Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Comparison of the effects of Mg–6Zn and titanium on intestinal tract in vivo

  • Published:
Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

To evaluate the ability of Mg–6Zn to replace titanium nails in the reconstruction of the intestinal tract in general surgery, we compared the Mg–6Zn and titanium implants with respect to their effects on rat’s intestinal tract by biochemical, radiological, pathological and immunohistochemical methods. The results indicated that Mg–6Zn implants started to degrade at the third week and disintegrate at the fourth week. No bubbles appeared, which may be associated with intestinal absorption of the Mg–6Zn implants. Pathological analyses (containing liver, kidney and cecum tissues) and biochemical measurements, including serum magnesium, creatinine, blood urea nitrogen, glutamic–pyruvic–transaminase and glutamic–oxaloacetic–transaminase proved that degradation of Mg–6Zn did not harm the important organs, which is an improvement over titanium implants. Immunohistochemical results showed that Mg–6Zn could enhance the expression of transforming growth factor-β1. Mg–6Zn reduced the expression of tumor necrosis factor at different stages. In general, our study demonstrates that the Mg–6Zn alloy had good biocompatibility in vivo and performed better than titanium at promoting healing and reducing inflammation. It may be a promising candidate for stapler pins in intestinal reconstruction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Nagels J, Stokdijk M, Rozing PM. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2003;12(1):35–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Tatiani A, Donato G, Luciano H, et al. Mater Sci Eng C. 2009;29(4):1365–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Navarro M, Michiardi A, Castaño O, Planell JA. J R Soc Interface. 2008;5(27):1137–58.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Renouf-Glauser AC, Rose J, Farrar DF, Cameron RE. Biomaterials. 2005;26(29):5771–82.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Chen CC, Chueh JY, Tseng H, Huang HM, Lee SY. Biomaterials. 2003;24(7):1167–73.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Staiger MP, Pietak AM, Huadmai J, Dias G. Biomaterials. 2006;27(9):1728–34.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Shikinami Y, Okuno M. Biomaterials. 1999;20(9):859–77.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. McBride ED. J Am Med Assoc. 1938;111(27):2464–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Peuster M, Beerbaum P, Bach FW, Hauser H. Cardiol Young. 2006;16(2):107–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Song G. Corros Sci. 2007;49(4):1696–701.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Zberg B, Uggowitzer PJ, Löffler JF. Nat Mater. 2009;8(11):887–91.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Zhang E, Xu L, Yu G, Pan F, Yang K. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2009;90(3):882–93.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Erdmann N, Bondarenko A, Hewicker-Trautwein M. Biomed Eng Online. 2010;9:63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Witte F. Acta Biomater. 2010;6(5):1680–92.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Aghion E, Arnon A, Atar D (2007) US Patent PCT/IL 000520.

  16. Stroganov GB, Savitski EM, Tikhov NM. US Patent 3687135. 1972.

  17. Li M, Chen Q, Zhang W, Hu W, Su Y. J Mater Sci. 2011;46:2365–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Brar HS, Platt MO, Sarntinoranont M, et al. J Miner Met Mater Soc. 2009;61:31–4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Zeng R, Dietzel W, Witte F, Hort N, Blawert C. Adv Eng Mater. 2008;10:B3–14.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Witte F, Kaese V, Haferkamp H, et al. Biomaterials. 2005;26:3557–63.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Aghion E, Yered T, Perezl Y, Gueta Y. Adv Eng Mater. 2010;12:B374–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Song G, Song S. Adv Eng Mater. 2007;9(4):298–302.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Li J, Cao P, Zhang X, Zhang S, He Y. J Mater Sci. 2010;45:6038–45.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Aghion E, Levy G, Ovadia S. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2012;23(3):805–12.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Smola B, Joska L, Březina V. Mater Sci Eng C. 2012;32(4):665–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Anderson S. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 1997;28(1):5–24.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Yang M, Cheng L, Pan F. J Mater Sci. 2009;44(17):4577–86.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Krause A, von der Höh N, Bormann D. J Mater Sci. 2010;45:624–32.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Zhang J, Gu Y, Guo Y, Ning C. J Mater Sci. 2012;47(13):5197–204.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Heublein B, Rohde R, Kaese V. Heart. 2003;89(6):651–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. El-Rahman SSA. Pharmacol Res. 2003;47(3):189–94.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Ku C-H, Pioletti DP, Browne M. Biomaterials. 2002;23(6):1447–54.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Yumiko N, Yukari T, Yasuhide T. Fundam Appl Toxicol. 1997;37(2):106–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Yang W, Zhang P, Liu J, Xue Y. J Rare Earth. 2006;24(3):369–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Li Z, Gu X, Lou S, Zheng Y. Biomaterials. 2008;29(10):1329–44.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Xu LP, Yu GN, Zhang E, Pan F, Yang K. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2007;83A(3):703–11.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Zhang S, Zhang X, Zhao C. Acta Biomater. 2010;6(2):626–40.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Zhang S, Li J, Song Y. Mater Sci Eng C. 2009;29:1907–12.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Chen D, He Y, Tao H, Zhang Y. Int J Mol Med. 2011;28(3):343–8.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Hänzi AC, Gerber I, Schinhammer M. Acta Biomater. 2010;6:1824–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Gu X, Zheng Y, Cheng Y, Zhong S, Xi T. Biomaterials. 2009;30(4):484–98.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Yuen CK, Ip WY. Acta Biomater. 2010;6(5):1808–12.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Zhang E, Yin D, Xu L, Yang L, Yang K. Mater Sci Eng C. 2009;29:987–93.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Mordike BL, Lukác P. Magnesium technology—metallurgy, design data, applications. Berlin: Springer; 2006. p. 76.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Ghadami M, Makita Y, Yoshida K. Am J Hum Genet. 2000;66(1):143–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Vaughn SP, Broussard S, Hall CR. Genomics. 2000;66(1):119–21.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Diegelmann RF, Evans MC. Front Biosci. 2004;9:283–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Badr G, Badr BM, Mahmoud MM. BMC Immunol. 2012;13(1):32–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Wajant H, Pfizenmaier K, Scheurich P. Cell Death Differ. 2003;10(1):45–65.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Chen G, Goeddel DV. Science. 2002;296(5573):1634–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Kant S, Swat W, Zhang S. Genes Dev. 2011;25(19):2069–78.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Gaur U, Aggarwal BB. Biochem Pharmacol. 2003;66(8):1403–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Walsh LJ, Trinchieri G, Waldorf HA. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1991;88(10):4220–4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Xia Y, Zhang B, Wang Y. Mater Sci Eng C. 2012;32(4):665–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Barollo M, Medici V, D’Incà R. World J Gastroenterol. 2011;17(36):4099–103.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. Mei X, Xu D, Xu S. Chem Biol Interact. 2012;197(1):31–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 30901422) and Shanghai Jiao Tong University Interdisciplinary (Biomedical Engineering) Research Fund (No. YG2010MS45). Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine Science and Technology Fund (No. 09XJ21005).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Qi Zheng.

Additional information

Jun Yan and Yigang Chen contributed equally to this work.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Yan, J., Chen, Y., Yuan, Q. et al. Comparison of the effects of Mg–6Zn and titanium on intestinal tract in vivo. J Mater Sci: Mater Med 24, 1515–1525 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10856-013-4906-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10856-013-4906-5

Keywords

Navigation