methods, vol. 1. Kluwer Academic Publish.

  • Blackmer, J. L., and Cañas, L. A. 2005. Visual cues enhance the response of Lygus hesperus (Heteroptera: Miridae) to volatiles from host plants. Environ. Entomol. 34:1524–1533.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blackmer, J. L., Rodriguez-saona, C., Byers, J. A., Shope, K. L., and Smith, J. P. 2004. Behavioral response of Lygus hesperus to conspecifics and headspace volatiles of alfalfa in a Y-tube olfactometer. J. Chem. Ecol. 30:1547–1564.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Blight, M. M., Pickett, J. A., Wadhams, L. J., and Woodcock, C. M. 1995. Antennal perception of oilseed rape, Brassica napus, (Brassicaceae) by the cabbage seedpod weevil Ceutorhynchus assimilis (Coleoptera, Curculionidae). J. Chem. Ecol. 21:1649–1664.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Broad, S. T., Schellhorn, N. A., Lisson, S. N., and Mendham, N. J. 2008. Host location and oviposition of lepidopteran herbivores in diversified broccoli cropping systems. Agric. For. Entomol. 10:157–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Byers, J. A., Lanne, B. S., Löfqvist, J., Schlyter, F., and Bergström, G. 1985. Olfactory recognition of host-tree susceptibility by pine shoot beetles. Naturwissenschaften 72:324–326.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chinta, S., Dickens, J. C., and Aldrich, J. R. 1994. Olfactory reception of potential pheromones and plant odors by tarnished plant bug, Lygus lineolaris (Hemiptera: Miridae). J. Chem. Ecol. 20:3251–3267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Choh, Y., Uefune, M., and Takabayashi, J. 2008. Diamondback moth females oviposit more on plants infested by non-parasitized than by parasitized conspecifics. Ecol. Entomol. 33:565–568.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coracini, M., Bengtsson, M., Liblikas, I., and Witzgall, P. 2004. Attaction of codling moth males to apple volatiles. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 110:1–10.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • De Camelo, L. A., Landolt, P. J., and Zack, R. S. 2007. A kairomone based attract-and-kill system effective against alfalfa looper (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). J. Econ. Entomol. 100:366–374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Moraes, C. M., Lewis, W. J., Paré, P. W., Alborn, H. T., and Tumlinson, J. H. 1998. Herbivore infested plants selectively attract parasitoids. Nature 393: 570–574.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • De Moraes, C. M., Mescher, M. C., and Tumlinson, J. H. 2001. Caterpillar-induced nocturnal plant volatiles repel conspecific females. Nature 410:577–580.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Debolt, J.W. 1982. Meridic diet for rearing successive generations of Lygus hesperus. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Amer. 75:119–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dicke, M., and Van Loon, J. J. A. 2003. Multitrophic effects of herbivore-induced plant volatiles in an evolutionary context. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 97:237–249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dickens, J. C. 1989. Green leaf volatiles enhance aggregation pheromone of boll weevil, Anthonomus grandis. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 52:191–203.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dobson, H. E. M. 2006. Relationship between floral fragrance composition and type of pollinator, pp. 147–198, in N. Dudareva and E. Pichersky (eds.).Biology of Floral Scent. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frati, F., Salerno, G. Conti, E., and Bin, F. 2008. Role of the plant-conspecific complex in host location and intra-specific communication of Lygus rugulipennis. Physiol. Entomol. 33:129–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frati, F., Chamberlain, K., Birkett, M., Dufour, S., Mayon, P., Woodcock, C., Wadhams, L., Pickett, J., Salerno, G. Conti, E., and Bin, F. 2009. Vicia faba—Lygus rugulipennis interactions: Induced plant volatiles and sex pheromone enhancement. J. Chem. Ecol. 35:201–208.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Groot, A. T., Timmer, R., Gort, G., Lelyveld, G. P., Drijfhout, F. P., Van Beek, T. A., and Visser, J. H. 1999. Sex-related perception of insect and plant volatiles in Lygocoris pabulinus. J. Chem. Ecol. 25:2357–2371.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Innocenzi, P. J. Hall, D. R., Cross, J. V., Masuh, H., Phythian, S. J., Chittamaru, S., and Guarino, S. 2004. Investigation of long-range female sex pheromone of the European tarnished plant bug, Lygus rugilipennis: chemical, electrophysiological, and field studies. J. Chem. Ecol. 30:1509–1529.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Innocenzi, P. J., Cross, J. V., Hesketh, H., and Hall, D. 2005. Attraction of male European tarnished plant bug, Lygus rugilipennis, to components of the female sex pheromone in the field. J. Chem. Ecol. 31:1401–1413.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Landolt, P. J., and Phillips, T. W. 1997. Host plant influences on sex pheromone behavior of phytophygous insects. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 42:371–391.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Leigh, T. F., Kerby, T. A., and Wynholds, T. F. 1988. Cotton square damage by the plant bug, Lygus hesperus (Hemiptera: Heteroptera: Miridae), and abscission rates. J. Econ. Entomol. 81:1328–1337.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leskey, T. C., Prokopy, R. J., Wright, S. E., Phelan, P. L., and Haynes, L. W. 2001. Evaluation of individual components of plum odor as potential attractants for adult plum curculios. J. Chem. Ecol. 27: 1–17.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Loughrin, J. H., Manukian, A., Heath, R. R., and Tumlinson, J. H. 1995. Volatiles emitted by different cotton varieties damaged by feeding beet armyworm larvae. J. Chem. Ecol. 21:1217–1227.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Martel, J. W., Alford, A. R., and Dickens, J. C. 2007. Evaluation of a novel host plant volatile-based attracticide for management of Colorado potato beetle, Leptinotarsa decemlineata (Say). Crop Prot. 26:822–827.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, M. S., Mankin, R. W., and Lemire, G. F. 1984. Quantitation of the insect electroantennogram: measurement of sensillar contributions, elimination of background potentials, and relationship to olfactory sensation. J. Insect Physiol. 30:757–763.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meagher, R. L., and Landolt, P. J. 2008. Attractiveness of binary blends of floral odorant compounds to moths in Florida, USA. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 128:323–329.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Meiners, T., Hacker, N. K., Anderson, P., and Hilker, M. 2005. Response of elm leaf beetle to host plants induced by oviposition and feeding: the infestation rate matters. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 115:171–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pallini, A., Janssen, A., and Sabelis, M. W. 1997. Odour-mediated responses of phytophagous mites to conspecific and heterospecific competitors. Oecologia 110: 179–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paré, P. W., and Tumlinson, J. H. 1998. Cotton volatiles synthesized and released distal to the site of insect damage. Phytochemistry 47:521–526.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piñero, J. C., and Prokopy, R. J. 2003. Field evaluations of plant odor and pheromonal combinations for attracting plum curculios. J. Chem. Ecol. 29:2735–2748.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rodriguez-saona, C., Crafts-brandner, S. J., Williams III, L., and Paré, P. W. 2002. Lygus hesperus feeding and salivary gland extracts induce volatile emissions in plants. J. Chem. Ecol. 28:1733–1747.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Röse, U. S. R., Manukian, A., Heath, R. R., and Tumlinson, J. H. 1996. Volatile semiochemicals released from undamaged cotton leaves. Plant Physiol. 111:487–495.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sas Institute, Inc. 2003. SAS/STAT User’s Guide, Release 9.1 edition. Cary, NC.

