Skip to main content
Log in

Study of validity of the single-diode model for solar cells by I–V curves parameters extraction using a simple numerical method

  • Published:
Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Electronics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The I–V measurement of solar cells is one of the most employed electrical characterization techniques in the photovoltaics research field due to the valuable information one can obtain from such a curve. Parameters like Voc, Isc and the maximum power can be easily observed at a glance. Furthermore, additional information can be extracted by a more exhaustive analysis involving the equivalent electrical circuit of a solar cell which is based on ideal electrical components with a well-defined behavior. This equivalent circuit is typically assumed to be formed by a current source in parallel with a single diode and a shunt resistor, connected to a series resistor. However, this model does not take into account the separate contributions of the different carrier transport mechanisms in solar cells; for example, carrier diffusion and recombination-generation in the depletion region. Therefore, the single diode model may not be suitable in many practical cases. In this work, a simple numerical method was developed to extract the parameters for both single diode and double diode models from experimental I–V curves of solar cells. The developed numerical algorithm was applied to extract the parameters for a published benchmark solar cell which has been used for testing this kind of algorithms. The extracted parameters using our simple method are comparable with other more sophisticated and computer power demanding algorithms. Thereafter, we applied the developed algorithm to extract the single-diode parameters from simulated “experimental” I–V curves, where two carrier transport mechanisms are present, trying to understand under what conditions the single diode approximation would provide meaningful parameters for such experimental curves. It is shown that the extracted parameters can vary strongly, particularly for the dark saturation current and ideality factor, without much variation of the root mean square error between the experimental data and the model, causing these values to be unreliable and its physical interpretation misleading. We show that the same algorithm can be applied to a double diode (two exponentials) model providing physically meaningful parameters without much computing power requirements. In summary, there is no further justification for using a single diode model to interpret the experimental I–V curves of real solar cells.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. G.K. Singh, Energy 53, 1–13 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. D. Oliva, E. Cuevas, G. Pajares, Energy 72, 93–102 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Solar Power Europe (Global Market Outlook 2017–2021) (2017), http://www.solarpowereurope.org/reports/global-market-outlook-2017. Accessed 17 Aug 2017

  4. M. Hejri, H. Mokhtari, M.R. Azizian, L. Söder, Int. J. Sustain. Energy 35(4), 396–410 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. M. Chegaar, Z. Ouennoughi, A. Hoffmann, Solid State Electron. 45, 293–296 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. T. Easwarakhanthan, J. Bottin, I. Bouhouch, C. Boutrit, Int. J. Sol. Energy 4, 1–12 (1986)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. P. Lin, S. Cheng, W. Yeh, Z. Chen, L. Wu, Sol. Energy 144, 594–603 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. A. Azkarzadeh, A. Rezazadeh, Sol. Energy 90, 123–133 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. A. Azkarzadeh, A. Rezazadeh, Sol. Energy 86, 3241–3249 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. A.R. Jordehi, Renew. Sust. Energy Rev. 61, 354–371 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. C. Chellaswamy, R. Ramesh, Renew. Energy 97, 823–837 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. D.H. Muhsen, A.B. Ghazali, T. Khatib, I.A. Abed, Sol. Energy 119, 286–297 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. J.J. Soon, K.S. Low, IEEE Trans. Power Electron. 27, 3975–3983 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. N. Rajasekar, N.K. Kumar, R. Venugopalan, Sol. Energy 97, 255–265 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. D. Sera, P. Rodriguez, Proc. IEEE-ISIE 2392–2396 (2007)

  16. S. Shongwe, M. Hanif, IEEE J. Photovolt. 5, 938–946 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. C.T. Sah, R.N. Noyce, W. Shockley, Proc. IRE. 45, 1228–1243 (1957)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. M.G. Villalva, J.R. Gazoli, E.R. Filho, IEEE Trans. Power Electron. 24, 1198–1208 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. P. Courrieu, Neural Inf. Process. 8, 25–29 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  20. J.J. Becker, M. Boccard, C.M. Campbell et al., IEEE J. Photovolt. 7, 900–905 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge and thank Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología de México (CONACyT) for their support through a Basic Science (SEP-CONACyT) Project and a Ph. D. scholarship for Mr. Armando Acevedo-Luna.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Arturo Morales-Acevedo.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Acevedo-Luna, A., Morales-Acevedo, A. Study of validity of the single-diode model for solar cells by I–V curves parameters extraction using a simple numerical method. J Mater Sci: Mater Electron 29, 15284–15290 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10854-018-8793-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10854-018-8793-x

Navigation