Abstract
This study examines how teachers’ discourse moves influence patterns of authority in the mathematics classroom. We identify changes in authority structure in one classroom taught by a primary mathematics teacher in Hong Kong. This teacher participant was one of 32 who participated in a larger teacher-intervention study that aimed to help teachers orchestrate dialogic classroom discourse for rich learning opportunities in mathematics. Previous research has investigated teachers’ discourse behaviors and authority structures in mathematics classrooms, but the connection between the two has yet to be addressed in extant studies. Our analysis shows that certain features and patterns embedded in classroom discourse can constrain or enable certain kinds of authority in the classroom. This study contributes to understanding the ways in which dialogic discourse may influence how authority is structured, including how mathematics teaching and learning are enacted through authority styles, and how the discipline of mathematics is positioned from an authority perspective.
References
Alrø, H., & Skovsmose, O. (2002). Dialogue and learning in mathematics education: Intention, reflection, critique. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Bagni, G. (2008). A theorem and its different proofs: History, mathematics education, and the semiotic–cultural perspective. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 8(3), 217–232.
Bakhtin, M. (1981). The dialogic imagination. Austin: University of Texas Press.
Biggs, J. (1994). What are effective schools? Lessons from East and West (The Radford Memorial Lecture). Australian Educational Researcher, 21(1), 19–39.
Brown, R. (2009). Teaching for social justice: Exploring the development of student agency through participation in the literacy practices of a mathematics classroom. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 12(3), 171–185.
Cazden, C. B. (2001). Classroom discourse: The language of teaching and learning (2nd ed.). Portsmouth: Heinemann.
Cobb, P., & Yackel, E. (1998). A constructivist perspective on the culture of the mathematics classroom. In F. Seeger, J. Voigt, & U. Waschescio (Eds.), The culture of the mathematics classroom (pp. 158–190). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Depaepe, F., De Corte, E., & Verschaffel, L. (2012). Who is granted authority in the mathematics classroom? An analysis of the observed and perceived distribution of authority. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 38(2), 223–234.
Gee, J. P. (1999). An introduction to discourse analysis: Theory and method. New York: Routledge.
Greeno, J. G. (2007). Toward the development of intellective character. In E. W. Gordon & B. L. Bridglall (Eds.), Affirmative development: Cultivating academic ability (pp. 17–48). Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
Grossman, P., Smagorinsky, P., & Valencia, S. (1999). Appropriating tools for teaching English: A theoretical framework for research on learning to teach. American Journal of Education, 108(1), 1–29.
Herbel-Eisenmann, B., Wagner, D., & Cortes, V. (2010). Lexical bundle analysis in mathematics classroom discourse: The significance of stance. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 75(1), 23–42.
Ho, E. S.-C. (2003). Accomplishment and challenges of Hong Kong education system: What we have learned from PISA. Educational Journal, 31(2), 1–30.
Kinser-Traut, J. Y., & Turner, E. E. (2020). Shared authority in the mathematics classroom: Successes and challenges throughout one teacher’s trajectory implementing ambitious practices. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 23(1), 5–34.
Knuth, E., & Peressini, D. (2001). Unpacking the nature of discourse in mathematics classrooms. Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School, 6(5), 320–325.
Langer-Osuna, J. (2016). The social construction of authority among peers and its implications for collaborative mathematics problem solving. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 18(2), 107–124.
Lee, J. (2009). Universals and specifics of math self-concept, math self-efficacy, and math anxiety across 41 PISA 2003 participating countries. Learning and Individual Differences, 19(3), 355–365.
Leung, F. K. S. (2001). In search of an East Asian identity in mathematics education. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 47(1), 35–51.
Lui, K. W., & Leung, F. K. S. (2013). Curriculum traditions in Berlin and Hong Kong: A comparative case study of the implemented mathematics curriculum. ZDM: The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 45(1), 35–46.
Lotman, Y. (1988). Text within a text. Soviet Psychology, 26(3), 32–51.
Matusov, E. (2007). Application of Bakhtin scholarship on discourse and education: A critical review essay. Educational Theory, 57(2), 215–237.