  • Showler, A. T. 2001. Spodoptera exigua oviposition and larval feeding preferences for pigweed, Amaranthus hybridus, over squaring cotton, Gossypium hirsutum, and a comparison of free amino acids in each host plant. J. Chem. Ecol. 27:2013–2028.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Smart, L. E., Blight, M. M., and Lane, A. 1996. Development of a monitoring trap for spring and summer pests of oilseed rape. Proceed. Brighton Crop Prot. Conf. 1:167–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stensmyr, M. C., Larsson, M. C., Bice, S., and Hansson, B. S. 2001. Detection of fruit- and flower-emitted volatiles by olfactory receptor neurons in the polyphagous fruit chafer Pachnoda marginata (Coleoptera: Cetoniinae). J. Comp. Physiol. A 187:509–519.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Suckling, D. M., Karg, G., Gibb, A. R., and Bradley, S. J. 1996. Electroantennogram and oviposition responses of Epiphyas postvittana (Lepidoptera: Torticidae) to plant volatiles. New Zealand J. Crop Hortic. Sci. 24:323–333.

    Google Scholar 

  • Takabayashi, J., Dicke, M., and Posthumus, M. A. 1994. Volatile herbivore-induced terpenoids in plant-mite interactions: variation caused by biotic and abiotic factors. J. Chem. Ecol. 20:1329–1354.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tumlinson, J. H., and Engelberth, J. 2008. Fatty acid-derived signals that induce or regulate plant defenses against herbivory, pp. 389–407, in A. Schaller (ed.). Induced Plant Resistance to Herbivory. Springer.

  • Turlings, T. C. J., Tumlinson, J. H., and Lewis, W. J. 1990. Exploitation of herbivore-induced plant odors by host-seeking parasitic wasps. Science 250:1251–1253.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Van Tol, R. W. H. M., Visser, J. H., and Sabelis, M. W. 2004. Behavioural responses of the vine weevil, Otiorhynchus sulcatus, to semiochemicals from conspecifics, Otiorhynchus salicicola, and host plants. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 110:145–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wee, S., El-sayed, A. M., Gibb, A. R., Mitchell, V., and Suckling, D. M. 2008. Behavioural and electrophysiological responses of Pantomorus cervinus (Boheman) (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) to host plant volatiles. Aust. J. Entomol. 47:24–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wheeler, A. G., JR. 2001. Biology of the Plant Bugs. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, III, L., Rodriguez-saona, C., Paré, P. W., and Crafts-brandner, S. J. 2005. The piercing-sucking herbivores Lygus hesperus and Nezara viridula induce volatile emissions in plants. Arch. Insect Biochem. Physiol. 58:84–96.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zar, J. H. 1996. Biostatistical Analysis, 3rd edition, Prentice-Hall, Inc., Upper Saddle River, New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to S. C. Castle del Conte, A. A. Faulkner, L. Jech, L. Lee, C. Li, W. Price, and K. Shope for technical assistance. We thank J. A. Byers, J. R. Hagler, and anonymous reviewers for critical and helpful comments on the manuscript. This article reports the results of research only. Mention of a proprietary product does not constitute an endorsement or a recommendation by the USDA for its use. The U. S. Government has the right to retain a non-exclusive, royalty-free license in and to any copyright of this article.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Livy Williams III.

Additional information

Jacquelyn L. Blackmer: Deceased

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Williams, L., Blackmer, J.L., Rodriguez-Saona, C. et al. Plant Volatiles Influence Electrophysiological and Behavioral Responses of Lygus hesperus . J Chem Ecol 36, 467–478 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10886-010-9778-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10886-010-9778-2

Key Words

Navigation