Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Energy absorption of a bio-inspired honeycomb sandwich panel

  • Computation
  • Published:
Journal of Materials Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this study, a novel bio-inspired honeycomb sandwich panel (BHSP) based on the microstructure of a woodpecker’s beak is proposed. Unlike a conventional honeycomb, the walls of the bio-inspired honeycomb (BH), which is used as the core of a sandwich panel, are made wavy. Finite element simulation shows that under dynamic crushing the proposed BHSPs exhibit superior energy absorption capability compared with the conventional honeycomb sandwich panel (CHSP). In particular, the specific energy absorption (SEA) of the BHSP increases by 125% and 63.7%, respectively, compared with that of the honeycomb sandwich panel with the same thickness core or the same volume core. In addition, a parametric study of the BHSPs is carried out to investigate the influences of the wave amplitude, wave number and core thickness on the energy absorption performance of the BHSPs. It is found that the BH core with a larger wave number and amplitude shows higher SEA. Furthermore, an increase in core thickness can improve the SEA. These results provide guidelines in the design of a lightweight sandwich panel for high-energy absorption capability.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Figure 1

(adapted from [35])

Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8
Figure 9
Figure 10
Figure 11
Figure 12
Figure 13
Figure 14
Figure 15
Figure 16
Figure 17
Figure 18
Figure 19

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Zhu F, Lu G, Ruan D, Wang Z (2010) Plastic deformation, failure and energy absorption of sandwich structures with metallic cellular cores. Int J Protect Struct 1:507–541

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Birman V, Kardomateas GA (2018) Review of current trends in research and applications of sandwich structures. Compos Part B Eng 142:221–240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Manalo A, Aravinthan T, Fam A, Benmokrane B (2017) State-of-the-art review on FRP sandwich systems for lightweight civil infrastructure. J Compos Constr 21:04016068

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Feng L-J, Wei G-T, Yu G-C, Wu L-Z (2019) Underwater blast behaviors of enhanced lattice truss sandwich panels. Int J Mech Sci 150:238–246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Liu C, Zhang YX, Li J (2017) Impact responses of sandwich panels with fibre metal laminate skins and aluminium foam core. Compos Struct 182:183–190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Yahaya MA, Ruan D, Lu G, Dargusch MS (2015) Response of aluminium honeycomb sandwich panels subjected to foam projectile impact—an experimental study. Int J Impact Eng 75:100–109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Sun G, Chen D, Huo X, Zheng G, Li Q (2018) Experimental and numerical studies on indentation and perforation characteristics of honeycomb sandwich panels. Compos Struct 184:110–124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Rong Y, Liu J, Luo W, He W (2018) Effects of geometric configurations of corrugated cores on the local impact and planar compression of sandwich panels. Compos Part B Eng 152:324–335

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Wang J, Shi C, Yang N, Sun H, Liu Y, Song B (2018) Strength, stiffness, and panel peeling strength of carbon fiber-reinforced composite sandwich structures with aluminium honeycomb cores for vehicle body. Compos Struct 184:1189–1196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Mozafari H, Khatami S, Molatefi H (2015) Out of plane crushing and local stiffness determination of proposed foam filled sandwich panel for Korean Tilting Train eXpress—numerical study. Mater Des 66:400–411

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Burlayenko VN, Sadowski T (2010) Effective elastic properties of foam-filled honeycomb cores of sandwich panels. Compos Struct 92:2890–2900

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Chen J, Fang H, Liu W et al (2018) Energy absorption of foam-filled multi-cell composite panels under quasi-static compression. Compos Part B Eng 153:295–305

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Han B, Qin K, Yu B, Wang B, Zhang Q, Lu TJ (2016) Honeycomb–corrugation hybrid as a novel sandwich core for significantly enhanced compressive performance. Mater Des 93:271–282

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Imbalzano G, Linforth S, Ngo TD, Lee PVS, Tran P (2018) Blast resistance of auxetic and honeycomb sandwich panels: comparisons and parametric designs. Compos Struct 183:242–261

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Qi C, Remennikov A, Pei L-Z, Yang S, Yu Z-H, Ngo TD (2017) Impact and close-in blast response of auxetic honeycomb-cored sandwich panels: experimental tests and numerical simulations. Compos Struct 180:161–178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Jin X, Wang Z, Ning J, Xiao G, Liu E, Shu X (2016) Dynamic response of sandwich structures with graded auxetic honeycomb cores under blast loading. Compos Part B Eng 106:206–217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Zhao L, Qian X, Sun Y et al (2018) Ballistic behaviors of injection-molded honeycomb composite. J Mater Sci 53:14287–14298. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-018-2611-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Xiang XM, Lu G, Ruan D, You Z, Zolghadr M (2017) Large deformation of an arc-Miura structure under quasi-static load. Compos Struct 182:209–222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Fischer S (2015) Aluminium foldcores for sandwich structure application: mechanical properties and FE-simulation. Thin Walled Struct 90:31–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Gattas JM, You Z (2015) The behaviour of curved-crease foldcores under low-velocity impact loads. Int J Solids Struct 53:80–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. McKittrick J, Chen PY, Tombolato L et al (2010) Energy absorbent natural materials and bioinspired design strategies: a review. Mater Sci Eng, C 30:331–342