Moghaddam, F., & Harré, R. (2010). Words, conflicts and political processes. In F. Moghaddam & R. Harré (Eds.), Words of conflict, words of war: How the language we use in political processes sparks fighting. Santa Barbara, CA: Praeger.
McCombs, B. L. (1994). Strategies for assessing and enhancing motivation: Keys to promoting self-regulated learning and performance. In H. F. O’Neil & M. Drillings (Eds.), Motivation: Theory and research (pp. 49–70). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Mercer, N., Dawes, L., & Staarman, J. K. (2009). Dialogic teaching in the primary science classroom. Language and Education, 23(4), 353–369.
Michaels, S., & O’Connor, C. (2015). Conceptualizing talk moves as tools: Professional development approaches for academically productive discussions. In L. B. Resnick, C. S. C. Asterhan, & S. N. Clarke (Eds.), Socializing intelligence through academic talk and dialogue (pp. 347–362). Washington: AERA.
Michaels, S., O’Connor, C., & Resnick, L. B. (2008). Deliberative discourse idealized and realized: Accountable talk in the classroom and in civic life. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 27(4), 283–297.
Morgan, C. (1996). “The language of mathematics”: Towards a critical analysis of mathematics texts. For the Learning of Mathematics, 16(3), 2–10.
Ng, O., & Ni, Y. (2019). The relationship between discourse moves and authority structures in mathematics classrooms. In M. Graven, H. Venkat, A. Essien & P. Vale (Eds.), Proceedings of the 43rd Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 4, p. 169). Pretoria, South Africa: PME.
Ni, Y., Ho, G., Cai, J., Cheung, A., Chen, G., & Ng, O. (2017). Research protocol: Teacher interventions in engaging students with dialogic classroom discourse for rich learning opportunity in mathematics classrooms. International Journal of Educational Research, 86, 23–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2017.08.008.
Ni, Y., Zhou, D., Li, X., & Li, Q. (2014). Relations of instructional tasks to classroom discourse. Cognition and Instruction, 32, 2–42.
Povey, H., Burton, L., Angier, C., & Boylan, M. (1999). Learners as authors in the mathematics classroom. In L. Burton (Ed.), Learning mathematics: From hierarchies to networks (pp. 232–245). London: Routledge.
Resnick, L. B., Michaels, S., & O’Connor, C. (2010). How (well-structured) talk builds the mind. Innovations in educational psychology: Perspectives on learning, teaching and human development, 163–194.
Skott, J. (2019). Understanding mathematics teaching and learning “in their full complexity”. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 22(5), 427–431.
Skovsmose, O. (2001). Landscapes of investigation. ZDM: The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 33(4), 123–132.
Stein, M. K., Engle, R. A., Smith, M. S., & Hughes, E. K. (2008). Orchestrating productive mathematical discussions: Five practices for helping teachers move beyond show and tell. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 10(4), 313–340.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard, MA: Harvard University Press.
Wagner, D. (2007). Students’ critical awareness of voice and agency in mathematics classroom discourse. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 9(1), 31–50.
Wagner, D. (2008). “Just go”: Mathematics students’ critical awareness of routine procedure. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 8(1), 35–48.
Wagner, D., & Herbel-Eisenmann, B. (2014). Identifying authority structures in mathematics classroom discourse: A case of a teacher's early experience in a new context. ZDM: The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 46(6), 871–882.
Wong, N.-Y. (2002). Conceptions of doing and learning mathematics among Chinese. Journal of Intercultural Studies, 23(2), 211–229.
Yackel, E., & Cobb, P. (1996). Sociomathematical norms, argumentation, and autonomy in mathematics. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 27, 458–477.
Acknowledgements
The project is supported by the Research Grant Council of Hong Kong (RGC Reference No. 14620515). However, positions expressed in the article do not necessarily reflect those of the funding agency. The researchers thank the teachers and students for their participation in the study.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethical approval
All original research procedures carried out in this study were consistent with the principles of the research ethics published by the American Psychological Association.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ng, OL., Cheng, W.K., Ni, Y. et al. How linguistic features and patterns of discourse moves influence authority structures in the mathematics classroom. J Math Teacher Educ 24, 587–612 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-020-09475-z
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-020-09475-z