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Wang B, Yang W, McKittrick J, Meyers MA (2016) Keratin: structure, mechanical properties, occurrence in biological organisms, and efforts at bioinspiration. Prog Mater Sci 76:229–318

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Weaver JC, Milliron GW, Miserez A et al (2012) The stomatopod dactyl club: a formidable damage-tolerant biological hammer. Science 336:1275–1280

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Chen J, Zhang X, Okabe Y, Saito K, Guo Z, Pan L (2017) The deformation mode and strengthening mechanism of compression in the beetle elytron plate. Mater Des 131:481–486

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Ha NS, Le VT, Goo NS (2018) Investigation of punch resistance of the Allomyrira dichtoloma beetle forewing. J Bionic Eng 15:57–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Xiang J, Du J, Li D, Scarpa F (2017) Numerical analysis of the impact resistance in aluminum alloy bi-tubular thin-walled structures designs inspired by beetle elytra. J Mater Sci 52:13247–13260. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-017-1420-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Hao P, Du J (2018) Mechanical properties of bio-mimetic energy-absorbing materials under impact loading. J Mater Sci 53:3189–3197. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-017-1798-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Yang X, Ma J, Shi Y, Sun Y, Yang J (2017) Crashworthiness investigation of the bio-inspired bi-directionally corrugated core sandwich panel under quasi-static crushing load. Mater Des 135:275–290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Wu Y, Liu Q, Fu J, Li Q, Hui D (2017) Dynamic crash responses of bio-inspired aluminium honeycomb sandwich structures with CFRP panels. Compos Part B Eng 121:122–133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Zhang X, Xie J, Chen J, Okabe Y, Pan L, Xu M (2017) The beetle elytron plate: a lightweight, high-strength and buffering functional-structural bionic material. Sci Rep 7:4440

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Yu X, Pan L, Chen J, Zhang X, Wei P (2019) Experimental and numerical study on the energy absorption abilities of trabecular–honeycomb biomimetic structures inspired by beetle elytra. J Mater Sci 54:2193–2204. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-018-2958-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Wang L, Cheung JT-M, Pu F, Li D, Zhang M, Fan Y (2011) Why do woodpeckers resist head impact injury: a biomechanical investigation. PLoS ONE 6:e26490

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Liu Y, Qiu X, Zhang X, Yu T (2015) Response of woodpecker’s head during pecking process simulated by material point method. PLoS ONE 10:e0122677

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Liu Y, Qiu X, Ma H, Fu W, Yu TX (2017) A study of woodpecker’s pecking process and the impact response of its brain. Int J Impact Eng 108:263–271

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Lee N, Horstemeyer MF, Rhee H, Nabors B, Liao J, Williams LN (2014) Hierarchical multiscale structure–property relationships of the red-bellied woodpecker (Melanerpes carolinus) beak. J R Soc Interface 11:20140274

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Alkhatib SE, Tarlochan F, Eyvazian A (2017) Collapse behavior of thin-walled corrugated tapered tubes. Eng Struct 150:674–692

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Ha NS, Lu G, Xiang X (2018) High energy absorption efficiency of thin-walled conical corrugation tubes mimicking coconut tree configuration. Int J Mech Sci 148:409–421

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Tarlochan F, Samer F, Hamouda AMS, Ramesh S, Khalid K (2013) Design of thin wall structures for energy absorption applications: enhancement of crashworthiness due to axial and oblique impact forces. Thin Walled Struct 71:7–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Ashab ASM, Ruan D, Lu G, Bhuiyan A (2016) Finite element analysis of aluminium honeycombs subjected to dynamic indentation and compression loads. Materials 9:162–178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Xu S, Beynon JH, Ruan D, Lu G (2012) Experimental study of the out-of-plane dynamic compression of hexagonal honeycombs. Compos Struct 94:2326–2336

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Zhang X, Zhang H, Wen Z (2014) Experimental and numerical studies on the crush resistance of aluminium honeycombs with various cell configurations. Int J Impact Eng 66:48–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Wierzbicki T (1983) Crushing analysis of metal honeycombs. Int J Impact Eng 1:157–174

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the Australian Research Council for the financial support through a Discovery Grant (DP160102612).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Science, Engineering and Technology, Swinburne University of Technology, Hawthorn, VIC, 3122, Australia

    Ngoc San Ha & Guoxing Lu

  2. School of Civil Engineering, Guangzhou University, Guangzhou Panyu University City Outer Ring Road No. 230, Guangzhou, 510006, China

    Xinmei Xiang

Authors
  1. Ngoc San Ha
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Guoxing Lu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Xinmei Xiang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Guoxing Lu.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ha, N.S., Lu, G. & Xiang, X. Energy absorption of a bio-inspired honeycomb sandwich panel. J Mater Sci 54, 6286–6300 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-018-3163-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-018-3163-x

Search

Navigation